Jump to content

Seattle psychologist accused of voyeurism suspended from practice


Guest fx

Recommended Posts

eattle psychologist accused of voyeurism suspended from practice

 

By Maureen O'Hagan

 

http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=webpsychologist19m&date=20070719

 

 

Seattle Times staff reporter

 

A prominent Seattle psychologist has been suspended from practice after

being accused by the state Board of Psychology of secretly videotaping a

woman in his office bathroom.

 

Stuart Greenberg, who has been licensed in Washington for more than 25

years, was arrested earlier this month on suspicion of voyeurism. He was

released after two days in jail and the allegations were passed onto the

King County Prosecutor's Office, to decide if there should be criminal

charges.

 

Meanwhile, the Psychology Board suspended Greenberg's license, which

means he can't practice pending further action by the board.

 

Greenberg may request a hearing to fight the suspension. If he does, his

credentials would remain suspended until the conclusion of that process.

 

According to the board, Greenberg hid a camera in the bathroom that was

used by co-workers and patients at his practice. He "used the hidden

camera to record, for his own gratification, images of others using the

bathroom," the board's order states.

 

In Washington, he was frequently court-appointed as an evaluator in

child-custody cases and was a consultant for the Archdiocese of Seattle

when it was defending itself in sexual-abuse cases involving priests.

 

The psychologist's testimony has also been used by plaintiffs' lawyers

who sue on behalf of sex-abuse victims.

 

In addition, he has spoken at national psychology conferences and was

president of the American Board of Forensic Psychology.

 

Maureen O'Hagan: 206-464-2562 or mohagan@seattletimes.com

 

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

 

 

 

CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A

DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NSA / CIA

WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

 

CPS Does not protect children...

It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even

killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

 

every parent should read this .pdf from

connecticut dcf watch...

 

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

 

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

 

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US

These numbers come from The National Center on

Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)

Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

 

Perpetrators of Maltreatment

 

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59

Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13

Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241

Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12

Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

 

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that

are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per

100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse

and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the

citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold

parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY

government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and

death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more

human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which

they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that

they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when

children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a

bunch of social workers.

 

 

CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT

FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON...

 

 

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF

REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES

TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY

ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...