phreakwars
New member
Just proves the T(errorist) party has been taken over by a bunch of Sarah Palin worshipping Neo-Cons. Not TRUE conservatism.
Most libertarians do not believe in socialist policies, but more of the self actualization and freedom to realize your full potential without constraint. True libertarians believe in complete social and economic freedom. It is more a pure capitalism/free market view. Libertarian socialists are like neo-conservatives…They just don’t get it.Progressives are center left fence sitters, just a few socialist policy's away from being libertarians... .
Most libertarians do not believe in socialist policies, but more of the self actualization and freedom to realize your full potential without constraint. True libertarians believe in complete social and economic freedom. It is more a pure capitalism/free market view. Libertarian socialists are like neo-conservatives…They just don’t get it.
Progressives are center left fence sitters, just a few socialist policy's away from being libertarians...
Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others.I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson
Oh ***, your one of those Ayn Rand/Atlas Shrugged nuts too?
IT'S A FICTIONAL BOOK PEOPLE!!
You can give it the same credibility as H.G. Well's "Time Machine"
.
.
That's wrong, and I'll tell you why. She didn't write it as an entertaining fictional book; she wrote it as an expression of her philosophical views and a way to explain objectivism. It is more like Plato's The Republic, only with a plot.IT'S A FICTIONAL BOOK PEOPLE!!
You can give it the same credibility as H.G. Well's "Time Machine"
.
.
Or Sinclair's The Jungle.That's wrong, and I'll tell you why. She didn't write it as an entertaining fictional book; she wrote it as an expression of her philosophical views and a way to explain objectivism. It is more like Plato's The Republic, only with a plot.
I agree that everyone has their own view of the world and what it should be, but that doesn't really fit with your credibility argument. By the logic of your first statement, everyone should be given the same amount of credibility because opinions are like a--holes.Here's the problem I have with that... taking ANYBODYS word about what life's all about and how society should function. Everybody has an answer, everybody has a Utopia, everybody has their own new wave religion/philosophy on life. Everyone knows what the real problem with the world is.
Rod Serling was just as good a conveyor of what society is to people with the Twilight Zone series as Rand could ever hope to be. Both, fictional story tellers. I give them both equal credibility about my own thoughts on life.
.
.