G
Gandalf Grey
Guest
Obama's Passportgate: Historical Echo
By Robert Parry
Created Mar 21 2008 - 10:44am
Five presidential elections ago, when another George Bush was in the White
House and when Bill Clinton was the Democratic nominee, State Department
officials conducted an improper search of Clinton's passport files, an echo
of the current case in which Barack Obama's passport files were penetrated
three times this year.
The State Department announced on March 20 that two State Department
contractors were fired and a third disciplined for accessing Obama's files.
Based on preliminary information, it was unclear what the motive of the
Obama search was.
In 1992, the evidence revealed that representatives of George H.W. Bush,
then fighting for a second term, pulled strings at the State Department and
at U.S. embassies in Europe to uncover and disseminate derogatory
information about Bill Clinton's loyalty and his student trips to the Soviet
Union and Czechoslovakia.
That assault on Clinton's patriotism moved into high gear on the night of
Sept. 30, 1992, when Assistant Secretary of State Elizabeth Tamposi - under
pressure from the White House - ordered three aides to pore through
Clinton's
passport files in search of a purported letter in which Clinton supposedly
sought to renounce his citizenship.
Though no letter was found, Tamposi still injected the suspicions into the
campaign by citing a small tear in the corner of Clinton's passport
application as evidence that someone might have tampered with the file,
presumably to remove the supposed letter. She fashioned that speculation
into a criminal referral to the FBI.
Within hours, someone from the Bush camp leaked word about the confidential
FBI investigation to reporters at Newsweek magazine. The Newsweek story
about the tampering investigation hit the newsstands on Oct. 4.
The article suggested that a Clinton backer might have removed incriminating
material from Clinton's passport file, precisely the spin that the Bush
people wanted.
Immediately, President George H.W. Bush took the offensive, using the press
frenzy over the criminal referral to attack Clinton's patriotism on a
variety of fronts, including his student trip to the Soviet Union in 1970.
With his patriotism challenged, Clinton saw his once-formidable lead shrink.
Panic spread through the Clinton campaign.
Bush allies put out another suspicion, that Clinton might have been a KGB
"agent of influence." Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Washington Times headlined that
allegation on Oct. 5, 1992, a story that attracted President Bush's personal
interest.
"Now there are stories that Clinton . may have gone to Moscow as [a] guest
of the KGB," Bush wrote in his diary that day. [For the fullest account of
the 1992 Passportgate case, see Robert Parry's Secrecy & Privilege [1].]
Democratic Suspicions
The suspicions about Clinton's patriotism might have doomed Clinton's
election, except that Spencer Oliver, then chief counsel on the
Democratic-controlled House International Affairs Committee, suspected a
dirty trick.
"I said you can't go into someone's passport file," Oliver told me in a
later interview. "That's a violation of the law, only in pursuit of a
criminal indictment or something. But without his permission, you can't
examine his passport file. It's a violation of the Privacy Act."
After consulting with House committee chairman Dante Fascell and a colleague
on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Oliver dispatched a couple of
investigators to the Archives warehouse in Suitland.
The brief congressional check discovered that State Department political
appointees had gone to the Archives at night to search through Clinton's
records and those of his mother.
Oliver's assistants also found that the administration's tampering
allegation rested on a very weak premise, the slight tear in the passport
application. The circumstances of the late-night search soon found their way
into an article in the Washington Post, causing embarrassment to the Bush
campaign.
Yet still sensing that the loyalty theme could hurt Clinton, President Bush
kept stoking the fire. On CNN's "Larry King Live" on Oct. 7, 1992, Bush
suggested anew that there was something sinister about a possible Clinton
friend allegedly tampering with Clinton's passport file.
"Why in the world would anybody want to tamper with his files, you know, to
support the man?" Bush wondered before a national TV audience. "I mean, I
don't understand that. What would exonerate him - put it that way - in the
files?
The next day, in his diary, Bush ruminated suspiciously about Clinton's
Moscow trip: "All kinds of rumors as to who his hosts were in Russia,
something he can't remember anything about."
But the GOP attack on Clinton's loyalty prompted some Democrats to liken
Bush to Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who built a political career in the early days
of the Cold War challenging people's loyalties without offering proof.
FBI Rejection
On Oct. 9, the FBI complicated Bush's strategy by rejecting the criminal
referral. The FBI concluded that there was no evidence that anyone had
removed anything from Clinton's passport file.
At that point, Bush began backpedaling: "If he's told all there is to tell
on Moscow, fine," Bush said on ABC's "Good Morning America." "I'm not
suggesting that there's anything unpatriotic about that. A lot of people
went to Moscow, and so that's the end of that one."
But documents about the investigation that I obtained years later at the
Archives revealed that privately Bush was not so ready to surrender the
disloyalty theme. The day before the first presidential debate on Oct. 11,
Bush prepped himself with one-liners designed to spotlight doubts about
Clinton's loyalty if an opening presented itself.
"It's hard to visit foreign countries with a torn-up passport," read one of
the scripted lines. Another zinger read: "Contrary to what the Governor's
been saying, most young men his age did not try to duck the draft. . A few
did go to Canada. A couple went to England. Only one I know went to Russia."
If Clinton had criticized Bush's use of a Houston hotel room as a legal
residence, Bush was ready to hit back with another Russian reference: "Where
is your legal residence, Little Rock or Leningrad?"
But the Oct. 11 presidential debate - which also involved Reform Party
candidate Ross Perot - did not go as Bush had hoped. Bush did raise the
loyalty issue in response to an early question about character, but the
incumbent's message was lost in a cascade of inarticulate sentence
fragments.
"I said something the other day where I was accused of being like Joe
McCarthy because I question - I'll put it this way, I think it's wrong to
demonstrate against your own country or organize demonstrations against your
own country in foreign soil," Bush said.
"I just think it's wrong. I - that - maybe - they say, 'well, it was a
youthful indiscretion.' I was 19 or 20 flying off an aircraft carrier and
that shaped me to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and - I'm sorry
but demonstrating - it's not a question of patriotism, it's a question of
character and judgment."
Clinton countered by challenging Bush directly.
"You have questioned my patriotism," the Democrat shot back. Clinton then
unloaded his own zinger: "When Joe McCarthy went around this country
attacking people's patriotism, he was wrong. He was wrong, and a senator
from Connecticut stood up to him, named Prescott Bush. Your father was right
to stand up to Joe McCarthy. You were wrong to attack my patriotism."
Many observers rated Clinton's negative comparison of Bush to his father as
Bush's worst moment in the debate. An unsettled Bush didn't regain the
initiative for the remainder of the evening.
Criminal Probe
The search of Clinton's passport file had other repercussions. Eventually,
the State Department's inspector general sought a special prosecutor
investigation for a scandal that became known as Passportgate.
In the end, however, George H.W. Bush escaped any legal consequences from
the passport gambit in large part because a Republican attorney, Joseph
diGenova, was named to serve as special prosecutor.
DiGenova's investigation cleared Bush and his administration of any
wrongdoing, saying the probe "found no evidence that President Bush was
involved in this matter."
FBI documents that I reviewed at the Archives, however, presented a more
complicated picture. Speaking to diGenova and his investigators in fall
1993, former President George H.W. Bush said he had encouraged then-White
House chief of staff James Baker and other aides to investigate Clinton and
to make sure the information got out.
"Although he [Bush] did not recall tasking Baker to research any particular
matter, he may have asked why the campaign did not know more about Clinton's
demonstrating," said the FBI interview report, dated Oct. 23, 1993.
"The President [Bush] advised that . he probably would have said, 'Hooray,
somebody's going to finally do something about this.' If he had learned that
the Washington Times was planning to publish an article, he would have said,
'That's good, it's about time.' .
"Based on his 'depth of feeling' on this issue, President Bush responded to
a hypothetical question that he would have recommended getting the truth out
if it were legal," the FBI wrote in summarizing Bush's statements. "The
President added that he would not have been concerned over the legality of
the issue but just the facts and what was in the files."
Bush also said he understood how his impassioned comments about Clinton's
loyalty might have led some members of his staff to conclude that he had "a
one-track mind" on the issue. He also expressed disappointment that the
Clinton passport search uncovered so little.
"The President described himself as being indignant over the fact that the
campaign did not find out what Clinton was doing" as a student studying
abroad, the FBI report said.
Bush's comments seem to suggest that he had pushed his subordinates into a
violation of Clinton's privacy rights. But diGenova, who had worked for the
Reagan-Bush Justice Department, already had signaled to Bush that the probe
was going no where.
At the start of the Oct. 23, 1993, interview, which took place at Bush's
office in Houston, diGenova assured Bush that the investigation's staff
lawyers were "all seasoned prof[essional] prosecutors who know what a real
crime looks like," according to FBI notes of the meeting. "[This is] not a
gen[eral] probe of pol[itics] in Amer[ica] or dirty tricks, etc., or a
general license to rummage in people's personal lives."
As the interview ended, two of diGenova's assistants - Lisa Rich and Laura
Laughlin - asked Bush for autographs, according to the FBI's notes on the
meeting.
Czech-ing on Bill
In January 1994, the story about Clinton's student trip to Czechoslovakia in
1970 took another turn.
The Czech news media reported that former Czech intelligence officials were
saying that in 1992, the Czech secret police, the Federal Security and
Information Service (FBIS), had collaborated with the Bush reelection
campaign to dig up dirt on Clinton's student trip to visit a friend in
Prague.
The centrist newspaper Mlada Fronta Dnes reported that during the 1992
campaign, FBIS gave the Republicans internal data about Clinton's
Moscow-Prague trips and supplied background material about Clinton's
"connections" inside Czechoslovakia.
Derogatory information also allegedly was funneled through officials at the
U.S. Embassy and was leaked to cooperative journalists. On Oct. 24, 1992,
three Czech newspapers ran similar stories about Clinton's Czech hosts.
"Bill Was With Communists" was one particularly nasty headline in the Cesky
Denik newspaper.
The Czech stories suggested that the first Bush administration would go so
far as to collaborate with a foreign secret police agency to undermine a
political opponent.
Though the Passportgate case is now only a footnote to the 1992 election -
especially after DiGenova cleared Bush and his administration of any
wrongdoing - the scandal was viewed as much more important inside George
H.W. Bush's White House.
After Bush's election defeat in November 1992, chief of staff Baker grew
depressed, blaming himself for the passport disaster and the reelection
loss. On Nov. 20, 1992, at 10:30 a.m., a despondent Baker visited Bush.
"Jim Baker came in here . deeply disturbed and read to me a long letter of
resignation all because of this stupid passport situation," Bush wrote in
his diary. Bush rejected Baker's offer to resign. [For details, see Secrecy
& Privilege [2].]
The disclosure that three State Department contractors accessed Obama's
passport files on Jan. 9, Feb. 21 and March 14 may not have the high-level
political intrigue of the Clinton passport case, but the intrusion does have
a troubling precedent.
_______
--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson
By Robert Parry
Created Mar 21 2008 - 10:44am
Five presidential elections ago, when another George Bush was in the White
House and when Bill Clinton was the Democratic nominee, State Department
officials conducted an improper search of Clinton's passport files, an echo
of the current case in which Barack Obama's passport files were penetrated
three times this year.
The State Department announced on March 20 that two State Department
contractors were fired and a third disciplined for accessing Obama's files.
Based on preliminary information, it was unclear what the motive of the
Obama search was.
In 1992, the evidence revealed that representatives of George H.W. Bush,
then fighting for a second term, pulled strings at the State Department and
at U.S. embassies in Europe to uncover and disseminate derogatory
information about Bill Clinton's loyalty and his student trips to the Soviet
Union and Czechoslovakia.
That assault on Clinton's patriotism moved into high gear on the night of
Sept. 30, 1992, when Assistant Secretary of State Elizabeth Tamposi - under
pressure from the White House - ordered three aides to pore through
Clinton's
passport files in search of a purported letter in which Clinton supposedly
sought to renounce his citizenship.
Though no letter was found, Tamposi still injected the suspicions into the
campaign by citing a small tear in the corner of Clinton's passport
application as evidence that someone might have tampered with the file,
presumably to remove the supposed letter. She fashioned that speculation
into a criminal referral to the FBI.
Within hours, someone from the Bush camp leaked word about the confidential
FBI investigation to reporters at Newsweek magazine. The Newsweek story
about the tampering investigation hit the newsstands on Oct. 4.
The article suggested that a Clinton backer might have removed incriminating
material from Clinton's passport file, precisely the spin that the Bush
people wanted.
Immediately, President George H.W. Bush took the offensive, using the press
frenzy over the criminal referral to attack Clinton's patriotism on a
variety of fronts, including his student trip to the Soviet Union in 1970.
With his patriotism challenged, Clinton saw his once-formidable lead shrink.
Panic spread through the Clinton campaign.
Bush allies put out another suspicion, that Clinton might have been a KGB
"agent of influence." Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Washington Times headlined that
allegation on Oct. 5, 1992, a story that attracted President Bush's personal
interest.
"Now there are stories that Clinton . may have gone to Moscow as [a] guest
of the KGB," Bush wrote in his diary that day. [For the fullest account of
the 1992 Passportgate case, see Robert Parry's Secrecy & Privilege [1].]
Democratic Suspicions
The suspicions about Clinton's patriotism might have doomed Clinton's
election, except that Spencer Oliver, then chief counsel on the
Democratic-controlled House International Affairs Committee, suspected a
dirty trick.
"I said you can't go into someone's passport file," Oliver told me in a
later interview. "That's a violation of the law, only in pursuit of a
criminal indictment or something. But without his permission, you can't
examine his passport file. It's a violation of the Privacy Act."
After consulting with House committee chairman Dante Fascell and a colleague
on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Oliver dispatched a couple of
investigators to the Archives warehouse in Suitland.
The brief congressional check discovered that State Department political
appointees had gone to the Archives at night to search through Clinton's
records and those of his mother.
Oliver's assistants also found that the administration's tampering
allegation rested on a very weak premise, the slight tear in the passport
application. The circumstances of the late-night search soon found their way
into an article in the Washington Post, causing embarrassment to the Bush
campaign.
Yet still sensing that the loyalty theme could hurt Clinton, President Bush
kept stoking the fire. On CNN's "Larry King Live" on Oct. 7, 1992, Bush
suggested anew that there was something sinister about a possible Clinton
friend allegedly tampering with Clinton's passport file.
"Why in the world would anybody want to tamper with his files, you know, to
support the man?" Bush wondered before a national TV audience. "I mean, I
don't understand that. What would exonerate him - put it that way - in the
files?
The next day, in his diary, Bush ruminated suspiciously about Clinton's
Moscow trip: "All kinds of rumors as to who his hosts were in Russia,
something he can't remember anything about."
But the GOP attack on Clinton's loyalty prompted some Democrats to liken
Bush to Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who built a political career in the early days
of the Cold War challenging people's loyalties without offering proof.
FBI Rejection
On Oct. 9, the FBI complicated Bush's strategy by rejecting the criminal
referral. The FBI concluded that there was no evidence that anyone had
removed anything from Clinton's passport file.
At that point, Bush began backpedaling: "If he's told all there is to tell
on Moscow, fine," Bush said on ABC's "Good Morning America." "I'm not
suggesting that there's anything unpatriotic about that. A lot of people
went to Moscow, and so that's the end of that one."
But documents about the investigation that I obtained years later at the
Archives revealed that privately Bush was not so ready to surrender the
disloyalty theme. The day before the first presidential debate on Oct. 11,
Bush prepped himself with one-liners designed to spotlight doubts about
Clinton's loyalty if an opening presented itself.
"It's hard to visit foreign countries with a torn-up passport," read one of
the scripted lines. Another zinger read: "Contrary to what the Governor's
been saying, most young men his age did not try to duck the draft. . A few
did go to Canada. A couple went to England. Only one I know went to Russia."
If Clinton had criticized Bush's use of a Houston hotel room as a legal
residence, Bush was ready to hit back with another Russian reference: "Where
is your legal residence, Little Rock or Leningrad?"
But the Oct. 11 presidential debate - which also involved Reform Party
candidate Ross Perot - did not go as Bush had hoped. Bush did raise the
loyalty issue in response to an early question about character, but the
incumbent's message was lost in a cascade of inarticulate sentence
fragments.
"I said something the other day where I was accused of being like Joe
McCarthy because I question - I'll put it this way, I think it's wrong to
demonstrate against your own country or organize demonstrations against your
own country in foreign soil," Bush said.
"I just think it's wrong. I - that - maybe - they say, 'well, it was a
youthful indiscretion.' I was 19 or 20 flying off an aircraft carrier and
that shaped me to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and - I'm sorry
but demonstrating - it's not a question of patriotism, it's a question of
character and judgment."
Clinton countered by challenging Bush directly.
"You have questioned my patriotism," the Democrat shot back. Clinton then
unloaded his own zinger: "When Joe McCarthy went around this country
attacking people's patriotism, he was wrong. He was wrong, and a senator
from Connecticut stood up to him, named Prescott Bush. Your father was right
to stand up to Joe McCarthy. You were wrong to attack my patriotism."
Many observers rated Clinton's negative comparison of Bush to his father as
Bush's worst moment in the debate. An unsettled Bush didn't regain the
initiative for the remainder of the evening.
Criminal Probe
The search of Clinton's passport file had other repercussions. Eventually,
the State Department's inspector general sought a special prosecutor
investigation for a scandal that became known as Passportgate.
In the end, however, George H.W. Bush escaped any legal consequences from
the passport gambit in large part because a Republican attorney, Joseph
diGenova, was named to serve as special prosecutor.
DiGenova's investigation cleared Bush and his administration of any
wrongdoing, saying the probe "found no evidence that President Bush was
involved in this matter."
FBI documents that I reviewed at the Archives, however, presented a more
complicated picture. Speaking to diGenova and his investigators in fall
1993, former President George H.W. Bush said he had encouraged then-White
House chief of staff James Baker and other aides to investigate Clinton and
to make sure the information got out.
"Although he [Bush] did not recall tasking Baker to research any particular
matter, he may have asked why the campaign did not know more about Clinton's
demonstrating," said the FBI interview report, dated Oct. 23, 1993.
"The President [Bush] advised that . he probably would have said, 'Hooray,
somebody's going to finally do something about this.' If he had learned that
the Washington Times was planning to publish an article, he would have said,
'That's good, it's about time.' .
"Based on his 'depth of feeling' on this issue, President Bush responded to
a hypothetical question that he would have recommended getting the truth out
if it were legal," the FBI wrote in summarizing Bush's statements. "The
President added that he would not have been concerned over the legality of
the issue but just the facts and what was in the files."
Bush also said he understood how his impassioned comments about Clinton's
loyalty might have led some members of his staff to conclude that he had "a
one-track mind" on the issue. He also expressed disappointment that the
Clinton passport search uncovered so little.
"The President described himself as being indignant over the fact that the
campaign did not find out what Clinton was doing" as a student studying
abroad, the FBI report said.
Bush's comments seem to suggest that he had pushed his subordinates into a
violation of Clinton's privacy rights. But diGenova, who had worked for the
Reagan-Bush Justice Department, already had signaled to Bush that the probe
was going no where.
At the start of the Oct. 23, 1993, interview, which took place at Bush's
office in Houston, diGenova assured Bush that the investigation's staff
lawyers were "all seasoned prof[essional] prosecutors who know what a real
crime looks like," according to FBI notes of the meeting. "[This is] not a
gen[eral] probe of pol[itics] in Amer[ica] or dirty tricks, etc., or a
general license to rummage in people's personal lives."
As the interview ended, two of diGenova's assistants - Lisa Rich and Laura
Laughlin - asked Bush for autographs, according to the FBI's notes on the
meeting.
Czech-ing on Bill
In January 1994, the story about Clinton's student trip to Czechoslovakia in
1970 took another turn.
The Czech news media reported that former Czech intelligence officials were
saying that in 1992, the Czech secret police, the Federal Security and
Information Service (FBIS), had collaborated with the Bush reelection
campaign to dig up dirt on Clinton's student trip to visit a friend in
Prague.
The centrist newspaper Mlada Fronta Dnes reported that during the 1992
campaign, FBIS gave the Republicans internal data about Clinton's
Moscow-Prague trips and supplied background material about Clinton's
"connections" inside Czechoslovakia.
Derogatory information also allegedly was funneled through officials at the
U.S. Embassy and was leaked to cooperative journalists. On Oct. 24, 1992,
three Czech newspapers ran similar stories about Clinton's Czech hosts.
"Bill Was With Communists" was one particularly nasty headline in the Cesky
Denik newspaper.
The Czech stories suggested that the first Bush administration would go so
far as to collaborate with a foreign secret police agency to undermine a
political opponent.
Though the Passportgate case is now only a footnote to the 1992 election -
especially after DiGenova cleared Bush and his administration of any
wrongdoing - the scandal was viewed as much more important inside George
H.W. Bush's White House.
After Bush's election defeat in November 1992, chief of staff Baker grew
depressed, blaming himself for the passport disaster and the reelection
loss. On Nov. 20, 1992, at 10:30 a.m., a despondent Baker visited Bush.
"Jim Baker came in here . deeply disturbed and read to me a long letter of
resignation all because of this stupid passport situation," Bush wrote in
his diary. Bush rejected Baker's offer to resign. [For details, see Secrecy
& Privilege [2].]
The disclosure that three State Department contractors accessed Obama's
passport files on Jan. 9, Feb. 21 and March 14 may not have the high-level
political intrigue of the Clinton passport case, but the intrusion does have
a troubling precedent.
_______
--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson