S
Sharon B
Guest
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:57:38 -0500, K. A. Cannon
<kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote in
<etfedb$35k$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:
>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:39:59 -0800, Bob Officer
><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:06:45 -0500, in news.groups, K. A. Cannon
>><kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>
>>>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com> posted
>>><etdub3$q5l$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> in news.admin.hierarchies
>>>on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:15:38 -0400:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:56:05 GMT, Aatu Koskensilta
>>>><aatu.koskensilta@xortec.fi> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Criticism of the B8MB is usually simply not on-topic in news.groups.proposals.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, since disagreeing with them is a form of criticism, those
>>>>posts will be ejected. Neat!
>>>
>>>I will not and cannot in good conscience reject a post that is
>>>critical of the B8MB if that post does not violate the charter and is
>>>not insulting, defaming, flamistic or otherwise objectionable.
>>>
>>>But....news.groups.proposals is not the place to have that discussion.
>>>
>>>Policy should be discussed in a group that is designed for and
>>>intended for that propose.
>>
>>Right here... un-moderated.
>>
>>Just as all the discussion for new groups belongs right here,
>>un-moderated.
>
>Yep...and then some poor dumb ******* with a good idea can run the
>gaunlet that is news.groups.
>
>Face it....news.groups make alt.flame look tepid.
snork
alt.cuddles makes alt.flame look tepid
a dot f replaces nah
<kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote in
<etfedb$35k$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:
>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:39:59 -0800, Bob Officer
><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:06:45 -0500, in news.groups, K. A. Cannon
>><kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>>
>>>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com> posted
>>><etdub3$q5l$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> in news.admin.hierarchies
>>>on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:15:38 -0400:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:56:05 GMT, Aatu Koskensilta
>>>><aatu.koskensilta@xortec.fi> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Criticism of the B8MB is usually simply not on-topic in news.groups.proposals.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, since disagreeing with them is a form of criticism, those
>>>>posts will be ejected. Neat!
>>>
>>>I will not and cannot in good conscience reject a post that is
>>>critical of the B8MB if that post does not violate the charter and is
>>>not insulting, defaming, flamistic or otherwise objectionable.
>>>
>>>But....news.groups.proposals is not the place to have that discussion.
>>>
>>>Policy should be discussed in a group that is designed for and
>>>intended for that propose.
>>
>>Right here... un-moderated.
>>
>>Just as all the discussion for new groups belongs right here,
>>un-moderated.
>
>Yep...and then some poor dumb ******* with a good idea can run the
>gaunlet that is news.groups.
>
>Face it....news.groups make alt.flame look tepid.
snork
alt.cuddles makes alt.flame look tepid
a dot f replaces nah