Guest Gandalf Grey Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Our Good Catholic President Bush By Dr. Gerry Lower Created Apr 13 2008 - 10:17pm The Republican Party in the U.S. currently occupies a position which insists that there is no such thing as "honest" human "truth" and the right wing press goes right along with it all. This is to occupy the very same position occupied by the Roman Catholic Church over the past 1700 years. In a world devoid of honest human truth, everything is purely "political ", which is to say that everyone is just arguing his or her own point of view upon which no one can agree, for nothing more than personal and political gain. This is all in keeping with the view that George W. Bush is a secret Catholic, which is to say that George W. Bush represents our "nation's first Catholic president" (1), which is to say that George W. Bush is a "fake christian" (2). John F. Kennedy, of course, was our first Catholic president, but he actively sought to divorce his religion from his office, correctly seeing it as a political albatross at the time during the 1960's protests of everything right wing, conservative and militaristic. Bush, on the other hand, has openly welcomed Roman Catholic doctrine and teachings into the White House, obligated to do so ever since Ronald Reagan got the Old Testament ball rolling for Republican votes. Indeed, in preparing for Pope Benedict's upcoming visit, President Bush is pulling out all the stops: driving out to a suburban military base to meet Pope Benedict 's plane, bringing a giant audience to the South Lawn and hosting a fancy East Room dinner. These are all firsts for a U.S. president (3). "There was a very self-conscious awareness that religious conservatives had brought Bush into the White House and that the administration wanted to do what they had been mandated to do" (1), which in the world of Rome translates into doing whatever one pleases in the name of Rome. Bush has placed Catholics into prominent roles in the federal government and it has been suggested that "he wedded Catholic intellectualism with evangelical political savvy to forge a powerful electoral coalition". But the Catholic "intellectual tradition" is an oxymoron, being neither intellectual or traditional in the church. That is precisely why Jefferson separated church and state, because there was no reason to be found in Old Testament religion. Jefferson knew that nascent Christian human rights deserve our belief not Roman faith. One must keep in mind that Jefferson's grasp of nascent Christian ethics was two orders of magnitude more real and sophisticated than the grasp of either Bush or Benedict, neither of whom know anything about human rights. Following the American revolution, Roman Catholics (and those who wanted to retain the beliefs they held under British dominion) and Catholic doctrine was largely avoided in politics right up until the 1930s when the Catholic community began finding success and influence in the business world. In terms of recruiting new members, Old Testament Roman theists typically have a field day during times of war, when fear can be used to create desperate people are seeking answers that do not even have to make sense. So, it is worth keeping in mind that Roman religion is the antithesis of Jeffersonian Democracy. Romanism was, after all, conjured up by a conquering Roman emperor in the sole interest of Roman despotism, conquest and control, all in the name of Jesus, the same man whom Jefferson saw as a kindred spirit and the Father of Human Rights (4). It is also worth keeping in mind that Bush and Benedict are "kindred spirits" (1). Benedict views the occupation of central and south America by Spanish "Conquistadores" as being entirely justified because it brought Roman "christianity" to the "heathen" native people. Bush views the occupation of Iraq by U.S. "Liberators" as being entirely justified because it brought U.S. "democracy" to the "oppressed" iraqi people.. What Bush and Benedict share is a "belief" system that is beyond human belief and a world view that is infallible by self-definition, above human reason and logic, above the voice of the People, and worth doing "whatever it takes" to maintain itself", "at all costs" - to the point of worshiping lies, fabrications, and overt ignorance, you name it. Jefferson knew that was no basis for or way to run a nation. The U.S., as part and parcel of a larger definable cultural evolutionary program (of which the people are entirely unaware), has fallen to become a "wolves in sheep's clothing" imperial nation, as yet another denigration of the Christ, yet again in the interest of Roman imperialism cum European colonialism cum U.S. capitalism, all driven by greed for money and lust for power. Like the Pope (5), Bush wants your mortal soul, he wants to control you and define you in terms of what it means to be human and what it means to be an American. In defining the people in Jefferson's America, Bush has done nothing but unholy terrorlsm and damage to our human rights-based democracy. As you must have blind faith in Old Testament religion, you must have blind faith in greed-driven corporate capitalism to boot. You must have blind faith if the Cheney-Bush worldview of global dominion by the U.S. is ever to come to fruition. Readings -- NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available to advance understanding of political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 "A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at stake." -Thomas Jefferson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lorad474@cs.com Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 On Apr 15, 9:55 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.