Question on Reflectionist

Status
Not open for further replies.

FireHawk

New member
Reflectionist was banned recently without notification on why. He would like to know for what and know why he didn't get notification. So could a mod please explain.
 

Clogz

Active Members
Though asking that question with this thread is not the wrong thing to do, you may get a faster awnser if you PM one of the mods. Just my advice.
 

Clogz

Active Members
He's posting this because several people want to know. Including myself.
I understand that, but the mods are not really keen on giving a Public Service Announcement letting everyone know who got banned now, and why.

 

Cyro

New member
I understand that' date=' but the mods are not really keen on giving a Public Service Announcement letting everyone know who got banned now, and why.[/quote']
Why not? ....
 

Cyro

New member
Who knows...

Might be diggin my grave here.... but honestly, no one can seem to answer this question. Vash can't answer... none of the elites can, and no official announcement has been made.

The ban was definatly misplaced IMO. A suspension maybe, but outright banning him without telling why.... -_-

 

misery

New member
The mods have never given the public a reason as to why they banned a user, at least as far as I remember. I'm not completely sure why, lol.

It was obviously for a justifiable reason though.. they all have to come to an agreement, and they aren't all going to agree if it's not for good reason.

 

woodyloveslinkin

New member
The mods have never given the public a reason as to why they banned a user' date=' at least as far as I remember. I'm not completely sure why, lol. [/quote']
Wrong. They did it when they banned Snipervirus and Treeves.
 

misery

New member
Wrong. They did it when they banned Snipervirus and Treeves.
I specifically remember making a thread asking why Treeves was banned, and it was locked and we never got an answer. I don't remember if that was the first time or the second, although I'm pretty sure it was the first. Either way, every other member has never been given a reason. Except for lpp, lol. ATL did in her journal.

I don't remember all that well though, I just know that reasons are not often given. Although it doesn't really matter, like I said, it's obviously for a good reason, or all of the mods would not agree on it.

 

acdcrules04

New member
Hmmm... Maybe it was just one thing. Perhaps it was just his overall attitude while posting. He was a cool guy sometimes but he was really rude most of the time. Maybe the mods just got tired of it. IDK

Side note: I have no idea what IMO means. Anyone care to explain it to me?

 

shadowfax1007

New member
Constant rudeness maybe? - which is becoming rather common around LPF now days.

Who knows....but i think if a member is banned

a) the public should be told who is banned

b) the person who was banned, deserves a resonable reason as to why they were banned. The public doesnt have to know, unless the banned person tells.

 

acdcrules04

New member
Ahh... Thanks Matt

EDIT: IDK. Maybe the mods just like to keep stuff like this to themselfs. It's not like it's going to kill us if we don't know. Yes, I think the person who was banned should be told why, but as for the other members, I don't think so. If the person who was banned wanted to tell people he/she could tell the public through aim or msn.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom