Source: U.S. Strike on Iran Nearing (for Israel)

N

NOMOREWARFORISRAEL

Guest
Source: U.S. Strike on Iran Nearing

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/iran_nuclear_strike/2008/04/14/87887.html?s=al&promo_code=4940-1

Monday, April 14, 2008 9:37 PM
By: Jim Meyers
Contrary to some claims that the Bush administration will allow
diplomacy to handle Iran's nuclear weapons program, a leading member
of America's Jewish community tells Newsmax that a military strike is
not only on the table - but likely.
"Israel is preparing for heavy casualties," the source said,
suggesting that although Israel will not take part in the strike, it
is expecting to be the target of Iranian retribution.
"Look at Dick Cheney's recent trip through the Middle East as
preparation for the U.S. attack," the source said.
Cheney's hastily arranged 9-day visit to the region, which began on
March 16, included stops in Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, Turkey,
and the Palestinian territories.
Tensions in the region have been rising.
While Israel was conducting the largest homefront military exercises
in its history last week, Israel's National Infrastructure Minister
Binyamin Ben-Eliezer warned Tehran about expected attacks on the
Jewish state.
"An Iranian attack will prompt a severe reaction from Israel, which
will destroy the Iranian nation," he said.
He predicted that in a future war, "hundreds of missiles will rain on
Israel," but added that Iran "is definitely aware of our strength."
In addition to long-range missiles Iran has been developing to strike
Israel, Israel's military strategists see the Iranians using terror
groups they back like Hamas operating from Palestine and Hezbollah
from Lebanon to launch attacks.
Iran has supplied Hezbollah with an arsenal that now contains "tens of
thousands of missiles," according to the Washington Post.
IIsrael's recent war exercises, including preparations for chemical
and biological weapons attacks, drew a sharp response from Syria which
held its own military drills. The Syrian government accused Israel of
preparing for a war which Damascus predicted would be begin anytime
between May 1 and the end of June.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently told foreign
journalists that Israel needs to confront the threat posed by Iran.
Privately he has been telling associates his number one priority is
have the Israeli military strike Iran if the U.S. is unwilling.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz disclosed that Israel is concerned that
North Korea has transferred technology and nuclear materials to Iran
to aid Tehran's secret nuclear weapons program.
Iran remains intransigent to international pressure that it offer full
transparency relating to its nuclear program. On Sunday the head of
Iran's nuclear program "abruptly canceled a meeting with the head of
the International Atomic Energy Agency, dealing a blow to the U.N.
monitor's efforts to investigate allegations that Iran tried to make
nuclear arms, an agency official said," according to an AP report.
"But a senior diplomat had told the AP that IAEA [International Atomic
Energy Agency] head Mohamed ElBaradei likely planned to use the
meeting with Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's nuclear
program, to renew a request for more information on allegations Tehran
had tried to make atomic arms."
A number of signs indicate that, contrary to the belief President Bush
is a lame duck who will not act before he leaves office, the U.S. is
poised to strike before Iran can acquire nuclear weapons and carry out
the threat of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to "wipe Israel
off the map":
According to intelligence sources, the administration now rejects the
National Intelligence Estimate report issued in December that asserted
Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in late 2003.
The French daily Le Monde reported in March that newly surfaced
documents show that Iran has continued developing nuclear weapons. In
late 2006, U.S. intelligence reportedly intercepted a phone
conversation in Iran's Defense Ministry in which the nuclear weapons
program was discussed.
The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, Admiral William
Fallon, resigned in March amid media reports that he broke with
President Bush's strategy on Iran and did not want to be in the chain
of command when the order comes down from the President to launch a
strike on the Islamic Republic.
Democrats suggested he had been forced out because of his candor in
opposing Bush's Iran plans, and Esquire magazine contended that
Fallon's departure signaled that the U.S. is preparing to attack
Iran.
According to a Tehran-based Iranian news network, Press TV, Saudi
Arabia is taking emergency steps in preparing to counter any
"radioactive hazards" that may result from an American attack on
Iran's nuclear facilities.
The Saudi newspaper Okaz disclosed that the Saudi government has
approved nuclear fallout preparations, and the Iranian network
reported that the approval came a day after Cheney met with the
kingdom's high-ranking officials, further stating that the U.S. "is
now informing its Arab allies of a potential war."
The American commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, has stepped up
criticism of Iran, telling Congress last week that Iranian support for
Shiite militias posed the most serious threat to Iraq's stability. He
told senators : "Iran has fueled the violence in a particularly
damaging way." Last week, the U.S. said Iran was providing insurgents
with missiles that were killing Americans and hitting targets within
the U.S. occupied Green Zone in Baghdad.
MSNBC Commentator Pat Buchanan said Petraeus' remarks to Congress lay
the groundwork for a U.S. attack on Iran.
President Bush said in a speech at the White House on April 10 that
Iran, along with al-Qaida, are "two of the greatest threats to
America."
He said Iran "can live in peace with its neighbors," or "continue to
arm and train and fund illegal militant groups which are terrorizing
the Iraqi people ... If Iran makes the wrong choice, America will act to
protect our interests and our troops and our Iraqi partners."
He later told ABC News that if Iran continues to help militants in
Iraq, "then we'll deal with them."
Members of Congress are said to have been briefed by the
administration about the rising Iran threat.
Iran did little to cool tensions when it announced that it had begun
installing 6,000 new centrifuges at its uranium enrichment plant in
Natanz.
Centrifuges can enrich uranium to a low level to produce nuclear fuel
or a high level for use in weapons.
The announcement of the new centrifuges by President Ahmadinejad came
on April 8, Iran's National Day of Nuclear Technology, which marked
the second anniversary of Iran's first enrichment of uranium.
Iran already has about 3,000 centrifuges operating in Natanz, and the
new announcement was widely seen as a show of defiance to
international demands to halt a nuclear program that the U.S. and its
allies insist is aimed at building nuclear weapons.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See the comments section of the following URL as well:

Iran War, Real Fear Petraeus Beating War Drums for Attack

http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-arent-we-talking-about-this.html

Here is a tiny URL for the above one:

http://tinyurl.com/3vue6c

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM

http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
 
In article
<d15a54be-78dd-4a0d-b2e8-e0174c0bc8f7@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Steve Thomas <misledrkstar@aol.com> wrote:

> On Apr 16, 12:11
 
"NOMOREWARFORISRAEL" <NOMOREWAR_FORISRAEL@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:842d4444-c925-4d5c-b580-81adff68f81e@1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Source: U.S. Strike on Iran Nearing


Death to Iran!

Bomb Iran NOW!
 
In article
<842d4444-c925-4d5c-b580-81adff68f81e@1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
NOMOREWARFORISRAEL <NOMOREWAR_FORISRAEL@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Source: U.S. Strike on Iran Nearing
>
> http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/iran_nuclear_strike/2008/04/14/87887.html?s=a
> l&promo_code=4940-1
>
> Monday, April 14, 2008 9:37 PM
> By: Jim Meyers
> Contrary to some claims that the Bush administration will allow
> diplomacy to handle Iran's nuclear weapons program, a leading member
> of America's Jewish community tells Newsmax that a military strike is
> not only on the table - but likely.
> "Israel is preparing for heavy casualties," the source said,
> suggesting that although Israel will not take part in the strike, it
> is expecting to be the target of Iranian retribution.
> "Look at Dick Cheney's recent trip through the Middle East as
> preparation for the U.S. attack," the source said.


You can't "attack" Iran, dummy.

Why? Because if you attack her, you must annihilate her. There are no
half measures open to anyone at THAT table.

Ergo, the first move is and has always been hers.

--
NeoLibertarian

http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg
 
Nancy Pelosi will have blood on her hands when the Bush administration
carries out this ghastly deed against Iran on behalf of the neocon war
lobby, which represents the interests of such rightwing politicians as
Netabyahu of Israel.

Buchanan wrote:

In early 2007, Nancy Pelosi pulled down a resolution that would
have denied Bush the authority to attack Iran without congressional
approval. In September, both Houses passed the Kyl-Lieberman
resolution designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist
organization.

Courtesy of Congress, Bush thus has a blank check for war on
Iran. And the signs are growing that he intends to fill it in and
cash it.

lo yeeOn
========

Petraeus Points to War With Iran (Patrick Buchanan)

Fri Apr 11, 3:00 AM ET

The neocons may yet get their war on Iran.

IFRAME:
http://ad.yieldmanager.com/st?ad_type=iframe&ad_size=300x250&site=14047
7&section_code=12513770&cb=1208299732751763&ycg=&yyob=&pub_redirect_une
ncoded=1&pub_redirect=http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14umb3mtc/M=619213.12
513770.12865465.1442997/D=news/S=97498783:LREC/_ylt=AiMeQgt6_cV2gdQd5T4
CyR6fts8F/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1208306932/L=GGX5FUWTcuoZ0YByRAA8Gwg8plQBBUgFMNQA
CeJP/B=VS.6x0LEYuM-/J=1208299732751763/A=4919452/R=0/

Ever since President Nouri al-Maliki ordered the attacks in Basra on
the Mahdi Army, Gen. David Petraeus has been laying the predicate for
U.S. air strikes on Iran and a wider war in the Middle East.

Iran, Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee, has "fueled
the recent violence in a particularly damaging way through its lethal
support of the special groups."

These "special groups" are "funded, trained, armed and directed by
Iran's Quds Force with help from Lebanese Hezbollah. It was these
groups that launched Iranian rockets and mortar rounds at Iraq's seat
of government (the Green Zone) ... causing loss of innocent life and
fear in the capital."

Is the Iranian government aware of this -- and behind it?

"President Ahmadinejad and other Iranian leaders" promised to end their
"support for the special groups," said the general, but the "nefarious
activities of the Quds force have continued."

Are Iranians then murdering Americans, asked Joe Lieberman:

"Is it fair to say that the Iranian-backed special groups in Iraq are
responsible for the murder of hundreds of American soldiers and
thousands of Iraqi soldiers and civilians?"

"It certainly is. ... That is correct," said Petraeus.

The following day, Petraeus told the House Armed Services Committee,
"Unchecked, the 'special groups' pose the greatest long-term threat to
the viability of a democratic Iraq."

Translation: The United States is now fighting the proxies of Iran for
the future of Iraq.

The general's testimony is forcing Bush's hand, for consider the
question it logically raises: If the Quds Force and Hezbollah, both
designated as terrorist organizations, are arming, training and
directing "special groups" to "murder" Americans, and rocket and mortar
the Green Zone to kill our diplomats, and they now represent the No. 1
threat to a free Iraq, why has Bush failed to neutralize these base
camps of terror and aggression?

Hence, be not surprised if President Bush appears before the TV
cameras, one day soon, to declare:

"My commanding general in Iraq, David Petraeus, has told me that Iran,
with the knowledge of President Ahmadinejad, has become a privileged
sanctuary for two terrorist organizations -- Hezbollah and the Quds
Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard -- to train, arm and direct
terrorist attacks on U.S. and coalition forces, despite repeated
promises to halt this murderous practice.

"I have therefore directed U.S. air and naval forces to begin air
strikes on these base camps of terror. Our attacks will continue until
the Iranian attacks cease."

Because of the failures of a Democratic Congress elected to end the
war, Bush can now make a compelling case that he would be acting fully
within his authority as commander in chief.

In early 2007, Nancy Pelosi pulled down a resolution that would have
denied Bush the authority to attack Iran without congressional
approval. In September, both Houses passed the Kyl-Lieberman resolution
designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization.

Courtesy of Congress, Bush thus has a blank check for war on Iran. And
the signs are growing that he intends to fill it in and cash it.

Israel has been hurling invective at Iran and conducting security
drills to prepare its population for rocket barrages worse than those
Hezbollah delivered in the Lebanon War.

Adm. William "Fox" Fallon, the Central Command head who opposed war
with Iran, has been removed. Hamas and Hezbollah have been stocking up
on Qassam and Katyusha rockets.

Vice President Cheney has lately toured Arab capitals.

And President Ahmadinejad just made international headlines by
declaring that Tehran will begin installing 6,000 advanced centrifuges
to accelerate Iran's enrichment of uranium.

This is Bush's last chance to strike and, when Iran responds, to effect
its nuclear castration. Are Bush and Cheney likely to pass up this last
chance to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and effect the election of
John McCain? For any attack on Iran's "terrorist bases" would rally the
GOP and drive a wedge between Obama and Hillary.

Indeed, Sen. Clinton, who voted to declare Iran's Revolutionary Guard a
terrorist organization, could hardly denounce Bush for ordering air
strikes on the Revolutionary Guards' Quds Force, when Petraeus
testified, in her presence, that it is behind the serial murder of U.S.
soldiers.

The Iranians may sense what is afoot. For Tehran helped broker the
truce in the Maliki-Sadr clash in Basra, and has called for a halt to
the mortar and rocket attacks on the Green Zone.

With a friendly regime in Baghdad that rolled out the red carpet for
Ahmadinejad, Iran has nothing to gain by war. Already, it is the big
winner from the U.S. wars that took down Tehran's Taliban enemies,
decimated its al-Qaida enemies and destroyed its Sunni enemies, Saddam
and his Baath Party.

No, it is not Iran that wants a war with the United States. It is the
United States that has reasons to want a short, sharp war with Iran.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other
Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
Previous: Petraeus Points to War With Iran


In article <842d4444-c925-4d5c-b580-81adff68f81e@1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
NOMOREWARFORISRAEL <NOMOREWAR_FORISRAEL@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Source: U.S. Strike on Iran Nearing
>
>http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/iran_nuclear_strike/2008/04/14/87887.html?s=al&promo_code=4940-1
>
>Monday, April 14, 2008 9:37 PM
>By: Jim Meyers
>Contrary to some claims that the Bush administration will allow
>diplomacy to handle Iran's nuclear weapons program, a leading member
>of America's Jewish community tells Newsmax that a military strike is
>not only on the table - but likely.
>"Israel is preparing for heavy casualties," the source said,
>suggesting that although Israel will not take part in the strike, it
>is expecting to be the target of Iranian retribution.
>"Look at Dick Cheney's recent trip through the Middle East as
>preparation for the U.S. attack," the source said.
>Cheney's hastily arranged 9-day visit to the region, which began on
>March 16, included stops in Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, Turkey,
>and the Palestinian territories.
>Tensions in the region have been rising.
>While Israel was conducting the largest homefront military exercises
>in its history last week, Israel's National Infrastructure Minister
>Binyamin Ben-Eliezer warned Tehran about expected attacks on the
>Jewish state.
>"An Iranian attack will prompt a severe reaction from Israel, which
>will destroy the Iranian nation," he said.
>He predicted that in a future war, "hundreds of missiles will rain on
>Israel," but added that Iran "is definitely aware of our strength."
>In addition to long-range missiles Iran has been developing to strike
>Israel, Israel's military strategists see the Iranians using terror
>groups they back like Hamas operating from Palestine and Hezbollah
>from Lebanon to launch attacks.
>Iran has supplied Hezbollah with an arsenal that now contains "tens of
>thousands of missiles," according to the Washington Post.
>IIsrael's recent war exercises, including preparations for chemical
>and biological weapons attacks, drew a sharp response from Syria which
>held its own military drills. The Syrian government accused Israel of
>preparing for a war which Damascus predicted would be begin anytime
>between May 1 and the end of June.
>Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently told foreign
>journalists that Israel needs to confront the threat posed by Iran.
>Privately he has been telling associates his number one priority is
>have the Israeli military strike Iran if the U.S. is unwilling.
>The Israeli newspaper Haaretz disclosed that Israel is concerned that
>North Korea has transferred technology and nuclear materials to Iran
>to aid Tehran's secret nuclear weapons program.
>Iran remains intransigent to international pressure that it offer full
>transparency relating to its nuclear program. On Sunday the head of
>Iran's nuclear program "abruptly canceled a meeting with the head of
>the International Atomic Energy Agency, dealing a blow to the U.N.
>monitor's efforts to investigate allegations that Iran tried to make
>nuclear arms, an agency official said," according to an AP report.
>"But a senior diplomat had told the AP that IAEA [International Atomic
>Energy Agency] head Mohamed ElBaradei likely planned to use the
>meeting with Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's nuclear
>program, to renew a request for more information on allegations Tehran
>had tried to make atomic arms."
>A number of signs indicate that, contrary to the belief President Bush
>is a lame duck who will not act before he leaves office, the U.S. is
>poised to strike before Iran can acquire nuclear weapons and carry out
>the threat of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to "wipe Israel
>off the map":
>According to intelligence sources, the administration now rejects the
>National Intelligence Estimate report issued in December that asserted
>Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in late 2003.
>The French daily Le Monde reported in March that newly surfaced
>documents show that Iran has continued developing nuclear weapons. In
>late 2006, U.S. intelligence reportedly intercepted a phone
>conversation in Iran's Defense Ministry in which the nuclear weapons
>program was discussed.
>The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, Admiral William
>Fallon, resigned in March amid media reports that he broke with
>President Bush's strategy on Iran and did not want to be in the chain
>of command when the order comes down from the President to launch a
>strike on the Islamic Republic.
>Democrats suggested he had been forced out because of his candor in
>opposing Bush's Iran plans, and Esquire magazine contended that
>Fallon's departure signaled that the U.S. is preparing to attack
>Iran.
>According to a Tehran-based Iranian news network, Press TV, Saudi
>Arabia is taking emergency steps in preparing to counter any
>"radioactive hazards" that may result from an American attack on
>Iran's nuclear facilities.
>The Saudi newspaper Okaz disclosed that the Saudi government has
>approved nuclear fallout preparations, and the Iranian network
>reported that the approval came a day after Cheney met with the
>kingdom's high-ranking officials, further stating that the U.S. "is
>now informing its Arab allies of a potential war."
>The American commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, has stepped up
>criticism of Iran, telling Congress last week that Iranian support for
>Shiite militias posed the most serious threat to Iraq's stability. He
>told senators : "Iran has fueled the violence in a particularly
>damaging way." Last week, the U.S. said Iran was providing insurgents
>with missiles that were killing Americans and hitting targets within
>the U.S. occupied Green Zone in Baghdad.
>MSNBC Commentator Pat Buchanan said Petraeus' remarks to Congress lay
>the groundwork for a U.S. attack on Iran.
>President Bush said in a speech at the White House on April 10 that
>Iran, along with al-Qaida, are "two of the greatest threats to
>America."
>He said Iran "can live in peace with its neighbors," or "continue to
>arm and train and fund illegal militant groups which are terrorizing
>the Iraqi people ... If Iran makes the wrong choice, America will act to
>protect our interests and our troops and our Iraqi partners."
>He later told ABC News that if Iran continues to help militants in
>Iraq, "then we'll deal with them."
>Members of Congress are said to have been briefed by the
>administration about the rising Iran threat.
>Iran did little to cool tensions when it announced that it had begun
>installing 6,000 new centrifuges at its uranium enrichment plant in
>Natanz.
>Centrifuges can enrich uranium to a low level to produce nuclear fuel
>or a high level for use in weapons.
>The announcement of the new centrifuges by President Ahmadinejad came
>on April 8, Iran's National Day of Nuclear Technology, which marked
>the second anniversary of Iran's first enrichment of uranium.
>Iran already has about 3,000 centrifuges operating in Natanz, and the
>new announcement was widely seen as a show of defiance to
>international demands to halt a nuclear program that the U.S. and its
>allies insist is aimed at building nuclear weapons.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>See the comments section of the following URL as well:
>
>Iran War, Real Fear Petraeus Beating War Drums for Attack
>
>http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-arent-we-talking-about-this.html
>
>Here is a tiny URL for the above one:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/3vue6c
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
>
>http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
 
Back
Top