G
Gandalf Grey
Guest
Reagan and the Salvadoran Baby Skulls
By Robert Parry
Created Jan 30 2007 - 8:36am
Ronald Reagan's many admirers may find this idea offensive, but - given a
new report by the Washington Post - it might be fitting to have a display at
Reagan National Airport to show how Salvadoran baby skulls were used as
candle holders and good luck charms. Perhaps the presentation could contain
skeletal remains of Guatemalans and Nicaraguans, too.
It might be modeled after skeletons on display in Cambodia from the
slaughters by the Khmer Rouge. After all, it was President Reagan - more
than any other person - who justified and facilitated the barbarity that
raged through Central America in the 1980s, claiming the lives of tens of
thousands of peasants, clergy and students, men, women and children.
Reagan portrayed the bloody conflicts as a necessary front in the Cold War,
but the Central American violence was always more about entrenched ruling
elites determined to retain their privileges against impoverished peasants,
including descendants of the region's Maya Indians, seeking social,
political and economic reforms.
One of the most notorious acts of brutality occurred in December 1981 in and
around the Salvadoran town of El Mozote. The government's Atlacatl
Battalion - freshly trained and newly armed thanks to Reagan's hard-line
policies - systematically slaughtered hundreds of men, women and children.
When the atrocity was revealed by reporters at the New York Times and the
Washington Post, the Reagan administration showed off its new strategy of
"perception management," denying the facts and challenging the integrity of
the journalists.
Because of that P.R. offensive, the reality about the El Mozote massacre
remained in doubt for almost a decade until the war ended and a United
Nations forensic team dug up hundreds of skeletons, including many little
ones of children.
Now the Washington Post has added a new grisly detail. Several months after
the massacre, the Salvadoran army returned to the scene and collected the
skulls of some El Mozote children as novelty items, the Post reported.
"They worked well as candle holders," recalled one of the soldiers, Jose
Wilfredo Salgado, "and better as good luck charms."
Now, a quarter century later, describing his role piling the tiny skulls
into sacks as souvenirs, Salgado acknowledged that he had "lost his love of
humanity."
The Post reported that "witnessing the aftermath of what his colleagues did
in El Mozote and reflecting on those skulls changed his mind about how the
war was being fought." Salgada said his mentor, Col. Domingo Monterrosa, who
later died in a helicopter crash, had ordered an act of "genocide" in El
Mozote.
"If Monterossa had lived," the Post reported, "Salgada said, he should have
been prosecuted for 'war crimes like a Hitler.'" [Washington Post, Jan. 29,
2007] [1]
Enablers to Murder
But what about the American officials who were the enablers and the
protectors of Central America's mass murderers?
While Monterrosa may have ordered massacres in El Mozote and other towns in
El Salvador, President Reagan and other senior U.S. officials collaborated
in and covered up those crimes, along with acts of genocide in Guatemala and
terrorism in Nicaragua.
Yet, the U.S. officials who supplied the guns, helicopters, advanced
technology and political cover have never been called to account. Some, like
former State Department official Elliott Abrams, have moved on to oversee
the bloody chaos in Iraq.
After leaving office, Reagan was showered with honors, including having
dozens of government sites named for him, including National Airport in
Washington.
Criticism also should fall on President Bill Clinton, who came into office
after the end of the Cold War but rejected suggestions that he authorize an
American truth commission to investigate U.S. complicity in the era's crimes
and separate fact from fiction, as was done in Argentina, South Africa and
other countries.
Only late in his eight-year presidency did Clinton agree to declassify
documents for use by a Guatemalan truth commission examining three decades
of political violence that had torn that Central American country apart and
claimed some 200,000 lives.
But the worst of the Guatemalan violence - like the bloodletting in El
Salvador, Nicaragua and to a lesser extent Honduras - came after the
election of Reagan in November 1980. That outcome touched off celebrations
in the walled-off, well-to-do neighborhoods across Central America.
After four years of Jimmy Carter's human rights nagging, the region's rich
and powerful were thrilled to have someone in the White House who understood
their problems and would let them do the needed dirty work.
Once in office, Reagan and his administration swung into action, deflecting
condemnation of Salvadoran security forces for the rape/murders of four
American churchwomen as well as playing down the staggering number of
political slayings that left decaying and mutilated corpses on street
corners and in trash dumps.
Reagan also put the Central Intelligence Agency to work arming and training
an army of Nicaraguan exiles to launch raids into northern Nicaragua and
destabilize that country's leftist Sandinista government. The contra army
soon gained a reputation for rape, torture, murder, drug trafficking and
terrorism. [For details, see Robert Parry's Lost History [2].]
The Guatemalan Genocide
Reagan also chipped away at an arms embargo imposed on Guatemala by Carter
who was offended by its ghastly human rights record. A fundamental part of
Reagan's strategy was to silence criticism of the atrocities whether the
accusations were coming from the news media, human rights groups or the U.S.
intelligence community.
In April 1981, for instance, a secret CIA cable described a Guatemalan army
massacre of peasants at Cocob, near Nebaj in the Ixil Indian territory. On
April 17, 1981, government troops attacked the area, which was believed to
support leftist guerrillas, the cable said.
According to a CIA source, "the social population appeared to fully support
the guerrillas" and "the soldiers were forced to fire at anything that
moved." The CIA cable added that "the Guatemalan authorities admitted that
'many civilians' were killed in Cocob, many of whom undoubtedly were
non-combatants."
While keeping the CIA account secret, Reagan permitted Guatemala's army to
buy $3.2 million in military trucks and jeeps in June 1981. Confident of
Reagan's sympathies, the Guatemalan government continued its political
repression without apology.
According to a State Department cable on Oct. 5, 1981, Guatemalan leaders
met with Reagan's roving ambassador, retired Gen. Vernon Walters, and left
no doubt about their plans. Guatemala's military dictator, Gen. Fernando
Romeo Lucas Garcia, "made clear that his government will continue as
before - that the repression will continue," the cable said.
Human rights groups saw the same picture. The Inter-American Human Rights
Commission released a report on Oct. 15, 1981, blaming the Guatemalan
government for "thousands of illegal executions." [Washington Post, Oct. 16,
1981]
But the Reagan administration sought to confuse the American public. A State
Department "white paper" in December 1981 blamed the violence on leftist
"extremist groups" and their "terrorist methods," inspired and supported by
Cuba's Fidel Castro.
Yet, even as these rationalizations were sold to the American people, U.S.
intelligence agencies in Guatemala continued to learn about
government-sponsored massacres. One CIA report in February 1982 described an
army sweep through the so-called Ixil Triangle in central El Quiche
province, an area where descendants of the ancient Maya lived.
"The commanding officers of the units involved have been instructed to
destroy all towns and villages which are cooperating with the Guerrilla Army
of the Poor [known as the EGP] and eliminate all sources of resistance," the
report stated. "Since the operation began, several villages have been burned
to the ground, and a large number of guerrillas and collaborators have been
killed."
The CIA report explained the army's modus operandi: "When an army patrol
meets resistance and takes fire from a town or village, it is assumed that
the entire town is hostile and it is subsequently destroyed. . The
well-documented belief by the army that the entire Ixil Indian population is
pro-EGP has created a situation in which the army can be expected to give no
quarter to combatants and non-combatants alike."
Rios Montt Coup
In March 1982, the violence continued to ratchet up when Gen. Efrain Rios
Montt seized power in a coup d'etat. An avowed fundamentalist Christian, he
was hailed by Reagan as "a man of great personal integrity."
By July 1982, Rios Montt had begun a new scorched-earth campaign. In
October, he also gave secret carte blanche to the feared "Archivos"
intelligence unit to expand "death squad" operations.
The U.S. embassy was soon hearing more accounts of the army conducting
Indian massacres. But the political officers knew that such grim news was
not welcome back in Washington and to report it would only damage their
careers.
So, the embassy cables increasingly began to spin the evidence in ways that
would best serve Reagan's hard-line foreign policy. On Oct. 22, 1982, the
embassy sought to explain away the mounting evidence of genocide by arguing
that the Rios Montt government was the victim of a communist-inspired
"disinformation campaign."
Reagan picked up on that theme. During a swing through Latin America, he
discounted the growing evidence that hundreds of Mayan villages were being
eradicated.
On Dec. 4, 1982, after meeting with Rios Montt, Reagan hailed the general as
"totally dedicated to democracy" and declared that the Rios Montt government
was "getting a bum rap."
On Jan. 7, 1983, Reagan lifted the ban on military aid to Guatemala and
authorized the sale of $6 million in military hardware. Approval covered
spare parts for UH-1H helicopters and A-37 aircraft used in
counterinsurgency operations.
In February 1983, a secret CIA cable noted a rise in "suspect right-wing
violence" with kidnappings of students and teachers. Bodies of victims were
appearing in ditches and gullies. CIA sources traced these political murders
to Rios Montt's order to the "Archivos" in October 1982 to "apprehend, hold,
interrogate and dispose of suspected guerrillas as they saw fit."
Despite these grisly facts on the ground, the annual State Department human
rights survey sugarcoated the facts for the American public and praised the
supposedly improved human rights situation in Guatemala. "The overall
conduct of the armed forces had improved by late in the year" 1982, the
report stated.
A different picture - far closer to the secret government reports - was
coming from independent human rights investigators. On March 17, 1983,
Americas Watch representatives condemned the Guatemalan army for human
rights atrocities against the Indian population.
New York attorney Stephen L. Kass said these findings included proof that
the government carried out "virtually indiscriminate murder of men, women
and children of any farm regarded by the army as possibly supportive of
guerrilla insurgents."
Rural women suspected of guerrilla sympathies were raped before execution,
Kass said. Children were "thrown into burning homes. They are thrown in the
air and speared with bayonets. We heard many, many stories of children being
picked up by the ankles and swung against poles so their heads are
destroyed." [AP, March 17, 1983]
Happy Face
Publicly, however, senior Reagan officials continued to put on a happy face.
On June 12, 1983, special envoy Richard B. Stone praised "positive changes"
in Rios Montt's government. But, in reality, Rios Montt's vengeful Christian
fundamentalism was hurtling out of control, even by Guatemalan standards. In
August 1983, Gen. Oscar Mejia Victores seized power in another coup.
Despite the power shift, Guatemalan security forces continued the killings.
Guatemala, of course, was not the only Central American country where Reagan
and his administration supported brutal military operations and then sought
to cover up the bloody facts.
Reagan's falsification of the historical record became a hallmark of the
conflicts in El Salvador and Nicaragua as well as Guatemala.
In one case, Reagan personally lashed out at a human rights investigator
named Reed Brody, a New York lawyer who had collected affidavits from more
than 100 witnesses to atrocities carried out by the U.S.-supported contras
in Nicaragua.
Angered by the revelations about his contra "freedom-fighters," Reagan
denounced Brody in a speech on April 15, 1985, calling him "one of dictator
[Daniel] Ortega's supporters, a sympathizer who has openly embraced
Sandinismo."
Privately, Reagan had a far more accurate understanding of the contras. At
one point, Reagan turned to CIA official Duane Clarridge and demanded that
the contras be used to destroy some Soviet-supplied helicopters that had
arrived in Nicaragua.
In his memoir, A Spy for All Seasons, Clarridge recalled that "President
Reagan pulled me aside and asked, 'Dewey, can't you get those vandals of
yours to do this job.'" Clarridge also acknowledged that "the people then in
power in El Salvador were an unsavory collection of rightist cutthroats with
an abominable record on human rights."
Killing Children
Despite the bloodletting across Central America in the 1980s, the massacre
at El Mozote in northeastern El Salvador in December 1981 still stood out as
notable not only for the ferocity of the killings but for the brazenness of
the Reagan administration's cover-up.
The slaughter occurred as the U.S.-trained Atlacatl Battalion swept through
northeastern El Salvador, a region considered sympathetic to leftist
guerrillas. Around the town of El Mozote, the troops rounded up about 800
unarmed peasants of all ages.
The Atlacatl soldiers started by shooting and beheading the men, followed by
the slaughter of the women, some of whom were first dragged off to be raped.
The soldiers then turned to the children, many of whom had watched their
parents butchered. The children were bludgeoned to death or burned alive.
When news of the El Mozote massacre leaked out in stories published by the
New York Times and the Washington Post in March 1982, the Reagan
administration sought to discredit the information and the journalists.
Times correspondent Raymond Bonner became a favorite target of right-wing
attack groups and eventually his Times editors succumbed to the pressure,
recalling him to New York and giving him an unappealing job. Bonner resigned
to the delight of Reagan's right-wing activists who claimed vindication.
Not until 1991, when a United Nations forensic team excavated the site and
found hundreds of skeletons, including many tiny ones, was the reality of
the El Mozote massacre confirmed. (Bonner was subsequently rehired by the
Times.)
The election of Bill Clinton - as the first President to take office after
the end of the Cold War - offered a unique opportunity to expose the real
history of the era and hold American war criminals to account. But Clinton
and his advisers saw such investigations as a distraction and chose instead
to focus on economic and social legislation.
After 1994, with the Republican congressional landslide, the opportunity was
lost. Instead, the Republicans transformed Reagan into an icon, naming
scores of buildings and other facilities after him, including National
Airport.
An honest accounting of what really happened under Reagan's presidency
became a political taboo in the United States. Even when Clinton finally
released incriminating U.S. documents to a Guatemalan truth commission, the
evidence never got the attention that it deserved.
On Feb. 25, 1999, Guatemala's Historical Clarification Commission issued a
report on the human rights crimes that Reagan and his administration had
aided, abetted and concealed. The independent human rights body estimated
that some 200,000 Guatemalans had died, with the most savage bloodletting
occurring in the 1980s.
The report documented that in the 1980s, the army committed 626 massacres
against Mayan villages. "The massacres that eliminated entire Mayan
villages . are neither perfidious allegations nor figments of the
imagination, but an authentic chapter in Guatemala's history," the
commission concluded.
The army "completely exterminated Mayan communities, destroyed their
livestock and crops," the report said. In the northern highlands, the report
termed the slaughter a "genocide."
Besides carrying out murder and "disappearances," the army routinely engaged
in torture and rape. "The rape of women, during torture or before being
murdered, was a common practice" by the military and paramilitary forces,
the report found.
U.S. Assistance
The report added that the "government of the United States, through various
agencies including the CIA, provided direct and indirect support for some
[of these] state operations." The report concluded that the U.S. government
also gave money and training to Guatemalan military units that committed
"acts of genocide" against the Mayas.
"Believing that the ends justified everything, the military and the state
security forces blindly pursued the anticommunist struggle, without respect
for any legal principles or the most elemental ethical and religious values,
and in this way, completely lost any semblance of human morals," said the
commission chairman, Christian Tomuschat, a German jurist.
"Within the framework of the counterinsurgency operations carried out
between 1981 and 1983, in certain regions of the country agents of the
Guatemalan state committed acts of genocide against groups of the Mayan
people," Tomuschat said.
During a visit to Central America, on March 10, 1999, President Clinton
apologized for the past U.S. support of right-wing regimes in Guatemala.
"For the United States, it is important that I state clearly that support
for military forces and intelligence units which engaged in violence and
widespread repression was wrong, and the United States must not repeat that
mistake," Clinton said.
But the story of the Reagan-supported genocide of the Mayan Indians was
quickly forgotten, as Republicans and the Washington press corps wrapped
Reagan's legacy in a fuzzy blanket of heroic mythology.
The atrocities inflicted on the Mayas - and the peasants of El Salvador and
Nicaragua - were rarely associated with the popular Reagan. Neither, of
course, will anyone in polite Washington society link Reagan to the
revelation that the skulls of children butchered at El Mozote became candle
holders and good luck charms.
_______
About author Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s
for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege:
Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at
secrecyandprivilege.com [3]. It's also available at Amazon.com [4], as is
his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.'
Robert Parry's web site is Consortium News [5]
--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson
By Robert Parry
Created Jan 30 2007 - 8:36am
Ronald Reagan's many admirers may find this idea offensive, but - given a
new report by the Washington Post - it might be fitting to have a display at
Reagan National Airport to show how Salvadoran baby skulls were used as
candle holders and good luck charms. Perhaps the presentation could contain
skeletal remains of Guatemalans and Nicaraguans, too.
It might be modeled after skeletons on display in Cambodia from the
slaughters by the Khmer Rouge. After all, it was President Reagan - more
than any other person - who justified and facilitated the barbarity that
raged through Central America in the 1980s, claiming the lives of tens of
thousands of peasants, clergy and students, men, women and children.
Reagan portrayed the bloody conflicts as a necessary front in the Cold War,
but the Central American violence was always more about entrenched ruling
elites determined to retain their privileges against impoverished peasants,
including descendants of the region's Maya Indians, seeking social,
political and economic reforms.
One of the most notorious acts of brutality occurred in December 1981 in and
around the Salvadoran town of El Mozote. The government's Atlacatl
Battalion - freshly trained and newly armed thanks to Reagan's hard-line
policies - systematically slaughtered hundreds of men, women and children.
When the atrocity was revealed by reporters at the New York Times and the
Washington Post, the Reagan administration showed off its new strategy of
"perception management," denying the facts and challenging the integrity of
the journalists.
Because of that P.R. offensive, the reality about the El Mozote massacre
remained in doubt for almost a decade until the war ended and a United
Nations forensic team dug up hundreds of skeletons, including many little
ones of children.
Now the Washington Post has added a new grisly detail. Several months after
the massacre, the Salvadoran army returned to the scene and collected the
skulls of some El Mozote children as novelty items, the Post reported.
"They worked well as candle holders," recalled one of the soldiers, Jose
Wilfredo Salgado, "and better as good luck charms."
Now, a quarter century later, describing his role piling the tiny skulls
into sacks as souvenirs, Salgado acknowledged that he had "lost his love of
humanity."
The Post reported that "witnessing the aftermath of what his colleagues did
in El Mozote and reflecting on those skulls changed his mind about how the
war was being fought." Salgada said his mentor, Col. Domingo Monterrosa, who
later died in a helicopter crash, had ordered an act of "genocide" in El
Mozote.
"If Monterossa had lived," the Post reported, "Salgada said, he should have
been prosecuted for 'war crimes like a Hitler.'" [Washington Post, Jan. 29,
2007] [1]
Enablers to Murder
But what about the American officials who were the enablers and the
protectors of Central America's mass murderers?
While Monterrosa may have ordered massacres in El Mozote and other towns in
El Salvador, President Reagan and other senior U.S. officials collaborated
in and covered up those crimes, along with acts of genocide in Guatemala and
terrorism in Nicaragua.
Yet, the U.S. officials who supplied the guns, helicopters, advanced
technology and political cover have never been called to account. Some, like
former State Department official Elliott Abrams, have moved on to oversee
the bloody chaos in Iraq.
After leaving office, Reagan was showered with honors, including having
dozens of government sites named for him, including National Airport in
Washington.
Criticism also should fall on President Bill Clinton, who came into office
after the end of the Cold War but rejected suggestions that he authorize an
American truth commission to investigate U.S. complicity in the era's crimes
and separate fact from fiction, as was done in Argentina, South Africa and
other countries.
Only late in his eight-year presidency did Clinton agree to declassify
documents for use by a Guatemalan truth commission examining three decades
of political violence that had torn that Central American country apart and
claimed some 200,000 lives.
But the worst of the Guatemalan violence - like the bloodletting in El
Salvador, Nicaragua and to a lesser extent Honduras - came after the
election of Reagan in November 1980. That outcome touched off celebrations
in the walled-off, well-to-do neighborhoods across Central America.
After four years of Jimmy Carter's human rights nagging, the region's rich
and powerful were thrilled to have someone in the White House who understood
their problems and would let them do the needed dirty work.
Once in office, Reagan and his administration swung into action, deflecting
condemnation of Salvadoran security forces for the rape/murders of four
American churchwomen as well as playing down the staggering number of
political slayings that left decaying and mutilated corpses on street
corners and in trash dumps.
Reagan also put the Central Intelligence Agency to work arming and training
an army of Nicaraguan exiles to launch raids into northern Nicaragua and
destabilize that country's leftist Sandinista government. The contra army
soon gained a reputation for rape, torture, murder, drug trafficking and
terrorism. [For details, see Robert Parry's Lost History [2].]
The Guatemalan Genocide
Reagan also chipped away at an arms embargo imposed on Guatemala by Carter
who was offended by its ghastly human rights record. A fundamental part of
Reagan's strategy was to silence criticism of the atrocities whether the
accusations were coming from the news media, human rights groups or the U.S.
intelligence community.
In April 1981, for instance, a secret CIA cable described a Guatemalan army
massacre of peasants at Cocob, near Nebaj in the Ixil Indian territory. On
April 17, 1981, government troops attacked the area, which was believed to
support leftist guerrillas, the cable said.
According to a CIA source, "the social population appeared to fully support
the guerrillas" and "the soldiers were forced to fire at anything that
moved." The CIA cable added that "the Guatemalan authorities admitted that
'many civilians' were killed in Cocob, many of whom undoubtedly were
non-combatants."
While keeping the CIA account secret, Reagan permitted Guatemala's army to
buy $3.2 million in military trucks and jeeps in June 1981. Confident of
Reagan's sympathies, the Guatemalan government continued its political
repression without apology.
According to a State Department cable on Oct. 5, 1981, Guatemalan leaders
met with Reagan's roving ambassador, retired Gen. Vernon Walters, and left
no doubt about their plans. Guatemala's military dictator, Gen. Fernando
Romeo Lucas Garcia, "made clear that his government will continue as
before - that the repression will continue," the cable said.
Human rights groups saw the same picture. The Inter-American Human Rights
Commission released a report on Oct. 15, 1981, blaming the Guatemalan
government for "thousands of illegal executions." [Washington Post, Oct. 16,
1981]
But the Reagan administration sought to confuse the American public. A State
Department "white paper" in December 1981 blamed the violence on leftist
"extremist groups" and their "terrorist methods," inspired and supported by
Cuba's Fidel Castro.
Yet, even as these rationalizations were sold to the American people, U.S.
intelligence agencies in Guatemala continued to learn about
government-sponsored massacres. One CIA report in February 1982 described an
army sweep through the so-called Ixil Triangle in central El Quiche
province, an area where descendants of the ancient Maya lived.
"The commanding officers of the units involved have been instructed to
destroy all towns and villages which are cooperating with the Guerrilla Army
of the Poor [known as the EGP] and eliminate all sources of resistance," the
report stated. "Since the operation began, several villages have been burned
to the ground, and a large number of guerrillas and collaborators have been
killed."
The CIA report explained the army's modus operandi: "When an army patrol
meets resistance and takes fire from a town or village, it is assumed that
the entire town is hostile and it is subsequently destroyed. . The
well-documented belief by the army that the entire Ixil Indian population is
pro-EGP has created a situation in which the army can be expected to give no
quarter to combatants and non-combatants alike."
Rios Montt Coup
In March 1982, the violence continued to ratchet up when Gen. Efrain Rios
Montt seized power in a coup d'etat. An avowed fundamentalist Christian, he
was hailed by Reagan as "a man of great personal integrity."
By July 1982, Rios Montt had begun a new scorched-earth campaign. In
October, he also gave secret carte blanche to the feared "Archivos"
intelligence unit to expand "death squad" operations.
The U.S. embassy was soon hearing more accounts of the army conducting
Indian massacres. But the political officers knew that such grim news was
not welcome back in Washington and to report it would only damage their
careers.
So, the embassy cables increasingly began to spin the evidence in ways that
would best serve Reagan's hard-line foreign policy. On Oct. 22, 1982, the
embassy sought to explain away the mounting evidence of genocide by arguing
that the Rios Montt government was the victim of a communist-inspired
"disinformation campaign."
Reagan picked up on that theme. During a swing through Latin America, he
discounted the growing evidence that hundreds of Mayan villages were being
eradicated.
On Dec. 4, 1982, after meeting with Rios Montt, Reagan hailed the general as
"totally dedicated to democracy" and declared that the Rios Montt government
was "getting a bum rap."
On Jan. 7, 1983, Reagan lifted the ban on military aid to Guatemala and
authorized the sale of $6 million in military hardware. Approval covered
spare parts for UH-1H helicopters and A-37 aircraft used in
counterinsurgency operations.
In February 1983, a secret CIA cable noted a rise in "suspect right-wing
violence" with kidnappings of students and teachers. Bodies of victims were
appearing in ditches and gullies. CIA sources traced these political murders
to Rios Montt's order to the "Archivos" in October 1982 to "apprehend, hold,
interrogate and dispose of suspected guerrillas as they saw fit."
Despite these grisly facts on the ground, the annual State Department human
rights survey sugarcoated the facts for the American public and praised the
supposedly improved human rights situation in Guatemala. "The overall
conduct of the armed forces had improved by late in the year" 1982, the
report stated.
A different picture - far closer to the secret government reports - was
coming from independent human rights investigators. On March 17, 1983,
Americas Watch representatives condemned the Guatemalan army for human
rights atrocities against the Indian population.
New York attorney Stephen L. Kass said these findings included proof that
the government carried out "virtually indiscriminate murder of men, women
and children of any farm regarded by the army as possibly supportive of
guerrilla insurgents."
Rural women suspected of guerrilla sympathies were raped before execution,
Kass said. Children were "thrown into burning homes. They are thrown in the
air and speared with bayonets. We heard many, many stories of children being
picked up by the ankles and swung against poles so their heads are
destroyed." [AP, March 17, 1983]
Happy Face
Publicly, however, senior Reagan officials continued to put on a happy face.
On June 12, 1983, special envoy Richard B. Stone praised "positive changes"
in Rios Montt's government. But, in reality, Rios Montt's vengeful Christian
fundamentalism was hurtling out of control, even by Guatemalan standards. In
August 1983, Gen. Oscar Mejia Victores seized power in another coup.
Despite the power shift, Guatemalan security forces continued the killings.
Guatemala, of course, was not the only Central American country where Reagan
and his administration supported brutal military operations and then sought
to cover up the bloody facts.
Reagan's falsification of the historical record became a hallmark of the
conflicts in El Salvador and Nicaragua as well as Guatemala.
In one case, Reagan personally lashed out at a human rights investigator
named Reed Brody, a New York lawyer who had collected affidavits from more
than 100 witnesses to atrocities carried out by the U.S.-supported contras
in Nicaragua.
Angered by the revelations about his contra "freedom-fighters," Reagan
denounced Brody in a speech on April 15, 1985, calling him "one of dictator
[Daniel] Ortega's supporters, a sympathizer who has openly embraced
Sandinismo."
Privately, Reagan had a far more accurate understanding of the contras. At
one point, Reagan turned to CIA official Duane Clarridge and demanded that
the contras be used to destroy some Soviet-supplied helicopters that had
arrived in Nicaragua.
In his memoir, A Spy for All Seasons, Clarridge recalled that "President
Reagan pulled me aside and asked, 'Dewey, can't you get those vandals of
yours to do this job.'" Clarridge also acknowledged that "the people then in
power in El Salvador were an unsavory collection of rightist cutthroats with
an abominable record on human rights."
Killing Children
Despite the bloodletting across Central America in the 1980s, the massacre
at El Mozote in northeastern El Salvador in December 1981 still stood out as
notable not only for the ferocity of the killings but for the brazenness of
the Reagan administration's cover-up.
The slaughter occurred as the U.S.-trained Atlacatl Battalion swept through
northeastern El Salvador, a region considered sympathetic to leftist
guerrillas. Around the town of El Mozote, the troops rounded up about 800
unarmed peasants of all ages.
The Atlacatl soldiers started by shooting and beheading the men, followed by
the slaughter of the women, some of whom were first dragged off to be raped.
The soldiers then turned to the children, many of whom had watched their
parents butchered. The children were bludgeoned to death or burned alive.
When news of the El Mozote massacre leaked out in stories published by the
New York Times and the Washington Post in March 1982, the Reagan
administration sought to discredit the information and the journalists.
Times correspondent Raymond Bonner became a favorite target of right-wing
attack groups and eventually his Times editors succumbed to the pressure,
recalling him to New York and giving him an unappealing job. Bonner resigned
to the delight of Reagan's right-wing activists who claimed vindication.
Not until 1991, when a United Nations forensic team excavated the site and
found hundreds of skeletons, including many tiny ones, was the reality of
the El Mozote massacre confirmed. (Bonner was subsequently rehired by the
Times.)
The election of Bill Clinton - as the first President to take office after
the end of the Cold War - offered a unique opportunity to expose the real
history of the era and hold American war criminals to account. But Clinton
and his advisers saw such investigations as a distraction and chose instead
to focus on economic and social legislation.
After 1994, with the Republican congressional landslide, the opportunity was
lost. Instead, the Republicans transformed Reagan into an icon, naming
scores of buildings and other facilities after him, including National
Airport.
An honest accounting of what really happened under Reagan's presidency
became a political taboo in the United States. Even when Clinton finally
released incriminating U.S. documents to a Guatemalan truth commission, the
evidence never got the attention that it deserved.
On Feb. 25, 1999, Guatemala's Historical Clarification Commission issued a
report on the human rights crimes that Reagan and his administration had
aided, abetted and concealed. The independent human rights body estimated
that some 200,000 Guatemalans had died, with the most savage bloodletting
occurring in the 1980s.
The report documented that in the 1980s, the army committed 626 massacres
against Mayan villages. "The massacres that eliminated entire Mayan
villages . are neither perfidious allegations nor figments of the
imagination, but an authentic chapter in Guatemala's history," the
commission concluded.
The army "completely exterminated Mayan communities, destroyed their
livestock and crops," the report said. In the northern highlands, the report
termed the slaughter a "genocide."
Besides carrying out murder and "disappearances," the army routinely engaged
in torture and rape. "The rape of women, during torture or before being
murdered, was a common practice" by the military and paramilitary forces,
the report found.
U.S. Assistance
The report added that the "government of the United States, through various
agencies including the CIA, provided direct and indirect support for some
[of these] state operations." The report concluded that the U.S. government
also gave money and training to Guatemalan military units that committed
"acts of genocide" against the Mayas.
"Believing that the ends justified everything, the military and the state
security forces blindly pursued the anticommunist struggle, without respect
for any legal principles or the most elemental ethical and religious values,
and in this way, completely lost any semblance of human morals," said the
commission chairman, Christian Tomuschat, a German jurist.
"Within the framework of the counterinsurgency operations carried out
between 1981 and 1983, in certain regions of the country agents of the
Guatemalan state committed acts of genocide against groups of the Mayan
people," Tomuschat said.
During a visit to Central America, on March 10, 1999, President Clinton
apologized for the past U.S. support of right-wing regimes in Guatemala.
"For the United States, it is important that I state clearly that support
for military forces and intelligence units which engaged in violence and
widespread repression was wrong, and the United States must not repeat that
mistake," Clinton said.
But the story of the Reagan-supported genocide of the Mayan Indians was
quickly forgotten, as Republicans and the Washington press corps wrapped
Reagan's legacy in a fuzzy blanket of heroic mythology.
The atrocities inflicted on the Mayas - and the peasants of El Salvador and
Nicaragua - were rarely associated with the popular Reagan. Neither, of
course, will anyone in polite Washington society link Reagan to the
revelation that the skulls of children butchered at El Mozote became candle
holders and good luck charms.
_______
About author Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s
for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege:
Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at
secrecyandprivilege.com [3]. It's also available at Amazon.com [4], as is
his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.'
Robert Parry's web site is Consortium News [5]
--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson