Guest Americanjihad Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 Priest Killed in Baghdad Drive-By Shooting Saturday, April 05, 2008 E-Mail Print Share: DiggFacebookStumbleUpon AP April 5: Family members of the priest Youssef Adel mourn in his house in central Baghdad. BAGHDAD -- An Assyrian Orthodox priest was killed in a drive-by shooting Saturday in Baghdad, police and an assistant said, the latest attack against Iraq's Christian minority. The priest, Youssef Adel, was shot by gunmen who drove up in a car and opened fire as he was opening the gate of his house near the St. Peter and Paul church where he presided, an assistant said. Christians have frequently been caught up in the violence or been targeted in this predominantly Muslim country. The body of Archbishop Paulos Faraj Rahho, one of Iraq's most senior Chaldean Catholic clerics, was found on March 13, about two weeks after he was seized by gunmen in the volatile northwestern city of Mosul. Adel's assistant, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of security concerns, said the attack occurred about 11:30 a.m. and the gunmen fled the area in a car after the shooting. He said the priest was in his early 40s and was married but had no children. Adel was an engineer but became a priest about six years ago. He previously served in a church in the predominantly Sunni area of Dora in southern Baghdad but moved to the central primarily Shiite district of Karradah after a series of attacks in the former insurgent stronghold. The assistant said Adel was a compassionate man who preached about love and peace and was heavily involved in helping orphans and widows in his church. "We are paying the price of the insecurity hitting this country," he said. Elsewhere in Baghdad, a bomb exploded on a minibus carrying morning commuters on the busy Palestine Street, killing at least four passengers and wounding 15, police said. The victims were primarily workers and vendors from the Sadr City district who were on their way to commercial areas elsewhere in the capital. The killings underscored the dangers that continue to face Iraqis in Baghdad and elsewhere as attacks persist despite a sharp decline in violence over recent months amid a U.S.-Iraqi security crackdown. The Iraqi government, meanwhile, eased security measures in two Baghdad neighborhoods that are strongholds of Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia -- Sadr City and Shula -- amid complaints of food shortages nearly a week after the radical Shiite cleric issued a cease-fire order. Trucks carrying maintenance teams, food, oil products and ambulances are now allowed to get into the areas, according to a statement issued by Brig. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi, Baghdad's chief Iraqi military spokesman. The areas -- including Sadr City, which is home to some 2.5 million Shiites and the militia's largest base -- have suffered as a vehicle ban remained effect despite the lifting of a curfew elsewhere in the capital earlier this week. Despite an order by al-Sadr to end to large-scale fighting that broke out over a government crackdown in the southern city of Basra, clashes have continued between his fighters and Iraqi security forces. Sporadic gunfire was heard in Basra, although it was relatively calm as aid workers delivered humanitarian assistance to the beleaguered residents. Associated Press Television News footage showed neighbors in the Hayaniyah area examining the rubble of a house they said was destroyed in an airstrike Friday evening in the militia stronghold. Police said five people were killed in the strike, acknowledging they included an unspecified number of militants who had fired a mortar at Iraqi security forces. British military spokesman Maj. Tom Holloway said an attack helicopter hit a position from which militants were firing at Iraqi forces in Hayaniyah, but he gave no information about casualties and did not specify whether the aircraft was U.S. or British. A series of airstrikes have struck suspected militant positions since the fighting erupted on March 25, drawing American and British forces into the battle and casting further doubt on the ability of Iraqi forces to take over their own security. The White House has conditioned further U.S. troop withdrawals on the readiness of the Iraqi military and police. Al-Maliki had suggested he planned similar crackdowns in Sadr City and Shula earlier this week, but instead he ordered a nationwide freeze on Iraqi raids against Shiite militants on Friday. The reversal came after al-Sadr hinted at retaliation if Iraqi security forces continue to arrest his followers. KILL THEM ALL!!! (God will sort them out) http://americanjihad.blogspot.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 Salute To Our Muslim Martyrs Musil Shehadeh As a Christian Palestinian, I cannot but bow my head in full reverence and admiration to our Muslim brothers who are teaching the Israelis and the world the real meaning of self-sacrifice in the face of cruel occupation. You can call them what you want but you cannot deny them the pinnacle of courage when they offer their own lives at the altar of freedom, not only for their own religious order but also for all of us. No power, be it the Israeli rocket, its F-16s, its tanks, or its nuclear weapons, can stand as a deterrent against such culmination of human sacrifice. Such martyrdom has created a new chapter in the history of human resistance against occupation that has never been emulated in the history of humanity except for the Japanese kamikaze in the Second World War. Instead of having the world study the psychological motives behind such courageous acts, they are dismissed naively by Israel and its U.S. protege as simple acts of "terrorism"! Really! Those who sacrifice their lives for freedom are "terrorists," while those who massacre people to keep them under the chains of bondage are engaged in philanthropic acts? Using such bizarre criterion, it would place George Washington, and Martin Luther King as "terrorists" while Genghis Khan, Attilla the Hun and Sharon as the heads of charitable organizations. Even those who criticize such heroic acts cannot deny that those young men and women, who strap themselves with explosives and sacrifice their lives, fully realize that there are other options for the future. They could have chosen to get married and to have children, or to seek profitable employment and to enjoy the many pleasures of life. They could have followed their instincts to continue living without bringing grief and misery to their loved ones. Yet when they kill themselves and deny themselves the pleasure of living, then there has to exist a very good cause that prompts them to commit such acts of self-destruction. As one of the bereaved mothers explained: life without freedom had no value in the eyes of her beloved martyr-son. They have chosen to die so that they would fight a cruel occupier to liberate their lands, to reject life without dignity, while creating life with freedom for others. Western teaching institutions would rush into explaining how frustration in life could drive people into acting violently, yet they tend to swallow with great relish the Zionist versions when explaining the violent nature of these acts. American history can easily recall how many Americans died along the road of freedom, in their War of Liberation against the British. Yet the American administration would not hesitate to espouse Sharon's view that his massacre of Palestinian women and children was a war against "terror." The U.S. apathy and flagrant ignorance with the tragic plight of the Palestinians is deepened further when President Bush calls Sharon a man of "peace," a title that Mr. Sharon's Likud constituents even deny! For those of us who are still advocating "give peace a chance," we should not forget that Mr. Sharon's war is not against "terrorism," as he would like us to believe, but rather an aggressive war to occupy our homes and land turning us into slaves in our own homes. His enemies are not those who carry the gun, but anyone who would stand in his way to expropriate more lands from the Palestinians. How else can one explain his closure of the Palestinian profile office in Jerusalem headed by Dr. Sari Nuseibeh? A super moderate Palestinian whose call for the existence of the two States, meeting all of Israeli demands for peace and security along the 1967 borders, could not be matched. Yet he was not spared the wrath of Sharon because he dared to demand the right of Palestinians for their own mini-State? It should be obvious to all of us that Sharon cannot understand any language except the language of force, as no moderate or peace-loving advocate can survive the war imposed upon us by those who are working hard to deny us our rights. It should behoove all of us to support our martyrs and their families, as these are the real heroes of our dignified and legitimate struggle for freedom in our homeland. http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scotius Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 In article <fukiv3dfml5nl44lm8o4d07p9636gj2ctc@4ax.com>, mars1933 @hotmail.com says... > > Salute To Our Muslim Martyrs > Musil Shehadeh > > As a Christian Palestinian, I cannot but bow my head in full reverence > and admiration to our Muslim brothers who are teaching the Israelis > and the world the real meaning of self-sacrifice in the face of cruel > occupation. You can call them what you want but you cannot deny them > the pinnacle of courage when they offer their own lives at the altar > of freedom, not only for their own religious order but also for all of > us. No power, be it the Israeli rocket, its F-16s, its tanks, or its > nuclear weapons, can stand as a deterrent against such culmination of > human sacrifice. > Such martyrdom has created a new chapter in the history of human > resistance against occupation that has never been emulated in the > history of humanity except for the Japanese kamikaze in the Second > World War. Instead of having the world study the psychological motives > behind such courageous acts, they are dismissed naively by Israel and > its U.S. protege as simple acts of "terrorism"! Really! Those who > sacrifice their lives for freedom are "terrorists," while those who > massacre people to keep them under the chains of bondage are engaged > in philanthropic acts? Using such bizarre criterion, it would place > George Washington, and Martin Luther King as "terrorists" while > Genghis Khan, Attilla the Hun and Sharon as the heads of charitable > organizations. Even those who criticize such heroic acts cannot deny > that those young men and women, who strap themselves with explosives > and sacrifice their lives, fully realize that there are other options > for the future. The writer is clearly a liar who knows damned well there are not "other options", since the PLO monsters who force people to act as suicide bombers will kill them and their families if they don't do so. Ditto for Hamas, Hezbollah, and the other supposed "liberation" movements. > Snipped... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Topaz Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 22:03:19 -0400, Scotius <yodasbud@mnsi.net> wrote: > The writer is clearly a liar who knows damned well there are not >"other options", since the PLO monsters who force people to act as >suicide bombers will kill them and their families if they don't do so. >Ditto for Hamas, Hezbollah, and the other supposed "liberation" >movements. > You talk like a Jew. Palestinians can absorb whatever Israel hurls at them By Reach CharleyReese | Posted July 11, 2001, 11:14 PM EDT The Israelis bulldozed another 14 Palestinian homes this week in a refugee camp in Gaza. The United States said the act was "provocative." Actually, it was a war crime. Actually, what the Israelis have been doing to the Palestinians has been correctly characterized by the International Red Cross as war crimes and by a United Nations official as "an affront to civilization." But, hey, you misled, sleeping Americans, you don't know what a breakthrough it is for the U.S. State Department to utter even the mildest criticism of some Israeli atrocity. "Provocative." Wow. Golly gee whiz. Old George W. Bush promised he would provide leadership, and that's real leadership, calling a war crime "provocative." Finally, after eight months of refusing to utter even that bland a criticism, he managed to say the destruction of homes so precious to such terribly poor people is "provocative." It is such an improvement over Warren Christopher. When he was secretary of state, the Israelis were indulging in one of their periodic and gratuitous artillery attacks against villages in South Lebanon. A group of about 100 Lebanese women and children fled to a United Nations compound for safety. It didn't matter. The Israelis fired on it deliberately, as a subsequent U.N. investigation demonstrated. They were all killed, along with the U.N. peacekeepers. Bits and pieces of their flesh hung like grotesque decorations, dripping blood from shattered debris and blasted trees. Do you know what Christopher said? "The United States urges both sides to show restraint." I wonder how he expected the shattered flesh of the dead Lebanese women and children to show restraint. Perhaps he thought that they should not bleed so profusely from their wounds. I think that was the very first time I felt ashamed to be an American, listening to that rat-faced, cold-blooded international lawyer brushing off an atrocity like a crumb on his expensive coat sleeve. One day, Americans are going to wake up from more than 50 years of Zionist propaganda and suddenly feel like strangers in a strange land, to borrow the title of an old science-fiction work. They're finally going to see the simple truth: Israelis drove Palestinians out of their own country and confiscated their land and wealth. Israelis refused to allow (and still refuse) Palestinian refugees to return, despite United Nations resolutions instructing them to do so. In 1967, the Israelis attacked and took the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. Since then, they have ruled it and still rule, despite U.N. resolutions against their actions. Now, after dragging out so-called peace negotiations for 10 years -- how can the simple question, "When are you going to withdraw from the territories you illegally occupy?" take 10 years? -- the drama is heading toward a climax. The Israelis have tried economic strangulation. They have tried to force the Palestinians to accept a chopped-up pseudo-country. They have tried killing their children, demolishing their homes and assassinating their leaders. They tried uprooting their agricultural orchards and sealing the Palestinians off from normal travel. By the way, where are you environmentalists while the Israelis commit this environmental atrocity? Don't you know how long it takes for an olive tree to reach maturity and start bearing fruit? I thought you were concerned about the environment. Oh, excuse me -- not when it's a Palestinian environment. My mistake. I sometimes forget who is a hypocrite and who isn't, because there are so many these days. What's next, of course, is for the Israelis to take off the bloody glove and commit one super massacre in an attempt to drive the Palestinians out or to break their spirit. This is what the Palestinians expect. They are bracing for it. They know that the Israelis have elected the one politician, Ariel Sharon, willing to do it. They figure they can absorb that blow. If the survivors can rise from the rubble and say to the Israelis, "You can bury us here, but you can never drive us out of our own country," then the Israelis will have exhausted their options. They will dump Sharon and replace him with somebody who will finally, at long last, do some serious talking. It's already terrible what the Palestinians are going through, and this new assault, when it comes, will be far worse. They need the support now of decent people with the courage to stand up for human rights. As you can see, the Bush administration prefers to remain on its knees. Most members of Congress are afraid even to do that. They prefer the supine position, total prostration. If you can't find the courage to speak out against evil financed with your tax money, then at least watch as Palestinian children show you how real men and women live and die with honor. Reach Charley Reese at 407-420-5315 or creese@orlandosentinel.com. Source: The Orlando Sentinel http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-edpreese12071201jul12.story http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.