Religious Groups Reap Share of US Aid for Pet Projects

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

Religious Groups Reap Share of US Aid for Pet Projects

Via NY Transfer News Collective All the News that Doesn't Fit

sent by Steven Robinson (activ-l)

The New York Times - May 13, 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/13/business/13lobby.html

Religious Groups Reap Share of U.S. Aid for Pet Projects

By Diana B. Henriques & Andrew W. Lehren

St. Vincent College, a small Benedictine college southeast of Pittsburgh,

wanted to realign a two-lane state road serving the campus. But the state

transportation department did not have the money.

So St. Vincent tried Washington instead. The college hired a professional

lobbyist in 2004 and, later that year, two paragraphs were tucked into

federal appropriation bills with the help of Representative John P. Murtha,

Democrat of Pennsylvania, awarding $4 million solely for that project.

College officials said the work would improve the safety and appearance of

the road into the campus, which President Bush visited two days ago to give

the college's commencement address.

Religious organizations have long competed for federal contracts to provide

social services, and they have tried to influence Congress on matters of

moral and social policy - indeed, most major denominations have a presence

in Washington to monitor such legislation. But an analysis of federal

records shows that some religious organizations are also hiring

professional lobbyists to pursue the narrowly tailored individual

appropriations known as earmarks.

A New York Times analysis shows that the number of earmarks for religious

organizations, while small compared with the overall number, have increased

sharply in recent years. From 1989 to January 2007, Congress approved

almost 900 earmarks for religious groups, totaling more than $318 million,

with more than half of them granted in the Congressional session that

included the 2004 presidential election. By contrast, the same analysis

showed fewer than 60 earmarks for faith-based groups in the Congressional

session that covered 1997 and 1998.

Earmarks are individual federal grants that bypass the normal

appropriations and competitive-bidding procedures. They have been blamed

for feeding the budget deficit and have figured in several Capitol Hill

bribery scandals, prompting recent calls for reform from White House and

Congressional leaders.

They are distinct from the competitive, peer-reviewed grants that have

traditionally been used by religious institutions and charities to obtain

money for social services.

As the number of faith-based earmarks grew, the period from 1998 to 2005

saw a tripling in the number of religious organizations listed as clients

of Washington lobbying firms and a doubling in the amount they paid for

services, according to an analysis by The Times.

Sometimes the earmarks benefited programs aimed at helping others. There

have been numerous earmarks totaling $5.4 million for World Vision, the

global humanitarian ministry, to conduct job training, youth mentoring and

gang prevention programs. Another earmark provided $150,000 to help St.

Jerome's Church in the Bronx build a community center, and Fuller

Theological Seminary, a leading evangelical seminary in Pasadena, Calif.,

received $2 million to study gambling and juvenile violence.

But many of the earmarks address the prosaic institutional needs of some

specific religious group, like the ones giving the Mormon Church control

over two parcels of federal land of historic significance to the church,

transferring 10 acres of federal forest land to a small church in Florida,

allowing a historic church surrounded by a federal park in Ohio to use

public land to expand its parking space, and handing several acres of

government land over to a Catholic college in New Hampshire. (An

interactive database of almost 900 faith-based earmarks can be found at

nytimes.com.)

Earmarks have also helped finance new buildings on religious college

campuses, including a fitness center at Malone College, a small evangelical

Christian liberal arts college in Canton, Ohio.

The $1 million that helped build the center came from an earmark by

Representative Ralph S. Regula, whose district includes the college,

according to Suzanne Thomas, director of communications for the college.

Another earmark helped pay for a new school of nursing, she said.

In seeking the earmarks, the college hired a Washington lobbyist "to help

us with a 'boots on the ground' program of meeting with various

Congressional and Senate leaders," Ms. Thomas said, noting that many

private colleges are enlisting similar lobbying help.

Several scholars who wrote books about religious advocacy work in

Washington in the 1980s and early 1990s say the push for earmarks

identified in The Times analysis represents a sharp departure from the

lobbying strategies traditionally associated with religious groups. One of

them, Allen D. Hertzke, a professor at the University of Oklahoma in

Norman, said, "I never heard religious lobbyists talk about earmarks."

That view was echoed by Daniel J.<133>B. Hofrenning, a professor at St.

Olaf College in Northfield, Minn.: "Getting heavily into the pork-barrel

politics of earmarks - that is a distinctive change."

It is a shift that some religious advocates find worrisome.

"Earmarks are bad public policy," said Maureen Shea, director of the

Episcopal Office of Government Relations in Washington. "If earmarks are

not in the public interest, I would wonder why the faith community would be

involved in them. It would hurt our credibility."

James E. Winkler, who has represented the United Methodist General Board of

Church and Society since 2000, says he fears that the pursuit of earmarks

could muffle religion's moral voice. "For example, we've opposed the war

since day one," he said. "But what if an earmark benefiting us - money for

a Methodist seminary, perhaps - is attached to the supplemental

appropriation for the war? You can see how very serious moral conflicts

could arise."

The Rev. Richard Cizik, vice president for governmental affairs at the

National Association of Evangelicals, said that while religious

organizations should be able to compete for federal money, such groups

"shouldn't do that through earmarks." He explained, "As good stewards of

the public trust, we have to be transparent and above board - and earmarks

are not transparent or above board."

And, constitutional lawyers point out, because the First Amendment

prohibits direct government financing of religious activities, earmarks

that steer money to religious groups pose constitutional risks. Indeed,

several faith-based earmarks were successfully challenged as

unconstitutional long after Congress approved them.

Paul Marcone, a lobbyist and former Capitol Hill staff member who

specializes in getting earmarks for nonprofit clients, disputes the notion

that religious groups should not pursue them.

Despite what the critics say, there is far more transparency in earmarks

than in the discretionary grant process," Mr. Marcone said. "It's the

difference between unelected bureaucrats using a peer-review process and an

elected member of Congress."

Applying for competitive government grants "is a very frustrating process,"

Mr. Marcone added. "You might score very high and have an innovative

program, and still not get funded." By contrast, he said, all his nonprofit

clients who sought earmarks received grants within two years of signing on

with him.

The lobbying firm to which Malone College and dozens of other religious

organizations have turned is Mr. Marcone's former employer, the Russ Reid

Company, based in Pasadena, Calif. Since 1964, Russ Reid has provided

direct-mail and other fund-raising services to some of the nation's largest

charities, like World Vision and Habitat for Humanity.

But it also maintains a government relations office in Washington, directed

by Mark D. McIntyre, a former Congressional press secretary and a vice

presidential speechwriter in the Reagan administration. "If your focus is

on how faith-based organizations are getting earmarks, I'm your guy," Mr.

McIntyre said in a brief telephone conversation last month. But the company

subsequently canceled an interview with Mr. McIntyre and declined to

comment further about his work.

Among the dozens of institutions for which Russ Reid has helped obtain

earmarks are several faith-based rescue missions, including the Detroit

Rescue Mission Ministries, the Light of Life Mission in Pittsburgh and the

Gospel Rescue Ministries of Washington; a host of religious colleges and

seminaries, including Fuller seminary and Vanguard University in Costa

Mesa, Calif., which got a $750,000 earmark for its new science center; and

various Catholic ministries, including the specialized children's

educational programs of the Holy Family Institute in Pittsburgh.

Russ Reid has also lobbied for earmarks for World Vision, the humanitarian

service ministry. Seeking earmarks is a departure for World Vision. "On the

international side, we do not do earmark advocacy," said Joseph Mettimano,

director of public policy and advocacy. Instead of competing for an

earmarked slice of money, the charity joins with other aid organizations to

lobby for a bigger pie of foreign aid, he explained, adding that similar

solidarity on the domestic front could "absolutely" be beneficial.

World Vision is evaluating whether to continue to seek earmarks, according

to Romanita Hairston, its vice president for domestic programs. A main

concern is the cost-effectiveness of such financing, but the controversy

over earmarking is also being weighed, she said.

Among the beneficiaries of Mr. Marcone's lobbying was the Silver Ring

Thing, a faith-based abstinence program for teenagers. The program's

earmarked grant was suspended after being challenged as unconstitutional

in May 2005, but other earmarks have been granted to Silver Ring Thing

programs in Pennsylvania, Alabama and South Carolina.

Federal law and regulations require that all faith-based recipients of

earmarks use the money only for non-religious purposes. But a federal

appeals court decision late last year has raised fresh constitutional

questions about earmarks awarded specifically to religious rescue missions.

The ruling came in a pending case that involves a homeless shelter owned by

the city of Boise, Idaho, but operated, under city contract, by the Boise

Rescue Mission. In a preliminary ruling, a trial judge refused to ban

voluntary worship services at the city-owned shelter.

In November, the Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San

Francisco reversed that decision, citing "serious questions" about whether

the city's support for the faith-based rescue mission has the

unconstitutional effect of advancing religion.

Constitutional questions aside, the political controversy over earmarks has

already begun to affect their availability for all petitioners, including

faith-based groups. But some lobbyists are optimistic that earmarks for

faith-based groups and other nonprofits will be spared.

Indeed, Mr. Marcone said that increasing the transparency of the earmark

process could actually work to the advantage of faith-based groups and

other deserving nonprofit groups. If members of Congress are required to

put their names on their earmarks, he explained, "they are going to want

to award money to programs that are going to make them look good, and

those are going to be groups that are doing good work."

But for those who believe religious organizations should not pursue

private-purpose earmarks, that is not necessarily good news.

Clyde Wilcox, a Georgetown University professor who has written extensively

on religion and politics, said religious groups would naturally justify

earmarks. But their moral authority in Washington - "the extra prophetic

power of the religious voice," as he put it - largely arises from the fact

that they are not seen as self-interested, he said. "The loss of that

prophetic voice would be profound."

Kenneth Wald, a professor at the University of Florida who also studies

religion in the political arena, foresees a more pragmatic danger for

religious organizations that lobby for earmarks. "If they start to act like

any other special interest, they'll start to be treated like any other

special interest," he said. "I think it's nuts to take that risk."

================================================================

NY Transfer News Collective A Service of Blythe Systems

Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us

Search Archives: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/htdig/search.html

List Archives: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/

Subscribe: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/mailman/listinfo/nytr

================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGRt2Niz2i76ou9wQRAov8AKC49SDHcA6XDmlnFllaGpc+sGaecACfYnZ0

dLsJgFFP7180ecZyv9kfQ84=

=A3AV

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----