PING MIMUS.

metro-golden-meower · Dec 28, 2008

it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

mimus · Dec 28, 2008

On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

didn't add much to the overall story or any notable mind-bogglingnesses).

--

tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Never underestimate the value of slime.

< _The Making of_ Tremors

metro-golden-meower · Dec 29, 2008

On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>

>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>

>Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>didn't add much to the overall story or any notable mind-bogglingnesses).

whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

mimus · Dec 29, 2008

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>

>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>

>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>

> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>

> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

--

tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Never underestimate the value of slime.

< _The Making of_ Tremors

david hillstrom · Dec 29, 2008

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>

>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>> wrote:

>>

>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>

>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>

>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>

>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>

>But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>

>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>

>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>

>Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>

>Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

Earthworms Perform Great Fallacio, Says Man At Scene.

--

dave hillstrom xrbj

mimus · Dec 29, 2008

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:02:04 -0500, david hillstrom wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>

>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>

>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>

>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>

>> But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>>

>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>

>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>

>> Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>>

>> Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>

> Earthworms Perform Great Fallacio, Says Man At Scene.

They botched a logical argument?

--

tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

See _Laws of Form_, Chapters 1 through 10 and Appendix 2,

first backward and then forward.

metro-golden-meower · Dec 29, 2008

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>

>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>> wrote:

>>

>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>

>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>

>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>

>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>

>But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>

>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>

>Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

that film as kid.

>Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

mimus · Dec 29, 2008

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:15:57 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>

>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>

>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>

>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>

>> But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>

> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

Naw, that's great. Remember, I used to be a stage-hand. And workin' with

worms would be a great gig. Hilarious.

Plus you get the interviews with the actors and so on (Reba was wryly

hilarious about her "big break" in movin' pitchers).

>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>

>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>

>> Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>

> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

> that film as kid.

I haven't even seen, er, _THEM_?

>> Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>

> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

Eh, unless too cheesy, without saving grace of being (a) intentionally so

or (b) so much so that it achieves _Plan 9_ stature . . . .

--

tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

"You are either insane or a fool."

"I am a sanitary inspector."

< _Maske: Thaery_

Tim Weaver · Dec 30, 2008

metro-golden-meower wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>

>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>

>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>

>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>

>>But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>

> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>

>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>

>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>

>>Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>

> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

> that film as kid.

He was also in the remake of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers".

>>Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>

> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

No.

--

Tim Weaver

I know you believe you understand what you think I said,

but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not

what I meant.

metro-golden-meower · Dec 30, 2008

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:13:18 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver

<tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:

>metro-golden-meower wrote:

>

>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>> wrote:

>>

>>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>>

>>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>>

>>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>>

>>>But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>>

>> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

>> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>>

>>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>>

>>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>>>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>>

>>>Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>>

>> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

>> that film as kid.

>

>He was also in the remake of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers".

spock sure does get about.

>>>Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>>

>> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

>

>No.

scardie cat.

metro-golden-meower · Dec 30, 2008

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:25:30 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:15:57 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>

>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>> wrote:

>>

>>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>>

>>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>>

>>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>>

>>> But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>>

>> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

>> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>

>Naw, that's great. Remember, I used to be a stage-hand. And workin' with

>worms would be a great gig. Hilarious.

you have a different perspective of it to me, so you would find it of

interest. i've seen a few of the making of things, but i found them to

be pretty much the same thing when it came down to cgi. which a lot of

films seem to come down to now.

>Plus you get the interviews with the actors and so on (Reba was wryly

>hilarious about her "big break" in movin' pitchers).

i guess i'm just a git. i just want to see them perform.

>>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>>

>>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>>>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>>

>>> Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>>

>> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

>> that film as kid.

>

>I haven't even seen, er, _THEM_?

**** what! you _HAVE_ to watch this film. its a classic. you'll love

it.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047573/

>>> Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>>

>> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

>

>Eh, unless too cheesy, without saving grace of being (a) intentionally so

>or (b) so much so that it achieves _Plan 9_ stature . . . .

i think the thing about tremors was it was played out as a b film and

no pretentions about it. i think that is why it works so well and is

so enjoyable. its a propper monster flick with no pretentions of being

more than that.

mimus · Dec 30, 2008

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:10:43 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:25:30 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:15:57 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>

>>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>>>

>>>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>>>

>>>> But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>>>

>>> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

>>> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>>

>> Naw, that's great. Remember, I used to be a stage-hand. And workin'

>> with worms would be a great gig. Hilarious.

>

> you have a different perspective of it to me, so you would find it of

> interest. i've seen a few of the making of things, but i found them to

> be pretty much the same thing when it came down to cgi. which a lot of

> films seem to come down to now.

Um. Not all. There were several physical worms used in the first movie

alone, ranging in size from hand-puppet (on a miniature stage, set to

exactly resemble a larger set) to great-white-shark-sized.

I want one-a the hand-puppets.

Just like, when I saw once a picture of the guy who did the alien in

_Alien_ standing there in a suit with the alien's head tucked under his

arm, mouth hanging open and internal proboscis slid laxly forward, teeth

'n' all (the alien's, I mean), I wanted an alien-head too.

>> Plus you get the interviews with the actors and so on (Reba was wryly

>> hilarious about her "big break" in movin' pitchers).

>

> i guess i'm just a git. i just want to see them perform.

>

>>>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>>>

>>>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it

>>>>> on as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>>>

>>>> Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>>>

>>> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

>>> that film as kid.

>>

>> I haven't even seen, er, _THEM_?

>

> **** what! you _HAVE_ to watch this film. its a classic. you'll love it.

>

> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047573/

>

>>>> Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>>>

>>> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

>>

>> Eh, unless too cheesy, without saving grace of being (a) intentionally

>> so or (b) so much so that it achieves _Plan 9_ stature . . . .

>

> i think the thing about tremors was it was played out as a b film and no

> pretentions about it. i think that is why it works so well and is so

> enjoyable. its a propper monster flick with no pretentions of being more

> than that.

Well, and a brilliant cast-- an astounding cast, really-- that worked

beautifully as a troupe together in the first movie helped kick-start the

series, although the cast didn't stay together <sniff>.

--

tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Let's get the **** out of here while we can still pass

our Rorschasch tests.

< _The Last Happy Hour_

Tim Weaver · Dec 30, 2008

metro-golden-meower wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:13:18 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver

> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>

>>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>>>

>>>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>>>

>>>>But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>>>

>>> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

>>> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>>>

>>>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>>>

>>>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it on

>>>>> as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>>>

>>>>Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>>>

>>> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

>>> that film as kid.

>>

>>He was also in the remake of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers".

>

> spock sure does get about.

Vulcans can move, baby.

>>>>Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>>>

>>> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

>>

>>No.

>

> scardie cat.

They make my nut sack shrivel up.

--

Tim Weaver

I know you believe you understand what you think I said,

but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not

what I meant.

metro-golden-meower · Jan 1, 2009

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:49:18 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:10:43 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>

>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:25:30 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>> wrote:

>>

>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:15:57 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>

>>>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:13:14 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:38:05 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:53:09 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:36:55 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> it looks like there is going to be a 5th tremors film made!!!!!!1!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Hmf. That means my "Attack Pack" DVD set will be out of date.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> that's something that i've allways had a problem with with box sets.

>>>>>> you just know somone will make a new film or publish a new book.

>>>>>

>>>>> But you get extras, like _The Making of_ Tremors", etc.

>>>>

>>>> the making of things never interest me. i find they ruin a films

>>>> entertainment value if i know how every **** thing was done.

>>>

>>> Naw, that's great. Remember, I used to be a stage-hand. And workin'

>>> with worms would be a great gig. Hilarious.

>>

>> you have a different perspective of it to me, so you would find it of

>> interest. i've seen a few of the making of things, but i found them to

>> be pretty much the same thing when it came down to cgi. which a lot of

>> films seem to come down to now.

>

>Um. Not all. There were several physical worms used in the first movie

>alone, ranging in size from hand-puppet (on a miniature stage, set to

>exactly resemble a larger set) to great-white-shark-sized.

cool a propperly made film and no cgi cheating!

>I want one-a the hand-puppets.

>

>Just like, when I saw once a picture of the guy who did the alien in

>_Alien_ standing there in a suit with the alien's head tucked under his

>arm, mouth hanging open and internal proboscis slid laxly forward, teeth

>'n' all (the alien's, I mean), I wanted an alien-head too.

a frind of mine has one of the face huggers from the first alien film.

********.

personaly, i'd love a full sized dalek (i have the plans somewhere how

to make one, only one part is hard to get hold of, incredibly hard to

get hold of in fact) and the alien from the first alien film.

>>> Plus you get the interviews with the actors and so on (Reba was wryly

>>> hilarious about her "big break" in movin' pitchers).

>>

>> i guess i'm just a git. i just want to see them perform.

>>

>>>>>>> 1, 2 and 4 are excellent, so I trust the guys doing it to do a

>>>>>>> decent Numbah Five (I thought 3 was kind of weak-ish-- just really

>>>>>>> didn't add much to the overall story or any notable

>>>>>>> mind-bogglingnesses).

>>>>>>

>>>>>> whenever its on tv and there is nothing else on, knoxy and i put it

>>>>>> on as you can never go wrong with a propper b movie.

>>>>>

>>>>> Well, yeah, or with worms, either.

>>>>

>>>> i'm such a geek. did you know that lenord nimoy is in _THEM_? i loved

>>>> that film as kid.

>>>

>>> I haven't even seen, er, _THEM_?

>>

>> **** what! you _HAVE_ to watch this film. its a classic. you'll love it.

>>

>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047573/

>>

>>>>> Especially big rapidly-evolving carnivorous ones.

>>>>

>>>> anything big and carniverous in a b film is worth watching out for.

>>>

>>> Eh, unless too cheesy, without saving grace of being (a) intentionally

>>> so or (b) so much so that it achieves _Plan 9_ stature . . . .

>>

>> i think the thing about tremors was it was played out as a b film and no

>> pretentions about it. i think that is why it works so well and is so

>> enjoyable. its a propper monster flick with no pretentions of being more

>> than that.

>

>Well, and a brilliant cast-- an astounding cast, really-- that worked

>beautifully as a troupe together in the first movie helped kick-start the

>series, although the cast didn't stay together <sniff>.

i have to agree. the cast was supperb.

PING MIMUS.

metro-golden-meower

Guest

mimus

Guest

metro-golden-meower

Guest

mimus

Guest

david hillstrom

Guest

mimus

Guest

metro-golden-meower

Guest

mimus

Guest

Tim Weaver

Guest

metro-golden-meower

Guest

metro-golden-meower

Guest

mimus

Guest

Tim Weaver

Guest

metro-golden-meower

Guest