?
???hw??f
Guest
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Naked Gonad <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 8:33 pm, snuhw...@netscape.net (???hw??f) wrote:
> > Naked Gonad <bodro...@yahoo.co.uk> clouded the waters of pure thought with:
> >
> > > On Mar 24, 4:27 pm, =A7=F1=FChw=A4=A3f <snuhw...@netscape.net> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > > > Naked Gonad <bodro...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > Unfortunately, GW Bush has made your beautiful country, pariahs
> > > > > of the world. We (Britain) got sucked into it because, (as friends),
> > > > > we
> > > > > felt obliged to help (which is what mates do). I'm not exonerating
> > > > > us, we must share the blame because we were involved.
> > > > > Bush is too gung ho, although I know he obviously meant well - but
> > > > > his hasty maverick approach, alienated much of this planet.
> > > > > Too many of yours and our boys are paying the ultimate price, as
> > > > > well as contributing to the demise in your economy.
> > > > > Put someone in who thinks a bit more before pulling that trigger!
> >
> > > > > Gonad
> >
> > > > Tony B-aLIAR didnt resist much though did he?
> >
> > > >www.afterdowningstreet.org
> >
> > > Can't argue with that but be fair, he based his judgement on info
> > > sent from Washington, claiming that Saddam could have Nukes
> > > up and ready to fire within 45minutes.This(as you know) was
> > > totally untrue.He assumed and trusted that the American info was
> > > reliable. What would you have done in Blairs shoes?
> >
> > > Gonad
> >
> > Why did he ignore the info from Hans Blix? There were MANY voices
> > warning caution and patience to let the inspectors get their job done.
> > Blair thought it would be a cakewalk and he overestimated the ability
> > of coalition forces. But the point to take away from all this is that if
> > one LIES about the reason for going to war, its not possible to justify
> > going into conflict. Blood for Oil, nothing less.
> >
> > --
> > ___ ___ ___ ___
> > /\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
> > /:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
> > /:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
> > /:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
> > /:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
> > \:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
> > \::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
> > \/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
> > /:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
> > \/__/ \/__/ \/__/ \/__/
> >
> > +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
> > |S|a|y| |D|u|h| |t|o| |A|y|n| |R|a|n|d|
> > +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
>
> Blair tried to tell Bush to hold back, you seem to dismiss that
> Bush forced the issue with false information about nukes in 45
> minutes?
> I ask you again, "what would you have done if a trusted friend
> told you that Saddam has got nukes and can be ready to fire
> in 45mins"?
> That was the catalyst that made Blair agree.
Just because you're "friends" with somwon dosent mean you trust them implicitly
> If the 45 min claim was true and if Saddam destroyed half of
> the worlds oil producing capability, then America and the UK
> would practically grind to a halt. Think about it! Yes oil was and
> is the lifeblood of our industry. We cannot operate without it!
>
So you're saying that x-amount of dead iraqi civilians is "worth it" to keep an economy humming along?
--
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/26/mccain-bear/
Naked Gonad <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 8:33 pm, snuhw...@netscape.net (???hw??f) wrote:
> > Naked Gonad <bodro...@yahoo.co.uk> clouded the waters of pure thought with:
> >
> > > On Mar 24, 4:27 pm, =A7=F1=FChw=A4=A3f <snuhw...@netscape.net> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > > > Naked Gonad <bodro...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > Unfortunately, GW Bush has made your beautiful country, pariahs
> > > > > of the world. We (Britain) got sucked into it because, (as friends),
> > > > > we
> > > > > felt obliged to help (which is what mates do). I'm not exonerating
> > > > > us, we must share the blame because we were involved.
> > > > > Bush is too gung ho, although I know he obviously meant well - but
> > > > > his hasty maverick approach, alienated much of this planet.
> > > > > Too many of yours and our boys are paying the ultimate price, as
> > > > > well as contributing to the demise in your economy.
> > > > > Put someone in who thinks a bit more before pulling that trigger!
> >
> > > > > Gonad
> >
> > > > Tony B-aLIAR didnt resist much though did he?
> >
> > > >www.afterdowningstreet.org
> >
> > > Can't argue with that but be fair, he based his judgement on info
> > > sent from Washington, claiming that Saddam could have Nukes
> > > up and ready to fire within 45minutes.This(as you know) was
> > > totally untrue.He assumed and trusted that the American info was
> > > reliable. What would you have done in Blairs shoes?
> >
> > > Gonad
> >
> > Why did he ignore the info from Hans Blix? There were MANY voices
> > warning caution and patience to let the inspectors get their job done.
> > Blair thought it would be a cakewalk and he overestimated the ability
> > of coalition forces. But the point to take away from all this is that if
> > one LIES about the reason for going to war, its not possible to justify
> > going into conflict. Blood for Oil, nothing less.
> >
> > --
> > ___ ___ ___ ___
> > /\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
> > /:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
> > /:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
> > /:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
> > /:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
> > \:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
> > \::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
> > \/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
> > /:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
> > \/__/ \/__/ \/__/ \/__/
> >
> > +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
> > |S|a|y| |D|u|h| |t|o| |A|y|n| |R|a|n|d|
> > +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
>
> Blair tried to tell Bush to hold back, you seem to dismiss that
> Bush forced the issue with false information about nukes in 45
> minutes?
> I ask you again, "what would you have done if a trusted friend
> told you that Saddam has got nukes and can be ready to fire
> in 45mins"?
> That was the catalyst that made Blair agree.
Just because you're "friends" with somwon dosent mean you trust them implicitly
> If the 45 min claim was true and if Saddam destroyed half of
> the worlds oil producing capability, then America and the UK
> would practically grind to a halt. Think about it! Yes oil was and
> is the lifeblood of our industry. We cannot operate without it!
>
So you're saying that x-amount of dead iraqi civilians is "worth it" to keep an economy humming along?
--
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/26/mccain-bear/
