Pakistan Raises Nuclear Alert Status - Fears Militant Attacks on Weapons Stash

B

B1ackwater

Guest
BBC
Pakistan has raised the state of alert around its nuclear facilities
amid concerns they could be targeted by Islamist militants.

But a senior Pakistan military official said there had been no
specific threat to the sites, and insisted that safeguards in place
were fool proof.

The official was speaking in a rare press briefing on the issue.

It followed Western media reports warning that Pakistan's nuclear
weapons could fall into the wrong hands.

The Pakistani authorities have been angered by Western media reports
speculating that the country?s nuclear arsenal could fall into the
hands of al-Qaeda militants.

The senior military official briefing foreign journalists said that
the weapons were protected by an elaborate command and control system,
and multiple levels of security.

He acknowledged that Islamic militants had begun to attack army
personnel in recent months, and that nuclear sites may also become a
target.

He said the state of alert around nuclear facilities had increased,
but there had been no specific threats against them.

The official said there was no way the Taleban or al-Qaeda could take
over Pakistan?s estimated 50 nuclear warheads.

And he dismissed the possibility of collusion from within the system,
saying all personnel dealing with sensitive material had been
carefully monitored.

- - - - -

No chance of collusion ... of 'stealth' islamists ??? Yea, sure.
I guess Pakistan has founds ways to read minds ...

It only takes a few.

Regardless, it was smart to bump up the alert level. Even
if militants can't get their hands on finished armable
weapons, a raid could yeild raw plutonium from which
bombs or fissile devices ('dirty bombs') could be
fabricated. Iran might be interested in acquiring
refined plutonium as well - and willing to PAY huge
amounts for the stuff.

The downside of any kind of alert at Pakistans nuclear
bunkers is that it will make India nervous. At the
present time, if a nuclear war is to break out anywhere
in the world, it's still most likely between India
and Pakistan - and the population densities and food
situation mean even a 'small' nuclear war would kill
untold millions.
 
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), "Charlie Carnitas, AKA the
pirate, \"rogue dick\"" <plantainhume@aol.com> wrote:

>On Jan 26, 11:01=A0am, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
>> BBC
>> Pakistan has raised the state of alert around its nuclear facilities
>> amid concerns they could be targeted by Islamist militants.
>>
>> But a senior Pakistan military official said there had been no
>> specific threat to the sites, and insisted that safeguards in place
>> were fool proof.
>>
>> The official was speaking in a rare press briefing on the issue.
>>
>> It followed Western media reports warning that Pakistan's nuclear
>> weapons could fall into the wrong hands.
>>
>> The Pakistani authorities have been angered by Western media reports
>> speculating that the country?s nuclear arsenal could fall into the
>> hands of al-Qaeda militants.
>>
>> The senior military official briefing foreign journalists said that
>> the weapons were protected by an elaborate command and control system,
>> and multiple levels of security.
>>
>> He acknowledged that Islamic militants had begun to attack army
>> personnel in recent months, and that nuclear sites may also become a
>> target.
>>
>> He said the state of alert around nuclear facilities had increased,
>> but there had been no specific threats against them.
>>
>> The official said there was no way the Taleban or al-Qaeda could take
>> over Pakistan?s estimated 50 nuclear warheads.
>>
>> And he dismissed the possibility of collusion from within the system,
>> saying all personnel dealing with sensitive material had been
>> carefully monitored.
>>
>> - - - - -
>>
>> =A0 =A0No chance of collusion ... of 'stealth' islamists ??? Yea, sure.
>> =A0 =A0I guess Pakistan has founds ways to read minds ...
>>
>> =A0 =A0It only takes a few.
>>
>> =A0 =A0Regardless, it was smart to bump up the alert level. Even
>> =A0 =A0if militants can't get their hands on finished armable
>> =A0 =A0weapons, a raid could yeild raw plutonium from which
>> =A0 =A0bombs or fissile devices ('dirty bombs') could be
>> =A0 =A0fabricated. Iran might be interested in acquiring
>> =A0 =A0refined plutonium as well - and willing to PAY huge
>> =A0 =A0amounts for the stuff.
>>
>> =A0 =A0The downside of any kind of alert at Pakistans nuclear
>> =A0 =A0bunkers is that it will make India nervous. At the
>> =A0 =A0present time, if a nuclear war is to break out anywhere
>> =A0 =A0in the world, it's still most likely between India
>> =A0 =A0and Pakistan - and the population densities and food
>> =A0 =A0situation mean even a 'small' nuclear war would kill
>> =A0 =A0untold millions.

>
>Then we should bomb Iran.


Um ... I think Iraq and Afghanistan have proven that
this approach does NOT work worth a danm. Oh yea, just
yesterday, Russia re-asserted it's nuclear "strike first"
doctrine - and made a point of mentioning attacks on its
'allies' being adequate provocation to vaporize armies.

>Gosh, I hope one of those nukes doesn't make their way to NEW YORK
>CITY...


Tel-Aviv more likely ...

Of course when it comes to making money for the US military-
industrial complex, just the IDEA of nukes or the makings'
being "out there" somewhere ...
 
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:38:19 -0800 (PST), "Charlie Carnitas, AKA the
pirate, \"rogue dick\"" <plantainhume@aol.com> wrote:

>On Jan 26, 1:11=A0pm, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), "Charlie Carnitas, AKA the
>> pirate, \"rogue dick\"" <plantainh...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jan 26, 11:01=3DA0am, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
>> >> BBC
>> >> Pakistan has raised the state of alert around its nuclear facilities
>> >> amid concerns they could be targeted by Islamist militants.

>>
>> >> But a senior Pakistan military official said there had been no
>> >> specific threat to the sites, and insisted that safeguards in place
>> >> were fool proof.

>>
>> >> The official was speaking in a rare press briefing on the issue.

>>
>> >> It followed Western media reports warning that Pakistan's nuclear
>> >> weapons could fall into the wrong hands.

>>
>> >> The Pakistani authorities have been angered by Western media reports
>> >> speculating that the country?s nuclear arsenal could fall into the
>> >> hands of al-Qaeda militants.

>>
>> >> The senior military official briefing foreign journalists said that
>> >> the weapons were protected by an elaborate command and control system,
>> >> and multiple levels of security.

>>
>> >> He acknowledged that Islamic militants had begun to attack army
>> >> personnel in recent months, and that nuclear sites may also become a
>> >> target.

>>
>> >> He said the state of alert around nuclear facilities had increased,
>> >> but there had been no specific threats against them.

>>
>> >> The official said there was no way the Taleban or al-Qaeda could take
>> >> over Pakistan?s estimated 50 nuclear warheads.

>>
>> >> And he dismissed the possibility of collusion from within the system,
>> >> saying all personnel dealing with sensitive material had been
>> >> carefully monitored.

>>
>> >> - - - - -

>>
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0No chance of collusion ... of 'stealth' islamists ??? Yea, s=

>ure.
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0I guess Pakistan has founds ways to read minds ...

>>
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0It only takes a few.

>>
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0Regardless, it was smart to bump up the alert level. Even
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0if militants can't get their hands on finished armable
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0weapons, a raid could yeild raw plutonium from which
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0bombs or fissile devices ('dirty bombs') could be
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0fabricated. Iran might be interested in acquiring
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0refined plutonium as well - and willing to PAY huge
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0amounts for the stuff.

>>
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0The downside of any kind of alert at Pakistans nuclear
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0bunkers is that it will make India nervous. At the
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0present time, if a nuclear war is to break out anywhere
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0in the world, it's still most likely between India
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0and Pakistan - and the population densities and food
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0situation mean even a 'small' nuclear war would kill
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0untold millions.

>>
>> >Then we should bomb Iran.

>>
>> =A0 =A0Um ... I think Iraq and Afghanistan have proven that
>> =A0 =A0this approach does NOT work worth a danm. Oh yea, just
>> =A0 =A0yesterday, Russia re-asserted it's nuclear "strike first"
>> =A0 =A0doctrine - and made a point of mentioning attacks on its
>> =A0 =A0'allies' being adequate provocation to vaporize armies.
>>
>> >Gosh, I hope one of those nukes doesn't make their way to NEW YORK
>> >CITY...

>>
>> =A0 =A0Tel-Aviv more likely ...
>>
>> =A0 =A0Of course when it comes to making money for the US military-
>> =A0 =A0industrial complex, just the IDEA of nukes or the makings'
>> =A0 =A0being "out there" somewhere ...- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -

>
>Oh, and will the Israelis be facilitating it?


The Israelis have spent the past 50 years pissing on and
pissing off everybody in the region. Needless to say they
are now VERY nervous about "those people" acquiring ANY
real means of defending themselves and their interests.
Israel will pull every string it can to prevent this from
happening.

>More importantly, and I am not being flip, would any one care, after
>what has happened to the Palestinians, and the general Israeli
>obdurate, thick behavior?


That's the thing ... NO ... relatively few non-Jews would
care. Propaganda or not, the Palestinians story has slowly
but surely eroded Israels image and mythos. A suprising
number feel BOTH parties are "bad guys" and kind-of hope
they exterminate each other.

This means when Israel pulls those strings ... some of
them may be rotten, and snap. Israel knows this. It
worries them - a lot. It's why they've been after "W"
so much to blast Iran ... because they fear the next
prez simply WON'T.

>Of course we'd care for the civilians, but accepting Bush and Cheney
>and the neocons are dirty, a lot of people would think Israel planned
>it, themselves, with help from Cheney, say.


Never underestimate Cheney and his MiC buddies ... very
clever, dangerous, people.

However Israel won't nuke itself.

It MIGHT, if desperate enough, arrange for terrorists
to nuke something ELSE that's handy ... a large european
city perhaps or a US base in moslem territory. Whether
they could get away with this is uncertain. Most of
the radicals REALLY want to nuke Israel and it would
be hell to get them to 'waste' their precious bomb on
any other target.

Making a 'fake' bomb would be a huge risk too ... matching
the 'fingerprint' of a Pakistani warhead well enough to
fool the major powers is likely impossible. Retribution
would be devastating - the world would come after Israels
nukes, gutting the country in the process.
 
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:58:05 -0800, "Joseph R Loegering"
<JosephLoegering@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"B1ackwater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
>news:479ba152.8081353@news.east.earthlink.net...
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), "Charlie Carnitas, AKA the
>> pirate, \"rogue dick\"" <plantainhume@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jan 26, 11:01=A0am, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
>>>> BBC
>>>> Pakistan has raised the state of alert around its nuclear facilities
>>>> amid concerns they could be targeted by Islamist militants.
>>>>
>>>> But a senior Pakistan military official said there had been no
>>>> specific threat to the sites, and insisted that safeguards in place
>>>> were fool proof.
>>>>
>>>> The official was speaking in a rare press briefing on the issue.
>>>>
>>>> It followed Western media reports warning that Pakistan's nuclear
>>>> weapons could fall into the wrong hands.
>>>>
>>>> The Pakistani authorities have been angered by Western media reports
>>>> speculating that the country?s nuclear arsenal could fall into the
>>>> hands of al-Qaeda militants.
>>>>
>>>> The senior military official briefing foreign journalists said that
>>>> the weapons were protected by an elaborate command and control system,
>>>> and multiple levels of security.
>>>>
>>>> He acknowledged that Islamic militants had begun to attack army
>>>> personnel in recent months, and that nuclear sites may also become a
>>>> target.
>>>>
>>>> He said the state of alert around nuclear facilities had increased,
>>>> but there had been no specific threats against them.
>>>>
>>>> The official said there was no way the Taleban or al-Qaeda could take
>>>> over Pakistan?s estimated 50 nuclear warheads.
>>>>
>>>> And he dismissed the possibility of collusion from within the system,
>>>> saying all personnel dealing with sensitive material had been
>>>> carefully monitored.
>>>>
>>>> - - - - -
>>>>
>>>> =A0 =A0No chance of collusion ... of 'stealth' islamists ??? Yea, sure.
>>>> =A0 =A0I guess Pakistan has founds ways to read minds ...
>>>>
>>>> =A0 =A0It only takes a few.
>>>>
>>>> =A0 =A0Regardless, it was smart to bump up the alert level. Even
>>>> =A0 =A0if militants can't get their hands on finished armable
>>>> =A0 =A0weapons, a raid could yeild raw plutonium from which
>>>> =A0 =A0bombs or fissile devices ('dirty bombs') could be
>>>> =A0 =A0fabricated. Iran might be interested in acquiring
>>>> =A0 =A0refined plutonium as well - and willing to PAY huge
>>>> =A0 =A0amounts for the stuff.
>>>>
>>>> =A0 =A0The downside of any kind of alert at Pakistans nuclear
>>>> =A0 =A0bunkers is that it will make India nervous. At the
>>>> =A0 =A0present time, if a nuclear war is to break out anywhere
>>>> =A0 =A0in the world, it's still most likely between India
>>>> =A0 =A0and Pakistan - and the population densities and food
>>>> =A0 =A0situation mean even a 'small' nuclear war would kill
>>>> =A0 =A0untold millions.
>>>
>>>Then we should bomb Iran.

>>
>> Um ... I think Iraq and Afghanistan have proven that
>> this approach does NOT work worth a danm. Oh yea, just
>> yesterday, Russia re-asserted it's nuclear "strike first"
>> doctrine - and made a point of mentioning attacks on its
>> 'allies' being adequate provocation to vaporize armies.
>>
>>>Gosh, I hope one of those nukes doesn't make their way to NEW YORK
>>>CITY...

>>
>> Tel-Aviv more likely ...
>>
>> Of course when it comes to making money for the US military-
>> industrial complex, just the IDEA of nukes or the makings'
>> being "out there" somewhere ...
>>

>
>Brainwashed Idiot, the State of Israel is flooded with Russians that want to
>attack the Arabs because the Arabs are US Oil!


Um ... Russia has now entered the oil biz in a big way, soon
to be a major producer. As good capitalists, they'll sell to
whomever will buy - and that includes the USA. The OPEC
nations have a problem right now - China and India. Both
have vastly increased their exports and their demand is
likely to double and triple again in just a short time.
The only way to meet this demand is to build new petroleum
infrastructure - wells, pipelines, storage/handling facilities
and refineries. This is a HUGE capital investment - one many
of OPECs members don't want to get involved in.

Some of the big oil-producing states have been informed that
they're running low on actual crude too - Dubai, for example,
has been diversifying away from an oil-only economy as fast
as it can. Their ready reserves may be gone in just a decade,
even at current consumption rates. Enlarging their infrastructure
would never pay off.

This leaves Russia ... which now HAS the money to build lots
of infrastructure and has barely begun to tap its vast Siberian
reserves. Russia will be one of the major players in the oil
biz for the next 50 years at least. More important than even
Saudi Arabia. In 2060, if you buy a liter of oil, most likely
it will have "Made in the Russian Federation" printed on
the bottle.


>CNN tricked the Government into giving our enemies all of our Government's
>Criminal Records!
>
>It is mostly Private Corporate Sites and Computers sending our Personal
>Information overseas to our enemies, and many times it is Government
>Computers. I have personally done an experiment to find out just how much
>they are sending. Like, these dating Sites that have you fill out a bunch of
>things about yourself to try to match you with a mate, everything you enter
>ends up in our enemies hands. The same with News Media, Business, or
>Government Sites, that ask for your likes and dislikes, and that ask what
>products that you prefer to use.



Ah ... so ... meds ran out, did they now ?

Nevermind. I'm sure Hillarycare will make everything OK again ...

Pssst ! Aside from people who want you to buy frozen widgets,
NOBODY CARES about the details of YOUR life. An important
senators, yea. A big businessmans, yea. But YOURS ... no way.

Paranoia and egomania ... two sides of the same coin.
 
"B1ackwater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
news:479ba152.8081353@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), "Charlie Carnitas, AKA the
> pirate, \"rogue dick\"" <plantainhume@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 26, 11:01=A0am, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
>>> BBC
>>> Pakistan has raised the state of alert around its nuclear facilities
>>> amid concerns they could be targeted by Islamist militants.
>>>
>>> But a senior Pakistan military official said there had been no
>>> specific threat to the sites, and insisted that safeguards in place
>>> were fool proof.
>>>
>>> The official was speaking in a rare press briefing on the issue.
>>>
>>> It followed Western media reports warning that Pakistan's nuclear
>>> weapons could fall into the wrong hands.
>>>
>>> The Pakistani authorities have been angered by Western media reports
>>> speculating that the country?s nuclear arsenal could fall into the
>>> hands of al-Qaeda militants.
>>>
>>> The senior military official briefing foreign journalists said that
>>> the weapons were protected by an elaborate command and control system,
>>> and multiple levels of security.
>>>
>>> He acknowledged that Islamic militants had begun to attack army
>>> personnel in recent months, and that nuclear sites may also become a
>>> target.
>>>
>>> He said the state of alert around nuclear facilities had increased,
>>> but there had been no specific threats against them.
>>>
>>> The official said there was no way the Taleban or al-Qaeda could take
>>> over Pakistan?s estimated 50 nuclear warheads.
>>>
>>> And he dismissed the possibility of collusion from within the system,
>>> saying all personnel dealing with sensitive material had been
>>> carefully monitored.
>>>
>>> - - - - -
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0No chance of collusion ... of 'stealth' islamists ??? Yea, sure.
>>> =A0 =A0I guess Pakistan has founds ways to read minds ...
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0It only takes a few.
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0Regardless, it was smart to bump up the alert level. Even
>>> =A0 =A0if militants can't get their hands on finished armable
>>> =A0 =A0weapons, a raid could yeild raw plutonium from which
>>> =A0 =A0bombs or fissile devices ('dirty bombs') could be
>>> =A0 =A0fabricated. Iran might be interested in acquiring
>>> =A0 =A0refined plutonium as well - and willing to PAY huge
>>> =A0 =A0amounts for the stuff.
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0The downside of any kind of alert at Pakistans nuclear
>>> =A0 =A0bunkers is that it will make India nervous. At the
>>> =A0 =A0present time, if a nuclear war is to break out anywhere
>>> =A0 =A0in the world, it's still most likely between India
>>> =A0 =A0and Pakistan - and the population densities and food
>>> =A0 =A0situation mean even a 'small' nuclear war would kill
>>> =A0 =A0untold millions.

>>
>>Then we should bomb Iran.

>
> Um ... I think Iraq and Afghanistan have proven that
> this approach does NOT work worth a danm. Oh yea, just
> yesterday, Russia re-asserted it's nuclear "strike first"
> doctrine - and made a point of mentioning attacks on its
> 'allies' being adequate provocation to vaporize armies.
>
>>Gosh, I hope one of those nukes doesn't make their way to NEW YORK
>>CITY...

>
> Tel-Aviv more likely ...
>
> Of course when it comes to making money for the US military-
> industrial complex, just the IDEA of nukes or the makings'
> being "out there" somewhere ...
>


Brainwashed Idiot, the State of Israel is flooded with Russians that want to
attack the Arabs because the Arabs are US Oil!

CNN tricked the Government into giving our enemies all of our Government's
Criminal Records!

It is mostly Private Corporate Sites and Computers sending our Personal
Information overseas to our enemies, and many times it is Government
Computers. I have personally done an experiment to find out just how much
they are sending. Like, these dating Sites that have you fill out a bunch of
things about yourself to try to match you with a mate, everything you enter
ends up in our enemies hands. The same with News Media, Business, or
Government Sites, that ask for your likes and dislikes, and that ask what
products that you prefer to use.

It will all come back to haunt you, as our enemies try to take the US over
from within. They have enough data on everyone that has a computer, they can
use the system to set you up to look criminal, even if you have never broken
a law. That is what they intend to do with it, by using Criminals to help
them set people up, like they used the Mob organizations to do so in the
past.

That is why they want all of our Criminal Records Public, even if it is just
traffic tickets, because they can use these to blackmail and intimidate
these people into helping them. The US gave the enemies of the People of
these United States, a very powerful and deadly tool, making criminal
records public. They like using the Criminal Records and giving them to
Religious Fundamentalists too, to show others that if they do not cooperate,
they will get the same brutal treatment.

An outed CID Informant, or any other outed Agent, and even those that have
not yet been Publicly outed, has to live on guard at all times, because the
secret files that were recorded only in the White House and in the Pentagon,
for our personal security, have fallen into the wrong hands. So the
Communists use Domestic Criminals via the Internet to set us up much faster
now, than the ways that they did it before. Our lives and are Liberty are at
risk every moment, because some among the Tax and Spend Democrats, and some
among the Borrow until Economic Collapse Republicans, have betrayed us, and
because of their personal dislikes, the Communists use them, and use
personal attacks to set us up, and get rid of us for our common enemies!

Who would know better about this, than an outed CID Informant whom was outed
and kidnapped by Legal Foreign Exchanged Students from Africa, armed with
stolen US Weapons on American soil, in the 1980s?

Putin knows better than to mess with me straight up, he has my personal
History, my Military, my Criminal, my Religious, and my Medical Records on
his Computers, and so does Communist China, compliments of our Zionist
friends that use US Corporations to send all of our personal information to
our enemies!

I wonder if your on our enemies good guy list, or bad guy list? Well, the
next time that I get a date, and sneak into Moscow, or Tehran, or Shanghai,
or Jerusalem, I will check, because they are all against real Americans!

http://www.josephsbusiness.com/

In service of God and Country

Joseph
 
"B1ackwater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
news:479bb1fe.12349738@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:58:05 -0800, "Joseph R Loegering"
> <JosephLoegering@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"B1ackwater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
>>news:479ba152.8081353@news.east.earthlink.net...
>>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), "Charlie Carnitas, AKA the
>>> pirate, \"rogue dick\"" <plantainhume@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Jan 26, 11:01=A0am, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
>>>>> BBC
>>>>> Pakistan has raised the state of alert around its nuclear facilities
>>>>> amid concerns they could be targeted by Islamist militants.
>>>>>
>>>>> But a senior Pakistan military official said there had been no
>>>>> specific threat to the sites, and insisted that safeguards in place
>>>>> were fool proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> The official was speaking in a rare press briefing on the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> It followed Western media reports warning that Pakistan's nuclear
>>>>> weapons could fall into the wrong hands.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Pakistani authorities have been angered by Western media reports
>>>>> speculating that the country?s nuclear arsenal could fall into the
>>>>> hands of al-Qaeda militants.
>>>>>
>>>>> The senior military official briefing foreign journalists said that
>>>>> the weapons were protected by an elaborate command and control system,
>>>>> and multiple levels of security.
>>>>>
>>>>> He acknowledged that Islamic militants had begun to attack army
>>>>> personnel in recent months, and that nuclear sites may also become a
>>>>> target.
>>>>>
>>>>> He said the state of alert around nuclear facilities had increased,
>>>>> but there had been no specific threats against them.
>>>>>
>>>>> The official said there was no way the Taleban or al-Qaeda could take
>>>>> over Pakistan?s estimated 50 nuclear warheads.
>>>>>
>>>>> And he dismissed the possibility of collusion from within the system,
>>>>> saying all personnel dealing with sensitive material had been
>>>>> carefully monitored.
>>>>>
>>>>> - - - - -
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 =A0No chance of collusion ... of 'stealth' islamists ??? Yea,
>>>>> sure.
>>>>> =A0 =A0I guess Pakistan has founds ways to read minds ...
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 =A0It only takes a few.
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 =A0Regardless, it was smart to bump up the alert level. Even
>>>>> =A0 =A0if militants can't get their hands on finished armable
>>>>> =A0 =A0weapons, a raid could yeild raw plutonium from which
>>>>> =A0 =A0bombs or fissile devices ('dirty bombs') could be
>>>>> =A0 =A0fabricated. Iran might be interested in acquiring
>>>>> =A0 =A0refined plutonium as well - and willing to PAY huge
>>>>> =A0 =A0amounts for the stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 =A0The downside of any kind of alert at Pakistans nuclear
>>>>> =A0 =A0bunkers is that it will make India nervous. At the
>>>>> =A0 =A0present time, if a nuclear war is to break out anywhere
>>>>> =A0 =A0in the world, it's still most likely between India
>>>>> =A0 =A0and Pakistan - and the population densities and food
>>>>> =A0 =A0situation mean even a 'small' nuclear war would kill
>>>>> =A0 =A0untold millions.
>>>>
>>>>Then we should bomb Iran.
>>>
>>> Um ... I think Iraq and Afghanistan have proven that
>>> this approach does NOT work worth a danm. Oh yea, just
>>> yesterday, Russia re-asserted it's nuclear "strike first"
>>> doctrine - and made a point of mentioning attacks on its
>>> 'allies' being adequate provocation to vaporize armies.
>>>
>>>>Gosh, I hope one of those nukes doesn't make their way to NEW YORK
>>>>CITY...
>>>
>>> Tel-Aviv more likely ...
>>>
>>> Of course when it comes to making money for the US military-
>>> industrial complex, just the IDEA of nukes or the makings'
>>> being "out there" somewhere ...
>>>

>>
>>Brainwashed Idiot, the State of Israel is flooded with Russians that want
>>to
>>attack the Arabs because the Arabs are US Oil!

>
> Um ... Russia has now entered the oil biz in a big way, soon
> to be a major producer. As good capitalists, they'll sell to
> whomever will buy - and that includes the USA. The OPEC
> nations have a problem right now - China and India. Both
> have vastly increased their exports and their demand is
> likely to double and triple again in just a short time.
> The only way to meet this demand is to build new petroleum
> infrastructure - wells, pipelines, storage/handling facilities
> and refineries. This is a HUGE capital investment - one many
> of OPECs members don't want to get involved in.
>
> Some of the big oil-producing states have been informed that
> they're running low on actual crude too - Dubai, for example,
> has been diversifying away from an oil-only economy as fast
> as it can. Their ready reserves may be gone in just a decade,
> even at current consumption rates. Enlarging their infrastructure
> would never pay off.
>
> This leaves Russia ... which now HAS the money to build lots
> of infrastructure and has barely begun to tap its vast Siberian
> reserves. Russia will be one of the major players in the oil
> biz for the next 50 years at least. More important than even
> Saudi Arabia. In 2060, if you buy a liter of oil, most likely
> it will have "Made in the Russian Federation" printed on
> the bottle.
>
>
>>CNN tricked the Government into giving our enemies all of our Government's
>>Criminal Records!
>>
>>It is mostly Private Corporate Sites and Computers sending our Personal
>>Information overseas to our enemies, and many times it is Government
>>Computers. I have personally done an experiment to find out just how much
>>they are sending. Like, these dating Sites that have you fill out a bunch
>>of
>>things about yourself to try to match you with a mate, everything you
>>enter
>>ends up in our enemies hands. The same with News Media, Business, or
>>Government Sites, that ask for your likes and dislikes, and that ask what
>>products that you prefer to use.

>
>
> Ah ... so ... meds ran out, did they now ?
>
> Nevermind. I'm sure Hillarycare will make everything OK again ...
>
> Pssst ! Aside from people who want you to buy frozen widgets,
> NOBODY CARES about the details of YOUR life. An important
> senators, yea. A big businessmans, yea. But YOURS ... no way.
>
> Paranoia and egomania ... two sides of the same coin.
>


Sold out to our enemies by a Zionist!

You mean Corporations Controlled by Communist Atheist Zionists that are
Pretending to be Jews and Christians, so that they can use the News Media to
Brainwash the Public into helping them destroy the Arabs for the Communist
Soviets and Communist Chinese, hey fools, the Arabs are our source of Oil
for National Security. You are a big bunch of suckers, the Communists own
you and control you everywhere you turn, and when someone realizes that,
they scream he is crazy, lock him up and drug him with mind control drugs
that destroy your ability to think, and eventually drive you to committing
suicide or murder suicide!

Betty Crocker Recipes, Balloon Fish.

We have had Members of the C.A.L.M. helping others to post emergency
procedures for surviving a Nuclear attack on US Soil.

Just Google these and start getting ready, the balloon is being filled, to
go up for Nuclear War.

Nuclear Attack Survival

Nuclear Decontamination



Also check the Internet Detective Sites to see what our enemies have on you,
even if you have no criminal record. Check to see what Credit Information
they have on you, it was all setup by our enemies so that they could use it
to control you, and or to destroy you one way or another. Among the Sites
giving our records to our Enemies are these Family Tree organizations the
trace your ancestry, like the Nazis and Soviets did to the Jews.



CNN tricked the Government into giving our enemies all of our Government's
Criminal Records!



It is Private Corporate Sites and Computers sending our Personal Information
overseas to our enemies. I have personally done and experiment to find out
just how much they are sending. These dating Sites that have you fill out a
bunch of things about yourself to try to match you with a mate, everything
you enter ends up in our enemies hands. The same with business Sites that
ask for your likes and dislikes, and that ask what products that you prefer
to use.

It will all come back to haunt you, as our enemies try to take the US over
from within. They have enough data on everyone that has a computer, they can
use the system to set you up to look criminal, even if you have never broken
a law. That is what they intend to do with it, by using Criminals to help
them set people up, like they used the Mob organizations to do so in the
past.

That is why they want all of our Criminal Records Public, even if it is just
traffic tickets, because they can use these to blackmail and intimidate
these people into helping them. The US gave the enemies of the People of
these United States, a very powerful and deadly tool, making criminal
records public. They like using the Criminal Records and giving them to
Religious Fundamentalists too, to show others that if they do not cooperate,
they will get the same brutal treatment.

An outed CID Informant, or any other outed Agent, and even those that have
not yet been Publicly outed, has to live on guard at all times, because the
secret files that were recorded only in the White House and in the Pentagon,
for our personal security, have fallen into the wrong hands. So the
Communists use Domestic Criminals via the Internet to set us up much faster
now, than the ways that they did it before. Our lives and are Liberty are at
risk every moment, because some among the Tax and Spend Democrats, and some
among the Borrow until Economic Collapse Republicans, have betrayed us, and
because of their personal dislikes, the Communists use them, and use
personal attacks to set us up, and get rid of us for our common enemies!

Who would know better about this, than an outed CID Informant whom was outed
and kidnapped by Legal Foreign Exchanged Students from Africa, armed with
stolen US Weapons on American soil, in the 1980s?

Putin knows better than to mess with me straight up, he has my personal
History, my Military, my Criminal, my Religious, and my Medical Records on
his Computers, and so does Communist China, compliments of our Zionist
friends that use US Corporations to send all of our personal information to
our enemies!

I wonder if your on our enemies good guy list, or bad guy list? Well, the
next time that I get a date, and sneak into Moscow, or Tehran, or Shanghai,
or Jerusalem, I will check, because they are all against real Americans!

http://www.josephsbusiness.com/

In service of God and Country

Joseph
 
The tired tirade of Pakistan's nuclear assets falling into the wrong
hands continues. The most recent comment in regard to this appeared on
the BBC news website on January 23 with this news channel's Shoaib
Hasan questioning whether the allegedly forty or so nuclear warheads
were sufficiently secured against an Al Qaeda takeover. Despite
Pakistan's Foreign Office dismissing this and similar submissions as
"outlandish musings" given the multi-layered security arrangements in
place to protect the arsenal, western media circles persist with
questioning the ability of Pakistan's security apparatus to safeguard
it. This is slighting, not just to the Pakistani personnel deputed to
sentry the arsenal, but also to the facility in the US where they are
said to have received their training. In addition questions concerning
Pakistan's sovereignty are raised. Then there are the matters of Al
Qaeda's capabilities to battle the Pakistan army, which stands as the
ultimate sentinel over the bombs, and the terrorist organization's
potential to acquire a delivery system which might pose the greater
threat. All in all it would appear that the repeated reference to the
vulnerability of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has less to do with Bin
Laden acquiring the bomb and more with facilitating NATO's presence in
Pakistan.
 
Back
Top