Guest William Flax Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Thank you for posting this. Certainly all Americans, who have any sense of fairness, must bristle at the media arrogance that seeks to exclude Ron Paul--the one candidate who seeks to discuss the issues in depth, rather than by slogan--from the debates, and from equal coverage. Considering that Ron Paul is no threat to any honest man or woman--that Ron Paul is the champion of freedom, not regimentation--what has been done to him is very ugly indeed. Let's have a real, true debate on the issues that vitally effect the future of America! How can any decent citizen oppose that idea? For some of the issues: http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul3.htm William Flax, Cincinnati, Ohio <NY.Transfer.News@blythe.org> wrote in message news:1199474178.54670155.3757159413@servebbs.org... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ron Paul pulls into double digits in Iowa! > > Via NY Transfer News Collective All the News that Doesn't Fit > > [The Ron Paul phenomenon is an interesting one, rather amazing > considering the blackout on mainstream press coverage and his complete > rejection by the GOP mainstream. Christopher Dodd, for the Dems, got > less than or around 1% of the vote and has dropped out. The 3rd place > finish by Fred Thompson is simply weird. > > Watch Moyers' Journal on PBS tonight, Jan 4, 2008, for interviews with > Paul and the other shut-out mainstream party candidate, Dennis Kucinich. > - -NYTr] > > sent by Walter Burien Jan 4, 2008 > > Ron Paul pulls into double digits in Iowa! > > NATIONAL RELEASE - 01/04/08 > > Well, 96% reporting and the big surprise for the media: Ron Paul even > though almost totally excluded from network media coverage pulls into > double digits of 10% and after the last 4% is counted it may be 11% or > two point behind third place. > > This is a tell-all number. If Dr. Paul was given the same share of > media coverage as the rest, over being intentionally excluded as was > the case, there is a very good possibility that he may have pulled 18% > to 20% or even better. The results can no longer be ignored by the > media. The results show also that Dr. Paul should have been invited to > participate in the Iowa FOX presidential debate. > > New Hampshire should be rather exciting. The momentum of Dr. Paul and > if he is now given equal news coverage, it would probable make him a > contender for that all sought after number one spot or possibly as > things progress, second. > > I hope the Ron Paul campaign carefully monitors equal access from this > point forward. To date the media continues to cover up the results of > their own on-line polls that in almost every case from NBC, FOX, ABC, > CBS, C-SPAN, and AOL showed Dr. Paul the clear cut winner and in fact > in some cases having more votes then all other candidates combined. For > the media to do this, it is in my opinion clear fraud on their part and > in fact actionable fraud which they should be held liable for. If it > continues on their part, a multi-billion dollar law suit should be > filed and aggressively pursued. It is clear that continued exclusion of > on-line poll results and equal access network time is being done to > intentionally influence a national election for the highest office in > the country. By doing so the networks are violating numerous federal > laws and in so many words to call a spade a spade, they are effecting > by their actions what can be call nothing other than treasonous > activities. I think it would be wise of Dr. Paul to get a federal court > order for injunctive relief to make sure that equal time is assured and > accuracy of network on-line polls are monitored and reported correctly. > > When the population sees that this has been going on and looks at Dr. > Paul's twenty-year record of never voting for a tax increase; and > always for a balanced budget; and all other issues as can be viewed on > his website http://RonPaul2008.com we may just see Dr. Paul bursting > forward into first place with all others loosing ground. > > The network media up until this point has intentionally created an > environment of exclusion were said exclusion leaves one out of three > people in the USA not even know that Dr. Paul is running for president > or the vast support he has from those that have looked. > > When all the people know and take the time to investigate Dr. Paul's > stand on the issues and sees his twenty-year voting record he will have > no competition and hello President Ron Paul come election time. The > syndicated media knows this and thus the exclusion of equal air time > given to Dr. Paul, being done in their obvious efforts to influence a > national election, a federal crime. > > As you can see by the results copied below, Dr. Paul was less than > 4,000 votes from being in third place. Come New Hampshire he may even do > much better than that: > > - ------------------------------------------------ > President - GOP Iowa Caucus - 5:14 AM - 01/04/08 > > 1702 of 1781 Precincts Reporting - 96% > > [see chart here: > http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2008/by_state/US_Page_0103_VD.h tml?SITE=CSPANELN&SECTION=POLITICS > > > Huckabee, Mike...34% > > Romney, Mitt.....25% > > Thompson, Fred...13% > > McCain, John.....13% > > Paul, Ron........10% > > Giuliani, Rudy....3% > > Hunter, Duncan....0% > > Tancredo, Tom.....0% > > > RESULTS FROM: > http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2008/by_state/US_Page_0103_VD.h tml?SITE=CSPANELN&SECTION=POLITICS > > Please share this communication with others from around the USA who may > not know of Dr. Paul so that they will be able to make an informed > decision when the vote comes to their state. > > Also, if you would like to run a radio ad for Dr. Paul in your home > town, so that more people will know and get to see Dr. Paul's stand on > the issues, please go to http://RonPaul4us.com > > Sent FYI from, > > Walter J. Burien, Jr. > Saint Johns, AZ 85936 > Website: http://CAFR1.com > > > > ================================================================= > NY Transfer News Collective A Service of Blythe Systems > Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us > Our main website: http://www.blythe.org > List Archives: http://blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/ > Subscribe: http://blythe-systems.com/mailman/listinfo/nytr > ================================================================= > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFHfoYBiz2i76ou9wQRAgTVAJkB+utfwY3vs7nXSWi9TaaUPomGkACfcjbQ > lgf8sV3Jx+k6keURbbmeiAA= > =aNgs > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest William Flax Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 You keep posting the same smear. Therefore, I will respond just as I did yesterday: The Presidency of the United States is a job created by our written Constitution. Its functions are defined by our written Constitution. It has no powers but those granted in our written Constitution. The procedures for the election of a President are spelled out in our written Constitution. The terms of Office are set out in our written Constitution, as are the qualifications and oath of Office of the President. Yet only one of the candidates for President, in either Party, regularly discusses the Constitution and its specific provisions! That candidate, of course, is Ron Paul. Voting for one of the candidates who does not feel it necessary to discuss the Constitution or his specific stands on Constitutional issues would be like hiring a Doctor who refuses to discuss your symptoms; or hiring a lawyer who will not discuss your case, or look at a Contract, you hire him to defend; or attending a Church, where the Preacher has never read the Bible. Obviously, the choice of the intelligent voter; the choice of the voter to whom personal honor and integrity matters, is Ron Paul. Or let us look at the War On Terror. We face an enemy that has no fixed base, no standing army, navy or air force; no industrial base; no large population. All that enemy has, in reality, is a proven ability to recruit people willing to commit suicide trying to hurt us. That is their asset; that is their strength. And yet only Ron Paul is willing to discuss how that enemy recruits!! The other candidates act as though it is some sort of "Macho" thing to refuse to even discuss the reason that those committing suicide to injure us, have stated as their reason for doing so! Teddy Roosevelt said, of foreign affairs, we should "Speak softly, but carry a Big Stick." We are being undermined, today, by men who shout hysterically or babble incoherently, but do not even understand what Teddy was talking about. Ron Paul does. We dare not elect anyone who does not. Finally, only Ron Paul has been willing to discuss, in depth, what is happening to the American Dollar, and why! Anyone who cares about the value of their savings, accounts receivable, insurance policies; or simply their ability to make decisions based upon predictable economic factors, should see the necessity of electing the one candidate, who actually understands what factors control the value of our money. Again, that candidate is Ron Paul. For more discussion, in depth: http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul3.htm http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul.htm http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul2.htm William Flax 414 Walnut Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 "boobs" <clitteigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c18bc115-18b0-403c-a999-f2090f7763a5@m34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > > RON PAUL'S APPEAL is mostly to teenagers and other young and > idealistic-but-unrealistic citizens. > > If those groups don't hit the polls in record numbers, everywhere, he > doesn't stand a chance. > > In many regards, he's not unlike Eugene McCarthy, whose charisma > charmed and mesmerized the kids like a Pied Piper, in 1968 and 1972. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kevin Cunningham Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 On Jan 4, 3:44 pm, "William Flax" <krtq7...@prodigy.net> wrote: > You keep posting the same smear. Therefore, I will respond just as I did > yesterday: > > The Presidency of the United States is a job created by our written > Constitution. Its functions are defined by our written Constitution. It > has no powers but those granted in our written Constitution. The procedures > for the election of a President are spelled out in our written Constitution. > The terms of Office are set out in our written Constitution, as are the > qualifications and oath of Office of the President. > > Yet only one of the candidates for President, in either Party, regularly > discusses the Constitution and its specific provisions! That candidate, of > course, is Ron Paul. Voting for one of the candidates who does not feel it > necessary to discuss the Constitution or his specific stands on > Constitutional issues would be like hiring a Doctor who refuses to discuss > your symptoms; or hiring a lawyer who will not discuss your case, or look at > a Contract, you hire him to defend; or attending a Church, where the > Preacher has never read the Bible. > > Obviously, the choice of the intelligent voter; the choice of the voter to > whom personal honor and integrity matters, is Ron Paul. > > Or let us look at the War On Terror. We face an enemy that has no fixed > base, no standing army, navy or air force; no industrial base; no large > population. All that enemy has, in reality, is a proven ability to recruit > people willing to commit suicide trying to hurt us. That is their asset; > that is their strength. And yet only Ron Paul is willing to discuss how > that enemy recruits!! The other candidates act as though it is some sort of > "Macho" thing to refuse to even discuss the reason that those committing > suicide to injure us, have stated as their reason for doing so! > > Teddy Roosevelt said, of foreign affairs, we should "Speak softly, but carry > a Big Stick." We are being undermined, today, by men who shout hysterically > or babble incoherently, but do not even understand what Teddy was talking > about. Ron Paul does. We dare not elect anyone who does not. > > Finally, only Ron Paul has been willing to discuss, in depth, what is > happening to the American Dollar, and why! Anyone who cares about the value > of their savings, accounts receivable, insurance policies; or simply their > ability to make decisions based upon predictable economic factors, should > see the necessity of electing the one candidate, who actually understands > what factors control the value of our money. Again, that candidate is Ron > Paul. > > For more discussion, in depth:http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul3.htmhttp://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul.htmhttp://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul2.htm > > William Flax > 414 Walnut Street > Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 > > "boobs" <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > Rep. Ron Paul is at best an idiot and at worst a virulent segregationist. He voted against giving the FBI and additional $59 million to track down and convict the killers of civil rights workers in the '60's. Rep. Paul continues to oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the single largest assist to African-Americans ever. He did that and you won't or can't explain why he did that. Neither Rep. Paul or you can explain what you mean and how the legal system or constitution works. The Paul campaign is one idiot chasing another idiot. Now, gutless, answer my charges, show us that one Paul supporter has some guts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MasterChief Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 The moron repost the same crap every time someone post something positive about Ron paul,I wonder what his agenda is. "William Flax" <krtq73aa@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:ZUwfj.33774$lD6.23793@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... > You keep posting the same smear. Therefore, I will respond just as I did > yesterday: > > The Presidency of the United States is a job created by our written > Constitution. Its functions are defined by our written Constitution. It > has no powers but those granted in our written Constitution. The > procedures > for the election of a President are spelled out in our written > Constitution. > The terms of Office are set out in our written Constitution, as are the > qualifications and oath of Office of the President. > > Yet only one of the candidates for President, in either Party, regularly > discusses the Constitution and its specific provisions! That candidate, > of > course, is Ron Paul. Voting for one of the candidates who does not feel > it > necessary to discuss the Constitution or his specific stands on > Constitutional issues would be like hiring a Doctor who refuses to discuss > your symptoms; or hiring a lawyer who will not discuss your case, or look > at > a Contract, you hire him to defend; or attending a Church, where the > Preacher has never read the Bible. > > Obviously, the choice of the intelligent voter; the choice of the voter to > whom personal honor and integrity matters, is Ron Paul. > > Or let us look at the War On Terror. We face an enemy that has no fixed > base, no standing army, navy or air force; no industrial base; no large > population. All that enemy has, in reality, is a proven ability to > recruit > people willing to commit suicide trying to hurt us. That is their asset; > that is their strength. And yet only Ron Paul is willing to discuss how > that enemy recruits!! The other candidates act as though it is some sort > of > "Macho" thing to refuse to even discuss the reason that those committing > suicide to injure us, have stated as their reason for doing so! > > Teddy Roosevelt said, of foreign affairs, we should "Speak softly, but > carry > a Big Stick." We are being undermined, today, by men who shout > hysterically > or babble incoherently, but do not even understand what Teddy was talking > about. Ron Paul does. We dare not elect anyone who does not. > > Finally, only Ron Paul has been willing to discuss, in depth, what is > happening to the American Dollar, and why! Anyone who cares about the > value > of their savings, accounts receivable, insurance policies; or simply their > ability to make decisions based upon predictable economic factors, should > see the necessity of electing the one candidate, who actually understands > what factors control the value of our money. Again, that candidate is Ron > Paul. > > For more discussion, in depth: > http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul3.htm > http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul.htm > http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/Paul2.htm > > > William Flax > 414 Walnut Street > Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 > > > > "boobs" <clitteigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:c18bc115-18b0-403c-a999-f2090f7763a5@m34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> RON PAUL'S APPEAL is mostly to teenagers and other young and >> idealistic-but-unrealistic citizens. >> >> If those groups don't hit the polls in record numbers, everywhere, he >> doesn't stand a chance. >> >> In many regards, he's not unlike Eugene McCarthy, whose charisma >> charmed and mesmerized the kids like a Pied Piper, in 1968 and 1972. >> >> The moron repost the same crap every time someone post something positive about Ron paul,I wonder what his agenda is. >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Governor Swill Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:24:50 GMT, "William Flax" <krtq73aa@prodigy.net> wrote: >Thank you for posting this. Certainly all Americans, who have any sense of >fairness, must bristle at the media arrogance that seeks to exclude Ron >Paul--the one candidate who seeks to discuss the issues in depth, rather >than by slogan--from the debates, and from equal coverage. Considering that >Ron Paul is no threat to any honest man or woman--that Ron Paul is the >champion of freedom, not regimentation--what has been done to him is very >ugly indeed. Let's have a real, true debate on the issues that vitally >effect the future of America! How can any decent citizen oppose that idea? It would have been better had it actually been true. Swill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Governor Swill Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:25:44 -0500, "MasterChief" <1@nowhere.com> wrote: >The moron repost the same crap every time someone post something positive >about Ron paul,I wonder what his agenda is. Crackpot for President? Swill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jeff Morgan Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 William Flax wrote: > You keep posting the same smear. Therefore, I will respond just as > I did yesterday: > > The Presidency of the United States is a job created by our written > Constitution. Its functions are defined by our written > Constitution. It has no powers but those granted in our written > Constitution. The procedures for the election of a President are > spelled out in our written Constitution. The terms of Office are set > out in our written Constitution, as are the qualifications and oath > of Office of the President. > > Yet only one of the candidates for President, in either Party, > regularly discusses the Constitution and its specific provisions! > That candidate, of course, is Ron Paul. Excellent post. Our political has gotten used to committing crimes and doing as they please. Ron Paul is a challenge to that method of operation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.