J
John \C\
Guest
"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:120620072204489299%erfc@caballista.org...
> Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:15:04 -0600, in alt.astronomy, Art Deco
> ><erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:48:02 -0700, in alt.astronomy, oldcoot
> >>><oldcoot7074@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Potter first comes across like a breath of fresh air, with a totally
> >>>>cogent and lucid assessment of the deco/duck problem. Then he blithely
> >>>>turns around and shoots himself in the foot, obliterating his
> >>>>credibility with the "Jewish conspiracy" hobbyhorse. Lordamighty,
> >>>>that's an old, old chestnut that's been around the block too many
> >>>>times to count.
> >>>>
> >>>>Potter, get a clue. If you want to be taken seriously on any issue,
> >>>>disconnect it from the perceived 'Jewish conspiracy'. Put a lid on it
> >>>>no matter how fervidly you believe it. As it is, you're merely using
> >>>>any issue as a vehicle for promoting that agenda.. and making yourself
> >>>>look like a buffoon.
> >>>
> >>>he looks, acts and writes like a buffoon, odds are he is a buffoon.
> >>>
> >>>Herb, Potter and Guth...
> >>>
> >>>I see no difference in their activities
> >>
> >>BS (oldcoot) is the high priest of the "Wolter" Flowing Space Theology,
> >
> >The problems I see with OC is he doesn't understand the basics enough
> >to join in on serious discussions. We see this happening all the time
> >with the people that wander through SGEq, and try to make earthquake
> >predictions.
> >
> >Until he gets a handle on the basics, which just keeps proving the
> >old adage about removing all doubt.
> >
> >>and the "deco/duck problem" is his way of whining about having the
> >>logical fallacies and non-physical results of this idea revealed.
> >
> >I see the "Think experiments" of Beert taking place. Beert is funny
> >and alarming at the same time. I see how Florida could have voted for
> >Bush if there are many ijits like him.
>
> Neither of them have a clue about what a rational discussion entails.
> Bert never quotes anything and posts completely random thoughts, while
> BS spouts the same stuff over and over about his gravity ideas, and
> refuses to consider that his ideas are bunk.
Glad you found a replacement for your "Slurpee" straightman at such short
notice.
Please, continue making us laugh!
Hee Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
HJ
news:120620072204489299%erfc@caballista.org...
> Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:15:04 -0600, in alt.astronomy, Art Deco
> ><erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:48:02 -0700, in alt.astronomy, oldcoot
> >>><oldcoot7074@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Potter first comes across like a breath of fresh air, with a totally
> >>>>cogent and lucid assessment of the deco/duck problem. Then he blithely
> >>>>turns around and shoots himself in the foot, obliterating his
> >>>>credibility with the "Jewish conspiracy" hobbyhorse. Lordamighty,
> >>>>that's an old, old chestnut that's been around the block too many
> >>>>times to count.
> >>>>
> >>>>Potter, get a clue. If you want to be taken seriously on any issue,
> >>>>disconnect it from the perceived 'Jewish conspiracy'. Put a lid on it
> >>>>no matter how fervidly you believe it. As it is, you're merely using
> >>>>any issue as a vehicle for promoting that agenda.. and making yourself
> >>>>look like a buffoon.
> >>>
> >>>he looks, acts and writes like a buffoon, odds are he is a buffoon.
> >>>
> >>>Herb, Potter and Guth...
> >>>
> >>>I see no difference in their activities
> >>
> >>BS (oldcoot) is the high priest of the "Wolter" Flowing Space Theology,
> >
> >The problems I see with OC is he doesn't understand the basics enough
> >to join in on serious discussions. We see this happening all the time
> >with the people that wander through SGEq, and try to make earthquake
> >predictions.
> >
> >Until he gets a handle on the basics, which just keeps proving the
> >old adage about removing all doubt.
> >
> >>and the "deco/duck problem" is his way of whining about having the
> >>logical fallacies and non-physical results of this idea revealed.
> >
> >I see the "Think experiments" of Beert taking place. Beert is funny
> >and alarming at the same time. I see how Florida could have voted for
> >Bush if there are many ijits like him.
>
> Neither of them have a clue about what a rational discussion entails.
> Bert never quotes anything and posts completely random thoughts, while
> BS spouts the same stuff over and over about his gravity ideas, and
> refuses to consider that his ideas are bunk.
Glad you found a replacement for your "Slurpee" straightman at such short
notice.
Please, continue making us laugh!
Hee Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
HJ