Re: Have you been slandered on the Internet?

T

Tom Potter

Guest
"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:030720071245349171%erfc@caballista.org...
> Herb Martin <news@learnquick.com> wrote:
>
>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
>>news:b60l835a9bhbdts9fgi767lrik299fa50p@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:41:07 -0500, in alt.astronomy, "Herb Martin"
>>> <news@learnquick.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:46878bd2$0$16272$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
>>>>> As can be seen from the post listed below,
>>>>> and reading the newsgroups,
>>>>> about 10 or 15 bigots and sociopaths
>>>>> try to control the opinions, ideas, and information
>>>>> expressed on the Internet,
>>>>>
>>>>> by banding together and voting their victims
>>>>> the dubious "Awards" listed.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Why did you copy this to "Talk.Politics.Guns" where (virtually)
>>>>no one knew you were a kook?
>>>>
>>>>Really, we had never heard of your before (unless perhaps some
>>>>readers also read the groups where you usually post.)
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the heads up.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should we forward a valid copy of the ballot to t.p.g.?
>>>

>>
>>Not on my account (and I suspect most people here would be
>>entirely uninterested but cannot speak for them.)
>>
>>My point to this fellow was only that we would NOT know he
>>was a kook (or about any kooks who MAY be on those other
>>newsgroups) if he hadn't mentioned it.

>
> TommY Crackpotter is a USDA Choice, Grade A #1 level kook. He's been
> infesting sci.phusics with his pseudoscience spews for years now.
>>
>>
>>> You are franchised, if you are not a kook...

>>
>>

>
> --
> Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
> Trainer and leash holder of:


--
As can be seen from their posts,
"Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
Internet into a vast sewer.

Rather than mud wrestling with them, I simply call attention to their posts
without comment.

The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
from destroying the Internet?

As rats, roaches, criminals, sociopaths, and other vermin
fear exposure and tend to fade away when exposed to light,
here's what could be done to prevent a few perverts and sociopaths
from turning your newsgroup into a sewer.

1. Post their real names, addresses and employers on the Internet.
2. Post their pictures and other personal data on the Internet.
3. Report them to their ISP and Google
4. Sue them in local Small Claims courts
5. Report them to law enforcement when they commit crimes such as forging
users names,
identity theft, soliciting children, etc.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On Jul 4, 11:30 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Art Deco" <e...@caballista.org> wrote in message
>
> The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
> from destroying the Internet?


Too late.


--bubbles
 
Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:30:07 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com>
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

>
>"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
>news:030720071245349171%erfc@caballista.org...
>> Herb Martin <news@learnquick.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
>>>news:b60l835a9bhbdts9fgi767lrik299fa50p@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:41:07 -0500, in alt.astronomy, "Herb Martin"
>>>> <news@learnquick.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:46878bd2$0$16272$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
>>>>>> As can be seen from the post listed below,
>>>>>> and reading the newsgroups,
>>>>>> about 10 or 15 bigots and sociopaths
>>>>>> try to control the opinions, ideas, and information
>>>>>> expressed on the Internet,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> by banding together and voting their victims
>>>>>> the dubious "Awards" listed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Why did you copy this to "Talk.Politics.Guns" where (virtually)
>>>>>no one knew you were a kook?
>>>>>
>>>>>Really, we had never heard of your before (unless perhaps some
>>>>>readers also read the groups where you usually post.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for the heads up.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should we forward a valid copy of the ballot to t.p.g.?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Not on my account (and I suspect most people here would be
>>>entirely uninterested but cannot speak for them.)
>>>
>>>My point to this fellow was only that we would NOT know he
>>>was a kook (or about any kooks who MAY be on those other
>>>newsgroups) if he hadn't mentioned it.

>>
>> TommY Crackpotter is a USDA Choice, Grade A #1 level kook. He's been
>> infesting sci.phusics with his pseudoscience spews for years now.
>>>
>>>
>>>> You are franchised, if you are not a kook...
>>>
>>>

>>
>> --
>> Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
>> Trainer and leash holder of:

>
>--
>As can be seen from their posts,
>"Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
>and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
>Internet into a vast sewer.
>
>Rather than mud wrestling with them, I simply call attention to their posts
>without comment.
>
>The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
>from destroying the Internet?
>
>As rats, roaches, criminals, sociopaths, and other vermin
>fear exposure and tend to fade away when exposed to light,
>here's what could be done to prevent a few perverts and sociopaths
>from turning your newsgroup into a sewer.


Well, we (tinw) could start by censoring you.

>

But first and foremost, there is no "slander" on Usenet. See if you
can wrap your teeny-tiny widdle brain around that concept, and
report back to the class the reasons why.


Widdershins

Cocreating scorn at credophiles since 1997.
 
When have I not been slandered on the internettubes?

Widdershins wrote:
> Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:30:07 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com>
> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
>> As can be seen from their posts,
>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
>> Internet into a vast sewer.


How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO a
sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the ****
right out of your house!')

>> Rather than mud wrestling with them, I simply call attention to their posts
>> without comment.


You shoulda left some words off there, bunky.

>> The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
>>from destroying the Internet?


Nothing, since 'anonymous' perverts and sociopaths OWN the internets.

>> As rats, roaches, criminals, sociopaths, and other vermin
>> fear exposure and tend to fade away when exposed to light,
>> here's what could be done to prevent a few perverts and sociopaths
>>from turning your newsgroup into a sewer.


Sewers are GOOD!

m, halfwits bad
 
Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:45:18 GMT, Veldfuchs
<theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil,
and wrote:

> When have I not been slandered on the internettubes?
>
>Widdershins wrote:
>> Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:30:07 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com>
>> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
>>> As can be seen from their posts,
>>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
>>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
>>> Internet into a vast sewer.

>
> How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO a
>sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the ****
>right out of your house!')


Look at the attributions, portobrain. I, me, Widdershins, did not
write the bits to which you are replying.

Nice try, ****wit.
>
>>> Rather than mud wrestling with them, I simply call attention to their posts
>>> without comment.

>
> You shoulda left some words off there, bunky.
>
>>> The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
>>>from destroying the Internet?

>
> Nothing, since 'anonymous' perverts and sociopaths OWN the internets.
>
>>> As rats, roaches, criminals, sociopaths, and other vermin
>>> fear exposure and tend to fade away when exposed to light,
>>> here's what could be done to prevent a few perverts and sociopaths
>>>from turning your newsgroup into a sewer.

>
> Sewers are GOOD!
>
>m, halfwits bad





Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
 
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:
> Veldfuchs <theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Widdershins wrote:
> >> "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> As can be seen from their posts,
> >>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck",

> >"Meat Plow",>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted
> >sociopaths are turning the >> Internet into a vast sewer.
> >
> > How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO
> > a
> >sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the
> >**** right out of your house!')

>
> Look at the attributions, portobrain. I, me, Widdershins, did not
> write the bits to which you are replying.


But you responded to them. That makes you guilty by association.
 
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:06:08 -0400, in alt.astrology, Jonah Thomas
<j2thomas@cavtel.net> wrote:

>Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:
>> Veldfuchs <theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Widdershins wrote:
>> >> "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>> As can be seen from their posts,
>> >>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck",
>> >"Meat Plow",>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted
>> >sociopaths are turning the >> Internet into a vast sewer.
>> >
>> > How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO
>> > a
>> >sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the
>> >**** right out of your house!')

>>
>> Look at the attributions, portobrain. I, me, Widdershins, did not
>> write the bits to which you are replying.

>
>But you responded to them. That makes you guilty by association.
>


Then, so are you, by association.

Doesn't your own logic make you a just a little hypocritical?


--
Ak'toh'di
 
Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
> Jonah Thomas <j2thomas@cavtel.net> wrote:
> >Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:
> >> Veldfuchs <theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Widdershins wrote:
> >> >> "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >>> As can be seen from their posts,
> >> >>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck",
> >> >"Meat Plow",>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted
> >> >sociopaths are turning the >> Internet into a vast sewer.
> >> >
> >> How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO a
> >> >sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the
> >> >**** right out of your house!')
> >>
> >> Look at the attributions, portobrain. I, me, Widdershins, did not
> >> write the bits to which you are replying.

> >
> >But you responded to them. That makes you guilty by association.

>
> Then, so are you, by association.


> Doesn't your own logic make you a just a little hypocritical?


Well, no. I don't mind being guilty by association, so I don't have to
be hypocritical about it.

By responding to me, you also are indirectly guilty by association with
Tom Potter. Do you mind?
 
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:28:47 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, Jonah Thomas
<j2thomas@cavtel.net> wrote:

>Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>> Jonah Thomas <j2thomas@cavtel.net> wrote:
>> >Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:
>> >> Veldfuchs <theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >Widdershins wrote:
>> >> >> "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> As can be seen from their posts,
>> >> >>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck",
>> >> >"Meat Plow",>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted
>> >> >sociopaths are turning the >> Internet into a vast sewer.
>> >> >
>> >> How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO a
>> >> >sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the
>> >> >**** right out of your house!')
>> >>
>> >> Look at the attributions, portobrain. I, me, Widdershins, did not
>> >> write the bits to which you are replying.
>> >
>> >But you responded to them. That makes you guilty by association.

>>
>> Then, so are you, by association.

>
>> Doesn't your own logic make you a just a little hypocritical?

>
>Well, no. I don't mind being guilty by association, so I don't have to
>be hypocritical about it.


I don't think there is "guilt by association". If sort of guilt was
true, a brother or uncle would be held responsible for the crimes of
his siblings or nieces or nephews.

See how this so-called guilt by association would work if it was
true?

>By responding to me, you also are indirectly guilty by association with
>Tom Potter. Do you mind?


Only if one subscribes to your faulty logic. It isn't true just
because you state it is.


--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
 
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message

> Only if one subscribes to your faulty logic. It isn't true just
> because you state it is.


What's good for the goose is good for the gander, Gay Slurper Bob!

Your Pal,
HJ
 
Widdershins wrote:
> Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:45:18 GMT, Veldfuchs
> <theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil,
> and wrote:
>> When have I not been slandered on the internettubes?
>> Widdershins wrote:
>>> Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:30:07 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com>
>>> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
>>>> As can be seen from their posts,
>>>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
>>>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
>>>> Internet into a vast sewer.

>> How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO a
>> sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the ****
>> right out of your house!')

> Look at the attributions,


And lo, I already had. Tom Potter said that - however, I picked up the
thread on YOUR post, so I left it in there. I presume most people can
read quoting indentation.

> portobrain.


I originally read that as protobrain, which actually sounds kind of
cool. My brain is also portable tho.

> I, me, Widdershins, did not
> write the bits to which you are replying.


I, me, did not reply to the bits you wrote. I, me, replied to the bits
you did not right. I, me, also have a theory: a dinosaur is really small
at one end, and then it gets bigger and bigger and then it gets really
small again at the other end. That is my theory. By me.

> Nice try, ****wit.


I hung ten.

m, surrrrrfffffin', surfin' usenet-a
 
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:28:47 -0400, in alt.astrology, Jonah Thomas
<j2thomas@cavtel.net> wrote:

>Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>> Jonah Thomas <j2thomas@cavtel.net> wrote:
>> >Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:
>> >> Veldfuchs <theinfinitiveofgo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >Widdershins wrote:
>> >> >> "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> As can be seen from their posts,
>> >> >>> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck",
>> >> >"Meat Plow",>> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted
>> >> >sociopaths are turning the >> Internet into a vast sewer.
>> >> >
>> >> How the hell do you turn a planet-sized tarpit/septic tank INTO a
>> >> >sewer, and if you did, wouldn't that be an IMPROVEMENT? ('Pipe the
>> >> >**** right out of your house!')
>> >>
>> >> Look at the attributions, portobrain. I, me, Widdershins, did not
>> >> write the bits to which you are replying.
>> >
>> >But you responded to them. That makes you guilty by association.

>>
>> Then, so are you, by association.

>
>> Doesn't your own logic make you a just a little hypocritical?

>
>Well, no. I don't mind being guilty by association, so I don't have to
>be hypocritical about it.
>
>By responding to me, you also are indirectly guilty by association with
>Tom Potter. Do you mind?


I don't happen to subscribe to the theory of guilt by association.
The extend of your theory would be the DA, Judge and jury should
share the guilt by association with the criminal convicted at the
trail.

No, I do not feel any guilt by association. Do you mind?


--
Ak'toh'di
 
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message

> No, I do not feel any guilt by association. Do you mind?


Yes I do. You are guilty of giving Deco "hummers".

HJ
 
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:30:07 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
>news:030720071245349171%erfc@caballista.org...
>> Herb Martin <news@learnquick.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
>>>news:b60l835a9bhbdts9fgi767lrik299fa50p@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:41:07 -0500, in alt.astronomy, "Herb Martin"
>>>> <news@learnquick.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:46878bd2$0$16272$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
>>>>>> As can be seen from the post listed below,
>>>>>> and reading the newsgroups,
>>>>>> about 10 or 15 bigots and sociopaths
>>>>>> try to control the opinions, ideas, and information
>>>>>> expressed on the Internet,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> by banding together and voting their victims
>>>>>> the dubious "Awards" listed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Why did you copy this to "Talk.Politics.Guns" where (virtually)
>>>>>no one knew you were a kook?
>>>>>
>>>>>Really, we had never heard of your before (unless perhaps some
>>>>>readers also read the groups where you usually post.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for the heads up.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should we forward a valid copy of the ballot to t.p.g.?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Not on my account (and I suspect most people here would be
>>>entirely uninterested but cannot speak for them.)
>>>
>>>My point to this fellow was only that we would NOT know he
>>>was a kook (or about any kooks who MAY be on those other
>>>newsgroups) if he hadn't mentioned it.

>>
>> TommY Crackpotter is a USDA Choice, Grade A #1 level kook. He's been
>> infesting sci.phusics with his pseudoscience spews for years now.
>>>
>>>
>>>> You are franchised, if you are not a kook...
>>>
>>>

>>
>> --
>> Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
>> Trainer and leash holder of:

>
>--
>As can be seen from their posts,
>"Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
>and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
>Internet into a vast sewer.
>
>Rather than mud wrestling with them, I simply call attention to their posts
>without comment.
>
>The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
>from destroying the Internet?
>
>As rats, roaches, criminals, sociopaths, and other vermin
>fear exposure and tend to fade away when exposed to light,
>here's what could be done to prevent a few perverts and sociopaths
>from turning your newsgroup into a sewer.
>
>1. Post their real names, addresses and employers on the Internet.
>2. Post their pictures and other personal data on the Internet.
>3. Report them to their ISP and Google
>4. Sue them in local Small Claims courts
>5. Report them to law enforcement when they commit crimes such as forging
>users names,
>identity theft, soliciting children, etc.


Half of them no doubt are cops. That profile matches perfectly....

Mycos

Prohibition Funds Terrorism
 
On Jul 4, 8:30 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Art Deco" <e...@caballista.org> wrote in message
>
> news:030720071245349171%erfc@caballista.org...
>
>
>
> > Herb Martin <n...@learnquick.com> wrote:

>
> >>"Bob Officer" <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
> >>news:b60l835a9bhbdts9fgi767lrik299fa50p@4ax.com...
> >>> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:41:07 -0500, in alt.astronomy, "Herb Martin"
> >>> <n...@learnquick.com> wrote:

>
> >>>>"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:46878bd2$0$16272$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
> >>>>> As can be seen from the post listed below,
> >>>>> and reading the newsgroups,
> >>>>> about 10 or 15 bigots and sociopaths
> >>>>> try to control the opinions, ideas, and information
> >>>>> expressed on the Internet,

>
> >>>>> by banding together and voting their victims
> >>>>> the dubious "Awards" listed.

>
> >>>>Why did you copy this to "Talk.Politics.Guns" where (virtually)
> >>>>no one knew you were a kook?

>
> >>>>Really, we had never heard of your before (unless perhaps some
> >>>>readers also read the groups where you usually post.)

>
> >>>>Thanks for the heads up.

>
> >>> Should we forward a valid copy of the ballot to t.p.g.?

>
> >>Not on my account (and I suspect most people here would be
> >>entirely uninterested but cannot speak for them.)

>
> >>My point to this fellow was only that we would NOT know he
> >>was a kook (or about any kooks who MAY be on those other
> >>newsgroups) if he hadn't mentioned it.

>
> > TommY Crackpotter is a USDA Choice, Grade A #1 level kook. He's been
> > infesting sci.phusics with his pseudoscience spews for years now.

>
> >>> You are franchised, if you are not a kook...

>
> > --
> > Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
> > Trainer and leash holder of:

>
> --
> As can be seen from their posts,
> "Art Deco", "Bob Officer", "Cujo DeSockpuppet", "Puddleduck", "Meat Plow",
> and a small group of low self-esteem, bigoted sociopaths are turning the
> Internet into a vast sewer.


So what else is new? sounds like youre talking to the Roman Senate
about how Rome is going to hell in a handbasket.
>
> Rather than mud wrestling with them, I simply call attention to their posts
> without comment.


What is this then?
>
> The question is, what can be done to keep anonymous perverts and sociopaths
> from destroying the Internet?


Obviously, nothing, as you are still posting.
>
> As rats, roaches, criminals, sociopaths, and other vermin
> fear exposure and tend to fade away when exposed to light,
> here's what could be done to prevent a few perverts and sociopaths
> from turning your newsgroup into a sewer.
>
> 1. Post their real names, addresses and employers on the Internet.


You know cujo sockpuppets real name and employer? POST it dude.

> 2. Post their pictures and other personal data on the Internet.


Ditto.

> 3. Report them to their ISP and Google


That does nothing.

> 4. Sue them in local Small Claims courts


Bwahahahahaha.

> 5. Report them to law enforcement when they commit crimes such as forging
> users names,
> identity theft, soliciting children, etc.


BWAHAHA. Putting in "forging user names" with "identity theft" and
"soliciting children." BWAHAHAHA.

Cujo Sockpoppet really got to ya. That's funny.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com


What's it got to do with yoga? I think you're one of the very people
whose internet ass we should kick, Tom Potter. Like that's your real
name. If it is, prove it.

Gotta say I love your cross-posting though. More people should cross-
post - all the fun goes out of usenet if you're not led through cross-
posting in vast territories - I preach it all the time and I'm pretty
convincing too.

But too lazy to cross-post - s0 good on you for starting it. Now,
stop posting to alt.yoga

Alt.california and alt.drugs.hard are a much more better choice of
venues
 
Back
Top