J
jetgraphics
Guest
Candidate / Congressman Ron Paul is no solution when he's part of the
problem
Americans know that there is "a problem". They see their country
crumbling before their eyes. They see their children sent to foreign
lands to fight and die, for no legitimate reason (no injured American
or his property as the basis for the invasion - no Congressional
Declaration of War). They see their standard of living tank (what one
receives in exchange for one's labor). They see their current monies
(Federal Reserve Notes) fall in relation with other currencies. They
see that their dependence upon petroleum holds them hostage to the
whims of less than stable suppliers abroad. They are burdened with
ever mounting taxes, while "public servants" vote themselves a life of
luxury, benefits, prerogatives, and a retirement package that is a
(expletive deleted) slap in the face of every hardworking American who
is destined for poverty.
Of course, no candidate DARES utter the basis for America's dilemma...
It's one word - usury.
(Oh Yeah?)
In case you are unaware, ALL major religions denounce usury. And, no,
usury is not "excessive interest". Usury is the fee denominated in
money for the use of money (or extension of credit). Any interest is
usury.
Mathematically speaking, usury is impossible to pay in a finite money
token system (like America's "lawful money" - gold and silver coin).
The exponential equation for calculating interest GUARANTEES that at
some finite increment of time, the aggregate (whole sum) of
outstanding debt (principle and interest) will exceed the total amount
of money in existence. In short, there will be a proportion of debtors
who will default simply because the money does not exist with which to
pay the usurer. And they suffer loss of pledged property as the usurer
gleefully collects. Yet they will blame themselves for their misery,
not realizing that the game was rigged, and the usurer always wins.
Key facts:
Coinage Act of 1792, et seq, defines a unit dollar as a silver coin
with no less than 3/4 troy ounce of pure silver and other alloys. And
a one ounce GOLD COIN is equivalent to 20 unit (silver) dollars.
LAWFUL MONEY - "The terms 'lawful money' and 'lawful money of the
United States' shall be construed to mean gold or silver coin of the
United States..."
Title 12 United States Code, Sec. 152.
Title 31 of the U.S. code, a silver dollar complies with the original
Coinage Act.
31 USC Sec. 5112. Denominations, specifications, and design of coins
(e)(1) ...weight 31.103 grams;
(e)(4) have inscriptions ... 1 Oz. Fine Silver ... One Dollar
(This complies with the U.S.Constitution, Art 1, Sec 8, & Sec 10)
Fort Knox: The United States Bullion Depository holds about 5,037.5
tons (4,570 metric tonnes) of gold bullion (147.3 million ounces).
That translates into $ 2,946,000,000 U.S. dollars (gold).
(Don't confuse the current market price for gold, since the price is
actually denominated in Federal Reserve Notes - not real dollars.)
TITLE 12,CHAPTER 3,SUBCHAPTER XII,sec. 411. Issuance to reserve banks;
nature of obligation; redemption
" Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of
making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve
agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are
authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States
and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal
reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They
shall be redeemed in LAWFUL MONEY on demand at the Treasury Department
of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia,
or at any Federal Reserve bank."
National Debt:
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 29 Nov 2007 at 11:11:18 PM GMT is: $
9,132,290,557,763.61
U.S. gold holdings (almost 3 billions) are insufficient to "pay off
the debt" over 9.1 trillions.
And, no, you can't pay off the debt with a debt. A Federal Reserve
Note is an obligation of the U.S. to pay dollars (gold) on demand
(Title 12 United States Code Section 411). But in 1933, Congress
repudiated their promise to pay on those notes. They have no par value
(i.e., worthless).
The "law" (Federal Reserve Act of 1913) created this "interest"
contract that holds us hostage. When Congress declared bankruptcy in
1933 (See Bank Holiday of 1933 and House Joint Resolution 192, June
1933), they declared that they would no longer redeem their notes with
lawful money. But the creditor wasn't stupid. Congress became trustees
of their own bankruptcy. (Oh my, the foxes are guarding the chicken
house!).
And in that spirit of fiduciary responsibility they passed the
"Federal Insurance Contribution Act" (aka Social Security Act) of
1935.
Every American who joined up, became a "human resource" pledged as
collateral on that unpayable national debt.
(You did know that there is law compelling participation. It's 100%
voluntary. If it was mandatory, it would be involuntary servitude and
thus unconstitutional.)
Now, the creditor was happy. The worthless notes were "legal tender"
upon all those millions of "contributors" (equally liable to pay the
debt notes), and government could take a skim with which to enrich the
creditor and themselves.
Ask RON PAUL or any other candidate for high office for his
willingness to tell the creditor to take a hike...
From what my sources say, RP said that it would be UNFAIR TO THE
CREDITOR.
(What do you call an impossible contract? FAIR PLAY!?)
An obligation to pay 9.1 trillions in gold dollars computes to roughly
455,000,000,000 ounces.
At current mining rates (and if the gold exists), it would only take
870,000 years to mine enough ore IF the debt was frozen right now.
(No, the world wide above ground stock of gold, if stolen by the U.S.
government, would still be insufficient to pay the debt)
It's obvious that going back to "gold money" is impossible.
Even if the national debt was wiped off the books, the amount of
U.S.gold at Fort Knox divided percapita is only $9.82 constitutional
dollars.
I don't know about you, but that is insufficient to operate a national
economy. Would that percapita share be a year's salary? A work year of
2080 hours would mean that an "honest hourly wage" would be 0.0046
dollars (4.6 mils or less than a half cent).
What would we use for "small change"? Certificates for molecules of
gold?
And you can bet that "billionaires and millionaires" would take the
lion's share of that gold money for themselves.
It would appear that ignorance of law, economics, physics and history
trump even apathy as the greatest challenge to resolving America's
problems.
As long as we consent to the abomination of usury, we are doomed.
(Warning - the following solution does not require any action on the
part of the government)
You can:
1. Cancel all contracts for usury (close all interest bearing bank
accounts, sell off all stocks)
2. Cancel participation in national socialism (aka Social Security)
3. Sit back and watch the U.S. Congress squirm, impotent to "command"
us; watch the Federal Reserve note sink into oblivion; but whatever
you do - watch out!
And to REALLY hack off the "system"
4. Acquire a domicile (legal and permanent home)
5. Revert back to American national status. (Cease being a "U.S.
citizen / resident residing at a residence")
(As an American national, free inhabitant, domiciled upon private
property within the boundaries of the U.S.A., one ceases to be a
person liable... for just about everything. An inhabitant is a non-
resident, thus all laws obligating "residents" no longer apply. SS-5
form for a SocSec account is limited to U.S. citizens and U.S.
residents. American nationals and inhabitants cannot apply nor
participate. )
Now you see why no candidate is a solution when they're part of the
underlying problem.
-- - - -- - - -- - - -- - -
Footnotes:
Ezekiel 18:13 KJV defines usury as a capital offense.
"Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then
live? he shall not live: he hath done all these
abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him."
He (the usurer) shall surely die - his blood be upon his own hands...
thus no blame to his killer.
Is this why the U.S. government "trusts in God" when it kills American
usurers with impunity?
Aristotle (384-322 BC) formulated the classical view against usury.
Aristotle understood that money is sterile; it doesn't beget more
money the way cows beget more cows. He knew that "Money exists not by
nature but by law":
"The most hated sort (of wealth getting) and with the greatest reason,
is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the
natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange
but not to increase at interest. And this term interest (tokos), which
means the birth of money from money is applied to the breeding of
money because the offspring resembles the parent.
Wherefore of all modes of getting wealth, this is the most
unnatural." (1258b POLITICS)
And he especially disliked usurers:
"...those who ply sordid trades, pimps and all such people, and those
who lend small sums at high rates. For all these take more than they
ought, and from the wrong sources. What is common to them is a sordid
love of gain..." (1122a, ETHICS)
In plain English - money is an abstraction, a medium of exchange and
an accounting symbol for REAL goods and services. Money, itself,
cannot have intrinsic value, lest mathematical chaos will erupt. Nor
can usury be tolerated in a finite money token system.
- - -
"INHABITANT -One who resides actually and permanently in a given
place, and has his domicile there."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.782
"DOMICILE - A person's legal home. That place where a man has his
true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to
which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.484
"RESIDENCE - Place where one actually lives ... Residence implies
something more than physical presence and something less than
domicile. The terms 'resident' and 'residence' have no precise legal
meaning... [One can have many residences but only one domicile]
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.1308, 1309
A resident with a (legal) residence is an assertion that one has NO
DOMICILE (no legal home). In contrast, an inhabitant has a legal and
permanent home. Coincidentally, no state requires non-resident
inhabitants to get permission (license) to drive, own a car, a dog,
build a house, enter occupations or any other rights of free men. In
fact, if you carefully examine their law, the inhabitant is rarely
mentioned since he is not subject to nor object of their authority.
The bottom line - no government that prospers at our ignorance will
admit that they have misled us for generations.
But you can prove it to yourself - go to any county courthouse law
library and look up the definitions and decisions related to the
following terms:
You will not find many references in statutes, if any, dealing with
the following terms:
[] American national (nationality is a characteristic of BIRTH and
PARENTAGE)
[] Free inhabitant
[] Domicile
[] Natural and personal liberty
[] Common law, rules of (see 7th amendment)
[] Private property (owned absolutely by an individual)
Instead, you will find numerous references to those persons liable,
subject to or object of their power:
>< U.S. citizens
>< U.S. residents
>< Legal residences
>< Estate (real and personal property held with qualified ownership)
>< Civil rights (Civil liberties)
>< Political liberties (Voting and holding office)
>< Civil law, based on strict rules and regulations
problem
Americans know that there is "a problem". They see their country
crumbling before their eyes. They see their children sent to foreign
lands to fight and die, for no legitimate reason (no injured American
or his property as the basis for the invasion - no Congressional
Declaration of War). They see their standard of living tank (what one
receives in exchange for one's labor). They see their current monies
(Federal Reserve Notes) fall in relation with other currencies. They
see that their dependence upon petroleum holds them hostage to the
whims of less than stable suppliers abroad. They are burdened with
ever mounting taxes, while "public servants" vote themselves a life of
luxury, benefits, prerogatives, and a retirement package that is a
(expletive deleted) slap in the face of every hardworking American who
is destined for poverty.
Of course, no candidate DARES utter the basis for America's dilemma...
It's one word - usury.
(Oh Yeah?)
In case you are unaware, ALL major religions denounce usury. And, no,
usury is not "excessive interest". Usury is the fee denominated in
money for the use of money (or extension of credit). Any interest is
usury.
Mathematically speaking, usury is impossible to pay in a finite money
token system (like America's "lawful money" - gold and silver coin).
The exponential equation for calculating interest GUARANTEES that at
some finite increment of time, the aggregate (whole sum) of
outstanding debt (principle and interest) will exceed the total amount
of money in existence. In short, there will be a proportion of debtors
who will default simply because the money does not exist with which to
pay the usurer. And they suffer loss of pledged property as the usurer
gleefully collects. Yet they will blame themselves for their misery,
not realizing that the game was rigged, and the usurer always wins.
Key facts:
Coinage Act of 1792, et seq, defines a unit dollar as a silver coin
with no less than 3/4 troy ounce of pure silver and other alloys. And
a one ounce GOLD COIN is equivalent to 20 unit (silver) dollars.
LAWFUL MONEY - "The terms 'lawful money' and 'lawful money of the
United States' shall be construed to mean gold or silver coin of the
United States..."
Title 12 United States Code, Sec. 152.
Title 31 of the U.S. code, a silver dollar complies with the original
Coinage Act.
31 USC Sec. 5112. Denominations, specifications, and design of coins
(e)(1) ...weight 31.103 grams;
(e)(4) have inscriptions ... 1 Oz. Fine Silver ... One Dollar
(This complies with the U.S.Constitution, Art 1, Sec 8, & Sec 10)
Fort Knox: The United States Bullion Depository holds about 5,037.5
tons (4,570 metric tonnes) of gold bullion (147.3 million ounces).
That translates into $ 2,946,000,000 U.S. dollars (gold).
(Don't confuse the current market price for gold, since the price is
actually denominated in Federal Reserve Notes - not real dollars.)
TITLE 12,CHAPTER 3,SUBCHAPTER XII,sec. 411. Issuance to reserve banks;
nature of obligation; redemption
" Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of
making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve
agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are
authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States
and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal
reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They
shall be redeemed in LAWFUL MONEY on demand at the Treasury Department
of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia,
or at any Federal Reserve bank."
National Debt:
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 29 Nov 2007 at 11:11:18 PM GMT is: $
9,132,290,557,763.61
U.S. gold holdings (almost 3 billions) are insufficient to "pay off
the debt" over 9.1 trillions.
And, no, you can't pay off the debt with a debt. A Federal Reserve
Note is an obligation of the U.S. to pay dollars (gold) on demand
(Title 12 United States Code Section 411). But in 1933, Congress
repudiated their promise to pay on those notes. They have no par value
(i.e., worthless).
The "law" (Federal Reserve Act of 1913) created this "interest"
contract that holds us hostage. When Congress declared bankruptcy in
1933 (See Bank Holiday of 1933 and House Joint Resolution 192, June
1933), they declared that they would no longer redeem their notes with
lawful money. But the creditor wasn't stupid. Congress became trustees
of their own bankruptcy. (Oh my, the foxes are guarding the chicken
house!).
And in that spirit of fiduciary responsibility they passed the
"Federal Insurance Contribution Act" (aka Social Security Act) of
1935.
Every American who joined up, became a "human resource" pledged as
collateral on that unpayable national debt.
(You did know that there is law compelling participation. It's 100%
voluntary. If it was mandatory, it would be involuntary servitude and
thus unconstitutional.)
Now, the creditor was happy. The worthless notes were "legal tender"
upon all those millions of "contributors" (equally liable to pay the
debt notes), and government could take a skim with which to enrich the
creditor and themselves.
Ask RON PAUL or any other candidate for high office for his
willingness to tell the creditor to take a hike...
From what my sources say, RP said that it would be UNFAIR TO THE
CREDITOR.
(What do you call an impossible contract? FAIR PLAY!?)
An obligation to pay 9.1 trillions in gold dollars computes to roughly
455,000,000,000 ounces.
At current mining rates (and if the gold exists), it would only take
870,000 years to mine enough ore IF the debt was frozen right now.
(No, the world wide above ground stock of gold, if stolen by the U.S.
government, would still be insufficient to pay the debt)
It's obvious that going back to "gold money" is impossible.
Even if the national debt was wiped off the books, the amount of
U.S.gold at Fort Knox divided percapita is only $9.82 constitutional
dollars.
I don't know about you, but that is insufficient to operate a national
economy. Would that percapita share be a year's salary? A work year of
2080 hours would mean that an "honest hourly wage" would be 0.0046
dollars (4.6 mils or less than a half cent).
What would we use for "small change"? Certificates for molecules of
gold?
And you can bet that "billionaires and millionaires" would take the
lion's share of that gold money for themselves.
It would appear that ignorance of law, economics, physics and history
trump even apathy as the greatest challenge to resolving America's
problems.
As long as we consent to the abomination of usury, we are doomed.
(Warning - the following solution does not require any action on the
part of the government)
You can:
1. Cancel all contracts for usury (close all interest bearing bank
accounts, sell off all stocks)
2. Cancel participation in national socialism (aka Social Security)
3. Sit back and watch the U.S. Congress squirm, impotent to "command"
us; watch the Federal Reserve note sink into oblivion; but whatever
you do - watch out!
And to REALLY hack off the "system"
4. Acquire a domicile (legal and permanent home)
5. Revert back to American national status. (Cease being a "U.S.
citizen / resident residing at a residence")
(As an American national, free inhabitant, domiciled upon private
property within the boundaries of the U.S.A., one ceases to be a
person liable... for just about everything. An inhabitant is a non-
resident, thus all laws obligating "residents" no longer apply. SS-5
form for a SocSec account is limited to U.S. citizens and U.S.
residents. American nationals and inhabitants cannot apply nor
participate. )
Now you see why no candidate is a solution when they're part of the
underlying problem.
-- - - -- - - -- - - -- - -
Footnotes:
Ezekiel 18:13 KJV defines usury as a capital offense.
"Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then
live? he shall not live: he hath done all these
abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him."
He (the usurer) shall surely die - his blood be upon his own hands...
thus no blame to his killer.
Is this why the U.S. government "trusts in God" when it kills American
usurers with impunity?
Aristotle (384-322 BC) formulated the classical view against usury.
Aristotle understood that money is sterile; it doesn't beget more
money the way cows beget more cows. He knew that "Money exists not by
nature but by law":
"The most hated sort (of wealth getting) and with the greatest reason,
is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the
natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange
but not to increase at interest. And this term interest (tokos), which
means the birth of money from money is applied to the breeding of
money because the offspring resembles the parent.
Wherefore of all modes of getting wealth, this is the most
unnatural." (1258b POLITICS)
And he especially disliked usurers:
"...those who ply sordid trades, pimps and all such people, and those
who lend small sums at high rates. For all these take more than they
ought, and from the wrong sources. What is common to them is a sordid
love of gain..." (1122a, ETHICS)
In plain English - money is an abstraction, a medium of exchange and
an accounting symbol for REAL goods and services. Money, itself,
cannot have intrinsic value, lest mathematical chaos will erupt. Nor
can usury be tolerated in a finite money token system.
- - -
"INHABITANT -One who resides actually and permanently in a given
place, and has his domicile there."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.782
"DOMICILE - A person's legal home. That place where a man has his
true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to
which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.484
"RESIDENCE - Place where one actually lives ... Residence implies
something more than physical presence and something less than
domicile. The terms 'resident' and 'residence' have no precise legal
meaning... [One can have many residences but only one domicile]
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.1308, 1309
A resident with a (legal) residence is an assertion that one has NO
DOMICILE (no legal home). In contrast, an inhabitant has a legal and
permanent home. Coincidentally, no state requires non-resident
inhabitants to get permission (license) to drive, own a car, a dog,
build a house, enter occupations or any other rights of free men. In
fact, if you carefully examine their law, the inhabitant is rarely
mentioned since he is not subject to nor object of their authority.
The bottom line - no government that prospers at our ignorance will
admit that they have misled us for generations.
But you can prove it to yourself - go to any county courthouse law
library and look up the definitions and decisions related to the
following terms:
You will not find many references in statutes, if any, dealing with
the following terms:
[] American national (nationality is a characteristic of BIRTH and
PARENTAGE)
[] Free inhabitant
[] Domicile
[] Natural and personal liberty
[] Common law, rules of (see 7th amendment)
[] Private property (owned absolutely by an individual)
Instead, you will find numerous references to those persons liable,
subject to or object of their power:
>< U.S. citizens
>< U.S. residents
>< Legal residences
>< Estate (real and personal property held with qualified ownership)
>< Civil rights (Civil liberties)
>< Political liberties (Voting and holding office)
>< Civil law, based on strict rules and regulations
