! NH - Hitlary Just Barely Wins by Cheating; 39% to Buckwheat's 37%

[Patriot Games]

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/mccain_new_hampshire/2008/01/08/62790.html

McCain, Hillary Win in New Hampshire

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

CONCORD, N.H. -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won New Hampshire's Democratic
primary Tuesday night in a startling upset, defeating Sen. Barack Obama and
resurrecting her bid for the White House. Sen. John McCain powered past his
Republican rivals and back into contention for the GOP nomination.

"I felt like we all spoke from our hearts and I am so gratified that you
responded," Clinton said in victory remarks before cheering supporters. "Now
together, let's give America the kind of comeback that New Hampshire has
just given me."

Her victory capped a revival from last week's third-place finish in the Iowa
caucuses. It also raised the possibility of a long battle for the party
nomination between the most viable black candidate in history and the former
first lady, who is seeking to become the first woman to occupy the Oval
Office.

"I am still fired up add ready to go," a defeated Obama told his own
backers, repeating the line that forms a part of virtually every campaign
appearance he makes.

McCain's triumph scrambled the Republican race as well.

"We showed this country what a real comeback looks like," the Arizona
senator told The Associated Press in an interview as he savored his triumph.
"We're going to move on to Michigan and South Carolina and win the
nomination."

Later, he told cheering supporters that together, "we have taken a step, but
only a first step toward repairing the broken politics of the past and
restoring the trust of the American people in their government."

McCain rode a wave of support from independent voters to defeat former Gov.
Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, a showing that reprised the senator's victory
in the traditional first-in-the-nation primary in 2000.

It was a bitter blow for Romney, who spent millions of dollars of his own
money in hopes of winning the kickoff Iowa caucuses and the first primary -
and finished second in both. Even so, the businessman-turned politician said
he would meet McCain next week in the Michigan primary, and he cast himself
as just what the country needed to fix Washington. "I don't care who gets
the credit, Republican or Democrat. I've got no scores to settle," he told
supporters.

After Iowa, Clinton and her aides seemed resigned to a second straight
setback. But polling place interviews showed that female voters - who
deserted her last week - were solidly in her New Hampshire column.

She also was winning handily among registered Democrats. Obama led her by an
even larger margin among independents, but he suffered from a falloff in
turnout among young voters compared with Iowa.

Word of Clinton's triumph set off a raucous celebration among supporters at
a hotel in Nashua - gathered there to celebrate a first-in-the-nation
primary every bit as surprising as the one 16 years ago that allowed a young
Bill Clinton to proclaim himself "the comeback kid."

She had 39 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary to 37 percent for
Obama, who is seeking to become the nation's first black president. Former
Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina trailed with 17 percent. New Mexico Gov.
Bill Richardson was fourth, polling less than 5 percent of the vote.

Despite running a distant third to his better-funded rivals, Edwards had no
plans to step aside. He pointed toward the South Carolina primary on Jan.
26, hoping to prevail in the state where he was born - and where he claimed
his only victory in the presidential primaries four years ago.

Among Republicans, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the leadoff
Iowa GOP caucuses last week, was running third in New Hampshire.

McCain was winning 37 percent of the Republican vote, Romney had 32 and
Huckabee 11. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani had 9 percent, Texas Rep.
Ron Paul 8.

Clinton's triumph was unexpected - and unpredicted.

Obama drew huge crowds as he swept into the state after winning Iowa.
Confident of victory, he stuck to his pledge to deliver "change we can
believe in," while the former first lady was forced to retool her appeal to
voters on the run. She lessened her emphasis on experience, and sought
instead to raise questions about Obama's ability to bring about the change
he promised.

The grind took a toll on both of them.

Obama suffered from a sore throat, while Clinton's voice quavered at one
point when asked how she coped with the rigors of the campaign. That
unexpected moment of emotion became the talk of the final 24 hours of a
campaign that was unlike any other in history.

Clinton's performance came as a surprise even to her own inner circle.

In the hours leading up to the poll closing, her closest advisers had
appeared to be bracing for a second defeat at the hands of Obama.

Officials said her aides were considering whether to effectively concede the
next two contests - caucuses in Nevada on Jan. 19 and a South Carolina
primary a week later - and instead try to regroup in time for a 22-state
round of Democratic contests on Feb. 5.

These officials also said a campaign shake-up was in the works, with
longtime Clinton confidante Maggie Williams poised to come aboard to help
sharpen the former first lady's message. Other personnel additions are
expected, according to these officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity
while discussing strategy.

Obama, who won the leadoff Iowa caucuses last week, looked for an
endorsement from the powerful Culinary Workers union in Nevada in the days
ahead. South Carolina's Democratic electorate is heavily black and likely to
go for the most viable black presidential candidate in history.

The Republican race turns next to Michigan, where McCain and Romney already
are advertising on television, and where both men planned appearances on
Wednesday. Huckabee also was expected to campaign in the state.

According to preliminary results of a survey of voters as they left their
polling places, more independents cast ballots in the Democratic race than
in the Republican contest. They accounted for four of every 10 Democratic
votes and about a third of Republican ballots. The survey was conducted for
The Associated Press and the television networks.

Republicans were split roughly evenly in naming the nation's top issues: the
economy, Iraq, illegal immigration and terrorism. Romney had a big lead
among those naming immigration, while McCain led on the other issues.

Half of Republicans said illegal immigrants should be deported, and this
group leaned toward Romney. Those saying illegal immigrants should be
allowed to apply for citizenship leaned toward McCain, while the two
candidates split those saying those here illegally should be allowed to stay
as temporary workers.

Among Democrats, about one-third each named the economy and Iraq as the top
issues facing the country, followed by health care. Voters naming the
economy were split about evenly between Obama and Clinton, while Obama had
an advantage among those naming the other two issues. Clinton has made
health care a signature issue for years.

About one-third said if Bill Clinton were running, they would have voted for
him on Tuesday.

It was hard to tell who needed a Republican victory more - McCain or Romney.
McCain was the long-ago front-runner who survived a near-death political
experience when his fundraising dried up and his support collapsed. He shed
much of his staff and regrouped. An unflinching supporter of the Iraq war,
he benefited when U.S. casualties declined in the wake of a controversial
building in U.S. troops. By the final days of the New Hampshire race, he
held a celebration of sorts to mark his 100th town hall meeting in the state
he won eight years ago.

"It has all the earmarks of a landslide with the Dixville Notch vote," an
upbeat McCain quipped - he got four votes there to Romney's two and one for
Giuliani - as his campaign bus headed to a polling place in Nashua. The
crowd of supporters was so big, that voters complained and a poll worker
pleaded with McCain to leave. Seconds later, the bus pulled away.

 

[Topaz]

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html