My First Off Topic Forum Thread -oldschool

oldschool

No Longer Welcome
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
This is my first Thread on GF. I hope you guys will go easy on me. lol
I have read alot before I decided to make a Thread. One thing that really stands out to me as a newbie is this. It is not smart to annoy the members here. Ok ,lets start my thread shall we?

If you could have heard the deathbed confession of one person from history, who would you pick?
 
oldschool said:
This is my first Thread on GF. I hope you guys will go easy on me. lol
I have read alot before I decided to make a Thread. One thing that really stands out to me as a newbie is this. It is not smart to annoy the members here. Ok ,lets start my thread shall we?

If you could have heard the deathbed confession of one person from history, who would you pick?
Lizzie Borden
 
atlantic said:
Lizzie Borden

Hey oldschool ,we are not suppose to go off topic here. I'm suppose to stay on the topic of your thread ,but then again I'm sixes so I'm not going to! haha
Hey man ,no hard feelings for ****ing with you when you joined eh? You seem like a cool person. You can stop calling me a bitch now.:p
 
I had to deal with his stupid policies when I was in the USAF in the early 80's. He is a ****tard
 
sixes said:
Hey oldschool ,we are not suppose to go off topic here. I'm suppose to stay on the topic of your thread ,but then again I'm sixes so I'm not going to! haha
Hey man ,no hard feelings for ****ing with you when you joined eh? You seem like a cool person. You can stop calling me a bitch now.:p

Look guy, I don't know who the hell you are or what a forum whore is, but I don't think I like you. I don't care that you insulted me when I first showed up. Most of the people I have talked to on here say you are complete ****! Prove them wrong and I might think of you as human. For now, you can **** off.
 
oldschool said:
Look guy, I don't know who the hell you are or what a forum whore is, but I don't think I like you. I don't care that you insulted me when I first showed up. Most of the people I have talked to on here say you are complete ****! Prove them wrong and I might think of you as human. For now, you can **** off.
Time for a chill pill dude.
 
Zukiman said:
I had to deal with his stupid policies when I was in the USAF in the early 80's. He is a ****tard

lol ,****tard? That is a new one for me. Pretty funny though. Yes, I think Carter was a dumbass myself, very very true.
 
oldschool said:
lol ,****tard? That is a new one for me. Pretty funny though. Yes, I think Carter was a dumbass myself, very very true.
So, USAF ay! What policy didn't you like exactly?
 
oldschool said:
You are right, I should not lower myself. Sorry everyone. He really pissed me off. Ok, moving on.
Sixes is a good ****; you just can't take him seriously is all!
 
oldschool said:
You are right, I should not lower myself. Sorry everyone. He really pissed me off. Ok, moving on.
Hey man ,I'm just going to leave you alone ,but you have alot to learn about this place.:D
 
atlantic said:
So, USAF ay! What policy didn't you like exactly?

Jimmy Carter delivered this televised speech on April 18, 1977.

Tonight I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem unprecedented in our history. With the exception of preventing war, this is the greatest challenge our country will face during our lifetimes. The energy crisis has not yet overwhelmed us, but it will if we do not act quickly.

It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century.

We must not be selfish or timid if we hope to have a decent world for our children and grandchildren.

We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources. By acting now, we can control our future instead of letting the future control us.

Two days from now, I will present my energy proposals to the Congress. Its members will be my partners and they have already given me a great deal of valuable advice. Many of these proposals will be unpopular. Some will cause you to put up with inconveniences and to make sacrifices.

The most important thing about these proposals is that the alternative may be a national catastrophe. Further delay can affect our strength and our power as a nation.

Our decision about energy will test the character of the American people and the ability of the President and the Congress to govern. This difficult effort will be the "moral equivalent of war" -- except that we will be uniting our efforts to build and not destroy.

I know that some of you may doubt that we face real energy shortages. The 1973 gasoline lines are gone, and our homes are warm again. But our energy problem is worse tonight than it was in 1973 or a few weeks ago in the dead of winter. It is worse because more waste has occurred, and more time has passed by without our planning for the future. And it will get worse every day until we act.

The oil and natural gas we rely on for 75 percent of our energy are running out. In spite of increased effort, domestic production has been dropping steadily at about six percent a year. Imports have doubled in the last five years. Our nation's independence of economic and political action is becoming increasingly constrained. Unless profound changes are made to lower oil consumption, we now believe that early in the 1980s the world will be demanding more oil that it can produce.

The world now uses about 60 million barrels of oil a day and demand increases each year about 5 percent. This means that just to stay even we need the production of a new Texas every year, an Alaskan North Slope every nine months, or a new Saudi Arabia every three years. Obviously, this cannot continue.

We must look back in history to understand our energy problem. Twice in the last several hundred years there has been a transition in the way people use energy.

The first was about 200 years ago, away from wood -- which had provided about 90 percent of all fuel -- to coal, which was more efficient. This change became the basis of the Industrial Revolution.

The second change took place in this century, with the growing use of oil and natural gas. They were more convenient and cheaper than coal, and the supply seemed to be almost without limit. They made possible the age of automobile and airplane travel. Nearly everyone who is alive today grew up during this age and we have never known anything different.

Because we are now running out of gas and oil, we must prepare quickly for a third change, to strict conservation and to the use of coal and permanent renewable energy sources, like solar power.

The world has not prepared for the future. During the 1950s, people used twice as much oil as during the 1940s. During the 1960s, we used twice as much as during the 1950s. And in each of those decades, more oil was consumed than in all of mankind's previous history.

World consumption of oil is still going up. If it were possible to keep it rising during the 1970s and 1980s by 5 percent a year as it has in the past, we could use up all the proven reserves of oil in the entire world by the end of the next decade.

I know that many of you have suspected that some supplies of oil and gas are being withheld. You may be right, but suspicions about oil companies cannot change the fact that we are running out of petroleum.

All of us have heard about the large oil fields on Alaska's North Slope. In a few years when the North Slope is producing fully, its total output will be just about equal to two years' increase in our nation's energy demand.

Each new inventory of world oil reserves has been more disturbing than the last. World oil production can probably keep going up for another six or eight years. But some time in the 1980s it can't go up much more. Demand will overtake production. We have no choice about that.

But we do have a choice about how we will spend the next few years. Each American uses the energy equivalent of 60 barrels of oil per person each year. Ours is the most wasteful nation on earth. We waste more energy than we import. With about the same standard of living, we use twice as much energy per person as do other countries like Germany, Japan and Sweden.

One choice is to continue doing what we have been doing before. We can drift along for a few more years.

Our consumption of oil would keep going up every year. Our cars would continue to be too large and inefficient. Three-quarters of them would continue to carry only one person -- the driver -- while our public transportation system continues to decline. We can delay insulating our houses, and they will continue to lose about 50 percent of their heat in waste.

We can continue using scarce oil and natural to generate electricity, and continue wasting two-thirds of their fuel value in the process.

If we do not act, then by 1985 we will be using 33 percent more energy than we do today.

We can't substantially increase our domestic production, so we would need to import twice as much oil as we do now. Supplies will be uncertain. The cost will keep going up. Six years ago, we paid $3.7 billion for imported oil. Last year we spent $37 billion -- nearly ten times as much -- and this year we may spend over $45 billion.

Unless we act, we will spend more than $550 billion for imported oil by 1985 -- more than $2,500 a year for every man, woman, and child in America. Along with that money we will continue losing American jobs and becoming increasingly vulnerable to supply interruptions.

Now we have a choice. But if we wait, we will live in fear of embargoes. We could endanger our freedom as a sovereign nation to act in foreign affairs. Within ten years we would not be able to import enough oil -- from any country, at any acceptable price.

If we wait, and do not act, then our factories will not be able to keep our people on the job with reduced supplies of fuel. Too few of our utilities will have switched to coal, our most abundant energy source.

We will not be ready to keep our transportation system running with smaller, more efficient cars and a better network of buses, trains and public transportation.

We will feel mounting pressure to plunder the environment. We will have a crash program to build more nuclear plants, strip-mine and burn more coal, and drill more offshore wells than we will need if we begin to conserve now. Inflation will soar, production will go down, people will lose their jobs. Intense competition will build up among nations and among the different regions within our own country.

If we fail to act soon, we will face an economic, social and political crisis that will threaten our free institutions.

But we still have another choice. We can begin to prepare right now. We can decide to act while there is time.

That is the concept of the energy policy we will present on Wednesday. Our national energy plan is based on ten fundamental principles.

The first principle is that we can have an effective and comprehensive energy policy only if the government takes responsibility for it and if the people understand the seriousness of the challenge and are willing to make sacrifices.

The second principle is that healthy economic growth must continue. Only by saving energy can we maintain our standard of living and keep our people at work. An effective conservation program will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs.
 
atlantic said:
So, USAF ay! What policy didn't you like exactly?
I was in the service during the Iran hostage situation. I was with a B-52 squadron that wanted to nuke those sand monkeys into the stone age but peanut boy Jimmy kept us from doing it. At the time the US military was willing to sacrifice the hostages in the midst of about 10 nukes but Carter wanted to play nice. Now look at Iran. We should have turned that country into a sheet of glass when we had the chance.
 
Back
Top