R
Raymond
Guest
Pledge For America
How to start a war.
"False flag terrorism" is defined as a government attacking its own
people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against
the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments,
corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as
if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived
from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the
flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not
limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used
in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would
hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own
navy. Because the enemy's flag, instead of the flag of the real
country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a "false flag"
attack.
There are many examples of false flag attacks through history. For
example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler,
faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on
the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. And it has now been
persuasively argued -- as shown, for example, in this History Channel
video -- that Nazis set fire to their own government building and
blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it
is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the
clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified
Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.
And in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating
in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic
facilities, then left
behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the
bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the
bombers). Israel's Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal,
along with the entire Israeli government. See also this confirmation.
And the Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia
in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into
power (see also this short essay and this report).
And the Turkish government has been caught bombing its own and blaming
it on a rebel group in order to justify a crackdown on that group.
Indeed, even Muslim governments appear to play this game. For example,
the well-respected former Indonesian president said that the
government had a role in the Bali bombings.
This sounds nuts, right? You've never heard of this "false flag
terrorism", where a government attacks its own people then blames
others in order to justify its goals, right? And you are cynical of
the statements discussed above?
Please take a look at these historical quotes:
"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he
first appears he is a protector." - Plato
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise
of fighting a foreign enemy." - U.S. President James Madison
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people
harder than a fear of sudden death". - Adolph Hitler
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the
leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought
to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to
tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack
of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in
any country." - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
"The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts
of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal
security is threatened". - Josef Stalin
But NOT the U.S.
It is logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out
false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the
Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so.
Well, as documented by the New York Times, Iranians working for the
C.I.A. in the 1950's posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran
in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected
president (see also this essay).
And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian
judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO, with
the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy
and blamed the communists, in order to rally people's support for
their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one
participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack
civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people
far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They
were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to
the state to ask for greater security."
Moreover, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the
American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up
AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of
airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and
then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of
Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the
following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this
interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's
World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
But Al-Qaeda is Different
You might say "But Al-Qaeda is different -- powerful, organized, and
out to get us", right? Maybe, but take a look at this Los Angeles
Times Article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled "The Power of
Nightmares", which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly
overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype). And a
former National Security Adviser told the Senate that the war on
terror is "a mythical historical narrative".
And did you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried
out the 1993 world trade center bombing, but had -- at the last minute
-- cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake
powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator's strong wishes
(summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view)? See also this
TV news report.
And did you know that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden
two months before 9/11?
And did you know that, many years after the FBI first stated that it
did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11, the
agency apparently still does not have any hard evidence linking Bin
Laden to the crime (see also this partial confirmation by the
Washington Post)?
And did you see the statement by the CIA commander in charge of the
capture that the U.S. LET Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan?
And have you heard that the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along
with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a
weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the
Fort Detrick military base? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated
that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; and see
this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer; and this
statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and
this one). It is also interesting that the only congress people mailed
anthrax-containing letters were key democrats, and that the attacks
occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot
Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into
passing that act without even reading it. And it might be coincidence,
but White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before
the Anthrax attacks occurred.
Even the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any
measure the US has long used terrorism. In '78-79 the Senate was
trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every
version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in
violation"(the audio is here)
Why Does This Matter?
Please read what the following very smart people are saying:
A former prominent republican U.S. congressman stated that the U.S. is
close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the current
administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.
Current republican U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated that the
government "is determined to have martial law", and that the
government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will
accept the man on the white horse". He also said "a contrived Gulf of
Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack
on Iran".
A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist
act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to
justify war against that nation.
The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan
administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former
editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and
Scripps Howard News Service, has said:
"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and
is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging
"terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?"
"If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle
East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to
conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger
the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of
"national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the
administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed
without hindrance."
(see also this even stronger statement).
A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential
Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents
stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would
lead to martial law. He went on to say:
"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big
violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the
masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because
it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow
them to get what they want."
The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play
fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events
themselves in order to rally people behind the flag.
General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in
the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor
of a military form of government".
Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if
there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what
he wants", which will include a dictatorship.
The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the
Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now
saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S.
government.
And a member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very
real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag
terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain
complete control domestically.
NEXT: The Pledge
http://pledgeforamerica.com/2.html
How to start a war.
"False flag terrorism" is defined as a government attacking its own
people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against
the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments,
corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as
if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived
from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the
flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not
limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used
in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would
hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own
navy. Because the enemy's flag, instead of the flag of the real
country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a "false flag"
attack.
There are many examples of false flag attacks through history. For
example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler,
faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on
the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. And it has now been
persuasively argued -- as shown, for example, in this History Channel
video -- that Nazis set fire to their own government building and
blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it
is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the
clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified
Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.
And in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating
in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic
facilities, then left
behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the
bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the
bombers). Israel's Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal,
along with the entire Israeli government. See also this confirmation.
And the Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia
in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into
power (see also this short essay and this report).
And the Turkish government has been caught bombing its own and blaming
it on a rebel group in order to justify a crackdown on that group.
Indeed, even Muslim governments appear to play this game. For example,
the well-respected former Indonesian president said that the
government had a role in the Bali bombings.
This sounds nuts, right? You've never heard of this "false flag
terrorism", where a government attacks its own people then blames
others in order to justify its goals, right? And you are cynical of
the statements discussed above?
Please take a look at these historical quotes:
"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he
first appears he is a protector." - Plato
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise
of fighting a foreign enemy." - U.S. President James Madison
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people
harder than a fear of sudden death". - Adolph Hitler
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the
leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought
to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to
tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack
of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in
any country." - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
"The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts
of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal
security is threatened". - Josef Stalin
But NOT the U.S.
It is logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out
false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the
Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so.
Well, as documented by the New York Times, Iranians working for the
C.I.A. in the 1950's posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran
in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected
president (see also this essay).
And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian
judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO, with
the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy
and blamed the communists, in order to rally people's support for
their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one
participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack
civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people
far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They
were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to
the state to ask for greater security."
Moreover, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the
American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up
AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of
airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and
then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of
Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the
following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this
interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's
World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
But Al-Qaeda is Different
You might say "But Al-Qaeda is different -- powerful, organized, and
out to get us", right? Maybe, but take a look at this Los Angeles
Times Article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled "The Power of
Nightmares", which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly
overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype). And a
former National Security Adviser told the Senate that the war on
terror is "a mythical historical narrative".
And did you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried
out the 1993 world trade center bombing, but had -- at the last minute
-- cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake
powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator's strong wishes
(summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view)? See also this
TV news report.
And did you know that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden
two months before 9/11?
And did you know that, many years after the FBI first stated that it
did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11, the
agency apparently still does not have any hard evidence linking Bin
Laden to the crime (see also this partial confirmation by the
Washington Post)?
And did you see the statement by the CIA commander in charge of the
capture that the U.S. LET Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan?
And have you heard that the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along
with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a
weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the
Fort Detrick military base? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated
that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; and see
this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer; and this
statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and
this one). It is also interesting that the only congress people mailed
anthrax-containing letters were key democrats, and that the attacks
occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot
Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into
passing that act without even reading it. And it might be coincidence,
but White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before
the Anthrax attacks occurred.
Even the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any
measure the US has long used terrorism. In '78-79 the Senate was
trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every
version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in
violation"(the audio is here)
Why Does This Matter?
Please read what the following very smart people are saying:
A former prominent republican U.S. congressman stated that the U.S. is
close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the current
administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.
Current republican U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated that the
government "is determined to have martial law", and that the
government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will
accept the man on the white horse". He also said "a contrived Gulf of
Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack
on Iran".
A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist
act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to
justify war against that nation.
The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan
administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former
editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and
Scripps Howard News Service, has said:
"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and
is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging
"terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?"
"If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle
East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to
conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger
the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of
"national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the
administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed
without hindrance."
(see also this even stronger statement).
A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential
Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents
stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would
lead to martial law. He went on to say:
"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big
violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the
masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because
it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow
them to get what they want."
The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play
fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events
themselves in order to rally people behind the flag.
General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in
the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor
of a military form of government".
Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if
there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what
he wants", which will include a dictatorship.
The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the
Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now
saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S.
government.
And a member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very
real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag
terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain
complete control domestically.
NEXT: The Pledge
http://pledgeforamerica.com/2.html