Re: U.S. JUDGE Interrupts Bush's "Immigration Reform" Party: "AMNESTY" - Ho!

On Oct 11, 10:20 am, bigTITS <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Sorry, folks. But a federal judge has blocked your Nincompoop-In-

> Chief's effort to stop the hiring of ILLEGALS.

>

> We may not like it, but we'll have to face it sooner -- or LATER.

> Whatever number of illegals are here at this time will be granted a

> path to legal citizenship. By federal law.

>

> This might take 5, 10, 15 years, but the shear numbers of illegals in

> the U.S. precludes any and all of your wild ideas for "getting rid of

> them."

>

> AND IF CONGRESS and your White House war criminal don't pass an

> immigration reform bill in the fairly near future, the COURTS will

> intervene and "institute" reform by negating and gutting more federal

> and local anti-immigrant "laws."

>

> SO -- shout, scream, jump-up-and-down, pull your hair, curse your

> politicians, commit hate crimes, threaten "action" of some kind -- but

> sooner or later some form of AMNESTY will become the law of the land,

> like Brown vs. Board of Education.

>

> Your federal government helped create this problem through decades of

> indifference and neglect.

>

> And soon your federal government will correct the problem, too.

>

> ----------------------

>

> "Effort to Curb Illegal Workers' Hiring Blocked"

>

> By Spencer S. Hsu

> Washington Post Staff Writer

> Thursday, October 11, 2007; A01

>

> A federal judge barred the Bush administration yesterday from

> launching a planned crackdown on U.S. companies that employ illegal

> immigrants, warning of its potentially "staggering" impact on law-

> abiding workers and companies.

> In a firm rebuke of the White House, U.S. District Judge Charles R.

> Breyer of San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction against the

> president's plan to press employers to fire as many as 8.7 million

> workers with suspect Social Security numbers, starting this fall.

>

> President Bush made the effort the centerpiece of a re-energized

> enforcement drive against illegal immigration in August after the

> Senate rejected his proposal to overhaul immigration laws. But the

> court ruling -- sought by major American labor, business and farm

> organizations -- highlighted the chasm that the issue has opened

> between the Republican Party and its traditional business allies.

>

> The case also called attention to the gulf between Washington rhetoric

> about the need to curtail illegal immigration and the economic reality

> that many U.S. employers rely on illegal labor, as well as to the

> government's inability for nearly three decades to develop adequate

> tools for identifying undocumented workers.

>

> In a 22-page ruling, Breyer said the plaintiffs -- an unusual

> coalition that included the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties

> Union and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- had raised serious questions

> about the legality of the administration's plan to mail Social

> Security "no-match" letters to 140,000 U.S. employers.

>

> "There can be no doubt that the effects of the rule's implementation

> will be severe," Breyer wrote, resulting in "irreparable harm to

> innocent workers and employers."

>

> The government letters are intended to warn employers for the first

> time that they must resolve questions about their employees'

> identities or fire them within 90 days. If they do not, employers

> could face "stiff penalties," including fines and even criminal

> prosecution, for violating a federal law that bars knowingly employing

> illegal workers, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said

> when he announced the plan Aug. 10.

>

> The plaintiffs convinced the judge that the Social Security

> Administration database includes so many errors -- incorporated in the

> records of about 9.5 million people in 2003 alone -- that its use in

> firings would unfairly discriminate against tens of thousands of legal

> workers, including native-born and naturalized U.S. citizens, and

> cause major workforce disruptions that would burden companies.

>

> "The government's proposal to disseminate no-match letters affecting

> more than eight million workers will, under the mandated time line,

> result in the termination of employment to lawfully employed workers,"

> the judge wrote. "Moreover the threat of criminal prosecution . . .

> reflects a major change in DHS policy."

>

> Breyer also said that the government may have ignored a 1980 law, the

> Regulatory Flexibility Act, that requires it to weigh the cost of

> imposing new regulations that would significantly burden small-

> business owners. Randel K. Johnson, a vice president of the Chamber of

> Commerce, said the ruling shows that "the government cannot do

> anything it wants simply in the name of enforcement. They've got to be

> careful about building their record and complying with the law."

> In a statement, AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney said: "This is a

> significant step towards overturning this unlawful rule, which would

> give employers an even stronger way to keep workers from freely

> forming unions. . . . More than 70% of SSA discrepancies refer to U.S.

> citizens."

>

> Chertoff expressed disappointment with the decision and said the

> administration will continue to aggressively enforce immigration laws

> while considering an appeal, which plaintiffs' attorneys said could

> take at least nine months.

> "Today's ruling is yet another reminder of why we need Congress to

> enact comprehensive immigration reform," Chertoff said. "The American

> people have been loud and clear about their desire to see our nation's

> immigration laws enforced."

>

> Several analysts said the Bush administration's plan appeared to be

> designed to push business interests back into the debate by

> demonstrating that the failure of legislative reform efforts would

> carry costs, and to reassure conservative lawmakers who oppose illegal

> immigration that the White House is able and willing to crack down on

> offenders.

>

> Doris Meissner, former commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and

> Naturalization Service and now a senior fellow at the nonpartisan

> Migration Policy Institute in Washington, said the ruling "shows how

> ineffective the current laws are."

> "It reinforces the opinion that many of us hold that until you have a

> better legal framework -- which requires new legislation -- we're

> stuck very much with the status quo," Meissner said.

>

> In a statement, Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Calif.), an opponent of

> Bush's approach who won election to the House last year on the issue,

> criticized the court. "What part of 'illegal' does Judge Breyer not

> understand?" he said. "At a time when the federal government is

> finally trying to enforce current immigration law, we cannot have

> activist judges stand in the way of doing what is right."

> The scope of the problem is uncontested. A three-year government audit

> ending in 2001 found "widespread" misuse of Social Security numbers by

> illegal immigrants, who often present fake or fraudulent documents to

> obtain jobs.

>

> Overall, 7.2 million illegal immigrants account for at least 10

> percent of low-skilled U.S. workers and 5 percent of the total U.S.

> workforce, according to a Pew Hispanic Center analysis of 2005 census

> data.

> Illegal immigrants make up even greater portions of workers in

> specific industries, including 24 percent in farming, 17 percent in

> cleaning, 14 percent in construction and 12 percent in food

> preparation. But the government's record in developing tools to screen

> such workers is spotty, largely because of successful efforts by

> employers, labor unions and civil rights groups to water them down.

>

> A government program to verify the validity of new hires' Social

> Security numbers, proposed in concept in 1981 and launched in 1996,

> remains voluntary and covers only about 23,000 of 8 million U.S.

> employers. It is also hampered by a high false-alarm rate and the

> limited ability to detect identity theft involving stolen or

> fraudulent numbers. Between June 2004 and May 2006, it erroneously

> rejected 11 percent of foreign-born U.S. citizens and 1.3 percent of

> authorized foreign-born noncitizens, according to a report provided to

> Congress.

>

> In protest, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) signed legislation in

> August that bars companies in his state from participating in the

> program until it is 99 percent accurate.

>

> The federal government has mailed Social Security no-match letters to

> employers since 1994, but such notices were generally silent about

> workers' immigration status and employers did not face liability. In

> June 2006, the Department of Homeland Security proposed using the

> letters to combat immigration fraud involving existing employees, and

> it finalized its plans this summer. The AFL-CIO and the ACLU filed

> suit to halt the Sept. 4 start of the mailings, and they were joined

> by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the trade associations for the

> agriculture, restaurant and construction industries.

>

> On Aug. 31, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney issued a temporary

> restraining order pending an Oct. 1 hearing before Breyer, who was

> appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1997 and is the sister of

> Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer.

>

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR200...

>

> Just keep chipping away at the rotting foundations of government.

ted

On Oct 11, 12:12 pm, greg3347 <theodor...@lycos.com> wrote:

> On Oct 11, 10:20 am, bigTITS <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > Sorry, folks. But a federal judge has blocked your Nincompoop-In-

> > Chief's effort to stop the hiring of ILLEGALS.

>

> > We may not like it, but we'll have to face it sooner -- or LATER.

> > Whatever number of illegals are here at this time will be granted a

> > path to legal citizenship. By federal law.

>

> > This might take 5, 10, 15 years, but the shear numbers of illegals in

> > the U.S. precludes any and all of your wild ideas for "getting rid of

> > them."

>

> > AND IF CONGRESS and your White House war criminal don't pass an

> > immigration reform bill in the fairly near future, the COURTS will

> > intervene and "institute" reform by negating and gutting more federal

> > and local anti-immigrant "laws."

>

> > SO -- shout, scream, jump-up-and-down, pull your hair, curse your

> > politicians, commit hate crimes, threaten "action" of some kind -- but

> > sooner or later some form of AMNESTY will become the law of the land,

> > like Brown vs. Board of Education.

>

> > Your federal government helped create this problem through decades of

> > indifference and neglect.

>

> > And soon your federal government will correct the problem, too.

>

> > ----------------------

>

> > "Effort to Curb Illegal Workers' Hiring Blocked"

>

> > By Spencer S. Hsu

> > Washington Post Staff Writer

> > Thursday, October 11, 2007; A01

>

> > A federal judge barred the Bush administration yesterday from

> > launching a planned crackdown on U.S. companies that employ illegal

> > immigrants, warning of its potentially "staggering" impact on law-

> > abiding workers and companies.

> > In a firm rebuke of the White House, U.S. District Judge Charles R.

> > Breyer of San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction against the

> > president's plan to press employers to fire as many as 8.7 million

> > workers with suspect Social Security numbers, starting this fall.

>

> > President Bush made the effort the centerpiece of a re-energized

> > enforcement drive against illegal immigration in August after the

> > Senate rejected his proposal to overhaul immigration laws. But the

> > court ruling -- sought by major American labor, business and farm

> > organizations -- highlighted the chasm that the issue has opened

> > between the Republican Party and its traditional business allies.

>

> > The case also called attention to the gulf between Washington rhetoric

> > about the need to curtail illegal immigration and the economic reality

> > that many U.S. employers rely on illegal labor, as well as to the

> > government's inability for nearly three decades to develop adequate

> > tools for identifying undocumented workers.

>

> > In a 22-page ruling, Breyer said the plaintiffs -- an unusual

> > coalition that included the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties

> > Union and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- had raised serious questions

> > about the legality of the administration's plan to mail Social

> > Security "no-match" letters to 140,000 U.S. employers.

>

> > "There can be no doubt that the effects of the rule's implementation

> > will be severe," Breyer wrote, resulting in "irreparable harm to

> > innocent workers and employers."

>

> > The government letters are intended to warn employers for the first

> > time that they must resolve questions about their employees'

> > identities or fire them within 90 days. If they do not, employers

> > could face "stiff penalties," including fines and even criminal

> > prosecution, for violating a federal law that bars knowingly employing

> > illegal workers, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said

> > when he announced the plan Aug. 10.

>

> > The plaintiffs convinced the judge that the Social Security

> > Administration database includes so many errors -- incorporated in the

> > records of about 9.5 million people in 2003 alone -- that its use in

> > firings would unfairly discriminate against tens of thousands of legal

> > workers, including native-born and naturalized U.S. citizens, and

> > cause major workforce disruptions that would burden companies.

>

> > "The government's proposal to disseminate no-match letters affecting

> > more than eight million workers will, under the mandated time line,

> > result in the termination of employment to lawfully employed workers,"

> > the judge wrote. "Moreover the threat of criminal prosecution . . .

> > reflects a major change in DHS policy."

>

> > Breyer also said that the government may have ignored a 1980 law, the

> > Regulatory Flexibility Act, that requires it to weigh the cost of

> > imposing new regulations that would significantly burden small-

> > business owners. Randel K. Johnson, a vice president of the Chamber of

> > Commerce, said the ruling shows that "the government cannot do

> > anything it wants simply in the name of enforcement. They've got to be

> > careful about building their record and complying with the law."

> > In a statement, AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney said: "This is a

> > significant step towards overturning this unlawful rule, which would

> > give employers an even stronger way to keep workers from freely

> > forming unions. . . . More than 70% of SSA discrepancies refer to U.S.

> > citizens."

>

> > Chertoff expressed disappointment with the decision and said the

> > administration will continue to aggressively enforce immigration laws

> > while considering an appeal, which plaintiffs' attorneys said could

> > take at least nine months.

> > "Today's ruling is yet another reminder of why we need Congress to

> > enact comprehensive immigration reform," Chertoff said. "The American

> > people have been loud and clear about their desire to see our nation's

> > immigration laws enforced."

>

> > Several analysts said the Bush administration's plan appeared to be

> > designed to push business interests back into the debate by

> > demonstrating that the failure of legislative reform efforts would

> > carry costs, and to reassure conservative lawmakers who oppose illegal

> > immigration that the White House is able and willing to crack down on

> > offenders.

>

> > Doris Meissner, former commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and

> > Naturalization Service and now a senior fellow at the nonpartisan

> > Migration Policy Institute in Washington, said the ruling "shows how

> > ineffective the current laws are."

> > "It reinforces the opinion that many of us hold that until you have a

> > better legal framework -- which requires new legislation -- we're

> > stuck very much with the status quo," Meissner said.

>

> > In a statement, Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Calif.), an opponent of

> > Bush's approach who won election to the House last year on the issue,

> > criticized the court. "What part of 'illegal' does Judge Breyer not

> > understand?" he said. "At a time when the federal government is

> > finally trying to enforce current immigration law, we cannot have

> > activist judges stand in the way of doing what is right."

> > The scope of the problem is uncontested. A three-year government audit

> > ending in 2001 found "widespread" misuse of Social Security numbers by

> > illegal immigrants, who often present fake or fraudulent documents to

> > obtain jobs.

>

> > Overall, 7.2 million illegal immigrants account for at least 10

> > percent of low-skilled U.S. workers and 5 percent of the total U.S.

> > workforce, according to a Pew Hispanic Center analysis of 2005 census

> > data.

> > Illegal immigrants make up even greater portions of workers in

> > specific industries, including 24 percent in farming, 17 percent in

> > cleaning, 14 percent in construction and 12 percent in food

> > preparation. But the government's record in developing tools to screen

> > such workers is spotty, largely because of successful efforts by

> > employers, labor unions and civil rights groups to water them down.

>

> > A government program to verify the validity of new hires' Social

> > Security numbers, proposed in concept in 1981 and launched in 1996,

> > remains voluntary and covers only about 23,000 of 8 million U.S.

> > employers. It is also hampered by a high false-alarm rate and the

> > limited ability to detect identity theft involving stolen or

> > fraudulent numbers. Between June 2004 and May 2006, it erroneously

> > rejected 11 percent of foreign-born U.S. citizens and 1.3 percent of

> > authorized foreign-born noncitizens, according to a report provided to

> > Congress.

>

> > In protest, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) signed legislation in

> > August that bars companies in his state from participating in the

> > program until it is 99 percent accurate.

>

> > The federal government has mailed Social Security no-match letters to

> > employers since 1994, but such notices were generally silent about

> > workers' immigration status and employers did not face liability. In

> > June 2006, the Department of Homeland Security proposed using the

> > letters to combat immigration fraud involving existing employees, and

> > it finalized its plans this summer. The AFL-CIO and the ACLU filed

> > suit to halt the Sept. 4 start of the mailings, and they were joined

> > by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the trade associations for the

> > agriculture, restaurant and construction industries.

>

> > On Aug. 31, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney issued a temporary

> > restraining order pending an Oct. 1 hearing before Breyer, who was

> > appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1997 and is the sister of

> > Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer.

>

> >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR200...

>

> > Just keep chipping away at the rotting foundations of government.

>

> ted

How many mexical criminals do you have in your neighborhood?

Enough for you to organize one of your daisey-chain celebratory romps?

On Oct 11, 12:19 pm, lorad...@cs.com wrote:

> On Oct 11, 12:12 pm, greg3347 <theodor...@lycos.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > On Oct 11, 10:20 am, bigTITS <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>

> > > Sorry, folks. But a federal judge has blocked your Nincompoop-In-

> > > Chief's effort to stop the hiring of ILLEGALS.

>

> > > We may not like it, but we'll have to face it sooner -- or LATER.

> > > Whatever number of illegals are here at this time will be granted a

> > > path to legal citizenship. By federal law.

>

> > > This might take 5, 10, 15 years, but the shear numbers of illegals in

> > > the U.S. precludes any and all of your wild ideas for "getting rid of

> > > them."

>

> > > AND IF CONGRESS and your White House war criminal don't pass an

> > > immigration reform bill in the fairly near future, the COURTS will

> > > intervene and "institute" reform by negating and gutting more federal

> > > and local anti-immigrant "laws."

>

> > > SO -- shout, scream, jump-up-and-down, pull your hair, curse your

> > > politicians, commit hate crimes, threaten "action" of some kind -- but

> > > sooner or later some form of AMNESTY will become the law of the land,

> > > like Brown vs. Board of Education.

>

> > > Your federal government helped create this problem through decades of

> > > indifference and neglect.

>

> > > And soon your federal government will correct the problem, too.

>

> > > ----------------------

>

> > > "Effort to Curb Illegal Workers' Hiring Blocked"

>

> > > By Spencer S. Hsu

> > > Washington Post Staff Writer

> > > Thursday, October 11, 2007; A01

>

> > > A federal judge barred the Bush administration yesterday from

> > > launching a planned crackdown on U.S. companies that employ illegal

> > > immigrants, warning of its potentially "staggering" impact on law-

> > > abiding workers and companies.

> > > In a firm rebuke of the White House, U.S. District Judge Charles R.

> > > Breyer of San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction against the

> > > president's plan to press employers to fire as many as 8.7 million

> > > workers with suspect Social Security numbers, starting this fall.

>

> > > President Bush made the effort the centerpiece of a re-energized

> > > enforcement drive against illegal immigration in August after the

> > > Senate rejected his proposal to overhaul immigration laws. But the

> > > court ruling -- sought by major American labor, business and farm

> > > organizations -- highlighted the chasm that the issue has opened

> > > between the Republican Party and its traditional business allies.

>

> > > The case also called attention to the gulf between Washington rhetoric

> > > about the need to curtail illegal immigration and the economic reality

> > > that many U.S. employers rely on illegal labor, as well as to the

> > > government's inability for nearly three decades to develop adequate

> > > tools for identifying undocumented workers.

>

> > > In a 22-page ruling, Breyer said the plaintiffs -- an unusual

> > > coalition that included the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties

> > > Union and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- had raised serious questions

> > > about the legality of the administration's plan to mail Social

> > > Security "no-match" letters to 140,000 U.S. employers.

>

> > > "There can be no doubt that the effects of the rule's implementation

> > > will be severe," Breyer wrote, resulting in "irreparable harm to

> > > innocent workers and employers."

>

> > > The government letters are intended to warn employers for the first

> > > time that they must resolve questions about their employees'

> > > identities or fire them within 90 days. If they do not, employers

> > > could face "stiff penalties," including fines and even criminal

> > > prosecution, for violating a federal law that bars knowingly employing

> > > illegal workers, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said

> > > when he announced the plan Aug. 10.

>

> > > The plaintiffs convinced the judge that the Social Security

> > > Administration database includes so many errors -- incorporated in the

> > > records of about 9.5 million people in 2003 alone -- that its use in

> > > firings would unfairly discriminate against tens of thousands of legal

> > > workers, including native-born and naturalized U.S. citizens, and

> > > cause major workforce disruptions that would burden companies.

>

> > > "The government's proposal to disseminate no-match letters affecting

> > > more than eight million workers will, under the mandated time line,

> > > result in the termination of employment to lawfully employed workers,"

> > > the judge wrote. "Moreover the threat of criminal prosecution . . .

> > > reflects a major change in DHS policy."

>

> > > Breyer also said that the government may have ignored a 1980 law, the

> > > Regulatory Flexibility Act, that requires it to weigh the cost of

> > > imposing new regulations that would significantly burden small-

> > > business owners. Randel K. Johnson, a vice president of the Chamber of

> > > Commerce, said the ruling shows that "the government cannot do

> > > anything it wants simply in the name of enforcement. They've got to be

> > > careful about building their record and complying with the law."

> > > In a statement, AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney said: "This is a

> > > significant step towards overturning this unlawful rule, which would

> > > give employers an even stronger way to keep workers from freely

> > > forming unions. . . . More than 70% of SSA discrepancies refer to U.S.

> > > citizens."

>

> > > Chertoff expressed disappointment with the decision and said the

> > > administration will continue to aggressively enforce immigration laws

> > > while considering an appeal, which plaintiffs' attorneys said could

> > > take at least nine months.

> > > "Today's ruling is yet another reminder of why we need Congress to

> > > enact comprehensive immigration reform," Chertoff said. "The American

> > > people have been loud and clear about their desire to see our nation's

> > > immigration laws enforced."

>

> > > Several analysts said the Bush administration's plan appeared to be

> > > designed to push business interests back into the debate by

> > > demonstrating that the failure of legislative reform efforts would

> > > carry costs, and to reassure conservative lawmakers who oppose illegal

> > > immigration that the White House is able and willing to crack down on

> > > offenders.

>

> > > Doris Meissner, former commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and

> > > Naturalization Service and now a senior fellow at the nonpartisan

> > > Migration Policy Institute in Washington, said the ruling "shows how

> > > ineffective the current laws are."

> > > "It reinforces the opinion that many of us hold that until you have a

> > > better legal framework -- which requires new legislation -- we're

> > > stuck very much with the status quo," Meissner said.

>

> > > In a statement, Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Calif.), an opponent of

> > > Bush's approach who won election to the House last year on the issue,

> > > criticized the court. "What part of 'illegal' does Judge Breyer not

> > > understand?" he said. "At a time when the federal government is

> > > finally trying to enforce current immigration law, we cannot have

> > > activist judges stand in the way of doing what is right."

> > > The scope of the problem is uncontested. A three-year government audit

> > > ending in 2001 found "widespread" misuse of Social Security numbers by

> > > illegal immigrants, who often present fake or fraudulent documents to

> > > obtain jobs.

>

> > > Overall, 7.2 million illegal immigrants account for at least 10

> > > percent of low-skilled U.S. workers and 5 percent of the total U.S.

> > > workforce, according to a Pew Hispanic Center analysis of 2005 census

> > > data.

> > > Illegal immigrants make up even greater portions of workers in

> > > specific industries, including 24 percent in farming, 17 percent in

> > > cleaning, 14 percent in construction and 12 percent in food

> > > preparation. But the government's record in developing tools to screen

> > > such workers is spotty, largely because of successful efforts by

> > > employers, labor unions and civil rights groups to water them down.

>

> > > A government program to verify the validity of new hires' Social

> > > Security numbers, proposed in concept in 1981 and launched in 1996,

> > > remains voluntary and covers only about 23,000 of 8 million U.S.

> > > employers. It is also hampered by a high false-alarm rate and the

> > > limited ability to detect identity theft involving stolen or

> > > fraudulent numbers. Between June 2004 and May 2006, it erroneously

> > > rejected 11 percent of foreign-born U.S. citizens and 1.3 percent of

> > > authorized foreign-born noncitizens, according to a report provided to

> > > Congress.

>

> > > In protest, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) signed legislation in

> > > August that bars companies in his state from participating in the

> > > program until it is 99 percent accurate.

>

> > > The federal government has mailed Social Security no-match letters to

> > > employers since 1994, but such notices were generally silent about

> > > workers' immigration status and employers did not face liability. In

> > > June 2006, the Department of Homeland Security proposed using the

> > > letters to combat immigration fraud involving existing employees, and

> > > it finalized its plans this summer. The AFL-CIO and the ACLU filed

> > > suit to halt the Sept. 4 start of the mailings, and they were joined

> > > by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the trade associations for the

> > > agriculture, restaurant and construction industries.

>

> > > On Aug. 31, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney issued a temporary

> > > restraining order pending an Oct. 1 hearing before Breyer, who was

> > > appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1997 and is the sister of

> > > Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer.

>

> > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/10/AR200...

>

> > > Just keep chipping away at the rotting foundations of government.

>

> > ted

>

> How many mexical criminals do you have in your neighborhood?

> Enough for you to organize one of your daisey-chain celebratory romps?- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

Help! I'm on your.

http://www.numbersusa.com/ NumbersUSA

http://www.newnation.org/ New Nation News

greg