RINO Schwanzenegger signs law outlawing 'Mom' and 'Dad' "husband and wife" in CA

P

Patriot Games

Guest
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130

'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'
October 13, 2007

"Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been banned
from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger,
who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use
girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.

"We are shocked and appalled that the governor has blatantly attacked
traditional family values in California," said Karen England, executive
director of Capitol Resource Institute.

"With this decision, Gov. Schwarzenegger has told parents that their values
are irrelevant. Many parents will have no choice but to pull their children
out of the public schools that have now become sexualized indoctrination
centers."

"Arnold Schwarzenegger has delivered young children into the hands of those
who will introduce them to alternative sexual lifestyles," said Randy
Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families, which worked to
defeat the plans. "This means children as young as five years old will be
mentally molested in school classrooms.

"Shame on Schwarzenegger and the Democrat politicians for ensuring that
every California school becomes a homosexual-bisexual-transsexual
indoctrination center," he said.

Analysts have warned that schools across the nation will be impacted by the
decision, since textbook publishers must cater to their largest purchaser,
which often is California, and they will be unlikely to go to the expense of
having a separate edition for other states.

The bills signed by Schwarzenegger include SB777, which bans anything in
public schools that could be interpreted as negative toward homosexuality,
bisexuality and other alternative lifestyle choices.

There are no similar protections for students with traditional or
conservative lifestyles and beliefs, however.

"SB 777 will result in reverse discrimination against students with
religious and traditional family values," said Meredith Turney, legislative
liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. "These students have lost their
voice as the direct result of Gov. Schwarzenegger's unbelievable decision.
The terms 'mom and dad' or 'husband and wife' could promote discrimination
against homosexuals if a same-sex couple is not also featured.

"Parents want the assurance that when their children go to school they will
learn the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic - not social
indoctrination regarding alternative sexual lifestyles. Now that SB777 is
law, schools will in fact become indoctrination centers for sexual
experimentation," she said.

England told WND that the law is not a list of banned words, including "mom"
and "dad." But she said the requirement is that the law bans discriminatory
bias.

"Having 'mom' and 'dad' promotes a dicsriminatory bias. You have to either
get rid of 'mom' and 'dad' or include everything when talking about
[parental issues]," she said. "They [promoters of sexual alternative
lifestyles] do consider that discriminatory."

Also signed was AB394, which targets parents and teachers for such
indoctrination through "anti-harassment" training, CCF said.

Schwarzenegger had vetoed almost identical provisions a year ago, saying
existing state law already provided for penalties for discrimination.

"We had hoped that the governor would once again veto this outrageous
legislation but he obviously decided to side with the out-of-touch
extremists that control the legislature. This law does not reflect the true
values of the average Californian," said England. "True leadership means
standing up for what is true and right."

Thomasson said SB777 prohibits any "instruction" or school-sponsored
"activity" that "promotes a discriminatory bias" against "gender" - the
bill's definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes - as well as
"sexual orientation."

"Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently
disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical
effect of SB777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual
lifestyles at every government-operated school," CCF noted.

Offenders will face the wrath of the state Department of Education, up to
and including lawsuits.

CCF noted that now on a banned list will be any text, reference or teaching
aid that portrays marriage as only between a man and woman, materials that
say people are born male or female (and not in between), sources that fail
to include a variety of transsexual, bisexual and homosexual historical
figures, and sex education materials that fail to offer the option of sex
changes.

Further, homecoming kings now can be either male or female - as can
homecoming queens, and students, whether male or female, must be allowed to
use the restroom and locker room corresponding to the sex with which they
choose to identify.

AB394 promotes the same issues through state-funded publications, postings,
curricula and handouts to students, parents and teachers.

It also creates the circumstances where a parent who says marriage is only
for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher could be
convicted of "harassment," and a student who believes people are born either
male or female could be reported as a "harasser" by a male teacher who wears
women's clothes, CCF said.

Thomasson said Schwarzenegger also signed AB14, which prohibits state
funding for any program that does not support a range of alternative sexual
practices, including state-funded social services run by churches.

Affected will be day cares, preschool or after-school programs, food and
housing programs, senior services, anti-gang efforts, jobs programs and
others.

Thomasson said it also forces every hospital in California - even private,
religious hospitals - to adopt policies in support of transsexuality,
bisexuality, and homosexuality and opens up nonprofit organizations to
lawsuits if they exclude members that engage in homosexual, bisexual, or
transsexual conduct.

"It's the height of intolerance to punish individuals, organizations,
businesses, and churches that have moral standards on sexual conduct and
sexual lifestyles," said Thomasson, in response to the signing of AB14.
"This is another insensitive law that violates people's moral boundaries."

The vitriol over the issue rose to new levels in its latest campaign.

As WND reported, a board member for the homosexual advocacy group Equality
California verbally attacked and threatened CRI for its opposition to the
bill earlier.

The board member sent an e-mail and video to CRI threatening the group would
be buried if it continued efforts opposing the homosexual advocacy.

"The shocking hate mail we received shows that those behind this legislation
do not promote true tolerance," said England. "Only politically correct
speech will be tolerated. Those with religious or traditional moral beliefs
will not be allowed to express their opinions in public schools."

She also cited an informational document published by the Gay-Straight
Alliance Network and the Transgender Law Center that already is lobbying for
special treatment in the school system.

"If you want to use a restroom that matches your gender identity . you
should be allowed to do so," it advises. "Whenever students are divided up
into boys and girls, you should be allowed to join the group or participate
in the program that matches your gender identity as much as possible."

Further, the groups advise, "If you change your name to one that better
matches your gender identity, a school needs to use that name to refer to
you." The advocacy group also warns schools against bringing parents into
any such discussion with students.

WND has documented a number of earlier cases in which educators, including
leaders in California, have taken it upon themselves to promote a homosexual
lifestyle to children under their charge.

WND reported California Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell,
under whose supervision hundreds of thousands of children are being
educated, has used his state position and taxpayer-funded stationery to
praise a "gay" pride event used in the past to expose children to sexually
explicit activities.

That drew vehement objections from several educators, including Priscilla
Schreiber, the president of the Grossmont Unified High School District
governing board.

"I am outraged that a person in this high-ranking elected position would
advocate an event where diversity is not just being celebrated but where
pornography and indecent exposure is being perpetrated on the young and
innocent children of our communities," she said.
 
Barbara Boxer is probably breathing a lot easier these days.

If the governor wants to run for another public office, it will have to be as an
independent or a democrat, which he increasingly shows signs of being. I wonder how
many little girls/boys will be accosted in a unisex restroom? I wonder how many
young trysts will go on behind individual stall doors. Talk about politicians losing
it.....AAC



On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:43:48 -0400, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>
>'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
>Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'
>October 13, 2007
>
>"Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been banned
>from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger,
>who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use
>girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.
>
>"We are shocked and appalled that the governor has blatantly attacked
>traditional family values in California," said Karen England, executive
>director of Capitol Resource Institute.
>
>"With this decision, Gov. Schwarzenegger has told parents that their values
>are irrelevant. Many parents will have no choice but to pull their children
>out of the public schools that have now become sexualized indoctrination
>centers."
>
>"Arnold Schwarzenegger has delivered young children into the hands of those
>who will introduce them to alternative sexual lifestyles," said Randy
>Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families, which worked to
>defeat the plans. "This means children as young as five years old will be
>mentally molested in school classrooms.
>
>"Shame on Schwarzenegger and the Democrat politicians for ensuring that
>every California school becomes a homosexual-bisexual-transsexual
>indoctrination center," he said.
>
>Analysts have warned that schools across the nation will be impacted by the
>decision, since textbook publishers must cater to their largest purchaser,
>which often is California, and they will be unlikely to go to the expense of
>having a separate edition for other states.
>
>The bills signed by Schwarzenegger include SB777, which bans anything in
>public schools that could be interpreted as negative toward homosexuality,
>bisexuality and other alternative lifestyle choices.
>
>There are no similar protections for students with traditional or
>conservative lifestyles and beliefs, however.
>
>"SB 777 will result in reverse discrimination against students with
>religious and traditional family values," said Meredith Turney, legislative
>liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. "These students have lost their
>voice as the direct result of Gov. Schwarzenegger's unbelievable decision.
>The terms 'mom and dad' or 'husband and wife' could promote discrimination
>against homosexuals if a same-sex couple is not also featured.
>
>"Parents want the assurance that when their children go to school they will
>learn the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic - not social
>indoctrination regarding alternative sexual lifestyles. Now that SB777 is
>law, schools will in fact become indoctrination centers for sexual
>experimentation," she said.
>
>England told WND that the law is not a list of banned words, including "mom"
>and "dad." But she said the requirement is that the law bans discriminatory
>bias.
>
>"Having 'mom' and 'dad' promotes a dicsriminatory bias. You have to either
>get rid of 'mom' and 'dad' or include everything when talking about
>[parental issues]," she said. "They [promoters of sexual alternative
>lifestyles] do consider that discriminatory."
>
>Also signed was AB394, which targets parents and teachers for such
>indoctrination through "anti-harassment" training, CCF said.
>
>Schwarzenegger had vetoed almost identical provisions a year ago, saying
>existing state law already provided for penalties for discrimination.
>
>"We had hoped that the governor would once again veto this outrageous
>legislation but he obviously decided to side with the out-of-touch
>extremists that control the legislature. This law does not reflect the true
>values of the average Californian," said England. "True leadership means
>standing up for what is true and right."
>
>Thomasson said SB777 prohibits any "instruction" or school-sponsored
>"activity" that "promotes a discriminatory bias" against "gender" - the
>bill's definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes - as well as
>"sexual orientation."
>
>"Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently
>disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical
>effect of SB777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual
>lifestyles at every government-operated school," CCF noted.
>
>Offenders will face the wrath of the state Department of Education, up to
>and including lawsuits.
>
>CCF noted that now on a banned list will be any text, reference or teaching
>aid that portrays marriage as only between a man and woman, materials that
>say people are born male or female (and not in between), sources that fail
>to include a variety of transsexual, bisexual and homosexual historical
>figures, and sex education materials that fail to offer the option of sex
>changes.
>
>Further, homecoming kings now can be either male or female - as can
>homecoming queens, and students, whether male or female, must be allowed to
>use the restroom and locker room corresponding to the sex with which they
>choose to identify.
>
>AB394 promotes the same issues through state-funded publications, postings,
>curricula and handouts to students, parents and teachers.
>
>It also creates the circumstances where a parent who says marriage is only
>for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher could be
>convicted of "harassment," and a student who believes people are born either
>male or female could be reported as a "harasser" by a male teacher who wears
>women's clothes, CCF said.
>
>Thomasson said Schwarzenegger also signed AB14, which prohibits state
>funding for any program that does not support a range of alternative sexual
>practices, including state-funded social services run by churches.
>
>Affected will be day cares, preschool or after-school programs, food and
>housing programs, senior services, anti-gang efforts, jobs programs and
>others.
>
>Thomasson said it also forces every hospital in California - even private,
>religious hospitals - to adopt policies in support of transsexuality,
>bisexuality, and homosexuality and opens up nonprofit organizations to
>lawsuits if they exclude members that engage in homosexual, bisexual, or
>transsexual conduct.
>
>"It's the height of intolerance to punish individuals, organizations,
>businesses, and churches that have moral standards on sexual conduct and
>sexual lifestyles," said Thomasson, in response to the signing of AB14.
>"This is another insensitive law that violates people's moral boundaries."
>
>The vitriol over the issue rose to new levels in its latest campaign.
>
>As WND reported, a board member for the homosexual advocacy group Equality
>California verbally attacked and threatened CRI for its opposition to the
>bill earlier.
>
>The board member sent an e-mail and video to CRI threatening the group would
>be buried if it continued efforts opposing the homosexual advocacy.
>
>"The shocking hate mail we received shows that those behind this legislation
>do not promote true tolerance," said England. "Only politically correct
>speech will be tolerated. Those with religious or traditional moral beliefs
>will not be allowed to express their opinions in public schools."
>
>She also cited an informational document published by the Gay-Straight
>Alliance Network and the Transgender Law Center that already is lobbying for
>special treatment in the school system.
>
>"If you want to use a restroom that matches your gender identity . you
>should be allowed to do so," it advises. "Whenever students are divided up
>into boys and girls, you should be allowed to join the group or participate
>in the program that matches your gender identity as much as possible."
>
>Further, the groups advise, "If you change your name to one that better
>matches your gender identity, a school needs to use that name to refer to
>you." The advocacy group also warns schools against bringing parents into
>any such discussion with students.
>
>WND has documented a number of earlier cases in which educators, including
>leaders in California, have taken it upon themselves to promote a homosexual
>lifestyle to children under their charge.
>
>WND reported California Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell,
>under whose supervision hundreds of thousands of children are being
>educated, has used his state position and taxpayer-funded stationery to
>praise a "gay" pride event used in the past to expose children to sexually
>explicit activities.
>
>That drew vehement objections from several educators, including Priscilla
>Schreiber, the president of the Grossmont Unified High School District
>governing board.
>
>"I am outraged that a person in this high-ranking elected position would
>advocate an event where diversity is not just being celebrated but where
>pornography and indecent exposure is being perpetrated on the young and
>innocent children of our communities," she said.
>
 
On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>
> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'
> October 13, 2007
>
> "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been banned
> from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger,
> who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use
> girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.
>
> "We are shocked and appalled that the governor has blatantly attacked
> traditional family values in California," said Karen England, executive
> director of Capitol Resource Institute.
>
> "With this decision, Gov. Schwarzenegger has told parents that their values
> are irrelevant. Many parents will have no choice but to pull their children
> out of the public schools that have now become sexualized indoctrination
> centers."
>
> "Arnold Schwarzenegger has delivered young children into the hands of those
> who will introduce them to alternative sexual lifestyles," said Randy
> Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families, which worked to
> defeat the plans. "This means children as young as five years old will be
> mentally molested in school classrooms.
>
> "Shame on Schwarzenegger and the Democrat politicians for ensuring that
> every California school becomes a homosexual-bisexual-transsexual
> indoctrination center," he said.
>
> Analysts have warned that schools across the nation will be impacted by the
> decision, since textbook publishers must cater to their largest purchaser,
> which often is California, and they will be unlikely to go to the expense of
> having a separate edition for other states.
>
> The bills signed by Schwarzenegger include SB777, which bans anything in
> public schools that could be interpreted as negative toward homosexuality,
> bisexuality and other alternative lifestyle choices.
>
> There are no similar protections for students with traditional or
> conservative lifestyles and beliefs, however.
>
> "SB 777 will result in reverse discrimination against students with
> religious and traditional family values," said Meredith Turney, legislative
> liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. "These students have lost their
> voice as the direct result of Gov. Schwarzenegger's unbelievable decision.
> The terms 'mom and dad' or 'husband and wife' could promote discrimination
> against homosexuals if a same-sex couple is not also featured.
>
> "Parents want the assurance that when their children go to school they will
> learn the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic - not social
> indoctrination regarding alternative sexual lifestyles. Now that SB777 is
> law, schools will in fact become indoctrination centers for sexual
> experimentation," she said.
>
> England told WND that the law is not a list of banned words, including "mom"
> and "dad." But she said the requirement is that the law bans discriminatory
> bias.
>
> "Having 'mom' and 'dad' promotes a dicsriminatory bias. You have to either
> get rid of 'mom' and 'dad' or include everything when talking about
> [parental issues]," she said. "They [promoters of sexual alternative
> lifestyles] do consider that discriminatory."
>
> Also signed was AB394, which targets parents and teachers for such
> indoctrination through "anti-harassment" training, CCF said.
>
> Schwarzenegger had vetoed almost identical provisions a year ago, saying
> existing state law already provided for penalties for discrimination.
>
> "We had hoped that the governor would once again veto this outrageous
> legislation but he obviously decided to side with the out-of-touch
> extremists that control the legislature. This law does not reflect the true
> values of the average Californian," said England. "True leadership means
> standing up for what is true and right."
>
> Thomasson said SB777 prohibits any "instruction" or school-sponsored
> "activity" that "promotes a discriminatory bias" against "gender" - the
> bill's definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes - as well as
> "sexual orientation."
>
> "Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently
> disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical
> effect of SB777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual
> lifestyles at every government-operated school," CCF noted.
>
> Offenders will face the wrath of the state Department of Education, up to
> and including lawsuits.
>
> CCF noted that now on a banned list will be any text, reference or teaching
> aid that portrays marriage as only between a man and woman, materials that
> say people are born male or female (and not in between), sources that fail
> to include a variety of transsexual, bisexual and homosexual historical
> figures, and sex education materials that fail to offer the option of sex
> changes.
>
> Further, homecoming kings now can be either male or female - as can
> homecoming queens, and students, whether male or female, must be allowed to
> use the restroom and locker room corresponding to the sex with which they
> choose to identify.
>
> AB394 promotes the same issues through state-funded publications, postings,
> curricula and handouts to students, parents and teachers.
>
> It also creates the circumstances where a parent who says marriage is only
> for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher could be
> convicted of "harassment," and a student who believes people are born either
> male or female could be reported as a "harasser" by a male teacher who wears
> women's clothes, CCF said.
>
> Thomasson said Schwarzenegger also signed AB14, which prohibits state
> funding for any program that does not support a range of alternative sexual
> practices, including state-funded social services run by churches.
>
> Affected will be day cares, preschool or after-school programs, food and
> housing programs, senior services, anti-gang efforts, jobs programs and
> others.
>
> Thomasson said it also forces every hospital in California - even private,
> religious hospitals - to adopt policies in support of transsexuality,
> bisexuality, and homosexuality and opens up nonprofit organizations to
> lawsuits if they exclude members that engage in homosexual, bisexual, or
> transsexual conduct.
>
> "It's the height of intolerance to punish individuals, organizations,
> businesses, and churches that have moral standards on sexual conduct and
> sexual lifestyles," said Thomasson, in response to the signing of AB14.
> "This is another insensitive law that violates people's moral boundaries."
>
> The vitriol over the issue rose to new levels in its latest campaign.
>
> As WND reported, a board member for the homosexual advocacy group Equality
> California verbally attacked and threatened CRI for its opposition to the
> bill earlier.
>
> The board member sent an e-mail and video to CRI threatening the group would
> be buried if it continued efforts opposing the homosexual advocacy.
>
> "The shocking hate mail we received shows that those behind this legislation
> do not promote true tolerance," said England. "Only politically correct
> speech will be tolerated. Those with religious or traditional moral beliefs
> will not be allowed to express their opinions in public schools."
>
> She also cited an informational document published by the Gay-Straight
> Alliance Network and the Transgender Law Center that already is lobbying for
> special treatment in the school system.
>
> "If you want to use a restroom that matches your gender identity . you
> should be allowed to do so," it advises. "Whenever students are divided up
> into boys and girls, you should be allowed to join the group or participate
> in the program that matches your gender identity as much as possible."
>
> Further, the groups advise, "If you change your name to one that better
> matches your gender identity, a school needs to use that name to refer to
> you." The advocacy group also warns schools against bringing parents into
> any such discussion with students.
>
> WND has documented a number of earlier cases in which educators, including
> leaders in California, have taken it upon themselves to promote a homosexual
> lifestyle to children under their charge.
>
> WND reported California Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell,
> under whose supervision hundreds of thousands of children are being
> educated, has used his state position and taxpayer-funded stationery to
> praise a "gay" pride event used in the past to expose children to sexually
> explicit activities.
>
> That drew vehement objections from several educators, including Priscilla
> Schreiber, the president of the Grossmont Unified High School District
> governing board.
>
> "I am outraged that a person in this high-ranking elected position would
> advocate an event where diversity is not just being celebrated but where
> pornography and indecent exposure is being perpetrated on the young and
> innocent children of our communities," she said.


So, in other words, your subject line is grossly inaccurate, since the
story you cited specifically says that no words have been banned.

Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
change the underlying fact that you're gay.

Lastly, I'm in agreement with you. There should be less teaching of
the "homosexual agenda" in schools and a return to christian
fundamentalism. There's just not enough new church-based paedophelia
or reverends in wetsuits hogtied nowadays to create significant
hypocrisy-laden entertainment value.
 
On Oct 15, 2:43 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>
> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California


[ Pack of lies snipped. ]

No words have been banned.

A far-right, wacked-out holyroller website has posted an article in
which the group claims that "mom" and "dad" COULD be banned and --
GASP!!! -- boys and girls COULD be required to use the same
restrooms. They give no support for these idiot claims.

Typical rightwing, religious nut propaganda -- project their own
fantasies onto everyone else then lie about it.

And Asshole Games repeats the lie.
 
"AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:piiah355aj1jcg3h759kf6rdk4snbi9qib@4ax.com...
> Barbara Boxer is probably breathing a lot easier these days.


Hahahahahha!!!

> If the governor wants to run for another public office, it will have to be
> as an
> independent or a democrat, which he increasingly shows signs of being. I
> wonder how
> many little girls/boys will be accosted in a unisex restroom? I wonder
> how many
> young trysts will go on behind individual stall doors. Talk about
> politicians losing
> it.....AAC


Turns out Aaaahnuld isn't the Republican everybody thought they elected....

You need to think about moving...
 
"neoconis_ignoramus" <bellamacina@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1192578436.966990.191080@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
>> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'
>> October 13, 2007
>> "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been banned
>> from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold
>> Schwarzenegger,
>> who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use
>> girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.

> So, in other words, your subject line is grossly inaccurate, since the
> story you cited specifically says that no words have been banned.


What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have
been banned from California schools" don't you understand?

> Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
> know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
> can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
> your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
> change the underlying fact that you're gay.


Hahahahahhaha!!!

> Lastly, I'm in agreement with you. There should be less teaching of
> the "homosexual agenda" in schools and a return to christian
> fundamentalism. There's just not enough new church-based paedophelia
> or reverends in wetsuits hogtied nowadays to create significant
> hypocrisy-laden entertainment value.


You're just jealous that you didn't come up with the dildo in ass double
wetsuit trick.
 
"Lickin' Ass and Takin' Names" <PopUlist349@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192582244.997121.207360@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 15, 2:43 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California

> [ Pack of lies snipped. ]
> No words have been banned.


What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have
been banned from California schools" don't you understand?

> A far-right, wacked-out holyroller website has posted an article in
> which the group claims that "mom" and "dad" COULD be banned and --
> GASP!!! -- boys and girls COULD be required to use the same
> restrooms. They give no support for these idiot claims.


Its signed into law.

> Typical rightwing, religious nut propaganda -- project their own
> fantasies onto everyone else then lie about it.
> And Asshole Games repeats the lie.


Your Homo Agenda is working in CA.

Good luck with that.
 
On Oct 17, 11:28 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "neoconis_ignoramus" <bellamac...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1192578436.966990.191080@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
> >> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
> >> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'
> >> October 13, 2007
> >> "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been banned
> >> from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold
> >> Schwarzenegger,
> >> who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use
> >> girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.

> > So, in other words, your subject line is grossly inaccurate, since the
> > story you cited specifically says that no words have been banned.

>
> What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have
> been banned from California schools" don't you understand?


The only one who mentioned that those words "could" (you understand
the meaning of that word, right?) be banned was the director of the
Capitol Resource Group. She also was the one who stated that "Mom"
and "Dad" show gender bias. The bill doesn't mention that. Nothing
associated with the bill says that. Only the rock-ribbed, God-
fearing, dumbass evangelical Republicans think that Mom and Dad show
gender bias. NO ONE else does. Unless the republicans ban the words
because they're afraid of them, will those words be banned.

You're stretching on this one.


>
> > Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
> > know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
> > can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
> > your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
> > change the underlying fact that you're gay.

>
> Hahahahahhaha!!!
>
> > Lastly, I'm in agreement with you. There should be less teaching of
> > the "homosexual agenda" in schools and a return to christian
> > fundamentalism. There's just not enough new church-based paedophelia
> > or reverends in wetsuits hogtied nowadays to create significant
> > hypocrisy-laden entertainment value.

>
> You're just jealous that you didn't come up with the dildo in ass double
> wetsuit trick.


I just want to know--how does one hog-tie ones self? I really didn't
think that was possible.
 
"John" <dahlgren.john@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192640731.633504.117940@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 17, 11:28 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "neoconis_ignoramus" <bellamac...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:1192578436.966990.191080@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>> >> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
>> >> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to
>> >> 'gays'
>> >> October 13, 2007
>> >> "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been
>> >> banned
>> >> from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold
>> >> Schwarzenegger,
>> >> who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to
>> >> use
>> >> girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.
>> > So, in other words, your subject line is grossly inaccurate, since the
>> > story you cited specifically says that no words have been banned.

>> What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively
>> have
>> been banned from California schools" don't you understand?

> The only one who mentioned that those words "could" (you understand
> the meaning of that word, right?) be banned was the director of the
> Capitol Resource Group. She also was the one who stated that "Mom"
> and "Dad" show gender bias. The bill doesn't mention that. Nothing
> associated with the bill says that. Only the rock-ribbed, God-
> fearing, dumbass evangelical Republicans think that Mom and Dad show
> gender bias. NO ONE else does. Unless the republicans ban the words
> because they're afraid of them, will those words be banned.
> You're stretching on this one.


We'll see.

>> > Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
>> > know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
>> > can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
>> > your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
>> > change the underlying fact that you're gay.

>> Hahahahahhaha!!!
>> > Lastly, I'm in agreement with you. There should be less teaching of
>> > the "homosexual agenda" in schools and a return to christian
>> > fundamentalism. There's just not enough new church-based paedophelia
>> > or reverends in wetsuits hogtied nowadays to create significant
>> > hypocrisy-laden entertainment value.

>> You're just jealous that you didn't come up with the dildo in ass double
>> wetsuit trick.

> I just want to know--how does one hog-tie ones self? I really didn't
> think that was possible.


I could probably hog-tie myself. So could you with some practice.

The trick would be doing all that squirming and twisting around hog-tying
yourself AND NOT fire that dildo outta yer ass across the room!

AH-HA! Maybe that's why the SECOND wetsuit!

I don't know who that reverend pissed off, and I don't wanna know....
 
On Oct 17, 11:29 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Lickin' Ass and Takin' Names" <PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1192582244.997121.207360@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 15, 2:43 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
> >> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California

> > [ Pack of lies snipped. ]
> > No words have been banned.

>
> What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have
> been banned from California schools" don't you understand?
>
> > A far-right, wacked-out holyroller website has posted an article in
> > which the group claims that "mom" and "dad" COULD be banned and --
> > GASP!!! -- boys and girls COULD be required to use the same
> > restrooms. They give no support for these idiot claims.

>
> Its signed into law.
>
> > Typical rightwing, religious nut propaganda -- project their own
> > fantasies onto everyone else then lie about it.
> > And Asshole Games repeats the lie.

>
> Your Homo Agenda is working in CA.
>
> Good luck with that.


Please provide a quote and a direct link to the law that bans "mom,"
"dad," or any other word.

Waiting.
 
On Oct 17, 6:40 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "John" <dahlgren.j...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1192640731.633504.117940@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 17, 11:28 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >> "neoconis_ignoramus" <bellamac...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >>news:1192578436.966990.191080@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> >> >>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
> >> >> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
> >> >> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to
> >> >> 'gays'
> >> >> October 13, 2007
> >> >> "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been
> >> >> banned
> >> >> from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold
> >> >> Schwarzenegger,
> >> >> who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to
> >> >> use
> >> >> girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.
> >> > So, in other words, your subject line is grossly inaccurate, since the
> >> > story you cited specifically says that no words have been banned.
> >> What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively
> >> have
> >> been banned from California schools" don't you understand?

> > The only one who mentioned that those words "could" (you understand
> > the meaning of that word, right?) be banned was the director of the
> > Capitol Resource Group. She also was the one who stated that "Mom"
> > and "Dad" show gender bias. The bill doesn't mention that. Nothing
> > associated with the bill says that. Only the rock-ribbed, God-
> > fearing, dumbass evangelical Republicans think that Mom and Dad show
> > gender bias. NO ONE else does. Unless the republicans ban the words
> > because they're afraid of them, will those words be banned.
> > You're stretching on this one.

>
> We'll see.
>
> >> > Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
> >> > know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
> >> > can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
> >> > your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
> >> > change the underlying fact that you're gay.
> >> Hahahahahhaha!!!
> >> > Lastly, I'm in agreement with you. There should be less teaching of
> >> > the "homosexual agenda" in schools and a return to christian
> >> > fundamentalism. There's just not enough new church-based paedophelia
> >> > or reverends in wetsuits hogtied nowadays to create significant
> >> > hypocrisy-laden entertainment value.
> >> You're just jealous that you didn't come up with the dildo in ass double
> >> wetsuit trick.

> > I just want to know--how does one hog-tie ones self? I really didn't
> > think that was possible.

>
> I could probably hog-tie myself. So could you with some practice.
>
> The trick would be doing all that squirming and twisting around hog-tying
> yourself AND NOT fire that dildo outta yer ass across the room!
>
> AH-HA! Maybe that's why the SECOND wetsuit!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>
> I don't know who that reverend pissed off, and I don't wanna know....


I know, I know, it was Bill Clinton. Hell, he gets blamed for
everything else on Usenet...


>
> - Show quoted text -
 
"John" <dahlgren.john@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192711999.364121.90680@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 17, 6:40 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "John" <dahlgren.j...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1192640731.633504.117940@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Oct 17, 11:28 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >> "neoconis_ignoramus" <bellamac...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> >>news:1192578436.966990.191080@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >> >>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>> >> >> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
>> >> >> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to
>> >> >> 'gays'
>> >> >> October 13, 2007
>> >> >> "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been
>> >> >> banned
>> >> >> from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold
>> >> >> Schwarzenegger,
>> >> >> who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to
>> >> >> use
>> >> >> girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.
>> >> > So, in other words, your subject line is grossly inaccurate, since
>> >> > the
>> >> > story you cited specifically says that no words have been banned.
>> >> What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively
>> >> have
>> >> been banned from California schools" don't you understand?
>> > The only one who mentioned that those words "could" (you understand
>> > the meaning of that word, right?) be banned was the director of the
>> > Capitol Resource Group. She also was the one who stated that "Mom"
>> > and "Dad" show gender bias. The bill doesn't mention that. Nothing
>> > associated with the bill says that. Only the rock-ribbed, God-
>> > fearing, dumbass evangelical Republicans think that Mom and Dad show
>> > gender bias. NO ONE else does. Unless the republicans ban the words
>> > because they're afraid of them, will those words be banned.
>> > You're stretching on this one.

>> We'll see.
>> >> > Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
>> >> > know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
>> >> > can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
>> >> > your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
>> >> > change the underlying fact that you're gay.
>> >> Hahahahahhaha!!!
>> >> > Lastly, I'm in agreement with you. There should be less teaching of
>> >> > the "homosexual agenda" in schools and a return to christian
>> >> > fundamentalism. There's just not enough new church-based
>> >> > paedophelia
>> >> > or reverends in wetsuits hogtied nowadays to create significant
>> >> > hypocrisy-laden entertainment value.
>> >> You're just jealous that you didn't come up with the dildo in ass
>> >> double
>> >> wetsuit trick.
>> > I just want to know--how does one hog-tie ones self? I really didn't
>> > think that was possible.

>> I could probably hog-tie myself. So could you with some practice.
>> The trick would be doing all that squirming and twisting around hog-tying
>> yourself AND NOT fire that dildo outta yer ass across the room!
>> AH-HA! Maybe that's why the SECOND wetsuit!

> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>> I don't know who that reverend pissed off, and I don't wanna know....

> I know, I know, it was Bill Clinton. Hell, he gets blamed for
> everything else on Usenet...


I just reviewed the autopsy records. The Reverend's ass-cavity was not
pre-lubricated prior to the forceful insertion of the dildo. His body was
not pre-lubricated prior to being placed in the first wetsuit nor was the
first wetsuit pre-lubricated prior to being dressed in the second wetsuit.

So, I decided to ask some questions.

First I asked some Democrat acquaintances about dildos. (Democrats know
more about dildos than anyone else.) Both males and female Democrats agreed
100% that nobody would dry-stuff their ass.

Then I asked some diving pals of mine and we all agreed its hard enough
getting into a wetsuit but getting a second wetsuit over a wetsuit is
impossible to do by yourself.

The Mafia would have stuffed goat dick in his mouth, not a dildo in his ass.

Muslim terrorists would just hack off his head.

Colombian drug lords would have hacked off his weeny and stuffed that in his
mouth.

So... I'm thinking radical frothing Lesbian Death Gangs.

So... I'm thinking it was Hillary.

Only a crazed radical slavering Dyke would dry-stuff a dildo up some guy's
ass. And it would have to 3 or 4 of them to get that second wetsuit on.

Definitely it was Lesbian Death Gangs.
 
"Lickin' Ass and Takin' Names" <PopUlist349@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192671531.348849.125590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 17, 11:29 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "Lickin' Ass and Takin' Names" <PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> messagenews:1192582244.997121.207360@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Oct 15, 2:43 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> >>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>> >> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
>> > [ Pack of lies snipped. ]
>> > No words have been banned.

>> What part of " "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively
>> have
>> been banned from California schools" don't you understand?
>> > A far-right, wacked-out holyroller website has posted an article in
>> > which the group claims that "mom" and "dad" COULD be banned and --
>> > GASP!!! -- boys and girls COULD be required to use the same
>> > restrooms. They give no support for these idiot claims.

>> Its signed into law.
>> > Typical rightwing, religious nut propaganda -- project their own
>> > fantasies onto everyone else then lie about it.
>> > And Asshole Games repeats the lie.

>> Your Homo Agenda is working in CA.
>> Good luck with that.

> Please provide a quote and a direct link to the law that bans "mom,"
> "dad," or any other word.
> Waiting.


What part of "effectively" don't you understand?
 
PG, I think he called you gay here. Who's going to tell your wife?..AAC


On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:47:16 -0700, neoconis_ignoramus <bellamacina@verizon.net>
wrote:

>Secondly, you should know...i mean YOU in particular really SHOULD
>know from personal experience, that being gay is not something that
>can be "indoctrinated". Now, you may go all Larry Craig and spend
>your pathetic life rejecting who you really are, but that doesn't
>change the underlying fact that you're gay.


>On Oct 15, 11:43 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
>>
>> 'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California
>> Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'
>> October 13, 2007
>>

(snip)
 
"AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:hl8ih35rg5e41a3essu7v3f5d8laajifio@4ax.com...
> PG, I think he called you gay here. Who's going to tell your wife?..AAC


The cognitively bankrupt have little else to attack with....

If I told my wife she'd hunt him down....
 
"Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote in message
news:47162918$0$24290$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> "AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:piiah355aj1jcg3h759kf6rdk4snbi9qib@4ax.com...
>> Barbara Boxer is probably breathing a lot easier these days.

>
> Hahahahahha!!!
>
>> If the governor wants to run for another public office, it will have to
>> be as an
>> independent or a democrat, which he increasingly shows signs of being. I
>> wonder how
>> many little girls/boys will be accosted in a unisex restroom? I wonder
>> how many
>> young trysts will go on behind individual stall doors. Talk about
>> politicians losing
>> it.....AAC

>
> Turns out Aaaahnuld isn't the Republican everybody thought they
> elected....
>
> You need to think about moving...
>
>


yep, moving toward the democrat side which is the best side to be on.

republi cons hate america
 
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:24:09 -0400, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>"AnAmericanCitizen" <NoAmnesty@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:piiah355aj1jcg3h759kf6rdk4snbi9qib@4ax.com...
>> Barbara Boxer is probably breathing a lot easier these days.

>
>Hahahahahha!!!
>
>> If the governor wants to run for another public office, it will have to be
>> as an
>> independent or a democrat, which he increasingly shows signs of being. I
>> wonder how
>> many little girls/boys will be accosted in a unisex restroom? I wonder
>> how many
>> young trysts will go on behind individual stall doors. Talk about
>> politicians losing
>> it.....AAC

>
>Turns out Aaaahnuld isn't the Republican everybody thought they elected....
>
>You need to think about moving...
>

I've thought about it but it's still not bad enough for me to give up my beloved
state.....AAC
 
Back
Top