Military Forms Group to Forge Plans for Massive Attack on Renegade Iran

[Patriot Games]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297733,00.html

U.S. Military Forms Group to Forge Plans for Potential Attack on iran
Sunday, September 23, 2007

As New York braces for the arrival of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
the U.S. military may be ramping up plans to prepare for any potential
attack on the rogue state seeking nuclear power.

The Sunday Times reports that the Air Force has set up a highly confidential
strategic planning group tasked with "fighting the next war" as tensions
rise with Iran.

Click here to read Sunday Times report on Project Checkmate:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article2512097.ece

Project Checkmate, a successor to the group that planned the 1991 Gulf War's
air campaign, was quietly reestablished at the Pentagon in June, according
to the report.

It reports directly to Air Force General Michael Moseley and consists of
20-30 top air force officers and defense and cyberspace experts with ready
access to the White House, the CIA and other intelligence agencies.

Detailed contingency planning for a possible attack on Iran has been carried
out for more than two years by Centcom (U.S. central command), according to
defense sources.

Checkmate's job is to add a dash of brilliance to Air Force thinking by
countering the military's tendency to "fight the last war" and by providing
innovative strategies for warfighting and assessing future needs for air,
space and cyberwarfare.

It is led by Brigadier-General Lawrence "Stutz" Stutzriem, who is considered
one of the brightest Air Force generals. He is assisted by Dr Lani Kass, a
former Israeli military officer and expert on cyberwarfare.

Ahmadinejad will arrive in New York Sunday to address the U.N. General
Assembly and participate in a controversial forum at Columbia University.
Many city leaders and political leaders, including several presidential
candidates, have condemned the appearance.

The Iranian leader has previously expressed his desire to wipe Israel off
the map and hosted a conference of experts questioning the Jewish Holocaust.

 

[kT]

Patriot Games wrote:

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the
prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins,
the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime
itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious.
Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common
themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a
suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves
viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the
objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the
population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by
marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was
egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most
significant common thread among these regimes was the use of
scapegoating as a means to divert the people

 

[Topaz]

Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:


"The fight which Fascist Italy waged against Jewry's three
principal weapons, the profound reasons for which may not of been
consciously understood (though I do not believe this myself) furnishes
the best proof that the poison fangs of that Power which transcends
all State boundaries are being drawn, even though in an indirect way.
The prohibition of Freemasonry and secret societies, the suppression
of the supranational Press and the definite abolition of Marxism,
together with the steadily increasing consolidation of the Fascist
concept of the State--all this will enable the Italian Government, in
the course of some years, to advance more and more the interests of
the Italian people without paying any attention to the hissing of the
Jewish world-hydra.
"The English situation is not so favorable. In that country
which has 'the freest democracy' the Jew dictates his will, almost
unrestrained but indirectly, through his influence on public opinion."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html