Republican Appointed Supreme Court Rules Against Bush: Media bias suspected by Republi-shills

[tomaxo@aol.com]

The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection
Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants, in a blow to the
White House.
"Because greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's
capacious definition of 'air pollutant' we hold that EPA has the
statutory authority to regulate the emission of such gases from new
motor vehicles," the court ruled.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070402160408.i1mdzqip&show_article=1

 

[truth_giver@yahoo.com]

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/02/scotus.detainees/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a victory for President Bush, the Supreme Court
on Monday rejected an appeal by suspected terrorists challenging their
imprisonment at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

At issue are the rights of the prisoners to contest their imprisonment
and the rules set up to try them as war criminals. About 400 detainees
are being held at the facility, including admitted September 11
mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and 13 other suspected top al Qaeda
members.

The justices ruled 6-3 to deny appeals from two groups of prisoners.
Preliminary hearings before military commissions at Guantanamo have
already begun for a few detainees.

 

[tomaxo@aol.com]

On Apr 2, 6:49 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
> The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection
> Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants, in a blow to the
> White House.
> "Because greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's
> capacious definition of 'air pollutant' we hold that EPA has the
> statutory authority to regulate the emission of such gases from new
> motor vehicles," the court ruled.
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070402160408.i1mdzqip&show_ar...

 

[truth_giver@yahoo.com]

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/02/scotus.detainees/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a victory for President Bush, the Supreme
Court
on Monday rejected an appeal by suspected terrorists challenging
their
imprisonment at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

At issue are the rights of the prisoners to contest their
imprisonment
and the rules set up to try them as war criminals. About 400
detainees
are being held at the facility, including admitted September 11
mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and 13 other suspected top al Qaeda
members.

The justices ruled 6-3 to deny appeals from two groups of prisoners.
Preliminary hearings before military commissions at Guantanamo have
already begun for a few detainees.

 

[tomaxo@aol.com]

On Apr 2, 6:49 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
> The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection
> Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants, in a blow to the
> White House.
> "Because greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's
> capacious definition of 'air pollutant' we hold that EPA has the
> statutory authority to regulate the emission of such gases from new
> motor vehicles," the court ruled.
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070402160408.i1mdzqip&show_ar...

 

[truthfortheworld@yahoo.com]

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/02/scotus.detainees/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a victory for President Bush, the Supreme
Court on Monday rejected an appeal by suspected terrorists
challenging
their imprisonment at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba.

At issue are the rights of the prisoners to contest their
imprisonment and the rules set up to try them as war criminals. About
400
detainees are being held at the facility, including admitted September
11
mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and 13 other suspected top al Qaeda
members.

The justices ruled 6-3 to deny appeals from two groups of prisoners.
Preliminary hearings before military commissions at Guantanamo have
already begun for a few detainees.

 

[saditha]

On Apr 3, 7:47 am, tom...@aol.com wrote:
> On Apr 2, 6:49 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection
> > Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants, in a blow to the
> > White House.
> > "Because greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's
> > capacious definition of 'air pollutant' we hold that EPA has the
> > statutory authority to regulate the emission of such gases from new
> > motor vehicles," the court ruled.
>
> >http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070402160408.i1mdzqip&show_ar...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Finally, some realistic public policy. What is is with those people,
too much media management, no knowledge of the Presidency? They suck,
alt madonna, if it LOOKS right it's ok, but you know it can't do the
job...

 

[tomaxo@aol.com]

On Apr 3, 11:11 am, "saditha" <plantainh...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 7:47 am, tom...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > On Apr 2, 6:49 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > > The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection
> > > Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants, in a blow to the
> > > White House.
> > > "Because greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's
> > > capacious definition of 'air pollutant' we hold that EPA has the
> > > statutory authority to regulate the emission of such gases from new
> > > motor vehicles," the court ruled.
>
> > >http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070402160408.i1mdzqip&show_ar...Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
.....

> Finally, some realistic public policy.

I wouldn't say it's so much a matter of "realistic public policy" as
it is the Supreme Court accepting the reality that allowing Bush to
continue to shred the Constitution will eventually leave them
irrelevant. Much as with Congress putting time-limits on slush-fund
budgets, the Supremes are merely restricting Junior's access to the
car keys.

>What is is with those people,
> too much media management, no knowledge of the Presidency? They suck,
> alt madonna, if it LOOKS right it's ok, but you know it can't do the
> job...