D
dave hillstrom
Guest
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:36:40 -0500, K. A. Cannon
<kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
(cowardly snecked newsgroups restored)
>dave hillstrom <dAvE@MeOw.oRg> posted
><ej1rvh$93d$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> in
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk on Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:40:22
>-0500:
>
><news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,news.groups,alt.config, snecked>
>
><snip>
>
>>>
>>>Again...You don't know the circumstances yet you certainly love to
>>>expound about things you don't know.
>>>
>>>You still are petulant.
>>
>>do you want me to post the email i had from gary?
>
>Post it. I encourage you to. In fact I demand it.
as this appears to be a formal request to out garys business email to
me, i will assume you, as you are a "partner" in databasix, have both
the authority and garys permission to request this. and therefore
nothing will befall me. on your head this rides.
====================================================
From - Wed Nov 01 16:59:00 2006
X-Account-Key: account4
X-UIDL: GmailId10ea58682b214fd3
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Gmail-Received: 87230a4e3f594ed24f3c60e858a7c288dcbad6d5
Delivered-To: xxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.61.11 with SMTP id o11cs68547nfk;
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.80.8 with SMTP id d8mr3744831agb;
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <support@mx1.netbasix.net>
Received: from cwmail.conepuppy.com ([66.154.0.169])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
3si1349143wrh.2006.11.01.13.57.05;
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: fail (google.com: domain of support@mx1.netbasix.net
does not designate 66.154.0.169 as permitted sender)
Received: by cwmail.conepuppy.com (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id BF639127C4; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:57:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
smtp1.cwmail.conepuppy.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50,NO_REAL_NAME,
SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0
Received: from mx1.netbasix.net (mx1.netbasix.net [69.17.2.118])
by cwmail.conepuppy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F96E127BA
for <dave@meow.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:57:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx1.netbasix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx1.netbasix.net (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id
kA1LuR4D027798
for <dave@meow.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:56:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
by mx1.netbasix.net (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id
kA1LuR1D027795;
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:56:27 -0500 (EST)
From: support@mx1.netbasix.net
Subject: Re: so, who did it?
To: dave@meow.org
Cc:
X-Originating-IP: 75.193.24.173
X-Mailer: Webmin 1.300
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:56:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1162418186.27789@mx1.netbasix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1162418186"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--bound1162418186
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
dave hillstrom wrote ..
> who copped your upstream about what?
No one.
TSB Moved. MCI/Verizon dropped the ball. The line is in but not up.
We're waiting on Verizon.
Watch www.databasix.com for further details as they become available.
--bound1162418186--
====================================================
>>hes the one i got this info from.
>
>Really...Good...I think you are lying.
this is where you appologize for calling me a liar. unless you dont
have the balls for it, kevin.
>>stop whining and start trying to run things like a
>>business, daddies boy.
>
>Ha. That is funny coming from an admitted head case with no job, on
>welfare, who can't control himself and acts like a spoiled child.
is that an ad hominem attack in answer to a sentence with valid
business concerns? again, the faimed kevin cannon irish temper toned
customer service technique.
>>circumstances and excuses do not interest ~customers~. in ANY
>>business.
>
>If the customer don't like it the customer can take his business
>elsewhere.
i have my reasons. but at this rate it wont be long now. but before
i do im going to let everyone i can know just how databasix is run,
and what poor uptime to expect. from my first hand experience.
>>only results do.
>
>You know all about results.
>Why don't you hide from life more Dave?
>Do you curl up in the fetal position on the floor of your crummy
>little apartment and get all frustrated about everything that isn't
>done to your liking?
ad hominem attack to valid business concern stated by a customer
noted. you really shouldnt talk to customers, kevin. especially not
in public like this.
>>and yours, kevin cannon, are lacking.
>
>I am playing in the game of life...while you, a degreed engineer have
>left the bench, left the stadium, left the town, went and hid in the
>woods and cower there.
another ad hominem attack in response to a valid business observation
by a customer. are you going for the record?
>>>Altopia is that way --->
>>
>>yup. it is. and its looking better EVERY day.
>
>Fine...take your business there.
as i said, in due time. ive pretty much seen that databasix is run
like a hobby and not a business.
and for someone who has stated in the private databasix groups that
you and gary have plans for the big time, you sure are off to a great
start, hmmmm? maybe you can go to a full two months downtime this
next year and beat your record.
>><...>
>>
>>is this ~public~ customer relation "style" of yours why dad keeps you
>>in the back room playing with computers, kevin? maybe gary would be
>>wise to do the same.
>
>Still have that chip on your shoulder from being told not to be an
>asshole?
are you saying i should listen to this exact whine of yours that you
use in every other post to everyone? heh. quaint.
>How about you go and get a job at McDonalds or Walmart you mental
>feeb?
thats the best you can do, kevin? maybe you should follow your own
advice considering your uptime record. im sure your dad would be
happier.
--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
'"Hillstrom" is "Him trolls" spelled sideways.'
-dvus
<kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
(cowardly snecked newsgroups restored)
>dave hillstrom <dAvE@MeOw.oRg> posted
><ej1rvh$93d$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> in
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk on Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:40:22
>-0500:
>
><news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,news.groups,alt.config, snecked>
>
><snip>
>
>>>
>>>Again...You don't know the circumstances yet you certainly love to
>>>expound about things you don't know.
>>>
>>>You still are petulant.
>>
>>do you want me to post the email i had from gary?
>
>Post it. I encourage you to. In fact I demand it.
as this appears to be a formal request to out garys business email to
me, i will assume you, as you are a "partner" in databasix, have both
the authority and garys permission to request this. and therefore
nothing will befall me. on your head this rides.
====================================================
From - Wed Nov 01 16:59:00 2006
X-Account-Key: account4
X-UIDL: GmailId10ea58682b214fd3
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Gmail-Received: 87230a4e3f594ed24f3c60e858a7c288dcbad6d5
Delivered-To: xxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.61.11 with SMTP id o11cs68547nfk;
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.80.8 with SMTP id d8mr3744831agb;
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <support@mx1.netbasix.net>
Received: from cwmail.conepuppy.com ([66.154.0.169])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
3si1349143wrh.2006.11.01.13.57.05;
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: fail (google.com: domain of support@mx1.netbasix.net
does not designate 66.154.0.169 as permitted sender)
Received: by cwmail.conepuppy.com (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id BF639127C4; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:57:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
smtp1.cwmail.conepuppy.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50,NO_REAL_NAME,
SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0
Received: from mx1.netbasix.net (mx1.netbasix.net [69.17.2.118])
by cwmail.conepuppy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F96E127BA
for <dave@meow.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:57:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx1.netbasix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx1.netbasix.net (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id
kA1LuR4D027798
for <dave@meow.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:56:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
by mx1.netbasix.net (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id
kA1LuR1D027795;
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:56:27 -0500 (EST)
From: support@mx1.netbasix.net
Subject: Re: so, who did it?
To: dave@meow.org
Cc:
X-Originating-IP: 75.193.24.173
X-Mailer: Webmin 1.300
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:56:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1162418186.27789@mx1.netbasix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1162418186"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--bound1162418186
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
dave hillstrom wrote ..
> who copped your upstream about what?
No one.
TSB Moved. MCI/Verizon dropped the ball. The line is in but not up.
We're waiting on Verizon.
Watch www.databasix.com for further details as they become available.
--bound1162418186--
====================================================
>>hes the one i got this info from.
>
>Really...Good...I think you are lying.
this is where you appologize for calling me a liar. unless you dont
have the balls for it, kevin.
>>stop whining and start trying to run things like a
>>business, daddies boy.
>
>Ha. That is funny coming from an admitted head case with no job, on
>welfare, who can't control himself and acts like a spoiled child.
is that an ad hominem attack in answer to a sentence with valid
business concerns? again, the faimed kevin cannon irish temper toned
customer service technique.
>>circumstances and excuses do not interest ~customers~. in ANY
>>business.
>
>If the customer don't like it the customer can take his business
>elsewhere.
i have my reasons. but at this rate it wont be long now. but before
i do im going to let everyone i can know just how databasix is run,
and what poor uptime to expect. from my first hand experience.
>>only results do.
>
>You know all about results.
>Why don't you hide from life more Dave?
>Do you curl up in the fetal position on the floor of your crummy
>little apartment and get all frustrated about everything that isn't
>done to your liking?
ad hominem attack to valid business concern stated by a customer
noted. you really shouldnt talk to customers, kevin. especially not
in public like this.
>>and yours, kevin cannon, are lacking.
>
>I am playing in the game of life...while you, a degreed engineer have
>left the bench, left the stadium, left the town, went and hid in the
>woods and cower there.
another ad hominem attack in response to a valid business observation
by a customer. are you going for the record?
>>>Altopia is that way --->
>>
>>yup. it is. and its looking better EVERY day.
>
>Fine...take your business there.
as i said, in due time. ive pretty much seen that databasix is run
like a hobby and not a business.
and for someone who has stated in the private databasix groups that
you and gary have plans for the big time, you sure are off to a great
start, hmmmm? maybe you can go to a full two months downtime this
next year and beat your record.
>><...>
>>
>>is this ~public~ customer relation "style" of yours why dad keeps you
>>in the back room playing with computers, kevin? maybe gary would be
>>wise to do the same.
>
>Still have that chip on your shoulder from being told not to be an
>asshole?
are you saying i should listen to this exact whine of yours that you
use in every other post to everyone? heh. quaint.
>How about you go and get a job at McDonalds or Walmart you mental
>feeb?
thats the best you can do, kevin? maybe you should follow your own
advice considering your uptime record. im sure your dad would be
happier.
--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
'"Hillstrom" is "Him trolls" spelled sideways.'
-dvus