Re: some dirty trick used by non-Muslims online

A

Almond

Guest
In article <1193779099.827032.91040@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, Kayid
Al-Kuffar <Kayedhom@gmail.com> wrote:
>What are non-Muslims afraid of???
>
>The following is a list of few "dirty" tricks used by non-Muslims
>online to challenge the high quality of Muslim articles.
>
>Non-Muslim intention is hijack the whole newsgroups by terrorizing
>Muslim posters to prevent them from participate in any discussion or
>posting.


Correct. I did see PLENTY of evidence of that on contro.cancel
pseoudo group.

What they have done to you, and I am the witness,
you can do to them, only much better.
Because you have brains, and they are nothing more than
bio-robots, brainwashed to oblivion with the lowest grade
one liner propaganda.

>Their job is to "kill" Muslims and pro-Palestinians articles before
>they reach to the readers.


Correct.

Because they are blood boiling and utterly intolerant zombies,
not even BEGINNING to comprehend what the real issues are,
and not even caring to even begin to comprehend it.

All they want is a free coca cola and stuff their faces with
macdonalds, and anyone, who challenges their puppet world of
zombies is an inherent threat to their very world view, and,
therefore, to be exterminated at all cost, so no one knows
the Truth.

>Or
>
>When they come across any powerful articles they dislike or disagree
>with, they will attack with malice the poster with menacing lines and
>vulgar remarks.


Correct. Seen plenty of that.

>Since non-Muslims don't have any valid argument against Islam,


Correct. Because they do not even care,
as they were brainwashed to literal oblivion with all these
ugly associations of Muslims and Islam with terrorism, shoved
down their throats on every information channel of media.

"Any lie, repeated long enough, eventuall becomes truth".
-- Adolph Hitler.

Now, Adolph Hitler was guided by one German psychologist
lady, who taugth him the tricks of zombification of humans.
It is with her "scientific" discoveries that Hitler was able
to achive such massive zombification effect on German people.

After a WWII, she was placed in jail as a war criminal.
She spent 2 years in prison and then...

Tada...

Americans came and got her out and brought to the USA to teach
those same mass brainwashing techniques in super-secret projects.
As a result, in early fifties, the real mass brainwashing was
rampant in the USA in the commerical world.

The secret was simple:

You don't zombify people with complicated explanations.
Instead, you use the simpliest one liner templates, such as
"coca cola is good, drink coca cola".

After you repeat this millions of times, on all possible
information channels, papers and you name it, that becomes
truth.

Simple as that.

I am sorry. But i am pretty busy here. So I can not follow
on your post point by point.

ALL I can offer is to download NewsMaestro and read the manual.
From then on, (starting with version 4.0.1), they will not be
able to shut your mouth with ANY of their tricks.

See my signature for this post with all the information
about it.

Good luck.

And remember the Truth can not be destroyed.
After all the lies are done with,
and they are FOREVER done with,
what remains is Truth.

It only takes time and intensity.

Finally, I do support the Arab people and Muslims
as this is probably the only people on the whole planet
that were abused as much as they were, and their battle
for freedom is something that is worth million fold
compared to all the battles for domination and this rotten
conspiracy of NWO, running rampant on the planet Earth.

Here is some quotes from my global archive,
in case you have not seen it:

Quote:

Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said,
"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
(NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6)."

Quote:

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, "We have to recognize that
Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing."
(NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

"The only good Arab is a dead Arab...When we have settled the
land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to
scurry around like drugged ****roaches in a bottle,"

--- Rafael Eitan,
Likud leader of the Tsomet faction (1981)
in Noam Chomsky, Fateful Triangle, pp 129, 130.

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

"It is forbidden to be merciful to them [Arabs], you must give them
missiles, with relish - annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones.
May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arabs' heads, and
cause their seed to be lost, and annihilate them, and cause
them to be vanquished and cause them to be cast from the
world,"

--- Rabbi Ovadia Yosef,
founder and spiritual leader of the Shas party,
Ma'ariv, April, 9, 2001.

Quote:

"One drop of blood of a Jew is worth that of a thousand
Gentiles." Yitzhak Shamir, a former Prime Minister of Israel

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

"There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here
to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them;
not one village, not one tribe, should be left."

--- Joseph Weitz,
the Jewish National Fund administrator
for Zionist colonization (1967),
from My Diary and Letters to the Children, Chapter III, p. 293.

Quote:

"When we have settled the land,
all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be
to scurry around like drugged ****roaches in a bottle."

--- Raphael Eitan,
Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces,
New York Times, 14 April 1983.

Quote:

"How can we return the occupied territories?
There is nobody to return them to."

--- Golda Meir,
March 8, 1969.

Quote:

"There was no such thing as Palestinians,
they never existed."

--- Golda Meir,
Israeli Prime Minister, June 15, 1969

Quote:

"The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us
in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical
existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after
the war."

--- Israeli General Matityahu Peled,
Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.

Quote:

Ben Gurion also warned in 1948:

"We must do everything to insure they ( the Palestinians)
never do return."

Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come
back to their homes.

"The old will die and the young will forget."

Quote:

"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned
to live here as slaves."

--- Chairman Heilbrun
of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat,
the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

Quote:

On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer
Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox Jew from Brooklyn,
massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children,
while they knelt in prayer in a mosque.

Subsequently, Israeli's have erected a statue to this -
his good work - advancing the Zionist Cause.

Goldstein was a disciple of the late Brooklyn
that his teaching that Arabs are "dogs" is derived
"from the Talmud." (CBS 60 Minutes, "Kahane").

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

That the Jews knew they were committing a criminal act is shown
by a eulogy Foreign Minister Moshe Dayan delivered for a Jew
killed by Arabs on the Gaza border in 1956:

"Let us not heap accusations on the murderers," he said.
"How can we complain about their deep hatred for us?
For eight years they have been sitting in the Gaza refugee camps,
and before their very eyes, we are possessing the land and the
villages where they and their ancestors have lived.

We are the generation of colonizers, and without the steel
helmet and the gun barrel we cannot plant a tree and build a home."

In April 1969, Dayan told the Jewish newspaper Ha'aretz:
"There is not one single place built in this country that
did not have a former Arab population."

"Clearly, the equation of Zionism with racism is founded on solid
historical evidence, and the charge of anti-Semitism is absurd."

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

"The equation of Zionism with the Holocaust, though, is based
on a false presumption.

Far from being a haven for all Jews, Israel is founded by
Zionist Jews who helped the Nazis fill the gas chambers and stoke
the ovens of the death camps.

Israel would not be possible today if the World Zionist Congress
and other Zionist agencies hadn't formed common cause with
Hitler's exterminators to rid Europe of Jews.

In exchange for helping round up non-Zionist Jews, sabotage
Jewish resistance movements, and betray the trust of Jews,
Zionists secured for themselves safe passage to Palestine.

This arrangement was formalized in a number of emigration
agreements signed in 1938.

The most notorious case of Zionist collusion concerned
Dr. Rudolf Kastner Chairman of the Zionist Organization in
Hungary from 1943-45.

To secure the safe passage of 600 Zionists to Palestine,
he helped the Nazis send 800,000 Hungarian Jews to their deaths.
The Israeli Supreme Court virtually whitewashed Kastner's crimes
because to admit them would have denied Israel the moral right
to exist."

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

"On Nov. 10, 2000, the American-Jewish editor in chief of the Kansas
City Jewish Chronicle, Debbie Ducro, published an impassioned 1,150
word article from another Jew decrying Israeli atrocities against the
Palestinians. The writer, Judith Stone, even used the term Israeli
Shoah, to draw allusion to Hitler's genocidal war against the Jews.
Ducro was fired on Nov. 11."

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

In San Francisco, Rabbi Michael Lerner has endured death threats
and vicious harassment from right-wing Jews because he gives voice
to Palestinian views on his website and in the magazine Tikkun.

"An Israeli web site called 'self-hate' has identified me as one
of the five enemies of the Jewish people, and printed my home
address and driving instructions on how to get to my home,"
wrote Lerner in a May 13 e-mail.

"We reported this to the police, the Israeli consulate, and to the
Anti Defamation league. The ADL said it wasn't their concern because
this was not a 'hate crime."

Here's a typical letter that Lerner said Tikkun received: "You subhuman
leftist animals. You should all be exterminated. You are the lowest of
the low life" (David Raziel in Hebron).

If anyone other than a Jew had written this, you can be sure that
the ADL and any other Jewish lobby groups would have gone into full
attack mode.

In other words, when non-Jews slander and threaten Jews, it's
called "anti-Semitism" and "hate crime'; when Zionists slander
and threaten Jews, nobody is supposed to notice.

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

Today, the world watches as Israelis unleash state-sanctioned
terrorism against Palestinians, who are deemed to be sub-human
(Untermenschen) - not worthy of dignity, respect or legal protection
under the law.

To kill a Palestinian, to destroy his livelihood, to force him
and his family out of their homes - these are accepted,
sanctioned forms of conduct by citizens of the Zionist Reich
designed to rid Palestine of a specific group of people.

If Nazism is racist and deserving of absolute censure, then so
is Zionism, for they are both fruit of the poisonous tree of
fascism.

It cannot be considered "anti-Semitic" to acknowledge this fact.

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, genocide, racism, ethnic cleansing, terrorism,
war crimes, Khasars, Illuminati, NWO]

As famed violinist Lord Yehudi Menuhin told the French newspaper
Le Figaro in January 1988:

"It is extraordinary how nothing ever dies completely.
Even the evil which prevailed yesterday in Nazi Germany is
gaining ground in that country [Israel] today."

For it to have any moral authority, the UN must equate Zionism
with racism. If it doesn't, it tacitly condones Israel's war
of extermination against the Palestinians.

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

"Thus, Illuminist John Page is telling fellow Illuminist
Thomas Jefferson that "...
Lucifer rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."

Certainly, this interpretation is consistent with most New Age
writings which boldly state that this entire plan to achieve
the New World Order is directed by Lucifer working through
his Guiding Spirits to instruct key human leaders of every
generation as to the actions they need to take to continue
the world down the path to the Kingdom of Antichrist."

--- from Cutting Edge Ministries

Quote:

"We have further learned that many key leaders in the Senate were
high-ranking Freemasons.

1.. When a Mason is taking the oath of the 3rd Degree, he promises
to conceal all crimes committed by a fellow Mason, except those of
treason and murder. [Malcom Duncan, Duncan's Ritual of Freemasonry,
New York, David McKay Co., p. 94]

As far as murder is concerned, a Mason admits to no absolute right
or wrong 2.. At the 7th Degree, the Mason promises that he "will assist
a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty,
and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same,
whether he be right or wrong." Now, we are getting very close to the truth of
the matter here.
Mason Trent Lott [33rd Degree] sees fellow Mason, President Bill Clinton,
in trouble over a silly little thing like Perjury and Obstruction of
Justice. Since Lott took this pledge to assist a fellow Mason,
"whether he be right or wrong", he is obligated to assistant
Bill Clinton. "whether he be right or wrong".

Furthermore, Bill Clinton is a powerful Illuminist witch, and has
long ago been selected to lead America into the coming New World Order.

As we noted in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,
the Plan calls for many scandals to break forth in the previous
types of government, so much so that people are wearied to death
of it all.

3. At the 13th Degree, Masons take the oath to conceal all crimes,
including Murder and Treason. Listen to Dr. C. Burns, quoting Masonic
author, Edmond Ronayne. "You must conceal all the crimes of your
[DISGUSTING degenerate] Brother Masons. and should you be summoned
as a witness against a Brother Mason, be always sure to shield him.

It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you're keeping
your obligations."
Key Senators Who Are Freemasons

1.. Senator Trent Lott [Republican] is a 33rd Degree Mason.
Lott is Majority Leader of the Senate

2.. Jesse Helms, Republican, 33rd Degree
3.. Strom Thurmond, Republican, 33rd Degree
4.. Robert Byrd, Democrat, 33rd Degree.
5.. Conrad Burns, Republican
6.. John Glenn, Democrat
7.. Craig Thomas, Democrat
8.. Michael Enzi,
9.. Ernest Hollings, Democrat
10.. Richard Bryan
11.. Charles Grassley

Robert Livingstone, Republican Representative."

--- NEWS BRIEF: "Clinton Acquitted By An Angry Senate:
Neither Impeachment Article Gains Majority Vote",
The Star-Ledger of New Jersey, Saturday,
February 13, 1999, p. 1, 6.

Quote:

[Zionism, fascism, ethnic cleansing, terrorism, war crimes, Khasars,
Illuminati, NWO]

"The epithet "anti-Semitism" is hurled to silence anyone,
even other Jews, brave enough to decry Israel's systematic,
decades-long pogrom against the Palestinian Arabs.

Because of the Holocaust, "anti-Semitism" is such a powerful
instrument of emotional blackmail that it effectively pre-empts
rational discussion of Israel and its conduct.

It is for this reason that many good people can witness
daily evidence of Israeli inhumanity toward the "Palestinians'
collective punishment," destruction of olive groves,
routine harassment, judicial prejudice, denial of medical services,
assassinations, torture, apartheid-based segregation, etc. --
yet not denounce it for fear of being branded "anti-Semitic."

To be free to acknowledge Zionism's racist nature, therefore,
one must debunk the calumny of "anti-Semitism."

Once this is done, not only will the criminality of Israel be
undeniable, but Israel, itself, will be shown to be the
embodiment of the very anti-Semitism it purports to condemn."

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

"...Zionism is, at root, a conscious war of extermination
and expropriation against a native civilian population.
In the modern vernacular, Zionism is the theory and practice
of "ethnic cleansing," which the UN has defined as a war crime."

"Now, the Zionist Jews who founded Israel are another matter.
For the most part, they are not Semites, and their language
(Yiddish) is not semitic. These Ashkenazi ("German") Jews --
as opposed to the Sephardic ("Spanish") Jews -- have no
connection whatever to any of the aforementioned ancient
peoples or languages.

They are mostly East European Slavs descended from the Khazars,
a nomadic Turko-Finnic people that migrated out of the Caucasus
in the second century and came to settle, broadly speaking, in
what is now Southern Russia and Ukraine."

In A.D. 740, the khagan (ruler) of Khazaria, decided that paganism
wasn't good enough for his people and decided to adopt one of the
"heavenly" religions: Judaism, Christianity or Islam.

After a process of elimination he chose Judaism, and from that
point the Khazars adopted Judaism as the official state religion.

The history of the Khazars and their conversion is a documented,
undisputed part of Jewish history, but it is never publicly
discussed.

It is, as former U.S. State Department official Alfred M. Lilienthal
declared, "Israel's Achilles heel," for it proves that Zionists
have no claim to the land of the Biblical Hebrews."

--- Greg Felton,
Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism

Quote:

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement,
that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them.
This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.
I'm here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue,
you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite.
It is the only prayer for which you stand.

You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty
that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next
twelve months shall be null and void.

The oath shall not be an oath;
the vow shall not be a vow;
the pledge shall not be a pledge.

They shall have no force or effect.

And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath,
vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer
that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted
from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon
their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered,
and for the same reason.

--- Benjamin H. Freedman

[Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful
Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner
of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry
after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the
remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his
considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the
Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.]

Quote:

"Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists
have complete control of our government.

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this
time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these
United States as though they were the absolute monarchs
of this country.

Now you may say that is a very broad statement,
but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep..."

--- Benjamin H. Freedman

[Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful
Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner
of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry
after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the
remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his
considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the
Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.]

Quote:

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you,
because they are known as "Jews". I don't call them Jews
myself. I refer to them as "so-called Jews", because I know
what they are). The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per
cent of the world's population of those people who call
themselves "Jews", were originally Khazars. They were a
warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they
were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia
into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of
800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor
did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom
was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so
powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war,
the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big
and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not
want to go into the details of that now. But that was their
religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and
barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became
so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he
decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either
Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism,
which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out
"eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism.
And that became the state religion. He sent down to the
Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up
thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and
schools, and his people became what we call "Jews".

There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put
a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but
back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they
come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed
insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help
repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their
ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave
you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to
church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew,
and we're Jews."

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the
same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call
them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54
million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in
620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted
Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000
miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's
birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call
themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics.
Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs
must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a
belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the
Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped
them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop
of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They
were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as
a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these
Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of
Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the
Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the
same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to
be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the
Khazars became what we call today "Jews".

--- Benjamin H. Freedman

Quote:

Lt. Gen. William G. "Jerry" Boykin, the new deputy undersecretary
of Offense for intelligence, is a much-decorated and twice-wounded
veteran of covert military operations.

Discussing the battle against a Muslim warlord in Somalia, Boykin told
another audience, "I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that my
God was a real God and his was an idol."

"We in the army of God, in the house of God, kingdom of God have been
raised for such a time as this," Boykin said last year.

On at least one occasion, in Sandy, Ore., in June, Boykin said of
President Bush:

"He's in the White House because God put him there."


>then
>trolling is the only option they have and still in use by as many non-
>Muslims they can get online.
>
>The following some dirty trick used by non-Muslims online:
>
> [ Forgery] Impersonating popular Muslims posters by using their
>name. Stealing aliases and identity theft are really common practice
>among non-Muslims online by pretending to be the genuine Muslim poster
>for the purpose of deception
>
> [Fraud] Distorting the truth, giving a false misleading account of
>Islam by twisted and disorderly manner, such as modifying Muslims
>posts to make them looking different in what actually said.
>
> [Cancellation] "Third-party cancels" Unauthorized and forged cancel
>article others, by such tactics non-Muslims believe they promote
>censorship to prevent the truth from reaching the readers!!
>
> [Excessive crossposting] posting off-topic trash to more not related
>newsgroups.
>
> [Spam] sending barrage of malicious spam to flood this newsgroup
>
>Despite all the above and other dirty tricks used by anti-Islam
>trolls, still Muslim posters winning at all fronts.
>
>Why? Because they are standing for noble cause, justice peace and love
>without boundaries...
>
>Ambassador Herman Ellis, in a testimony in front of the committee on
>Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives of the United States
>Congress on June 24th, 1985, said, "The Muslim community of the globe
>today is in the neighborhood of one billion. That is an impressive
>figure.
>
>But what to me is equally impressive is that Islam today is the
>fastest growing monotheistic religion. This is something we have to
>take into account.
>
>Something is right about Islam. It is attracting a good many people."
>
>Yes, something is right about Islam and that's why it has attracted so
>many people throughout its 1400 years of history.
>
>Get The Holy Quran. It is absolutely FREE
>
>http://www.freequran.org/
>
>http://www.faithfreedom.com/
>
>Useful links
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2482wo
>
>http://www.muslim-answers.org/
>
>www.islamonline.net
>
>http://www.muslimheritage.com/Default.aspx
>
>http://www.studying-islam.org/index.aspx
>
>Similar websites
>
>Islamic Awareness
>http://www.islamic-awareness.org/
>Bismikaallahuma.org
>http://bismikaallahuma.org/
>The True Religion http://www.thetruereligion.org/missionary.htm
>Investigating Islam
>http://www.islamic.org.uk/
>Muslim Answers
>http://www.muslim-answers.org/
>Sharif.org
>http://www.sharif.org.uk/
>Guided Ones
>http://www.guidedones.com/
>Understanding Islam
>http://www.understanding-islam.org/
>Examine the Truth
>http://www.ExamineTheTruth.com
>
>
>


--
The most powerful Usenet tool you have ever heard of.
NewsMaestro v. 4.0.5 - Way Too Cool has been released.

Automatic enablement of all buttons, checkboxes and fields
depending on operation.
Templates generator improvements.

Job list improvements for new installations having no jobs
to begin with.

In some previous releases some class files were missing.
As a result, the program would not run.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Multi-job support and other important feature additions
and various improvements and optimizations.

Web page:
http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/

Download page:
http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/Download_Information.htm

Send any feedback to newsmaestroinfo \at/ mail.ru.
Your personal info will not be released and your privacy
will be honored.
 
How many moderate Muslims gave money to victims of Islamic terrorism?
Exactly the same number of moderate Nazis gave money to victims of
Holocaust. When American Muslim named Kamal Nawash tried to organize
anti-terrorism rally in Washington, DC., Islamic organizations
condemned the rally. About 50 people showed up, mostly Jews and
Christians. Arabic proverb says "first comes Saturday, then Sunday."
It means that Arabs are going to exterminate Jews before they
exterminate Christians. It also means that Israel is the first line of
defense against Islam. "Islamic Civilization" is a contradiction in
terms because the main purpose of Islam is replacing our civilization
with barbaric theocracy. Our media, our politicians, and our
universities are terrorized by Muslim immigrants and corrupted by
Saudi petrodollars. Muslim terrorists have not corrupted Islam, Islam
has corrupted them. Muslim immigrants could not care less about their
host countries because they have pledged exclusive allegiance to an
Arab-dominated, Muslim nation called Ummah. Can you imagine Churchill
or Roosevelt praising "moderate Nazis"? Alas, we do not have statesmen
who understand the heinous nature of Islam. Muslims use this fact to
prove that the West is decadent and powerless.

The most benign varieties of Islam: Sufism and Ismaili, are Bedouin
fables. Its mainstream varieties are not religions but crime
syndicates controlled by Arabic and Iranian imperialists. The main
purpose of its most deadly variety, called Salafism, is killing all
non-Salafis. Islam must be eradicated to prevent another world war.

There are several hundred sharia mini-states in Europe. Muslims living
in those sharia mini-states hate outsiders, especially the police. If
an outsider ventures there, his life is in danger. In southern France
there are more mosques than churches. If the present trends continue,
Muslims will become the majority of European population in about 35
years!

23-year old French Jew, Ilan Halimi was abducted by Muslim immigrants
and tortured for three weeks in a basement of an apartment building in
a southeastern suburb of Paris. Some Muslim neighbors came to the
basement to watch the torture and to participate in the torture. About
30 Muslim immigrants living in the building heard the screams of the
tortured Jew for three weeks, but none of them called the police. The
Jew was later found tied to a tree near a railway track. Cigarettes
were burned into his skin. He had multiple stab wounds. One ear and
one toe was severed. 80% of his skin was burned. He died on his way to
a hospital. While the Jew was held hostage, his torturers called his
family on the phone many times. They made ransom demands and quoted
Koran while tortured Jew's screaming was heard in the background. The
French police refused to trace the phone calls claiming that they had
technical problems. The police also claimed that there was "no anti-
Semitism involved." The Jew's mother, Ruth Halimi was not happy with
the way the police handled the case. She said: "We told the police
that there had been at least three other attempted abductions of young
Jews, but they persisted in considering the motives purely criminal
because they are afraid of reviving a clash with the Muslims." The
French interior minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, described the abduction,
torture and killing of the Jew as an anti-Semitic crime.

Two years earlier another Jew named Sebastien Sellam was savagely
killed in the eastern part of Paris by a Muslim. The Muslim cut off
the Jew's head and took out his eyeballs with a fork. He came home a
few minutes later saying to his family: "Now, I can go to paradise. I
killed my Jew." The Muslim was sent to jail, then to an insane asylum,
and declared cured two years later.
____________________________

"Jihad is holy fighting in Allah's Cause with full force of numbers
and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of
its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah's Word is made
superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and
Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from
that) Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority
vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who
tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart
wish to fulfil this duty, dies as a hypocrite." sources:
1. http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/59458,
2. Koran 2:190 Footnote, King Fahd Complex translation
3. page 580 of the Islamic University of Medina's translation of Sahih
al-Bukhari's Hadith; it opens Bukhari's Book of Jihad

"To say that moderate Islam is the solution to radical Islam implies
several things: that moderate Islam exists; that it represents the
true (though perhaps currently disregarded) norm of Islam; and that
radical Islam is a departure from that norm." - Lawrence Auster

Muslim activists emphasize that Islam is a religion of peace. They say
that "Islam" is derived from the Arabic word "Salam," meaning peace,
while Islam, in fact, means "Surrender" (to the will of Allah). To
prove that Islam stands for peace, Muslims often quote certain verses
out of the early period of the Quranic revelation. Here are some of
them. "Let there be no compulsion in religion." Surah 2: 256 "And have
patience with what they (opponents) say, and leave them with noble
(dignity)." Surah 73:10 However, what Muslim advocates deliberately
fail to say is that the peaceful verses from the Meccan period have
been abrogated (nullified) and replaced by the militant verses of the
Medinan period. These verses were written after Mohammed moved to
Medina, abandoned his peaceful approach and resorted to using the
sword. As an example of the abrogation, 124 verses of the Quran that
call for tolerance, peace, and patience have been canceled and
replaced by this one single verse: "Fight and slay the Pagans wherever
ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them
in every stratagem (of war.)" Surah 9:5 source: "The Islamization of
America" by Abdullah Al-Araby,
http://infidelnation.org/DOWNLOADS/TheIslamizationofAmericaTheIsl.zip

This idea of abrogation was concocted to deal with the many
contradictions in the Koran. source: http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/004246.php

"There is no moderate Islam. There are Muslims who are passive, who
don't always follow the rules of Islam, but there's really only one
Islam, defined as submission to the will of God. There's nothing
moderate about it... The Western mind-set - that if we respect them,
they're going to respect us, that if we indulge and appease and
condone and so on, the problem will go away - is delusional." - Ayaan
Hirsi Ali

"The terror and death inflicted on humanity is not the work of radical
Islam, neither the political Islam, nor the militant Islam. It is
Islam, period... To be a moderate Muslim demands that a person
explicitly renounce much of the violent, exclusionary, and radical
teachings of the Quran. By so doing, the individual issues his own
death warrant in Islamic countries, is condemned as an apostate if he
lives in a non-Islamic land, and may even earn a fatwa on his head...
The so-called moderate Muslims, even if they exist, are complicit in
the crimes of the radicals either by providing them with funds,
logistics, and new recruits or simply by failing actively to confront
and unequivocally renounce them." - Amil Imani

"There does not exist an identifiable body of Muslims, substantive in
number or an outright majority, who could be described as "moderate"
by their repudiation of Muslim extremists. Violence has been an
integral part of Muslim history, irrespective of whether it is
sanctioned by Islam, and Muslims who unhesitatingly use violence to
advance their political ambitions have created a climate within their
faith culture that any Muslim who questions such practice is then
deemed apostate and subject to harm. Consequently, what might pass for
"moderate" Muslims, the large number of Muslims unaccounted for as to
what they think, in practical terms constitute a forest within which
extremists are incubated, nurtured, given ideological and material
support, and to which they return for sanctuary." - Salim Mansur

"Just as cancer cannot be reformed..., Islam can't be reformed either
and it must be eradicated for the world to be saved." - Ali Sina

Latest offerings from the religion of peace: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
____________________________

THE ORIGIN OF ISLAM (sources: http://www.historyofjihad.org/
http://www.islam-watch.org/AnwarSheikh/JihadandCivilization1.htm
http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Allah-and-Eurabia.htm with minor
edits)

The birthplace of Islam, Arabia was afflicted with a harsh environment
unsuitable for agriculture. Bedouins inhabited this harsh environment.
They were wandering in search of pastures and supplemented their
meager livelihood with brigandage, which meant raiding other tribes
and commercial caravans. Though it was sheer looting, it assured them
solace, security and survival, and, therefore, it was not looked down
upon as sinful but a source of power, pleasure and prestige. This
institution of brigandage known as ghazwa (razzia) had existed long
before the advent of prophet Muhammad, the greatest Arab national
hero. The Umayyad poet al-Qutami has alluded to this custom in his two
verses: "Our business is to make raids on the enemy, on our neighbor
and on our own brother, in case we find none to raid but a brother."
Brigandage was a compulsive trait of the Arab national character and
this is the reason that it was not considered an act of impiety but a
mark of honor and manliness.

The chief deity of pre-Islamic Mecca was the moon-god called Hubal or
al-ilah (god), which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times.
Mohammed dropped the name Hubal but retained the generic Allah. Pre-
Islamic Arabs worshipped the moon-god by bowing in prayer toward Mecca
several times a day. They also made pilgrimages to Mecca, walked
around the Kaaba seven times and threw stones at the devil. And they
fasted for one month, which began with the appearance of the crescent
moon and ended when the crescent moon reappeared. These same rites
form the core of Islam today: Muslims bow in prayer toward Mecca, make
pilgrimages to Mecca, walk around the Kaaba seven times, and they
still throw stones at the devil. They also observe the fast of
Ramadan, which begins and ends with the crescent moon.

The word Islam is not derived from the word "Salam" which means peace,
but from the word "al-silm" which means submission or surrender. The
Kaaba is actually a meteorite which fascinated the ancient tribal
Arabs who were awe-struck by its flaming rush from the skies before it
landed in Mecca.

Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be
obliterated) was a murderer, a pedophile and a scoundrel of the worst
kind. Epileptic fits created hallucinations that a god was talking to
him. His first converts were his wife Khadija, his slave Zaid, and
hardened criminals who wanted to loot a harried and defeated enemy.
Having lost his father, the posthumous orphan Mohammed wanted to
perpetuate his father's memory. His father's name Abdallah was derived
from Abd-Allah which translates as "Slave of Allah." This is the
reason why Mohammed chose Allah among the many pre-Islamic Arab
deities to be the only deity to be worshipped by the Muslims.

After normal marriage with Khadija, he started his spree of marriages
with his marriage of Aisha who was the daughter of his follower Abu
Bakr. Aisha was just seven years old when Mohammed married her and she
was only nine years old when he consumed this marriage! This is the
inspiration for the Arabs of today to pick up child brides.

Realizing the significance of brigandage, Mohammed converted this
institution into a religious doctrine called jihad i.e., the holy War
against the infidels. At his core, Mohammed was nothing more than a
power grabber, who slyly used religion to promote himself. And the
people of Mecca as well as those of Medina saw through that. Some
inhabitants of Medina supported him because he advocated war against
their competitors: the Jews and the Quraish tribe of Mecca. Mohammed
drilled into his followers the fantasy that if they died in a jihad,
they would reach heaven (Jann'at) where they would be served by 72
virgins (Houris) and by pearly eyed boys for the perverts among his
followers.

Two communities lived in Medina (Yathrib): the pagan, polytheistic
Arabs and the Jews. They were often on the warpath. The Arabs were
more numerous, but the Jews by virtue of being traders were more
prosperous and better organized, they also had built fortresses within
and around Medina to defend themselves during their internecine fights
with the pre-Islamic Arab tribes around Yathrib (Medina). The Jews
were usually victorious in the battles against the Arabs. The Arabs of
Medina decided to outwit the Jews by becoming Mohammed's followers and
seek his help in defeating the Jews. This is why the Arabs of Medina
(Yathrib) welcomed Mohammed, in whom they saw an opportunity to break
the trade monopoly of the Jews and also to defeat their other rivals,
the Meccans.

Islam was conceived as a political ploy of Arabs living in Medina
against Jews and Mecca, and it was marketed by Mohammed to his first
converts in Medina as a political alliance rather than as a lofty
religion. Mohammed organized them to take his first revenge on the
Meccans, and he started regularly raiding the caravans of the Meccans
that passed by Medina. He organized 64 such raids from 622 to 630, of
which he personally led 27 raids. These raids were called Ghazawats or
Razzias. The Meccans finally got fed up with Mohammed's antics and
attacked him in Medina. This led to the first major battle in
Mohammed's life - the battle of Badr. The Meccan army was led by Abu
Jahal. In this battle, he realized that the far stronger Meccan army
could only be defeated by guile. He ordered all the water springs
outside Medina to be sanded-up, so that the attacking Meccans would be
without any water. This was a legitimate tactic in a war, but a true
messenger of god would not destroy water supply of his own clan. The
Meccans decided to outwit Mohammed and attack Medina during a
cloudburst, to obviate the need for water. But the heavily armored
Meccan army got trapped in the slushy sands outside Medina and they
were in disarray with camels falling over each other in total
disorder. They were defeated by the infantry charges of the Mohammed
's rag-tag, but highly motivated gang.

Many of Mohammed's followers pretended to leave Islam before they
settled in Mecca, thus becoming the fifth column during the eventual
invasion of Mecca that took place in 8 A.H. (630 C.E.). The Hudna
(temporary peace treaty) with the Meccans demonstrates the evil genius
of Mohammed. This evil genius is shared by all Muslims who trick non-
Muslims in day-to-day life in a practice popularly known among the
Muslims as Taquiyya (also spelt as Taqiyya or Taqiya) which means
deception. Pervez Musharraf (the President of Pakistan) referred to
the Hudna when he announced after 9/11 that he was making a pact with
America to fight the Taliban.

With every Muslim military victory, there was not just a change of
ruler, but a wholesale slaughter of those who refused to convert or
pay Jaziya. There was also a total destruction of the pre-Islamic
culture, its educational institutions, libraries, etc.

One of the cardinal principles of Islam is that when a Muslim commits
heinous deeds in order to bring victory to Muslims waging a Jihad
against the Non-Muslims (Kafirs), Islamic law forgives those deeds.
Mohammed preached contempt for all the non-Muslims and told his
gangsters that the non-Muslims were living in ignorance (Jahiliyaa)
and that he would lead his followers to enlightenment (Ailm or ilm).
This enlightenment forgave all acts of rape, murder, torture, as long
as they were committed against the non-Muslims (Kafirs).

Muslims respect only strength and cruelty. They treat magnanimity,
charity and noblesse with contempt. The ritual of emulating Mohammed
in everything is called the Sunnat (or Sunnah). Muslim males emulate
him in doing everything he did like drinking camel urine, dyeing hair
red by using henna, in addition to emulating Mohammed's traits of
being murderous, lecherous, and deceptive.

Arabs brainwashed, Arabized and Islamized all the conquered people at
the pain of death. Knowing all this is relevant today for those who
attempt to eradicate Islam. To do so we have to first understand the
depth of depravity in Islam. Islam has brutalized them and transformed
them into robotic followers, killers, and sadists. If the Muslims are
to be saved from Islam, then it is not sufficient to conquer the
Muslim countries and to encourage democratic forms of government. If
we want Muslims to become emancipated, civilized beings, we have to de-
Islamize them as thoroughly as we have de-Nazified Germans.

Muslims have devised ingenious methods to reach those best suited for
Islam, so they evangelize in prisons, where they appeal to the dregs
of society, or those who come from broken families, or those who have
had some heart-breaking personal experience. Muslim missionaries prey
on them like vultures and hyenas. Richard Reid (the shoe bomber), and
Jose Padilla are typical Westerners who became Muslims. During the
fourteen centuries of Islam's existence, death threats forced people
to become Muslims and kept them Muslim. The same death threats are
used today to intimate Ayan Hirsi Ali, Salman Rushdie and many others
who tell us the truth about Islam. According to the Shariah, a Murtad
(Muslim apostate) has to be killed, and it is the duty of all Muslims
to kill any Muslim who leaves Islam.

While all forms of religious fanaticism are deplorable, only Islam
sanctifies the slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims). It teaches
Muslims to gloat over the killing of non-Muslims, including women and
children. Islam is a psychology of perpetual war. A psychology that
had existed among the pre-Islamic Bedouin Arabs. But then, before
Islam, this psychology was not a global problem, since the Arabs
fought amongst themselves.

The full understanding of the heinous nature of Islam is the first,
and most important step in our efforts to eradicate Islam. Islam lives
by the sword and shall die by the sword. Death threats forced people
into becoming Muslims and kept them as Muslims. Death threats are the
only way these scum can be shaken out of their adherence to the
savagery called Islam. Those opposed to Islam will have to be like the
hunter who aims his rifle between the eyes of the man-eating tiger and
shoots till the tiger is dead meat. The hunter bears no enmity toward
the tiger, but he has to kill the tiger if he does not intend to
become tiger's dinner.
____________________________

THE BRUTAL TRUTH ABOUT ISLAM

Name any area of achievement, any field of human endeavour - patents
filed, literacy, quality of life, degree of civil or political
freedoms, transparency, world-class universities, and so on. In every
case, the nations of Islam are at or near the bottom in every
category, and only barely beat sub-Saharan Africa in overall
performance. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Why-Muslims-doomed-to-fail.htm

Muslims constitute 22 percent of world population with a 1 percent
share of Nobel Prizes. Jews constitute 0.23 percent of world
population with a 22 percent share of Nobel Prizes. source:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51126.htm

Islam has the world's record of genocide. Its victims, over more than
1,350 years, number in the hundreds of millions, many more than the
victims of the Holocaust and World Communism combined. Muslim genocide
is still ongoing in the Sudan, Ivory Cost. Mauritania, Somalia, the
Philippines, Indonesia, and, to a lesser extent in other Muslim
countries. source: http://allaboutmuhammad.com/page15.html

Turkish holocaust of Christian Armenians inspired Adolf Hitler:
http://tinyurl.com/3yjvae
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide#Influence_of_the_Armenian_Genocide_on_Adolf_Hitler

Beheading video of American civil engineer Eugene Armstrong:
http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/audio/eugene-armstrong-beheading-video.wmv

Beheading video of American engineer Jack Hensley:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/jack_hensle.htm

Beheading video of Japanese tourist Shosei Koda:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/shosei_koda.htm

Beheading video of American businessman Nicholas Berg:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/nick_burg.htm

Beheading video of British civil engineer Kenneth John Bigley:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/kenneth_bigley.htm

Beheading video of South Korean translator Kim Sun-il:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/kim_sun_execution.htm

Muslim Albanians exterminate Christian Serbs in Kosovo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaqThra0kCI

Muslim families are baby-production factories. No consideration is
given about the child's future... and whether the parents can feed,
shelter and educate him/her. What is important is the mullah's call to
grow in numbers, so that the Ummah may overcome the kaffirs. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1259

The Muslim world does not accept non-Muslim immigrants. In fact, it is
becoming more homogenous as Islamic regimes drive out religious
minorities or whittle them down through other means of attrition. Even
Muslims who feel entitled to life in the West often decry the presence
of foreigners in Muslim lands. source: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=1072859

"What I dislike about it is this element of parasitism. These (Muslim)
people who want to come to other countries from their own benighted
places. They twist the laws, they hire lawyers, they do bad things to
get residence. And then, having got that, they wish to destroy (the
society) which has welcomed them." - Nobel Prizewinning author Sir
Vidia Naipaul

Everything a Muslim does is done to promote Islam. Everything they see
and touch which is not Islamic, or accepted by Islam, becomes a target
for "jihad". So no matter how many concessions we make, Westerners can
never concede enough. Yet Muslims are moving us, step by step, towards
conceding the unthinkable: that there is only one God and his name is
Allah and that politics, religion, education and every other form of
human life must bow down to and accept the "guidance" of Islam. There
can be no shared ground with Islam. Muslims, by their very nature, are
committed to transforming every area they live and work in into an
Islam-dominated world. And freedom for Islam is doom for anything and
anyone else. Saying "I will live in peace, equality and tolerance with
Islam" is... the medical equivalent to saying you will live in
equality and harmony with a body-wasting disease.... Anyone with a
mind knows that "jihad" means the Islamization of everyday life. And
any Muslim who accepts secularism, freedom, equality or any of our
other cherished "Western" values can no longer be considered a Muslim
in anything but name - for the Qur'an forbids it. The dominance and
authority of the Qur'an is why Muslim communities, no matter where
they are have never integrated. They are either dominant or growing...
Building a mosque in a European city is Islamization. Changing school
meals to halal is Islamization. A teacher telling my child that Allah
and God are the same thing is Islamization. Destroying traditional
European culture because it may offend the people who would like to
destroy it is Islamization. Allowing irresponsibly fecund families
into Europe to breed, take our jobs and bleed our welfare system dry
is Islamization... "Islamization" is the mass immigration of people
who hold "Western" values in contempt. "Islamization" is the
invitation of people who detest our freedoms, religions, equalities
and ways of life into our neighbourhoods, cities and schools. And
"Islamization" is the reprehensible enforcement of multiculturalism
even though the result is inevitable social tension, alienation and
hatred. Westerners and Islamic culture are bipolar opposites which
never have - and never will - share common values. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1355

I was born and raised as a Muslim... I left Islam when I understood
that Islam is a sick and evil religion... You will find us well
mannered, polite... but we will stab you in your back when you are
sleeping as we did on 911. There will be more 9/11s in Europe and in
America. We will say, "We do not support terrorism but America got
what it deserved." The war of civilizations has just begun... American
laws will protect us. Democrats and Leftist will support us. UNO will
legitimize us. CAIR will incubate us. ACLU will empower us. Western
Universities will educate us. Mosques will shelter us. OPEC will
finance us. Hollywood will love us... We will use your welfare
system... We will take the advantage of American kindness,
gullibility, and compassion... We will say one thing on the camera and
teach another thing to our children at home... Our boys will marry
Caucasian girls in Europe and in America. We will mix with the
intricate fabric of the Western society but still will remember to do
Jihad when time comes. Who are we? We are the sleeper cells. We will
raise our children to be loyal to Islam and Mohammad only. Everything
else is secondary... You infidels cannot defeat us. We are 1.2 billion
strong. We will double again. Do you have enough bullets to kill us?
source (minor edits): http://waronjihad.org/muslim170605.html

I headed for Gracanica, a small enclave of Christian Serbs who's
ancestors have been living in Kosovo for thousands of years. Gracanica
Monastery has been the site of Christian churches since the 6th
century, yet when I arrived I was struck by the towering concrete
walls adorned with coiled barbed wire and machine gun nests, all
required now for the protection of the nuns and bishops who live
there. The outside was also spotted with vehicle blockers reminiscent
of Normandy Beach, with KFOR guards and vehicles patrolling to protect
the Christians from Islamist attacks. I visited with the nuns in the
monastery, who told me their stories, how much they lived in fear of
being murdered by radical Muslims. My heart sank as I saw that even
though their families had been there for countless years, they knew
that their situation would never get better, and that sometime in
their lives they would either be murdered or forced to leave. My mind
shot back to Dearborn, Michigan, and I found myself wondering if
Christians there would one day be forced to live like this. source:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=9A68C6F6-8A08-453E-B2E8-6E247D2736CD

Why did Bosnia collapse into the worst slaughter in Europe since World
War Two? In the thirty years before the meltdown, Bosnian Serbs had
declined from 43 percent to 31 percent of the population, while
Bosnian Muslims had increased from 26 percent to 44 percent. In a
democratic age, you can't buck demography-except through civil war.
The Serbs figured that out - as other Continentals will in the years
ahead: if you can't outbreed the enemy, cull 'em. The problem that
Europe faces is that Bosnia's demographic profile is now the model for
the entire continent. source: http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_1_urbanities-steyn.html

The mythical Moderate Islam is nowhere to be found... After each
terror attack, moderate Islam seems more of a dream while the reality
of Jihad expands around the globe... While Muslims have been moderate
under European colonial rule, the Islamic Revival has brought a return
of the original Islam. Given its origin, Islam has severe problems
that preclude it from being a suitable candidate for modernization and
as a basis for a sustained liberal order. Consequently, Islam will
continue to be a threat to civilization as long as it exists... The
key to understanding Islam is to realize that it is a supremacist
ideology. This explains why, for jihadist Muslims, the atrocity of
9/11 was a religious experience that reaffirmed Allah's will that
Islam is destined to rule this world... source:
http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/2005_12_01_libertyandculture_archive.html

There is no such thing as "radical Islam", since by its true
definition Islam is nothing but radical. Those who espouse a "liberal"
view of Islam should be forced to back up their nouveau interpretation
with unabrogated scriptural facts. Unless such would-be "reformists"
can categorically denounce Islamofascisim based on sound evidence from
the Qur'an, they prove to be the true radicals... The terrorists are
faithful and true to what is written in the holy Qur'an. A Muslim is
forbidden to think critically about the Qur'an. He must blindly obey
it and accept it passively and should memorize all of it. source:
http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=71&Itemid=2

Progressive radicalization is a persistent theme in Islam, not just in
the West, but in other parts of the world as well, where
fundamentalism usually has a way of winning out over pragmatism.
source: http://www.topix.net/forum/religion/hindu/TVJL7MSEGIK5D2GM9

"Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not
disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of
(other) countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country
in the world." - Ayatollah Khomeini

"Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of
creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and
prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no
jokes in Islam. There is no humor in Islam. There is no fun in Islam.
There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious." - Ayatollah
Khomeini

"Those who oppose the mullahs oppose Islam itself; eliminate the
mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years. It is only the
mullahs who can bring the people into the streets and make them die
for Islam - begging to have their blood shed for Islam." - Ayatollah
Khomeini

"I have nothing against Islam because it educates the men in this
division for me and promises them heaven if they fight and are killed
in action. A very practical and attractive religion for soldiers." -
Heinrich Himmler (head of Nazi SS troops)

Hassan al Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood (from which
today's radical Muslim groups descend) was, after all, an open admirer
and supporter of Adolf Hitler -- as was the principal theorist of the
modern jihad, Sayyid Qutb. During World War II, the Grand Mufti of
Jerusalem, cousin of Yasir Arafat and spiritual godfather of
Palestinian nationalism, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, pronounced his pro-
Nazi sympathies openly and proudly. In May 1941, he issued a fatwa
calling upon the Germans to bomb Tel Aviv, and in November 1941
traveled to Berlin and met with Hitler. He implored the Nazi dictator
to help implement a Final Solution in the Middle East. Then he went to
the Balkans, where he spearheaded the creation of Muslim units of the
Waffen SS. source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=FDD13E54-41C7-4C89-A482-58159E9435A5

Sun Tzu teaches that to win a war one must know who the enemy is. And
if there is a single reason while we've failed, it is the
administration's' staggering inability after six years to figure out
who our enemy is, let alone how to go about defeating it. Officially,
we're fighting a war against terror, but terrorism is a tactic not an
enemy and one does not win wars by fighting tactics. Yet, the enemy is
very real and formidable. Armed with a murderous ideology, it has a
worldwide support and recruitment infrastructure, virtually unlimited
financing and single-minded commitment to the destruction of our
civilization... Saudi Arabia, a reactionary medieval fiefdom
subsisting on our oil rents, has spent, by its own admission, anywhere
between $80 and $100 billion dollars over the past 30 years exporting
its hateful Wahhabi creed worldwide and building a gigantic
infrastructure of Islamism. There is not a city of any size anywhere
in the West today that does not have a Saudi-controlled mosque,
Islamic center or a madrassa, all preaching hatred and violence
against the infidels. In the United States, at least half of the
mosques are owned by the radical Wahhabi organization North American
Islamic Trust (NAIT) and most of what claims to be the Muslim
establishment is in the hands of radical Islamists.
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/terrorism.php?id=1315637

What on earth has American foreign policy got to do with the stoning
to death of a woman for adultery in Nigeria? It has every thing to do
with Islam, and Islamic Law... We must take seriously what the
Islamists say to understand their motivations, to understand September
11, 2001. The four greatest influences on the modern rise of Militant
Islam have been the Egyptians Hasan al Banna, the founder of Muslim
Brethren, and Sayyid Qutb, the Indo-Pakistani, Maududi, and the
Iranian Ayatollah Khomeini. They all repeat the same message, derived
from classical writers like Ibn Taymiyyah, and ultimately from the
Koran and Hadith, namely, it is the divinely ordained duty of all
Muslims to fight non-Muslims in the literal, military sense until man-
made law has been replaced by God's Law, the Sharia, and Islam has
conquered the entire world... In August, 2002, the Rand Corporation
published a report that described Saudi Arabia as "the kernel of evil,
the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent." The report went on
explain that "Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our
allies. The Saudis are active at every level of the terror chain, from
planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to
cheerleader." And yet little seems to have changed in the West's
behaviour towards a regime that has financed terrorism, funneled
millions into madrassas that preach more anti-Western hatred, has
corrupted institutions of higher education like Harvard and Georgetown
University, has bought the favours of Western politicians and seeks to
destroy Western civilisation at every turn. We know the reason: oil.
But until we address the question of Saudi Arabia and its influence on
life in the West we shall have no progress, no rest... Demand the re-
writing of Saudi, Egyptian, and Syrian textbooks preaching hatred of
the West, of Jews, of Non-Muslims... French teachers, in recent years,
have been intimidated by Muslim pupils into not teaching the
Holocaust... There is, among many well-meaning Western intellectuals,
academics, and Islamologists, the belief that somehow Islam will
reform itself without anyone anywhere ruffling any feathers,
disturbing Muslim sensibilities, or saying anything at all about the
Koran. This is wishful thinking. If one desires to bring about an
Enlightenment in the Islamic world or among Muslims living in the
West, at some stage, someone somewhere will have to apply to the Koran
the same techniques of textual analysis as were applied to the Bible
by Spinoza and others, especially in Germany during the 19th Century.
In recent years, Saudi Arabia, and other Islamic countries (for
example, Brunei) have established Chairs of Islamic Studies in
prestigious Western Universities, which are encouraged to present a
favourable image of Islam. Scientific research, leading to objective
truth, no longer seems to be the goal. Critical examination of the
sources or the Koran is discouraged. Scholars, such as Daniel
Easterman, have even lost their posts for not teaching about Islam in
the way approved by Saudi Arabia. In December, 2005, Georgetown and
Harvard Universities accepted $20 million each from Saudi Prince
Alwaleed bin Talal for programmes in Islamic Studies. Such money can
only corrupt the original intent of all higher institutions of
education, that is, the search for truth. Now, we shall only have
"Islamic truth" that is acceptable to the Royal Saudi family, a family
that has financed terrorism, anti-Westernism and anti-Semitism for
over thirty years. Previous donations from various Saudi sources have
included gifts of $20 million, $5 million, and $2 million dollars to
the University of Arkansas, the University of California, Berkeley;
and Harvard respectively. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/IbnWarraq/Islamic-Enlightenment.htm

"Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Mohammedanism
rather than with Christianity and Buddhism. Christianity and Buddhism
are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love
of contemplation. Mohammedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social,
unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of this world. - Bertrand
Russell (source: Theory and Practice of Bolshevism, London, 1921 pp .
5, 29, 114)

"The conversion of the entire population to Islam and the extinction
of every form of dissent is the ideal of the Muslim State. If any
infidel is suffered to exist in the community, it is as a necessary
evil, and for a transitional period only. Political and social
disabilities must be imposed on him, and bribes offered to him from
the public funds, to hasten the day of his spiritual enlightenment and
the addition of his name to the roll of true believers. A non-Muslim
therefore cannot be a citizen of the State; he is a member of a
depressed class; his status is a modified form of slavery. He lives
under a contract (zimma, or 'dhimma') with the State: for the life and
property grudgingly spared to him by the commander of the faithful he
must undergo political and social disabilities, and pay a commutation
money. In short, his continued existence in the State after the
conquest of his country by the Muslims is conditional upon his person
and property made subservient to the cause of Islam." Author: Bat
Ye'or source: http://globalpolitician.com/articleshow.asp?ID=2878&cid=3&sid=7

For the most part, Christianity has been purged from the Middle East.
While some countries have a small minority of Christians, they are
persecuted and tormented and in many cases, they are not even allowed
to be citizens of the country of their birth because they are not
Muslim. In most Islamic countries, non-Muslims cannot own land and
their children are not allowed to attend the better schools. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=254

For hundreds of years the Middle East was the embodiment of real
multicultural ideal, the thesaurus of spiritual and philosophical
knowledge. Antique mystery religions and Zoroastrism; the Ebonites and
the first Christian sects; Gnosticism and Kabbalistic teachings; the
Neoplatonics and the Manichees, the Arians and the Nestorians -- all
of them had co-existed in harmony... It was from this fathomless
source, that European philosophy, theology and learning got strength
which paved the way to freedom and liberal values... What has remained
from the multicultural world of the Middle East? Do the Zoroastrians
and Bahai's stay in Iran, their homeland? It will be easer to find
them in a cemetery in that country, than living. Those who could
escape flew to India and the West. Had the Sufis remained in Saudi
Arabia? No, they were annihilated by the regime as the enemies of
"true Islam". Can you find a branch of Ahmadiyya movement at least in
one of the countries of the Middle East?... The Christians of Iraq and
the West Bank escaped to the USA and Canada. Copts left Egypt... In
20-30 years the Middle East will turn into a multicultural cemetery
with an oasis in the form of Israel... One more step, and instead of
the cradle of humanity only a scorched desert of hatred will be left
here. And this desert will spread to the North and South, to the East
and West. It will enter the open doors of your house; devour you and
your family, your clubs, cafes, libraries, theaters, and galleries.
You have got used to freedom; you don't know what the world without
freedom is. I know it because I have grown up in communist Moscow. But
I also know the Middle East. And believe me, in comparison to the new
Caliphate the Soviet empire of the 60ies and 70ies would seem a
paradise. The new rulers of the world will not only shut your mouth,
but turn your soul inside out. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Islam-Multicultural-Cemetery-Open-Letter-Educated-Liberal.htm

There is an asymmetry between the good that many moderate Muslims can
do for Britain and the harm that a few fanatics can do to it. The 1-
in-1,000 chance that a man is a murderous fanatic is more important to
me than the 999-in-1,000 chance that he is not a murderous fanatic...
British society could get by perfectly well without the contribution
even of moderate Muslims. The only thing we really want from Muslims
is their oil money for bank deposits, to prop up London property
prices and to sustain the luxury market; their cheap labor that we
imported in the 1960s in a vain effort to bolster the dying textile
industry, which could not find local labor, is now redundant. source:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion...0,6923090.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

Alqaeda members live in the West and get total protection and
financial support from the infidels. They do not even have to worry
about going to work. This is taken care of, thanks to the infidel's
welfare system, which gives the jihadists the vital time to focus on
their jihad activities. Almost all of the terrorists arrested in the
UK benefited from the state's welfare system while they were planning
for the destruction of that very system and the state altogether... As
a result of the military jihad, America now spends millions of dollars
to protect its airlines from being hijacked, bombed or shot down,
while the Arab airlines are busy reaping profits from the confident
passengers who know well that by flying in an Arab airliner they are
unlikely targets for Islamic terrorism. A terrorists' attack on an
American city would result in raised alert level for weeks with severe
disruption of normal life throughout the country and the loss of
billions of dollars. On the other hand, life in the cities of the Arab
world continues just as normal, after the initial dancing in the
streets, with no fear at all that an American reprisal in kind will
ever take place... Soon after 9/11, the sale of many American products
in the Middle East came to a near standstill and many American
businesses had to shut down their operations. MacDonald's restaurants
in the Middle East, which are partly owned by local Arab companies,
had a hard time explaining to the public they were joint ventures and
had nothing to do with the American policies. The pressure of the
market forced the American fast food chain to donate a proportion of
its profits to the Palestinians in a desperate attempt to retain
customers... In the Middle East, no Arab will doubt that
Marks&Spencers donates its Saturday's revenues to finance Israel's war
efforts. In the Middle East, anti Western rumours spread fast among
the Arabs and are readily believed even by the professionals and
intellectuals! In the West, mosques and Islamic centres usually take
the lead in steering the war; they regularly update their communities
on which stores or businesses to avoid. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/MuminSalih/Trade-Jihad.htm

A Shiite Muslim can't build a mosque in Cairo; his Sunni brother can't
have a mosque of his own in Tehran. Editions of the Koran printed in
Egypt or Saudi Arabia are seized as contraband in Iran; Egypt and most
other Muslim nations in turn ban the import of Korans printed in Iran.
The works of a majority of Muslim writers and philosophers are banned
in most Muslim countries. source: http://tinyurl.com/2ggld6

Laughing is an unacceptable behavior in Islam and it's against
Mohammad' teachings. source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=742

To become a Muslim, you must take an Arab name, dress like an Arab,
speak Arabic, eat only what Arabs eat, treat your wife as Arabs treat
their wives, etc... Such things as blue jeans are not really condemned
because they are immoral but because they are not Arab. source:
http://www.chick.com/information/religions/islam/quran.asp

All sports like football, cricket, volleyball, basketball etc. will be
prohibited. Islam does not condone any types of sports for recreation
purposes. Sport of any type is considered the game of Satan. Praying
five times a day is their main sports. All forms of drama, theaters
and cinema are deadly illegal in Islam; hence will be strictly
prohibited by Islamic shariah. Islamic morality/virtue police
(Muttawalli) will roam the country to stop these Satanic vices and
will severely punish with beatings and lashing, if anybody violates
the code of Islamic virtues. In the Islamic Shariah laws, music is
considered weapons of Satan (Devil); hence music of all kinds are
strictly prohibited. Only vocal music of religious nature (commonly
known as Gazzal), which exalts the greatness of Allah and his prophet,
is allowed. All instrumental music, i.e. all musical instruments is
strictly prohibited. Violators are punished or imprisoned. Islam does
not allow drawings or sculpturing of any living beings (such as
humans, animals and birds). The drawings of plants and vines will be
allowed, because the Islamic God thought plants and vines were
lifeless objects! Punishments for the crimes (like stealing, adultery,
killings etc.) will be cutting/chopping hands, feet and even chopping
heads, or stoning death and lashings one hundred and one times.
Present Islamic paradises like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan,
Sudan and many other Arab nations randomly practice these above
mentioned punishments according to Islamic Sharia or hudud laws.
Islamic shariah laws will also control people's sexual life and
marriage life. Shariah will dictate when, what and how to do sexual
acts. Usage of condom etc. will be prohibited. Love acts of all types
will be strictly prohibited at the outside of the private home. Even
the family lives in the Islamic country are controlled by the Sharia
laws. Family planning such as birth-control will be strictly
prohibited. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/Shabana/real_islam.pdf

Even though you are not ethnically an Arab, you must keep an Arabic
name, follow Arabic culture; adopt their food, clothing, hygiene and
toilet habits; memorise their Holy Scriptures without comprehending a
single word of it and prostrate endlessly to their Allah. When you go
on pilgrimage or when they hire you as slaves to work for them they
ridicule you as a 'miskin' (indigent). But they treat the white
infidel workers with respect and offer them higher pay and more fringe
benefits than the black and brown immigrant workers (like you) .Though
you are better qualified than many of them (white infidels) your Arab
brothers discriminate you against the white infidel workers. As a
general rule, you are paid half compared to a white unbeliever. Yet,
you consider the Arabs superior to you and you imitate their dress and
Bedouin habits. Some Islamic Paradises (like Pakistan) even broadcast
news in Arabic when not even 0.1% of their population understand the
Arabic language. You wonder why a desperately poor country should
spend money to Arabise its population? source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/AK_apostacy.htm)

Recently I had the experience of travelling by train from Karachi to
Islamabad. More often than not, there was no water in the (train)
compartments, for no sooner was the overhead tank filled with water
than it was consumed in a frenzy of ablution (wazu) by the pious
preparing themselves for prayer... Government offices practically
don't become functional until 9:30 or 10:00 and close for business
about 2:30 or so. This five-hour working day is further reduced by an
extended 'prayer break' or waqfa barae namaz. During this break, the
pious pray, others socialise or just loaf around... I am told of
instances when groups of holies have commenced congregational prayer
(ba-jama'at namaz) in the aisles of planes as they prepare for
landing. In some cases, even cabin crew have made themselves
incommunicado from passengers by drawing curtains with the notice
'prayer break'... Morality has become synonymous with, and reduced to,
a dress code for women, preferably the veil. Human rights, good
customer service, politeness in public, adherence to contractual
obligations, facilities for the handicapped, public toilets, voluntary
work, donations to secular charities and equality before the law are
not considered worthy objectives, and are conspicuous by their absence
in Muslim countries. source: http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/news/dailytimes-01-18-07.htm

A poll of more than 1,000 British Muslims, conducted by the Policy
Exchange think-tank this year (2007), found that 36 per cent of
Muslims aged between 16 and 24 believe those who convert to another
faith should be punished by death. source:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2170160,00.html

The apostate should not be put to death until he has been asked to
repent three times. This is the view of the majority of scholars,
including 'Umar, 'Ali, 'Ata', al-Nakhaii, Maalik, al-Thawri, al-
Awzaa'i, Ishaaq and others. Because apostasy comes about because of
doubt, and cannot be dispelled in an instant. Time should be allowed
for the person to rethink the matter, and the best length of time is
three days. The saheeh Sunnah indicates that it is essential to put
the apostate to death. Al-Bukhaari (6922) narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas
said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) said: "Whoever changes his religion, put him to death." Al-
Bukhaari (6484) and Muslim (1676) narrated that 'Abd-Allaah ibn
Mas'ood said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) said: "It is not permissible to shed the blood of a
Muslim who bears witness that there is no god except Allaah and that I
am the Messenger of Allaah, except in one of three cases: a soul for a
soul (i.e., in the case of murder); a previously-married person who
commits zina; and one who leaves his religion and separates from the
main body of the Muslims." source: http://www.islam-qa.com/index.php?ref=14231&ln=eng&txt=apostasy

As a child, I was asked to memorize the verses of Koran. I used to ask
the Hujur (Mullah) what meanings were conveyed by those verses? The
reply I used to get from the Hujur was a few strokes of the cane and
rebukes. He used to say that one should never ask any question on the
matter of Islam especially on Koran. The penalty for asking questions
is whipping. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/breaking_the_manacles.htm

Koran is full of internal contradictions, scientific errors and
historical blunders. 54:19 mentions Aad was destroyed in a day but
69:6,7 mentions Aad was destroyed in seven nights and eight days;
19:17 shows an angel appeared to Mary but 3:42 shows several angels
appeared; 28:40 mentions pharaoh drowned and died but 10:92 states
that the same pharaoh was saved; 18:86 states that sun sets in a muddy
spring of water; 15:19 mentions earth is flat; 86:6,7 states that
semen emits from between back-bone and the ribs; 19:27,28 states that
Mary was the sister of Aaron, whereas history shows they were born
about 1300 years apart; 28:8 tells that pharaoh and Haman were living
at the same time and place whereas history clearly shows they were
born about 1000 years apart and pharaoh lived in Egypt and Haman lived
in Shushan city in Persia; and 4:157 says that Jesus was not crucified
whereas it is crystal clear in historical records that Jesus was
crucified and not another man who looked like Jesus. By the way, the
transliterated name of Jesus in arabic Quran is Isa but even this is
wrong because the name of Esau, brother of Jacob (Yaqub in arabic) is
Isa in arabic. The correct transliterated name of Jesus in arabic is
Yasu. Isa (Esau) means 'hairy' and Yasu (Jesus) means 'God saves.'
source: http://islam-watch.org/LeavingIslam/Why-I-Quit-Islam.htm

Any religion that requires total obedience without thought is not
likely to produce people capable of critical thought, people capable
of free and independent thought. Such a situation is favorable to the
development of a powerful "clergy" and is clearly responsible for the
intellectual, cultural, and economic stagnation of several centuries.
Illiteracy remains high in Muslim countries. Historically, as there
never was any separation of state and religion, any criticism of one
was seen as a criticism of the other... No Muslim country has
developed a stable democracy; Muslims are being subjected to every
kind of repression possible. Under these conditions healthy criticism
of society is not possible, because critical thought and liberty go
together... All innovations are discouraged in Islam - every problem
is seen as a religious problem rather than a social or economic one...
If a man were to break into a woman's dormitory and rape half a dozen
women, he would risk nothing since there would be no male witnesses.
Indeed a female victim of rape is unlikely to file a lawsuit because
she would risk being condemned herself and have little chance of
obtaining justice... According to Muslim jurists, the husband is not
obliged under Islamic law to pay for her (wife) medical expenses in
case of illness... According to Women's Action Forum, a woman's rights
organization, 72% of all women in police custody in Pakistan are
physically and sexually abused... Under Islamic law a woman cannot be
the head of state. source: http://islam-watch.org/IbnWarraq/Islam's-Shame-Veil-Tears.htm

The United Nations, in its 2002 Arab Human Development Report, found
that the total number of books translated into Arabic each year is no
more than 330, or one-fifth of those annually translated in a small
country like Greece. Indeed, the total number of books translated into
Arabic during the last 1,000 years, since the age of Caliph Al-
Ma'moun, (a ninth-century Arab ruler who was a patron of cultural
interaction between Arab, Persian, and Greek scholars) to this day is
less than those translated in Spain in one year... Muslims claim to
have contributed the numeral "Zero" to the sum total of human
knowledge, and alas, have continued to contribute zero ever since.
source: http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Gutenberg-and-the-Date-Palm.htm

Most of the scientists, poets and philosophers in Islam's golden age
(the time of the Abassid Caliphate) were Jews, Christians or Muslims
who were suspected of apostasy or blasphemy. Many suffered harassment
and even death. Thus if science did flourish during this golden age,
it was in spite of Islam and not because of it. source:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/Ohmyrus/islam_failed_muslims.htm

During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the Organization of Arab Petroleum
Exporting Countries unleashed the oil weapon, embargoing critical oil
exports to the United States and Western Europe as a strategy for
compelling Israel to withdraw unconditionally from all territories
occupied in the 1967 war. The US rejected Arab demands, but the
European Community (EC, later EU), more dependent on Arab oil than
America, decided on a policy of outright appeasement. This led to a
series of quasi-official meetings between European and Arab officials
and experts that culminated in a meeting at the ministerial level in
Paris on July 31, 1974. There, an agreement was reached to initiate
the Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD), an ongoing series of closed, high-level
meetings between senior officials of the two sides which would enable
the EC and the Arab League to formulate a new understanding on
economic, cultural, and diplomatic issues... Over time, the EAD would
institute a number of long-term policy agreements that guaranteed the
Europeans both an uninterrupted oil supply and lucrative export
contracts with oil-rich Arab states. In return, the Europeans would
facilitate international recognition of the PLO at a time when its
charter called for Israel's destruction, and enable Arab religious,
cultural, and intellectual institutions to achieve unprecedented
influence in Europe. The Arabs also pressured the EC to relax its
immigration rules and permit a massive influx of Muslims into Europe.
>From its inception, every EAD meeting passed resolutions in support of

Muslim immigration to Europe. source: http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=1113

German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch newspaper De
Volkskrant that young Europeans who love freedom, better emigrate.
Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now. Whilst
sitting on a terrace in Berlin, Broder pointed to the other customers
and the passers-by and said melancholically: "We are watching the
world of yesterday." Europe is turning Muslim. As Broder is sixty
years old he is not going to emigrate himself. "I am too old," he
said. However, he urged young people to get out and "move to Australia
or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they want to
avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable."
Many Germans and Dutch, apparently, did not wait for Broder's advice.
The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has
already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in. One does not
have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk Broder, that Europe is
becoming Islamic. Just consider the demographics. The number of
Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is
expected to double in twenty years. By 2025, one third of all European
children will be born to Muslim families. Today Mohammed is already
the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels, Amsterdam,
Rotterdam, and other major European cities. Broder is convinced that
the Europeans are not willing to oppose islamization. "The dominant
ethos," he told De Volkskrant, "is perfectly voiced by the stupid
blonde woman author with whom I recently debated. She said that it is
sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious
injuries while resisting. source: http://www.islamreview.com/articles/awakenedsecularists.shtml

The attack on America was like a fire bell ringing, waking other
countries up to the growing masses of Muslims in their midst. It was
noticed that these Muslims made no effort to blend in with the local
population. Instead, Muslims banded together, taking over
neighborhoods and eventually driving out the non-Muslims. Any
acceptance of the local culture and customs was strongly discouraged
and often severely punished. These Muslim neighborhoods set up their
own legal system of Islamic law, ignoring the laws of the land.
Immigrants were encouraged to have very large families to form huge
voting blocks to maneuver Muslims into positions of power within the
government... Many Islamic leaders state emphatically that Islam and
democracy cannot co-exist. Muslims are expected to have only one
master and that master is Islam. Islam dictates every aspect of their
lives from birth to death... American Muslims are now petitioning that
the call to prayer be blasted over loud speakers five times a day in
quiet neighborhoods and towns. source: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/stock/051019

And if we allow Muslims to have complete religious freedom, will we
also allow their Muezzins to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer over
loudspeakers five times a day - at dawn, at midday, in mid-afternoon,
at sunset, and two hours after sunset - in every city and town in
America? And if we find a way to prohibit them from doing so, how long
will it be before Muslims and the ACLU use the "equal protection"
clause of our Constitution to prohibit Christian churches from
sounding their steeple bells on Sunday morning? source:
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/21775.html

Prime Minister Gordon Brown told the nation that "we have got to
separate those great moderate members of our community from a few
extremists who wish to practice violence and inflict maximum loss of
life in the interests of a perversion of their religion." By contrast,
a former jihadist from Manchester wrote that the "real engine of our
violence" is "Islamic theology." Months ago, this young man informed
me that as a militant he raised most of his war chest not from
obscenely rich Saudis, but from middle-class Muslim dentists living in
the United Kingdom. There's sobering lesson here for the new prime
minister. So far, those arrested in connection to the car bombs are,
by and large, medical professionals. The seeming paradox of the
privileged seeking to avenge grievance has many champions of
compassion scratching their heads. Aren't Muslim martyrs supposed to
be poor, disenfranchised, and resentful about both? source:
ttp://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/07082007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/islams_problem_opedcolumnists_irshad_manji.htm

Jihad is a duty of every Muslim... Jihad... does not recognise any...
permanent peace because such a permanent peace does not match the
necessary expansion of "Dar-al-Islam". source:
http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/09/05/jihad-is-a-justification-of-aggression/

Terror groups have tried to use the guise of injury to pass security.
Being in a wheelchair, wearing a cast, posing as gravely ill to "get
treatment" in the States, and claiming asylum are all techniques
employed by various groups... There have even been cases of Middle
Eastern individuals posing as Mexicans to cross the Southern U.S.
border, knowing that the U.S. government is sympathetic toward illegal
immigrants... Islamic terrorists have been using many disguises to
hide themselves. They hide in South America and work to convert
indigenous people to Islam... There are innumerable vulnerabilities in
the U.S. As a criminal profiler who has consulted with police and
members of U.S. Military Intelligence, I see many similarities between
serial murder and terrorism. Serial killers become whatever they need
to be in order to get close to their victims. They have had jobs as
doctors, police officers, military officers, pharmacists, and
teachers. One can be sure, that if the lone serial killer is smart
enough to get into these positions, a well financed terror
organization can do the same. Remember, people are not always what
they appear to be. source: http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5760_0_6_0_C/

Once a sleeper has succeeded in entering a country he is intent on
attacking, his goal is to establish himself (herself) in a community
and take on a pedestrian appearance. Such sleepers seek employment
that provides them with camouflage and mobility. We have seen
terrorists such as Mahmoud Abouhalima who entered our country as a
tourist and then overstayed his authorized period of admission. He
subsequently applied for amnesty under the agricultural worker
provisions of the disastrous Amnesty of 1986, falsely claiming to have
been a farmer. His application for amnesty was approved and he drove
a taxicab in New York City. The only thing he ever planted was a bomb
in the basement of the World Trade Center complex that was detonated
on September 26, 1993, killing 6, injuring hundreds of innocent
victims and inflicting an estimated 500 million dollars in damages to
that iconic complex, nearly toppling one of the towers! source:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=1384797

Even the Westerners who perceive a danger rarely grasp its full scope.
Religious war simply does not fit with their understanding of the
world. While they may be able to grasp the notion of Islamic terrorism
or "Islamofascism," it is inconceivable that Islam itself could be
hostile. They assume, without questioning, that all religions are
basically the same, and that all religions teach about peace and love.
source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=756

The elite newspapers, with the exception of The Wall Street Journal,
systematically censor the news in order to downplay the threat, or at
worst, literally distort the facts to falsely portray radical Islamic
groups in the United States as victims, which is exactly in line with
the victimology propagated by these groups. If misreporting were a
crime, a lot of reporters would be in jail. source:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411449079&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/Printer

The West has been hampered by a festering and self-inflicted wound: a
reluctance to identify its foe as the totalitarian, Islamic-based
ideology that it is. Instead, our elites call forth a politically
correct haze to shroud the jihadist elephant in the room. Media
outlets invoke euphemisms about rocket-launching "militants" and car-
torching "youths..." The conflict between Islamic expansionists and
the West does not stem from political disagreements that can be
assuaged by dialogue or compromise. Radical Islam seeks to wear down
and ultimately destroy its opponent -- in Iraq, Israel, Europe, and
everywhere else. We must focus on doing the same to radical Islam.
source: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/the_art_of_the_long_war.html

65.2% Muslims favor Caliphate, 65.5% Muslims favor strict Sharia law
in every Islamic country: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=28064

Terror Free Tomorrow of Vienna, Virginia and the Pakistan Institute
for Public Opinion conducted a poll in Pakistan on August 18-29, 2007
to determine approval ratings of some organizations and politicians.
Poll results (approval ratings): al Qaeda = 43%, Taliban = 38%, local
Muslim extremist groups = from 37% to 49%, Osama bin Laden = 46%,
Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf = 38%. source:
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/11/poll.pakistanis/index.html

Peru is said to be one of Osama Bin Laden's favorite training
locales... In South America, Islamists have met inside Catholic
churches to avoid raising a red flag. They have worn crucifixes, taken
on Christian names, attended Christian services, stolen dead
Christians' birth certificates, stolen the identity of a dead Catholic
priest, and sought asylum under the pretext of being a persecuted
Christian. By attempting to blend in using the cover of a different
religion, the terrorists believe that scrutiny will be minimized...
Puerto Ricans can come to the mainland any time they want. Fraudulent
documents are a huge industry there as illegals and terror operatives
look to enter the island illegally, obtain fake paperwork, and then
simply come to the mainland. source: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/terrorism.php?id=1325399

A recent study by the London-based Transparency International found
that Middle Eastern and North African nations form the world's most
corrupt region. source: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2003/inter102003.htm

Repressive laws, supplemented and reinforced by terrorists, vigilantes
and mob violence, are a fundamental barrier to open discussion and
dissent, and so to democracy and free societies, within the Muslim
world. source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/28/AR2007092801358.html

72 terrorist organizations with thousands of operatives exist and
operate within the borders of the United States. These organizations
include: Hezbollah, Hamas, Abu Sayyaf, Islamic Jihad, al Fuqra, the
Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. source: http://www.basicsproject.org/terrorism/terrorism.htm

France will pay Muslim immigrants to return home. Under the scheme,
Paris will provide each family with a nest egg of
 
<simple_language@yahoo.com> wrote in message...

> Arabic proverb says "first comes Saturday, then Sunday."
> It means that Arabs are going to exterminate Jews before they
> exterminate Christians.


What a sick, paranoid, bigoted **** you are.
 
By Patrick Grimm

What is at stake is beauty. Why do we not wish for a Judaized world?
Simple. Because it is a world devoid of beauty, yet rife with soulless
consumerism and slave workers grinding away on a global plantation, an
international gulag run by our moneyed masters. A Judaized world is a
world swept clean of higher life, for higher life cannot exist where
the dollar is god, where the man with the most shekels is king.
What is at stake is beauty. Yet in a Judaized mindset, womanhood and
true feminine qualities like empathy, nurturance and childbirth are
devalued, destroyed, made of no effect. No, laboring for the Almighty
Dollar is the lord of all, even if it means blotting out family, faith
and offspring. Traditional families are mocked and twisted
"alternative lifestyles" are portrayed as the paragon of health, the
camera lights blotting out the maggot within the apple.
What is at stake is beauty. A Jewish intelligentsia and culture is one
where filth, depravity, degeneracy are celebrated. It is the
difference between Dostoevsky and a pulp comic. It is the giant leap
backward into a Lord of the Flies milieu, a Jew brainchild where
aesthetically pleasing art is quashed and urination, defecation and
mockery of God, country and flag reign supreme. It is JEWISHNESS put
to the canvas and the page.
What is at stake is beauty. The beauty of our philosophers, of our
Golden Rule, our sages, our great authors, poets and musicians,
painters and sculptors has been replaced with perversions that defy
belief. It means that ugliness is now vogue, the outre is kitschy and
slickly chic for those who make it their aim to flaunt what is snidely
called "conventional." The Jewish hate for the comely has caused a
broadside of disdain and the deconstructing of standards across the
board. We are only seeing the opening act of their very long-running
"stage play" of disease and disorder pirouetting its way across our
universe, infecting all it touches.
What is at stake is beauty. The Jewish psychopaths and sociopaths who
have seized control of us will never be satisfied till they have
soiled and debauched, collapsed and caved in all we have built. They
will do it with their insatiable bloodlust, their megalomaniacal wars,
their endorsement and parading of every kind of sickness in the human
soul and spirit. There is no malignancy they will choose not to
approve of, no subversive movement they won't lead and no radical,
harmful cause that they will pass on funding and fighting for. They
will steal our money, smash our treasures, sell our guarded secrets
and make a lie of all our truths. They will gut and turn our religions
to their purposes, enlist our very children to bleed for their
propaganda, drug our boys till they are feminine and docile and easy
to shape. They have made the lovely female body into nothing more than
cheap pornography and told us to hate our very history, roots and
race. No one has harmed us so much and loved us so little. No one is
less deserving of our forgiveness and no one is more arrogant and less
likely to ask for it, though the mountain of crimes against us rivals
ancient Babel.
What is at stake is beauty and yes, it has been said before, only
beauty can save us.
http://zionistwatch.wordpress.com/

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 

> a world devoid of beauty, yet rife with soulless
> consumerism and slave workers grinding away
> on a global plantation, an international gulag run
> by our moneyed masters.



WOW !!! The Bush Administration ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
 
<snip />
.... Arabic proverb says "first comes Saturday, then Sunday."
It means that Arabs are going to exterminate Jews before they
exterminate Christians.
</snip />

I think its correct to surmise one thing we will never see in a movie or TV
program produced within an Islamic society is a young white girl bending
over grabbing her ankles while a ****** stands behind her and simulates
****ing her in the ass and calling it dancing.

I don't think an Islamic society will have TV programs that simulate some
white trash sucking a ******s dick do you?

I don't think an Islamic society will tolerate white trash on a website like
craigslist publishing a photo of herself sucking a ******'s ****.

That is what the jew has brought to the jewnited states and that is why the
jewnited states all the jews and the jew cult called christians must be and
will be destroyed.

All Praise to Allah
 
911 Who Really Did It? wrote:
> <snip />
> ... Arabic proverb says "first comes Saturday, then Sunday."
> It means that Arabs are going to exterminate Jews before they
> exterminate Christians.
> </snip />
>
> I think its correct to surmise one thing we will never see in a movie
> or TV program produced within an Islamic society is a young white
> girl bending over grabbing her ankles while a ****** stands behind
> her and simulates ****ing her in the ass and calling it dancing.
>
> I don't think an Islamic society will have TV programs that simulate
> some white trash sucking a ******s dick do you?
>
> I don't think an Islamic society will tolerate white trash on a
> website like craigslist publishing a photo of herself sucking a
> ******'s ****.
> That is what the jew has brought to the jewnited states and that is
> why the jewnited states all the jews and the jew cult called
> christians must be and will be destroyed.
>
> All Praise to Allah
>

Does this summarize the moderate Muslim viewpoint? Good job, one way or the
other. You managed to get "white trash", "******s", and "jews" all in only
four paragraphs. You do supreme justice to your cause, whatever it is.

I do hope you realize that you make "Islamic society" and "tolerate"
("Islamic society will tolerate") look like an oxymoron.
 
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html

Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique

Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck

In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews
-- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed
the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
generally
thought to be more sinned against than sinning.

The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's
massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two
previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation
and
its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is
written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a
unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic
groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of
California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first
volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of
uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from
other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile
relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the
almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile
societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of
Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account
of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.

The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
are
Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology,
and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial
perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting
multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis
Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these
movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often
tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of
their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against
Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be
working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own
good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
gentiles,
Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity
they decry as immoral in others.

Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which
Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and
diversity -- but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they
have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations
of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
for
morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time,
within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel,
they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile
society.

Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group
loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
society
that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish
determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their
survival as a people for thousands for years -- even without a country
-- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in
nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's
view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the
identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
flower
in safety only when gentile identity is weak.

Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman:
"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their
belief -- one firmly rooted in history -- that Jews are safe only in a
society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well
as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for
example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming
majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a
liberal
stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."

He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the
diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal
of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They
are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept.
Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews
may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for
the country but because it is good for the Jews.

Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish
economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic
policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate
anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the
faces
I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican
convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted
for
a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What
is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.

Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University
makes
the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his
satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next
century
whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped beyond the
point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this
country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture
of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an
anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as
potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and
national
continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage
takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct
community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.

In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "[w]e [Jews]
have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for
about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the
heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
irreversible..." -- just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement
of European culture also irreversible.

Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to
several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish
immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established
the
current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological
explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof.
MacDonald reports that he and his followers -- with the notable
exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict -- were all Jews with
strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the pursuit of
perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of
cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the
'invisible subject' of American anthropology."

By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological
Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university
anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted
the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that
environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology
so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration,
integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the
idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of
non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The
ultimate
conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts
for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be
eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the
justification
for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.

The entire "civil rights" movement can be seen as a natural
consequence
of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent,
separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white
self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish
parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that Jews
almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement. Without
the
leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been established, and
until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. Prof. MacDonald
reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus Garvey visited
NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he stormed out,
complaining that it was a white organization.

Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the
"civil rights" transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the
American Jewish Congress who claims that "many of these [civil rights]
laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish
staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into
being
by Jewish voters."

While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial
equivalence,
it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald's words, "American culture
as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and aesthetically
repressive (especially with regard to sexuality). Central to this
program was creating ethnographies of idyllic [Third-World] cultures
that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were attributed
to Western culture."

The Role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything
about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof.
MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples
deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to
contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to
undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them
permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is
enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration
because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.

Authoritarian Personalities
In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that
would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity
and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the
basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt
School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was
founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish
millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took
power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the
institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was
headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W.
Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong
Jewish
identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of the
institute's activities: "Research would be able here to transform
itself directly into propaganda," he wrote. (Italics in the original)

Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian
Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was
part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the
Frankfurt
school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and Emotional
Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality, which was particularly
influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the American Jewish
Committee heavily funded its promotion and because Jewish academics
took up its message so enthusiastically.

The book's purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it
were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion
to family -- and race -- loyalty are sign of a dangerous and defective
"authoritarian personality." Because drawing distinctions between
different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties -- even close
family ties! -- are "prejudice." As Christopher Lasch has written, the
book leads to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only
by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective
psychotherapy -- by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum."

But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group
loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences
central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as
mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually
became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose
political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof.
MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even
described Jewish group identity -- only that of gentiles: "behavior
that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary
strategy
is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles."

For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of
mental
illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and especially
sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt school was
enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which "Oedipal
ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in early
childhood are the anti-Semite's irrevocable inheritance."

In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the
Frankfurt
school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof. MacDonald
sees
the school as a seminal influence: "Certainly many of the central
attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural revolution
find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including idealizing
rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual relationships, and
scorn for upward social mobility, social status, family pride, the
Christian religion, and patriotism."

Of the interest here, however, is the movement's success in branding
ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he
came later, the French-Jewish "deconstructionist" Jacques Derrida was
in the same tradition when he wrote:

"The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of
strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to
deconstruct
the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the metaphysics of
native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm the bombs... of
identity that nation-states build to defend themselves against the
stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants... "

As Prof. MacDonald puts it, "Viewed at its most abstract level, a
fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples
of
the United States to view concern about their own demographic and
cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of
psychopathology." Needless to say, this project has been successful;
anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a
mentally unhinged "hate-monger," and whenever whites defend their
group
interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The irony
has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: "The ideology that ethnocentrism was
a
form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group that over its long
history had arguably been the most ethnocentric group among all the
cultures of the world."

Immigration
Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote
open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews find comforting
and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the
world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass
immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic
efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews
have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover,
whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of
every
political persuasion have favored high immigration.

This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
Israel
Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot, was of
the
view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that is the
absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom houses... "
He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of Jewish
intermarriage.

Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
to
America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse of
your teeming shore."

Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
majority.

It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
disputes
this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish groups from
the beginning.

Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
were
the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian Jews
led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one reason
for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish Democrat:
"The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is also our
most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day
Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more
confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like Earl
Raab
writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is prepared to
sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of Australia
to
specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising if such an
openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect from the
intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.

Jews and the Left
It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the
left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail.
Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements
that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation,
Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose
ground
to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries. However,
in Prof. MacDonald's view, Jewish commitment to leftist causes has
often been motivated by the hope that communism, especially, would be
a
tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by expectation that universalist
social solutions would be yet another way to dissolve gentile
loyalties
that might exclude Jews. The appeal of univeralist ideologies is tied
to the implicit understanding that Jewish particularism will be
exempt:
"At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by gentiles
would result in gentiles not perceiving Jews as in a different social
category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a
strong personal identity as Jews."

Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for
supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for
its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet
Union
seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state anti-Semitism,
tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities to individual
Jews, and preached a "classless" society in which Jewishness would
presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover, since Marxism
taught that all conflict was economic rather than ethnic, many Jews
believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.

Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached
both atheism and the solidarity of the world's working people, they
took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports
that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the
continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in
1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also
supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although
Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were
confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He
writes that despite the official view that all men were to be
brothers,
"very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire soviet
era."

Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof.
MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: "The
Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and
human community in history... The disappearance of the Jewish people
would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man
into a wild beast." This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position
incompatible with "unity and human community."

Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from
Communism
only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And just as Jews
had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic pre-Revolutionary
Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an anti-Semitic Soviet
Union. A similar pattern can be found in the imposed Communist
governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely dominated by Jews.
The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist Party, for
example,
spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too maintained a strong
Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many stopped being Polish
and emigrated to Israel.

Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun's short-lived 1919 Communist
government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that
at
the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated with
Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He argues
that
in the United States as well, the hard core among Communists and
members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was mainly Jewish.
Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist world-view was
fully compatible with strong identification as Jews. Prof. MacDonald
quotes from a study of American leftists:

"Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have
married
a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they could
have
married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the question, and found
it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many concluded that they had
always taken marriage to someone Jewish for granted." Their commitment
as Jews was even more fundamental and unexamined than their commitment
to the left.

Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned
Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number,
the Soviet Union's severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the
1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for
many when he explained, "If I must choose between the Jewish cause and
a 'progressive' anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If
barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew." According to Prof.
MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface
shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment
to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an
ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American
conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of
which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high
levels
of immigration and were active in excluding white racial
identification
from the "respectable" right.

Objections
There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald's thesis. The
first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are
dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of
others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought
of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a "light unto the
nations" or a "chosen people." This is echoed today in the Jewish self
image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time
what passes for "social justice" has the effect of undermining the
traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately
undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be
wrongs?

Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support
for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that
"the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves." In other words,
many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first
convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to
become less white may also have convinced himself that America
benefits
from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can more
effectively convince others.

Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the
extent
to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or their
political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his
surprise
at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the 1967 war:
"I had not known how Jewish I was." This is an arresting statement
from
a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish spiritual
leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their politics, Jews
certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of peoplehood. Prof.
MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as saying,"most Jews claim
to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that
enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy
camouflage." Always to think in terms of "friends or foe" is no
insignificant matter.

Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: "Surface
declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading."
He
notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence of
American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as
"anti-Semitic" if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who
has said "they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen
as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests
while pretending that they have no such interests ... "

Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual
movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was
hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian
Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the
Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in
fact, "the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and
the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile
intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to
view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an
aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda." Prof. MacDonald
also
claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character of
an
intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible
positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in
the
American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and
resigned.

But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a
difficult test: "The best evidence that individuals have really ceased
to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that
they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In
the
absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it
remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews
are
only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish interests."

This standard may seem unduly harsh -- until it is applied to white
gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action,
anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in
the
interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating
how completely they have abandoned their racial identity.

Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some
Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate
gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: "a fundamental
motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has
simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived
as anti-Semitic." He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet
Heinrich Heine as "using his skill, reputation and popularity to
undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order."

In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes
Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile
relations on Jews: "They may have become so odious and so hostile to
mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how
occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which
they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle."

Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of
numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that
minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect
Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the
intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald's view, the explanation
lies
in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of Jews. He
attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews -- at 115, a full
standard deviation above the white gentile average -- and to "their
hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the world,
and
their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal promotion, and
achieve public acclaim... " He also believes Jews have worked together
unfailingly on any question they consider necessary for survival:
"Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor: Cohesive
groups outcompete individual strategies." He notes that there has
never
been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored non-white
immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that beat down the
disorganized resistance of the majority.

Prof. MacDonald believes that because of the effectiveness of some
Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support
anti-majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still
decisive. As he puts it, "Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were
a critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the
intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies." This,
of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that
American
Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American intellect.
Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the effect
that
"what has happened since World War II is that the American sensibility
has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is anything
else... The literate American mind has come in some measure to think
Jewishly."

Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the
further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If
correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which
whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident
race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to
dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people,
ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands
they
have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental concepts
to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation or two,
as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests there
has
been something more than natural change.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 
In article <Xm2Wi.4650$oy4.726@trnddc08>, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm> wrote:
>
>> a world devoid of beauty, yet rife with soulless
>> consumerism and slave workers grinding away
>> on a global plantation, an international gulag run
>> by our moneyed masters.

>
>
>WOW !!! The Bush Administration ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !


:--}


--
The most powerful Usenet tool you have ever heard of.
NewsMaestro v. 4.0.6 - Dictionary Update/Expert Mode has been released.

Significant improvement in symbol substitution mechanism
for verb tense and plurals.
Expert mode.
Miscellaneous improvements and bug fixes.
Templates generator improvements.
Multi-job support.

Note: In some previous releases some class files were missing.
As a result, the program would not run.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Web page:
http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/

Download page:
http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/Download_Information.htm

Send any feedback, ideas, suggestions, test results to
newsmaestroinfo \at/ mail.ru.

Your personal info will not be released and your privacy
will be honored.
 
In article <f1ski3hq9m5amd387elpkskn90dap8oqm4@4ax.com>, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html
>
>Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique
>
>Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
>
>In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
>researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
>century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews
>-- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed
>the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
>designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
>even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
>utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
>had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
>caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
>with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
>generally
>thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
>
>The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's
>massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two
>previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation
>and
>its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is
>written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a
>unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic
>groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of
>California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first
>volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of
>uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from
>other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile
>relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the
>almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile
>societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of
>Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account
>of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
>
>The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
>are
>Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology,
>and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial
>perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting
>multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis
>Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these
>movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often
>tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of
>their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against
>Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be
>working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own
>good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
>brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
>gentiles,
>Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity
>they decry as immoral in others.
>
>Celebrating Diversity
>Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which
>Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and
>diversity -- but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they
>have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations
>of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
>for
>morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time,
>within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel,
>they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile
>society.
>
>Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group
>loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
>society
>that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish
>determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their
>survival as a people for thousands for years -- even without a country
>-- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in
>nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's
>view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the
>identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
>flower
>in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
>
>Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman:
>"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their
>belief -- one firmly rooted in history -- that Jews are safe only in a
>society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well
>as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for
>example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming
>majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a
>liberal
>stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
>
>He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the
>diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal
>of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They
>are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept.
>Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews
>may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for
>the country but because it is good for the Jews.
>
>Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish
>economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic
>policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate
>anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the
>faces
>I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican
>convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted
>for
>a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What
>is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.
>
>Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University
>makes
>the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his
>satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next
>century
>whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped beyond the
>point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this
>country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture
>of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an
>anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as
>potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and
>national
>continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage
>takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct
>community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.
>
>In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "[w]e [Jews]
>have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for
>about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the
>heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
>irreversible..." -- just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement
>of European culture also irreversible.
>
>Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to
>several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish
>immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established
>the
>current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological
>explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof.
>MacDonald reports that he and his followers -- with the notable
>exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict -- were all Jews with
>strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the pursuit of
>perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of
>cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the
>'invisible subject' of American anthropology."
>
>By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological
>Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university
>anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted
>the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that
>environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology
>so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration,
>integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the
>idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of
>non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The
>ultimate
>conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts
>for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be
>eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the
>justification
>for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.
>
>The entire "civil rights" movement can be seen as a natural
>consequence
>of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent,
>separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white
>self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish
>parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that Jews
>almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement. Without
>the
>leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been established, and
>until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. Prof. MacDonald
>reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus Garvey visited
>NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he stormed out,
>complaining that it was a white organization.
>
>Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the
>"civil rights" transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the
>American Jewish Congress who claims that "many of these [civil rights]
>laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish
>staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into
>being
>by Jewish voters."
>
>While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial
>equivalence,
>it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald's words, "American culture
>as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and aesthetically
>repressive (especially with regard to sexuality). Central to this
>program was creating ethnographies of idyllic [Third-World] cultures
>that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were attributed
>to Western culture."
>
>The Role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything
>about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof.
>MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples
>deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to
>contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to
>undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them
>permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is
>enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration
>because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.
>
>Authoritarian Personalities
>In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that
>would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity
>and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the
>basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt
>School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was
>founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish
>millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took
>power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the
>institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was
>headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W.
>Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong
>Jewish
>identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of the
>institute's activities: "Research would be able here to transform
>itself directly into propaganda," he wrote. (Italics in the original)
>
>Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian
>Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was
>part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the
>Frankfurt
>school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and Emotional
>Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality, which was particularly
>influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the American Jewish
>Committee heavily funded its promotion and because Jewish academics
>took up its message so enthusiastically.
>
>The book's purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it
>were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion
>to family -- and race -- loyalty are sign of a dangerous and defective
>"authoritarian personality." Because drawing distinctions between
>different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties -- even close
>family ties! -- are "prejudice." As Christopher Lasch has written, the
>book leads to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only
>by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective
>psychotherapy -- by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum."
>
>But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group
>loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences
>central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as
>mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually
>became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose
>political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof.
>MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even
>described Jewish group identity -- only that of gentiles: "behavior
>that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary
>strategy
>is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles."
>
>For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of
>mental
>illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and especially
>sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt school was
>enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which "Oedipal
>ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in early
>childhood are the anti-Semite's irrevocable inheritance."
>
>In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the
>Frankfurt
>school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof. MacDonald
>sees
>the school as a seminal influence: "Certainly many of the central
>attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural revolution
>find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including idealizing
>rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual relationships, and
>scorn for upward social mobility, social status, family pride, the
>Christian religion, and patriotism."
>
>Of the interest here, however, is the movement's success in branding
>ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he
>came later, the French-Jewish "deconstructionist" Jacques Derrida was
>in the same tradition when he wrote:
>
>"The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of
>strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to
>deconstruct
>the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the metaphysics of
>native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm the bombs... of
>identity that nation-states build to defend themselves against the
>stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants... "
>
>As Prof. MacDonald puts it, "Viewed at its most abstract level, a
>fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples
>of
>the United States to view concern about their own demographic and
>cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of
>psychopathology." Needless to say, this project has been successful;
>anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a
>mentally unhinged "hate-monger," and whenever whites defend their
>group
>interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The irony
>has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: "The ideology that ethnocentrism was
>a
>form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group that over its long
>history had arguably been the most ethnocentric group among all the
>cultures of the world."
>
>Immigration
>Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote
>open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews find comforting
>and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the
>world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass
>immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic
>efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews
>have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover,
>whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of
>every
>political persuasion have favored high immigration.
>
>This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
>considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
>Israel
>Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot, was of
>the
>view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that is the
>absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom houses... "
>He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of Jewish
>intermarriage.
>
>Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
>the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
>American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
>helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
>the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
>to
>America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse of
>your teeming shore."
>
>Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
>diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
>Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
>Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
>spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
>people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
>there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
>Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
>experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
>the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
>immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
>majority.
>
>It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
>1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
>would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
>disputes
>this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish groups from
>the beginning.
>
>Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
>immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
>were
>the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian Jews
>led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one reason
>for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish Democrat:
>"The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is also our
>most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day
>Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more
>confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like Earl
>Raab
>writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is prepared to
>sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of Australia
>to
>specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising if such an
>openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect from the
>intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.
>
>Jews and the Left
>It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the
>left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail.
>Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements
>that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation,
>Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose
>ground
>to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries. However,
>in Prof. MacDonald's view, Jewish commitment to leftist causes has
>often been motivated by the hope that communism, especially, would be
>a
>tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by expectation that universalist
>social solutions would be yet another way to dissolve gentile
>loyalties
>that might exclude Jews. The appeal of univeralist ideologies is tied
>to the implicit understanding that Jewish particularism will be
>exempt:
>"At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by gentiles
>would result in gentiles not perceiving Jews as in a different social
>category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a
>strong personal identity as Jews."
>
>Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for
>supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for
>its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet
>Union
>seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state anti-Semitism,
>tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities to individual
>Jews, and preached a "classless" society in which Jewishness would
>presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover, since Marxism
>taught that all conflict was economic rather than ethnic, many Jews
>believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.
>
>Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached
>both atheism and the solidarity of the world's working people, they
>took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports
>that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the
>continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in
>1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also
>supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although
>Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were
>confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He
>writes that despite the official view that all men were to be
>brothers,
>"very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire soviet
>era."
>
>Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof.
>MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: "The
>Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and
>human community in history... The disappearance of the Jewish people
>would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man
>into a wild beast." This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position
>incompatible with "unity and human community."
>
>Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from
>Communism
>only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And just as Jews
>had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic pre-Revolutionary
>Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an anti-Semitic Soviet
>Union. A similar pattern can be found in the imposed Communist
>governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely dominated by Jews.
>The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist Party, for
>example,
>spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too maintained a strong
>Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many stopped being Polish
>and emigrated to Israel.
>
>Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun's short-lived 1919 Communist
>government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that
>at
>the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated with
>Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He argues
>that
>in the United States as well, the hard core among Communists and
>members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was mainly Jewish.
>Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist world-view was
>fully compatible with strong identification as Jews. Prof. MacDonald
>quotes from a study of American leftists:
>
>"Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have
>married
>a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they could
>have
>married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the question, and found
>it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many concluded that they had
>always taken marriage to someone Jewish for granted." Their commitment
>as Jews was even more fundamental and unexamined than their commitment
>to the left.
>
>Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned
>Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number,
>the Soviet Union's severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the
>1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for
>many when he explained, "If I must choose between the Jewish cause and
>a 'progressive' anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If
>barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew." According to Prof.
>MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface
>shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment
>to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an
>ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American
>conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of
>which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high
>levels
>of immigration and were active in excluding white racial
>identification
>from the "respectable" right.
>
>Objections
>There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald's thesis. The
>first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are
>dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of
>others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought
>of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a "light unto the
>nations" or a "chosen people." This is echoed today in the Jewish self
>image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time
>what passes for "social justice" has the effect of undermining the
>traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately
>undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be
>wrongs?
>
>Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support
>for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that
>"the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves." In other words,
>many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first
>convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to
>become less white may also have convinced himself that America
>benefits
>from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can more
>effectively convince others.
>
>Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the
>extent
>to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or their
>political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his
>surprise
>at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the 1967 war:
>"I had not known how Jewish I was." This is an arresting statement
>from
>a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish spiritual
>leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their politics, Jews
>certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of peoplehood. Prof.
>MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as saying,"most Jews claim
>to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that
>enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy
>camouflage." Always to think in terms of "friends or foe" is no
>insignificant matter.
>
>Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: "Surface
>declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading."
>He
>notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence of
>American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as
>"anti-Semitic" if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who
>has said "they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen
>as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests
>while pretending that they have no such interests ... "
>
>Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual
>movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was
>hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian
>Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the
>Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in
>fact, "the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and
>the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile
>intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to
>view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an
>aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda." Prof. MacDonald
>also
>claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character of
>an
>intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible
>positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in
>the
>American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and
>resigned.
>
>But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a
>difficult test: "The best evidence that individuals have really ceased
>to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that
>they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In
>the
>absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it
>remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews
>are
>only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish interests."
>
>This standard may seem unduly harsh -- until it is applied to white
>gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action,
>anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in
>the
>interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating
>how completely they have abandoned their racial identity.
>
>Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some
>Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate
>gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: "a fundamental
>motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has
>simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived
>as anti-Semitic." He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet
>Heinrich Heine as "using his skill, reputation and popularity to
>undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order."
>
>In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes
>Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile
>relations on Jews: "They may have become so odious and so hostile to
>mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how
>occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which
>they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle."
>
>Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of
>numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that
>minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect
>Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the
>intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald's view, the explanation
>lies
>in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of Jews. He
>attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews -- at 115, a full
>standard deviation above the white gentile average -- and to "their
>hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the world,
>and
>their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal promotion, and
>achieve public acclaim... " He also believes Jews have worked together
>unfailingly on any question they consider necessary for survival:
>"Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor: Cohesive
>groups outcompete individual strategies." He notes that there has
>never
>been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored non-white
>immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that beat down the
>disorganized resistance of the majority.
>
>Prof. MacDonald believes that because of the effectiveness of some
>Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support
>anti-majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still
>decisive. As he puts it, "Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were
>a critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the
>intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies." This,
>of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that
>American
>Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American intellect.
>Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the effect
>that
>"what has happened since World War II is that the American sensibility
>has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is anything
>else... The literate American mind has come in some measure to think
>Jewishly."
>
>Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the
>further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If
>correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which
>whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident
>race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to
>dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people,
>ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands
>they
>have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental concepts
>to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation or two,
>as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests there
>has
>been something more than natural change.
>
>
>http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
>
>http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
>
>http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html


Yep, this is how the story goes.

--
The most powerful Usenet tool you have ever heard of.
NewsMaestro v. 4.0.6 - Dictionary Update/Expert Mode has been released.

Significant improvement in symbol substitution mechanism
for verb tense and plurals.
Expert mode.
Miscellaneous improvements and bug fixes.
Templates generator improvements.
Multi-job support.

Note: In some previous releases some class files were missing.
As a result, the program would not run.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Web page:
http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/

Download page:
http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/Download_Information.htm

Send any feedback, ideas, suggestions, test results to
newsmaestroinfo \at/ mail.ru.

Your personal info will not be released and your privacy
will be honored.
 
Back
Top