Re: B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber Crash Video

  • Thread starter Bertie the Bunyip
  • Start date
B

Bertie the Bunyip

Guest
debco99@nt.org (DaveB) wrote in news:484b31b1.10455013

@news.dslextreme.com:


> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 23:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip <T@ld.you>



> wrote:



>



>>Le Chaud Lapin <jaibuduvin@gmail.com> wrote in news:ed9fb806-990a-


4a04-


>>8ac9-d7318d2c8bdf@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:



>>



>>> On Jun 7, 3:57?pm, Larry Dighera <LDigh...@att.net> wrote:



>>>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:10:13 -0700 (PDT), Le Chaud Lapin



>>>> <jaibudu...@gmail.com> wrote in



>>>> <61c1a6af-039c-4061-8d8a-97de48696...


@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>:


>>>>



>>>> >On Jun 7, 12:02?pm, Larry Dighera <LDigh...@att.net> wrote:



>>>> >> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT), Le Chaud Lapin



>>>> >> <jaibudu...@gmail.com> wrote in



>>>> >> >"Step 38...when flying $1.4 billion aircraft and computer warns



>>you



>>>> >> >that something is wrong, listen to it."



>>>>



>>>> >> What you suggest that the pilots may have done as a result of


that


>>>> >> computer warning?



>>>>



>>>> >Abort takeoff?



>>>>



>>>> Is that the appropriate response when the computer issues that



>>warning



>>>> message? ?



>>>>



>>>> It appears that they were just about to leave the runway when the



>>>> computer issued that warning. ?



>>>>



>>>> Did adequate runway remain to abort the takeoff ?



>>>



>>> Hmm...that's a good question. Not being a pilot, I cannot say, but



>>> from the video, the firestreak of the crash looks extremely long,


even


>>> for a 300,000lb+ aircraft. Also, it stated that IAS of 120mph was,


in


>>> fact, much less, so conservatively, we could say 110mph.



>>>



>>> Not sure if that is slow enough, but again, that runway looks very



>>> long.



>>>



>>



>>



>>You have no idea what you're talking about. You're certainly not



>>qualified to comment on the decisions made by a B2 crew.



>>



>>



>>



>>Bertie



>>



>>



>>



>>Bertie



>>



> and I suppose you are?



> Daveb



>


Nope. Never flew one. I know enough to know he's not qualified to say

why Mary Jane fell off her tricycle, though.

Bertie

 
B

Bertie the Bunyip

Guest
"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@***.^net> wrote in news:JHO2k.4739$t07.4088

@newsfe22.lga:


>



> "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message



> news:g2g8uo$h6b$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...



>>



>> Nope. Never flew one. I know enough to know he's not qualified to say



>> why Mary Jane fell off her tricycle, though.



>>



>>



>



> I would seriously doubt it, unless you caused it. But then you would lie



> about it.



>



>



>


Oh no! The k00k is caling me a liar again! My rep!

Bwawahwhahwhahwhahhahhahhahha!

Bertie

 
J

Jonathan Hartley

Guest
Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell

you why.

 
A

Aratzio

Guest
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,

"Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret

probation for writing:


>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>you why.



>


The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to

provide lift.

 
A

ah

Guest
Aratzio wrote:


> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



> probation for writing:



>



>>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>>you why.



>>



>



> The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



> provide lift.


Cranberry juice?

--

/\_/|

=a-h=

 
A

Aratzio

Guest
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:59:03 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,

ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:


>Aratzio wrote:



>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



>> probation for writing:



>>



>>>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>>>you why.



>>>



>>



>> The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



>> provide lift.



>



>Cranberry juice?


Dirt

 
S

Steve Hix

Guest
In article <4952e8dd$0$67957$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,

ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:


> Aratzio wrote:



> > On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



> > "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



> > probation for writing:



> >



> >>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can



> >>tell



> >>you why.



> >>



> >



> > The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



> > provide lift.



>



> Cranberry juice?


Guam.

 
J

Jonathan Hartley

Guest
The B2 crash started with a clogged pitot tube, which led to computer error

and a stall. If you watch the video closely, you can detect the stall

situation. More detail?

"Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> wrote in message

news:jXo4l.12187$dc4.3703@bignews2.bellsouth.net...


> Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can



> tell you why.



>


 
A

ah

Guest
Aratzio wrote:


> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:59:03 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:



>



>>Aratzio wrote:



>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>>> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



>>> probation for writing:



>>>



>>>>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>>>>you why.



>>>>



>>>



>>> The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



>>> provide lift.



>>



>>Cranberry juice?



>



> Dirt


That tears it.

--

ah

 
A

ah

Guest
Steve Hix wrote:


> In article <4952e8dd$0$67957$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,



> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:



>



>> Aratzio wrote:



>> > On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>> > "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



>> > probation for writing:



>> >



>> >>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can



>> >>tell



>> >>you why.



>> >>



>> >



>> > The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



>> > provide lift.



>>



>> Cranberry juice?



>



> Guam.


Lies!

--

ah

 
A

ah

Guest
Jonathan Hartley wrote:


> The B2 crash started with a clogged pitot tube, which led to computer error



> and a stall. If you watch the video closely, you can detect the stall



> situation. More detail?



>



> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> wrote in message



> news:jXo4l.12187$dc4.3703@bignews2.bellsouth.net...



>> Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can



>> tell you why.



>>



>



>


No; thanks.

--

ah

 
A

Aratzio

Guest
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:19:09 -0500, in the land of

alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got

double secret probation for writing:


>Aratzio wrote:



>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:59:03 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:



>>



>>>Aratzio wrote:



>>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>>>> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



>>>> probation for writing:



>>>>



>>>>>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>>>>>you why.



>>>>>



>>>>



>>>> The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



>>>> provide lift.



>>>



>>>Cranberry juice?



>>



>> Dirt



>



>That tears it.


If it were a regular metal plane it would have crumpled.

 
A

ah

Guest
Aratzio wrote:


> On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:19:09 -0500, in the land of



> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got



> double secret probation for writing:



>



>>Aratzio wrote:



>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:59:03 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:



>>>



>>>>Aratzio wrote:



>>>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>>>>> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



>>>>> probation for writing:



>>>>>



>>>>>>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>>>>>>you why.



>>>>>>



>>>>>



>>>>> The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



>>>>> provide lift.



>>>>



>>>>Cranberry juice?



>>>



>>> Dirt



>>



>>That tears it.



>



> If it were a regular metal plane it would have crumpled.


Cost-cutting is for the birds.

--

ah

 
A

Aratzio

Guest
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 06:18:21 -0500, in the land of

alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got

double secret probation for writing:


>Aratzio wrote:



>> On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:19:09 -0500, in the land of



>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got



>> double secret probation for writing:



>>



>>>Aratzio wrote:



>>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:59:03 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:



>>>>



>>>>>Aratzio wrote:



>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:29:14 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,



>>>>>> "Jonathan Hartley" <jonathan.hartley@att.net> got double secret



>>>>>> probation for writing:



>>>>>>



>>>>>>>Are we still interested in knowing why the plane crashed? If so, I can tell



>>>>>>>you why.



>>>>>>>



>>>>>>



>>>>>> The medium through which it was attempting to fly was too thick to



>>>>>> provide lift.



>>>>>



>>>>>Cranberry juice?



>>>>



>>>> Dirt



>>>



>>>That tears it.



>>



>> If it were a regular metal plane it would have crumpled.



>



>Cost-cutting is for the birds.


Billion dollar baby.

 
Top Bottom