Ruling at The Hague: Serbs not guilty of genocide

?

-

Guest
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=121

A Notable Ruling at The Hague

General; Posted on: 2007-03-21
[ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]


Serbs not guilty of genocide

Srdja Trifkovic


In a landmark case that put a nation on trial for genocide for the
first time in history, Serbia has been found not guilty by the
International Court of Justice at The Hague. "The court finds that the
acts of genocide at Srebrenica cannot be attributed to [Serbia's]
state organs," said the ICJ president, Judge Rosalyn Higgins, in the
ruling made public on February 26. She said it could also not be
established that Serbia had been complicit by supplying aid to the
Bosnian Serbs in the summer of 1995, when the killings at Srebrenica
took place. Reflecting the complexities of the case, the 16 judges
deliberated for 10 months. The court's decisions are binding, without
appeal, and enforceable by the UN Security Council.

The Muslim authorities in Sarajevo instituted proceedings against
Serbia at the ICJ in March 1993, charging the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia (as it was then) of violating the 1948 U.N. Genocide
Convention. The case continued after the end of the Bosnian war in
October 1995 and the fall of Slobodan Milosevic in October 2000, even
though the Republika Srpska (RS)-a constituent Bosnian
entity-subsequently objected to the charge being brought on behalf of
"Bosnia-Herzegovina" as a whole. The RS authorities disputed the
legitimacy of the filing of the Bosnian application to the Court
because it had not been ratified by the post-Dayton presidency, where
the Bosnian Serbs would have been able to veto it.

Most major media depositors in the bank of collective Serbian guilt
have tried to spin the verdict. The New York Times led the pack, with
Marlise Simons' February 27 headline, "Court Declares Bosnia Killings
Were Genocide" and the subhead, "Serbia is Faulted but Cleared of the
Crime." The article's lead sentence asserted that the International
Court of Justice "for the first time called the massacre of Bosnian
Muslims at Srebrenica in 1995 an act of genocide"; the paper repeated
the claim in an editorial on March 5. In a follow-up article, Simons
repeated the claim: "The judges ruled that Bosnian Serb troops
committed genocide against Muslims in 1995 in Srebrenica."


Continue
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/cgi-bin/newsviews.cgi/The%




2007 European Americans United.
 
Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.


"-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4602d75e.3170411420@news.isomedia.com...
>
> http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=121
>
> A Notable Ruling at The Hague
>
> General; Posted on: 2007-03-21
> [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
>
>
> Serbs not guilty of genocide
>
> Srdja Trifkovic
>
>
> In a landmark case that put a nation on trial for genocide for the
> first time in history, Serbia has been found not guilty by the
> International Court of Justice at The Hague. "The court finds that the
> acts of genocide at Srebrenica cannot be attributed to [Serbia's]
> state organs," said the ICJ president, Judge Rosalyn Higgins, in the
> ruling made public on February 26. She said it could also not be
> established that Serbia had been complicit by supplying aid to the
> Bosnian Serbs in the summer of 1995, when the killings at Srebrenica
> took place. Reflecting the complexities of the case, the 16 judges
> deliberated for 10 months. The court's decisions are binding, without
> appeal, and enforceable by the UN Security Council.
>
> The Muslim authorities in Sarajevo instituted proceedings against
> Serbia at the ICJ in March 1993, charging the Federal Republic of
> Yugoslavia (as it was then) of violating the 1948 U.N. Genocide
> Convention. The case continued after the end of the Bosnian war in
> October 1995 and the fall of Slobodan Milosevic in October 2000, even
> though the Republika Srpska (RS)-a constituent Bosnian
> entity-subsequently objected to the charge being brought on behalf of
> "Bosnia-Herzegovina" as a whole. The RS authorities disputed the
> legitimacy of the filing of the Bosnian application to the Court
> because it had not been ratified by the post-Dayton presidency, where
> the Bosnian Serbs would have been able to veto it.
>
> Most major media depositors in the bank of collective Serbian guilt
> have tried to spin the verdict. The New York Times led the pack, with
> Marlise Simons' February 27 headline, "Court Declares Bosnia Killings
> Were Genocide" and the subhead, "Serbia is Faulted but Cleared of the
> Crime." The article's lead sentence asserted that the International
> Court of Justice "for the first time called the massacre of Bosnian
> Muslims at Srebrenica in 1995 an act of genocide"; the paper repeated
> the claim in an editorial on March 5. In a follow-up article, Simons
> repeated the claim: "The judges ruled that Bosnian Serb troops
> committed genocide against Muslims in 1995 in Srebrenica."
>
>
> Continue
> http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/cgi-bin/newsviews.cgi/The%
>
>
>
>
> 2007 European Americans United.
>
 
"Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote:
> Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.



How many serbs was that? How many would be needed to
establish a crime of -genocide- (as contrasted to mere atrocities)?
International anti-Genocide Laws address States as the perpetrators.




- regards
- jb

--------------------------------------------------------
Kosovo: Hot spring, cool summer boiling
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=116
--------------------------------------------------------
 
"-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4602dc1f.3171627869@news.isomedia.com...
>
> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote:
>> Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.

>
>
> How many serbs was that? How many would be needed to
> establish a crime of -genocide- (as contrasted to mere atrocities)?
> International anti-Genocide Laws address States as the perpetrators.


You're in a refugee camp, and I just took your wife out and shot her
because of her ethnicity. Still interested in legalities?
 

>> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote:
>>> Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.


> "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> How many serbs was that? How many would be needed to
>> establish a crime of -genocide- (as contrasted to mere atrocities)?
>> International anti-Genocide Laws address States as the perpetrators.


"Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote:
> You're in a refugee camp, and I just took your wife out and shot her
> because of her ethnicity. Still interested in legalities?



Shooting somebody's wife does not yet qualify as genocide.
I suggest that you consult with a dictionary to acquire some knack of
certain distinctions which delineate level of atrocity in "hate crimes."




- regards
- jb

----------------------------------------------------------
The Arrival Of Mind-Reading Machines
http://slate.msn.com/id/2161936/
----------------------------------------------------------
 
"-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4602e86b.3174776246@news.isomedia.com...
>
>>> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote:
>>>> Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.

>
>> "-" <jazzerciser@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> How many serbs was that? How many would be needed to
>>> establish a crime of -genocide- (as contrasted to mere atrocities)?
>>> International anti-Genocide Laws address States as the perpetrators.

>
> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote:
>> You're in a refugee camp, and I just took your wife out and shot her
>> because of her ethnicity. Still interested in legalities?

>
>
> Shooting somebody's wife does not yet qualify as genocide.


lol Playing stupid, the #1 hobby of republicans everywhere.
 
On Mar 22, 12:53 pm, jazzerci...@hotmail.com (-) wrote:
> "Server 13" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
> > Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.

>
> How many serbs was that?



The ones that were guilty, idiot.


Like this one:

Last year the tribunal secured its first conviction for genocide - the
most serious of war crimes - in the trial of former Bosnian Serb
general, Radislav Krstic.

He was found guilty over the massacre of thousands of Muslim men and
boys at Srebrenica and sentenced to 46 years in prison.
 
On Mar 22, 1:40 pm, jazzerci...@hotmail.com (-) wrote:
> >> "Server 13" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
> >>> Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.

> > "-" <jazzerci...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> How many serbs was that? How many would be needed to
> >> establish a crime of -genocide- (as contrasted to mere atrocities)?
> >> International anti-Genocide Laws address States as the perpetrators.

> "Server 13" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
> > You're in a refugee camp, and I just took your wife out and shot her
> > because of her ethnicity. Still interested in legalities?

>
> Shooting somebody's wife does not yet qualify as genocide.


It does when there were thousands of them shot.

Like in the case of general Radislav Krstic, who was found guilty of
genocide and sentenced to 46 years in prison for the murder of
thousands of Muslims.
 
On Mar 22, 3:29 pm, "Server 13" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
> Fixed your header, because certain serbs sure as hell were.
>
> "-" <jazzerci...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4602d75e.3170411420@news.isomedia.com...
>
>
>
> >http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=121

>
> > A Notable Ruling at The Hague

>
> > General; Posted on: 2007-03-21
> > [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]

>
> > Serbs not guilty of genocide

>
> > Srdja Trifkovic

>
> > In a landmark case that put a nation on trial for genocide for the
> > first time in history, Serbia has been found not guilty by the
> > International Court of Justice at The Hague. ...



Well then it's time to have Clinton sent to the gallows for lying to
the American people and bombing the Serbs.
 
Back
Top