San Francisco Chronicle critiques “O.J. is Guilty, But Not of Murder – The Overlooked Suspect”

  • Thread starter c_mulholland@nym.hush.com
  • Start date
C

c_mulholland@nym.hush.com

Guest
The documentary was shown at the Roxy Theatre in San Francisco the second
week of March, 2008.

Here is a critique of the documentary from a San Francisco Chronicle film
editor.


The measure of this movie's success is that it can take something you
thought you knew all about and make you wonder. We all know Simpson did it,
don't we? The case is open and shut right? Well, maybe not. By
meticulously piling evidence on top of evidence, "The Overlooked Suspect:
O.J. Is Guilty, But Not of Murder" makes a convincing case for another
interpretation.

It's worth noting that "The Overlooked Suspect" was not made by a crank.
William C. Dear is a respected private investigator who, over a 35-year
career, has solved many high-profile cases. He first approached the Simpson
case assuming, like everyone else, that Simpson did it. But his
investigation soon took him in another direction.

Just offhand, ask yourself this: If Simpson practically decapitated his
ex-wife, how come he had only a microscopic trace of blood in his car and on
the white rug in his house. And if O.J. got into a brutal fight with Ron
Goldman, a strapping young man whose hands were found blistered from
punching his assailant, why did middle-aged Simpson not have a scratch on
him?

But this movie goes beyond making the case for why Simpson might not have
done it. It makes a full case for another suspect's guilt, a suspect that
the police, according to Dear, barely investigated. It's a suspect that
Simpson might have had an interest in protecting.

As a work of filmmaking, "The Overlooked Suspect" has its flaws. Its
biggest is that most of the key witnesses Dear talked to refused to appear
on camera.

However, having seen the documentary, I find it hard to imagine anyone
coming away from it believing that the police investigation was thorough and
conclusive. Rather it seems the L.A.P.D. had its suspect and looked no
further. If "The Overlooked Suspect" doesn't completely solve, beyond a
doubt, the Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman murders, it demonstrates that the
police haven't done so, either.

At the very least, "The Overlooked Suspect" is a convincing call for
reopening the case.
 
suzee wrote:
>
> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
> > OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?

>
> That's what he says....



I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert Fields, that private
bada bing detective Pellicano might be the one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe,
but I heard he was in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I don't know
what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J. is not.
 
Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?


That's what he says....
 
The Starmaker wrote:
> suzee wrote:
>> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>>> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?

>> That's what he says....

>
>
> I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert Fields, that private
> bada bing detective Pellicano might be the one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe,
> but I heard he was in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I don't know
> what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J. is not.


Every cop in West LA knew that OJ liked to beat on his wife and white
girlfriends. It was a matter of time.
 
> ask yourself this: If Simpson practically decapitated his
> ex-wife, how come he had only a microscopic trace of blood in his car and on
> the white rug in his house.


There wasn't microscopic traces of blood. There was real blood that
was collected from the vehicle.


> And if O.J. got into a brutal fight with Ron
> Goldman, a strapping young man whose hands were found blistered from
> punching his assailant, why did middle-aged Simpson not have a scratch on
> him?


He did have wounds on himself. That why his blood was found at the
scene. IIRC, he claimed that he broke a glass.

So I guess if you start with faulty premises, you come to faulty
conclusions!
 
Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > suzee wrote:
> >> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
> >>> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?
> >> That's what he says....

> >
> >
> > I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert Fields, that private
> > bada bing detective Pellicano might be the one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe,
> > but I heard he was in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I don't know
> > what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J. is not.

>
> Every cop in West LA knew that OJ liked to beat on his wife and white
> girlfriends. It was a matter of time.



There is a big difference between beating up your wife or girlfried, and killing her.


When you beat up your wife or girlfriend, it's just discipline. You're teaching her how to
have self-control. Too many women are running around out-of-control...

In fact, I've never met a woman who didn't need a slap ot two on the kisser...

If you have a wife at home and you see her get out of control, SLAP HER!



The Starmaker
 
"Larry Bud" <larrybud2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eaa56207-3376-4fe7-91e6-674a0b9901e9@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
>> ask yourself this: If Simpson practically decapitated his
>> ex-wife, how come he had only a microscopic trace of blood in his car and
>> on
>> the white rug in his house.

>
> There wasn't microscopic traces of blood. There was real blood that
> was collected from the vehicle.


The blood collected was droplets. Not smudges. They were microscopic.
Furthermore... blood was transfered from the crime scene to the O.J. Simpson
compound, and taken out of the car. That was proven in court.

I am not saying OJ was not guilty. Just that there is a lot of sh_t that
does not make sense. I.E. Having your entire home cleaned by the maid, yet
just happening to leave bloody socks in the middle of the floor.




> He did have wounds on himself. That why his blood was found at the
> scene. IIRC, he claimed that he broke a glass.


O.J.'s blood was never found at the crime scene. He claimed the cut on his
hand was from rushing out of a Chicago hotel room... Because the prosecution
did not question the cut on his hand, the defense was unable to present a
maid who found blood on a broken glass in his hotel room.


>
> So I guess if you start with faulty premises, you come to faulty
> conclusions!
>
>
>
>
 
The Starmaker wrote:
> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> suzee wrote:
>>>> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>>>>> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?
>>>> That's what he says....
>>>
>>> I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert Fields, that private
>>> bada bing detective Pellicano might be the one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe,
>>> but I heard he was in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I don't know
>>> what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J. is not.

>> Every cop in West LA knew that OJ liked to beat on his wife and white
>> girlfriends. It was a matter of time.

>
>
> There is a big difference between beating up your wife or girlfried, and killing her.
>
>
> When you beat up your wife or girlfriend, it's just discipline. You're teaching her how to
> have self-control. Too many women are running around out-of-control...
>
> In fact, I've never met a woman who didn't need a slap ot two on the kisser...
>
> If you have a wife at home and you see her get out of control, SLAP HER!
>
>
>
> The Starmaker


Yeah, maybe you're right, Nicole needed a lot of "physical warnings" to
shape up.
 
Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> suzee wrote:
> >>>> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
> >>>>> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?
> >>>> That's what he says....
> >>>
> >>> I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert Fields, that private
> >>> bada bing detective Pellicano might be the one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe,
> >>> but I heard he was in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I don't know
> >>> what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J. is not.
> >> Every cop in West LA knew that OJ liked to beat on his wife and white
> >> girlfriends. It was a matter of time.

> >
> >
> > There is a big difference between beating up your wife or girlfried, and killing her.
> >
> >
> > When you beat up your wife or girlfriend, it's just discipline. You're teaching her how to
> > have self-control. Too many women are running around out-of-control...
> >
> > In fact, I've never met a woman who didn't need a slap ot two on the kisser...
> >
> > If you have a wife at home and you see her get out of control, SLAP HER!
> >
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker

>
> Yeah, maybe you're right, Nicole needed a lot of "physical warnings" to
> shape up.



Exactly, she was asking for it! Who does she thinks she is that she can go around town in O.J's car
with some other guy in it?

And how stupid can that white guy be? Everybody knows you don't mess with a girl who's got a BLACK boyfriend!!!!

He's Dead because he was STUPID!!!! And she's dead because, Hell...What was she doing with a Black guy anyway???
 
On 28 Mar 2008, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> posted some
news:47ED97BB.5AD5@ix.netcom.com:

> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>> >> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>> suzee wrote:
>> >>>> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>> >>>>> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?
>> >>>> That's what he says....
>> >>>
>> >>> I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert
>> >>> Fields, that private bada bing detective Pellicano might be the
>> >>> one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe, but I heard he was
>> >>> in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I
>> >>> don't know what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J.
>> >>> is not.
>> >> Every cop in West LA knew that OJ liked to beat on his wife and
>> >> white girlfriends. It was a matter of time.
>> >
>> >
>> > There is a big difference between beating up your wife or
>> > girlfried, and killing her.
>> >
>> >
>> > When you beat up your wife or girlfriend, it's just discipline.
>> > You're teaching her how to have self-control. Too many women are
>> > running around out-of-control...
>> >
>> > In fact, I've never met a woman who didn't need a slap ot two on
>> > the kisser...
>> >
>> > If you have a wife at home and you see her get out of control, SLAP
>> > HER!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The Starmaker

>>
>> Yeah, maybe you're right, Nicole needed a lot of "physical warnings"
>> to shape up.

>
>
> Exactly, she was asking for it! Who does she thinks she is that she
> can go around town in O.J's car with some other guy in it?
>
> And how stupid can that white guy be? Everybody knows you don't mess
> with a girl who's got a BLACK boyfriend!!!!


Of course not. All of the whigger ****s have one or more venereal
diseases, and genital warts wherever their switch hitting black
boyfriends were poking them.

Over half of them black boys is ****ing his male cousins or male friends
up the ass anyway. AIDS is nature's way of telling them that they
shouldn't do that, but the filthy animals are too stupid to learn until
it's too late.

> He's Dead because he was STUPID!!!! And she's dead because,
> Hell...What was she doing with a Black guy anyway???


She was ugly and stupid, but she was good at sucking dick. She
practiced on a lot of surfers. Black boys are good at sucking ****
covered dicks too.
 
"Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exists1@Earth71.net> wrote in message
news:8vfHj.145$A87.88@trnddc06...
> O.J.'s blood was never found at the crime scene. He claimed the cut on his
> hand was from rushing out of a Chicago hotel room... Because the
> prosecution did not question the cut on his hand, the defense was unable
> to present a maid who found blood on a broken glass in his hotel room.


For the record, Simpson's blood was found on the walkway and gate at
Nicole's condo.

However, police have been faulted for failing to investigate reports of a
one-armed man seen fleeing the murder scene.
 
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:47ED97BB.5AD5@ix.netcom.com:

> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>> >> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>> suzee wrote:
>> >>>> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>> >>>>> OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?
>> >>>> That's what he says....
>> >>>
>> >>> I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert
>> >>> Fields, that private bada bing detective Pellicano might be the
>> >>> one who did it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe, but I heard he was
>> >>> in the area when it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I
>> >>> don't know what happen, I wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J.
>> >>> is not.
>> >> Every cop in West LA knew that OJ liked to beat on his wife and
>> >> white girlfriends. It was a matter of time.
>> >
>> >
>> > There is a big difference between beating up your wife or
>> > girlfried, and killing her.
>> >
>> >
>> > When you beat up your wife or girlfriend, it's just discipline.
>> > You're teaching her how to have self-control. Too many women are
>> > running around out-of-control...
>> >
>> > In fact, I've never met a woman who didn't need a slap ot two on
>> > the kisser...
>> >
>> > If you have a wife at home and you see her get out of control, SLAP
>> > HER!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The Starmaker

>>
>> Yeah, maybe you're right, Nicole needed a lot of "physical warnings"
>> to shape up.

>
> Exactly, she was asking for it! Who does she thinks she is that she
> can go around town in O.J's car with some other guy in it?
>
> And how stupid can that white guy be? Everybody knows you don't mess
> with a girl who's got a BLACK boyfriend!!!!
>
> He's Dead because he was STUPID!!!! And she's dead because,
> Hell...What was she doing with a Black guy anyway???


I like how you started your thread bysaying that he didn't do it because
he only hit her, and then concluded with she's dead because her
boyfriend was black. You make a fine art out of putting your foot in
your mouth.
 
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:47ED39EF.6F4A@ix.netcom.com:

> suzee wrote:
>>
>> Captain Conservative Ph.d wrote:
>> > OJ is still looking for the real murderer. Isn't he?

>>
>> That's what he says....

>
> I heard that that guy who is on trial for wiretapping for Bert Fields,
> that private bada bing detective Pellicano might be the one who did
> it, ...I'm not sure...rumor maybe, but I heard he was in the area when
> it happen...anything is possible. I mean, I don't know what happen, I
> wasn't there..but he's in jail and O.J. is not.


Why should OJ want to protect that guy, as the article says?
 
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:41:25 -0700, "Talkin Horse" <drramulec@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>"Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exists1@Earth71.net> wrote in message
>news:8vfHj.145$A87.88@trnddc06...
>> O.J.'s blood was never found at the crime scene. He claimed the cut on his
>> hand was from rushing out of a Chicago hotel room... Because the
>> prosecution did not question the cut on his hand, the defense was unable
>> to present a maid who found blood on a broken glass in his hotel room.

>
>For the record, Simpson's blood was found on the walkway and gate at
>Nicole's condo.
>
>However, police have been faulted for failing to investigate reports of a
>one-armed man seen fleeing the murder scene.
>


Right, O.J.'s blood WAS found at the crime scene, BUT, it was proven in
court that blood had astronomical amounts of EDTA in it.

I'm sure a one-armed man was more that a match for Ron Goldman who, was
trained in the martial arts and had bruises on all the knuckles of both of
his {Ron's] hands...NOT!
 
<cwed@tic.org> wrote in message
news:i9hsu3188s913ag6fojd04c0k315poi4ks@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:41:25 -0700, "Talkin Horse"

<drramulec@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> >"Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exists1@Earth71.net> wrote in message
> >news:8vfHj.145$A87.88@trnddc06...


> >> O.J.'s blood was never found at the crime scene. He claimed the cut on

his
> >> hand was from rushing out of a Chicago hotel room...


He also said he had a lot of cuts on his hands because he played
golf...that's right, golf, the bloodiest game on Earth...

> >> Because the
> >> prosecution did not question the cut on his hand,


What an idiot. The prosecution couldn't question him because he
refused to testify under the Fifth Admendment, just like Mark Fuhrman.

> >>the defense was unable
> >> to present a maid who found blood on a broken glass in his hotel room.


They showed pictures of his hands at the criminal trial. If they
wanted to call a witness that could explain those cuts, I think they
could have (I presume but don't remember if they ever asked the judge
to do so, and there probably was never any such "maid" in the first
place).

> >For the record, Simpson's blood was found on the walkway and gate at
> >Nicole's condo.
> >

> Right, O.J.'s blood WAS found at the crime scene, BUT, it was proven in
> court that blood had astronomical amounts of EDTA in it.


Man, these latter-day OJ supporters are...well, just as wacky and
uninformed as the OJ supporters from a decade ago.

It was NEVER "proven" in ANY court that the undegraded fresh
blood on the gate (which matched Simpson to the odds of several
hundred million to one) had ANY EDTA in it, let alone "astronomical
amounts". That blood was NEVER tested specifically for EDTA
by ANYBODY, which is strange, because the defense planted
a bunch of stories in the media that evidence had been "planted"
by the cops, and they were going to "prove" it at the trial, but
then they never asserted it as a defense, and never bothered
to test the blood themselves.

It's REALLY strange, because if they had found "astronomical
amounts" of EDTA in the blood that would constitute proof beyond
ANY doubt that the LAPD planted the blood to frame OJ, and
would have led to Johnnie Cochran's biggest case by far against
the LAPD in his several decades of suing the LAPD for racial
harrassment. And yet, Johnny NEVER bothered to test the
blood...any thoughts as to WHY? (Be aware that several
members of OJ's defense team have openly expressed doubt
as to his "innocence", and Johnny Cochran himself said he
"didn't know" if OJ was guilty or not.)

---
William Ernest Reid
 
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:08:44 GMT, "Bill Reid" <hormelfree@happyhealthy.net>
wrote:

>
><cwed@tic.org> wrote in message
>news:i9hsu3188s913ag6fojd04c0k315poi4ks@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:41:25 -0700, "Talkin Horse"

><drramulec@earthlink.net>
>> wrote:
>> >"Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exists1@Earth71.net> wrote in message
>> >news:8vfHj.145$A87.88@trnddc06...

>
>> >> O.J.'s blood was never found at the crime scene. He claimed the cut on

>his
>> >> hand was from rushing out of a Chicago hotel room...

>
>He also said he had a lot of cuts on his hands because he played
>golf...that's right, golf, the bloodiest game on Earth...
>
>> >> Because the
>> >> prosecution did not question the cut on his hand,

>
>What an idiot. The prosecution couldn't question him because he
>refused to testify under the Fifth Admendment, just like Mark Fuhrman.
>
>> >>the defense was unable
>> >> to present a maid who found blood on a broken glass in his hotel room.

>
>They showed pictures of his hands at the criminal trial. If they
>wanted to call a witness that could explain those cuts, I think they
>could have (I presume but don't remember if they ever asked the judge
>to do so, and there probably was never any such "maid" in the first
>place).
>
>> >For the record, Simpson's blood was found on the walkway and gate at
>> >Nicole's condo.
>> >

>> Right, O.J.'s blood WAS found at the crime scene, BUT, it was proven in
>> court that blood had astronomical amounts of EDTA in it.

>
>Man, these latter-day OJ supporters are...well, just as wacky and
>uninformed as the OJ supporters from a decade ago.


Wacky & uninformed. Me??? O.J. supporter? Maybe/maybe not. However, I
like to have my facts straight.

>
>It was NEVER "proven" in ANY court that the undegraded fresh
>blood on the gate (which matched Simpson to the odds of several
>hundred million to one) had ANY EDTA in it, let alone "astronomical
>amounts". That blood was NEVER tested specifically for EDTA
>by ANYBODY, which is strange, because the defense planted
>a bunch of stories in the media that evidence had been "planted"
>by the cops, and they were going to "prove" it at the trial, but
>then they never asserted it as a defense, and never bothered
>to test the blood themselves.


Sorry to have taken so long to reply. Had to research this before
commenting.

Sure it was. This is Dr. Henry Lee area of expertise. Dr. Lee was the one
who said there was EDTA in the blood on the back gate. Same for the blood
on the walkway. Moreover, Dr. Lee said [that] blood was discovered several
days after the murders. WTF was that all about? All those forensic folks
swarming the crime scene and they happen to discover blood on the back gate
about a week after the morders? Sounds fishy to me.

>
>It's REALLY strange, because if they had found "astronomical
>amounts" of EDTA in the blood that would constitute proof beyond
>ANY doubt that the LAPD planted the blood to frame OJ, and
>would have led to Johnnie Cochran's biggest case by far against
>the LAPD in his several decades of suing the LAPD for racial
>harrassment. And yet, Johnny NEVER bothered to test the
>blood...any thoughts as to WHY? (Be aware that several
>members of OJ's defense team have openly expressed doubt
>as to his "innocence", and Johnny Cochran himself said he
>"didn't know" if OJ was guilty or not.)


By astronmical I mean it had the same consentration of EDTA in blood you
normally find in a vial of blood taken to perserve such blood. Not the
small amount of EDTA that is naturally found.

>
>---
>William Ernest Reid
>
>
 
<cwed@tic.org> wrote in message
news:ttl0v39bgo5aeapctgfuop6rjgs3pkuj8u@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:08:44 GMT, "Bill Reid"

<hormelfree@happyhealthy.net>
> wrote:
> ><cwed@tic.org> wrote in message
> >news:i9hsu3188s913ag6fojd04c0k315poi4ks@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:41:25 -0700, "Talkin Horse"

> ><drramulec@earthlink.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >"Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exists1@Earth71.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:8vfHj.145$A87.88@trnddc06...

> >
> >> >> O.J.'s blood was never found at the crime scene. He claimed the cut

on
> >his
> >> >> hand was from rushing out of a Chicago hotel room...

> >
> >He also said he had a lot of cuts on his hands because he played
> >golf...that's right, golf, the bloodiest game on Earth...
> >
> >> >> Because the
> >> >> prosecution did not question the cut on his hand,

> >
> >What an idiot. The prosecution couldn't question him because he
> >refused to testify under the Fifth Admendment, just like Mark Fuhrman.
> >
> >> >>the defense was unable
> >> >> to present a maid who found blood on a broken glass in his hotel

room.
> >
> >They showed pictures of his hands at the criminal trial. If they
> >wanted to call a witness that could explain those cuts, I think they
> >could have (I presume but don't remember if they ever asked the judge
> >to do so, and there probably was never any such "maid" in the first
> >place).
> >
> >> >For the record, Simpson's blood was found on the walkway and gate at
> >> >Nicole's condo.
> >> >
> >> Right, O.J.'s blood WAS found at the crime scene, BUT, it was proven in
> >> court that blood had astronomical amounts of EDTA in it.

> >
> >Man, these latter-day OJ supporters are...well, just as wacky and
> >uninformed as the OJ supporters from a decade ago.

>
> Wacky & uninformed. Me??? O.J. supporter? Maybe/maybe not. However, I
> like to have my facts straight.
>

That's why I straightened out your messed-up facts. I'm waiting for
a giant "THANK YOU"...

> >It was NEVER "proven" in ANY court that the undegraded fresh
> >blood on the gate (which matched Simpson to the odds of several
> >hundred million to one) had ANY EDTA in it, let alone "astronomical
> >amounts". That blood was NEVER tested specifically for EDTA
> >by ANYBODY, which is strange, because the defense planted
> >a bunch of stories in the media that evidence had been "planted"
> >by the cops, and they were going to "prove" it at the trial, but
> >then they never asserted it as a defense, and never bothered
> >to test the blood themselves.

>
> Sorry to have taken so long to reply.


Oh believe me, it was worth the wait...

> Had to research this before
> commenting.


Where did you "research" this? Show your links!!!

> Sure it was. This is Dr. Henry Lee area of expertise.


Wrong. Henry Lee is a wacky quack that has his own laughable
methods of physical evidence examination ("brod spratter"). He
typically testifies for the prosecution, but for OJ, and a tremendous
amount of money and publicity, he "testified" for the defense. He
was such a thin-skinned egomaniac that he held a press conference
immediately after being cross-examined claiming that the DEFENSE
twisted his words and made him look like a fool who thought OJ was
innocent...but making him look like a fool doesn't take a
"dream team"...

> Dr. Lee was the one
> who said there was EDTA in the blood on the back gate.


Wrong. You don't know squat about the case, like all "Pro-Js".

NOBODY testified that there was ANY EDTA in the blood on
the back gate. However, if you are a sufficiently weak-minded
fool who slavishly followed the defense team media "leaks"
prior to the trial, you probably still believe OJ couldn't have
done it because he was in Chicago at the time...

> Same for the blood
> on the walkway.


WRONG!!! The blood on the walkway was severely degraded by
bacterial contamination, and as such was never even considered
to have possibly come from a blood vial containing HUGE amounts
of EDTA, a PRESERVATIVE THAT SPECIFICALLY IS USED TO
KILL BACTERIA AND PREVENT DEGRADATION OF BLOOD
SAMPLES.

However, the degradation could make case for "reasonable doubt",
since it could only match to OJ by odds of a few hundred/thousand
to one, and you could question why blood collected the day
after a murder would be so degraded (Barry Scheck, of the defense
team, pound for pound the most genuinely effective lawyer in
that courtroom, did a MASTERFUL job in showing that the
cops mishandled and miscollected the blood evidence in the
case, leading VERY debateably to a "reasonable" conclusion of
"reasonable doubt" about SOME of the blood evidence).

> Moreover, Dr. Lee said [that] blood was discovered several
> days after the murders.


Possibly it was his testimony, or probably not, but there WAS a
"discrepancy" in terms of the "appearance" of the blood on the back
gate. Problem is, the only logical places the blood could have come
from were from the murderer, OJ, or from a police evidence vial, and
an FBI chemist CALLED BY THE DEFENSE testified beyond any
REASONABLE doubt that it did NOT come from a police evidence
vial...CASE CLOSED!!!

> WTF was that all about?


Much ado about nothing? See above...and below...

> All those forensic folks
> swarming the crime scene and they happen to discover blood on the back

gate
> about a week after the morders? Sounds fishy to me.


Problem is, Barry Scheck did such a great job proving what a
bunch of incompetent fools the LAPD were, he unintentionally
provided the explanation for why those "Keystone Kops" couldn't
find their own ass for a week even with both hands...

> >It's REALLY strange, because if they had found "astronomical
> >amounts" of EDTA in the blood that would constitute proof beyond
> >ANY doubt that the LAPD planted the blood to frame OJ, and
> >would have led to Johnnie Cochran's biggest case by far against
> >the LAPD in his several decades of suing the LAPD for racial
> >harrassment. And yet, Johnny NEVER bothered to test the
> >blood...any thoughts as to WHY? (Be aware that several
> >members of OJ's defense team have openly expressed doubt
> >as to his "innocence", and Johnny Cochran himself said he
> >"didn't know" if OJ was guilty or not.)

>
> By astronmical I mean it had the same consentration of EDTA in blood you
> normally find in a vial of blood taken to perserve such blood.


I know exactly what you meant. They never found it in ANY amount.
Read the above carefully, have somebody explain it to you if you can't
figure it out...oh hell, I'll just kind of repeat it: JOHNNY COCHRAN,
WHO SPENT HIS ENTIRE ADULT LIFE SUING THE LAPD FOR
RACIAL HARRASSMENT, NEVER BOTHERED TO TEST THE
BLOOD FOR THE PRESERVATIVE EDTA, WHICH WOULD HAVE
PROVEN BEYOND ANY DOUBT THAT THE LAPD FRAMED OJ
SIMPSON, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN THE KEY PIECE OF
EVIDENCE IN THE MOST MONUMENTAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE
IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Get it? Johnny never tested the blood because he KNEW it
wasn't planted, and that's why he NEVER even spoke a single
word about filing a racial harrassment suit on behalf of OJ
Simpson after the criminal trial, BECAUSE HE KNEW THE
LAPD DID NOT "FRAME" OJ, BECAUSE THERE WASN'T A
ANY EVIDENCE TO THAT EFFECT THAT COULD SUSTAIN
THE VERY LOW BURDEN OF PROOF IN A CIVIL TRIAL.

It's also why he never asserted it as an "affirmative defense"
in the criminal trial, because he knew he couldn't prove it to
the "clear and convincing" standard for those kinds of defenses.
Instead, he planted the idea in the media, and idiots like you
are STILL parrotting it as if it actually was "proven" in the
criminal trial, WHEN IT WAS NEVER ACTUALLY EVEN
RAISED AS AN ISSUE BY THE DEFENSE.

> Not the
> small amount of EDTA that is naturally found.


There is no easily detectable level of EDTA in human blood,
because a detectable level would be enough to seriously
sicken a person. EDTA IS widely used as a food preservative
in very common foodstuffs everybody eats, but in VERY minute
quantities...oddly enough, this WAS testified to in the criminal
trial, so you've managed to get EVERY single fact wrong...GREAT
WORK!!!

---
William Ernest Reid
 
Back
Top