N
ned
Guest
D O N E
C
Christopher Helms
Guest
On Feb 21, 8:50
A
Amanda Williams
Guest
Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
> On Feb 21, 8:50
news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
> On Feb 21, 8:50
H
HarryNadds
Guest
On Feb 21, 10:44
G
George Grapman
Guest
HarryNadds wrote:
> On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote:
>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>>> D O N E
>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>> rotfl...
>>
>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>>
>> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
>> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
>> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
>>
>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
>> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>>
>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
>> the fuss ???
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> --
>> AW
>>
>> <small but dangerous>
>
> WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a
> person does in his *** life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened??
> Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name.
Likewise we also heard that when it is a public official it is a
matter of public interest.
> On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote:
>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>>> D O N E
>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>> rotfl...
>>
>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>>
>> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
>> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
>> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
>>
>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
>> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>>
>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
>> the fuss ???
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> --
>> AW
>>
>> <small but dangerous>
>
> WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a
> person does in his *** life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened??
> Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name.
Likewise we also heard that when it is a public official it is a
matter of public interest.
R
robw
Guest
So why worry about it?
"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ff167f54-a265-4f5d-a6cd-8c8f85eca3a6@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote:
> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said
innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
> >> D O N E
>
> > Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
> > denied it and that's the end of that.
>
> rotfl...
>
> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>
> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
>
> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>
> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
> the fuss ???
>
> <snicker>
>
> --
> AW
>
> <small but dangerous>
WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a
person does in his *** life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened??
Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name.
"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ff167f54-a265-4f5d-a6cd-8c8f85eca3a6@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote:
> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said
innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
> >> D O N E
>
> > Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
> > denied it and that's the end of that.
>
> rotfl...
>
> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>
> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
>
> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>
> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
> the fuss ???
>
> <snicker>
>
> --
> AW
>
> <small but dangerous>
WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a
person does in his *** life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened??
Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name.
O
OneTwoThree
Guest
"Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252...
> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>> D O N E
>>
>>
>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>
> rotfl...
>
> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>
> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a Viet
Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as you stood
behind Kerry.
>
> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer? thought
you folks believed in personal privacy?
>
> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
> the fuss ???
right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt even
need ******!
>
> <snicker>
>
> --
> AW
>
> <small but dangerous>
news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252...
> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>> D O N E
>>
>>
>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>
> rotfl...
>
> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>
> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a Viet
Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as you stood
behind Kerry.
>
> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer? thought
you folks believed in personal privacy?
>
> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
> the fuss ???
right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt even
need ******!
>
> <snicker>
>
> --
> AW
>
> <small but dangerous>
A
Amanda Williams
Guest
"OneTwoThree" <youare@notverysmart.ru> allegedly said in
news:6pWdnRvOlO8PJCDanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com:
>
> "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252...
>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
>> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>>> D O N E
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>>
>> rotfl...
>>
>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>>
>> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who
>> waited faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger
>> model, so why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the
>> second ???
>
> yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a
> Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as
> you stood behind Kerry.
>
WTF has THAT to do with whether he is "******* around" on cindy ?
>
>>
>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane
>> mafia to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>
> Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer?
> thought you folks believed in personal privacy?
>
Gee.. you don't think it's relevant that the randy old goat may have been
getting the leg over with a lobbyist ??? A lobbyist for the Telecom
industry while the matter was before the Senate ??? Of course old Cindy
was zonked out on "hillbilly heroin" that she stole from her employer at
the time, so she probably doesn't care.
REAL "family values" at work eh ???
>
>>
>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so
>> why all the fuss ???
>
>
> right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt
> even need ******!
>
Unlike your other hero Limpballs
news:6pWdnRvOlO8PJCDanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com:
>
> "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252...
>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
>> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>>> D O N E
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>>
>> rotfl...
>>
>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>>
>> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who
>> waited faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger
>> model, so why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the
>> second ???
>
> yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a
> Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as
> you stood behind Kerry.
>
WTF has THAT to do with whether he is "******* around" on cindy ?
>
>>
>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane
>> mafia to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>
> Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer?
> thought you folks believed in personal privacy?
>
Gee.. you don't think it's relevant that the randy old goat may have been
getting the leg over with a lobbyist ??? A lobbyist for the Telecom
industry while the matter was before the Senate ??? Of course old Cindy
was zonked out on "hillbilly heroin" that she stole from her employer at
the time, so she probably doesn't care.
REAL "family values" at work eh ???
>
>>
>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so
>> why all the fuss ???
>
>
> right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt
> even need ******!
>
Unlike your other hero Limpballs
H
HarryNadds
Guest
On Feb 21, 10:51
H
HarryNadds
Guest
On Feb 21, 1:37
O
OneTwoThree
Guest
"Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4B94CF485B9fubar@63.218.45.252...
> "OneTwoThree" <youare@notverysmart.ru> allegedly said in
> news:6pWdnRvOlO8PJCDanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>>
>> "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252...
>>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
>>> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>>>> D O N E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>>>
>>> rotfl...
>>>
>>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>>>
>>> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who
>>> waited faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger
>>> model, so why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the
>>> second ???
>>
>> yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a
>> Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as
>> you stood behind Kerry.
>>
>
> WTF has THAT to do with whether he is "******* around" on cindy ?
what do you care whether or not he is getting something on the side?
>
>>
>>>
>>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane
>>> mafia to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>>
>> Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer?
>> thought you folks believed in personal privacy?
>>
>
> Gee.. you don't think it's relevant that the randy old goat may have been
> getting the leg over with a lobbyist ??? A lobbyist for the Telecom
> industry while the matter was before the Senate ??? Of course old Cindy
> was zonked out on "hillbilly heroin" that she stole from her employer at
> the time, so she probably doesn't care.
as soon as you start outing dems for their sleazeball realtionships with
lobbyists, you will have some credibility on this one. fact is you're a
hypocrite who has no interest in eliminating the problem.
>
> REAL "family values" at work eh ???
define "family values"
then tell us all how you denounce anyone (including leftists like SF mayor
Gavin Newsome) for violating those values that you subscribe to.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so
>>> why all the fuss ???
>>
>>
>> right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt
>> even need ******!
>>
>
> Unlike your other hero Limpballs
news:Xns9A4B94CF485B9fubar@63.218.45.252...
> "OneTwoThree" <youare@notverysmart.ru> allegedly said in
> news:6pWdnRvOlO8PJCDanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>>
>> "Amanda Williams" <pms@fu.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9A4B77780B29fubar@63.218.45.252...
>>> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> allegedly said in
>>> news:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
>>>>> D O N E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>>> denied it and that's the end of that.
>>>
>>> rotfl...
>>>
>>> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>>>
>>> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who
>>> waited faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger
>>> model, so why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the
>>> second ???
>>
>> yeah, but McCain is a REAL war hero, unlike that wannabe Kerry. As a
>> Viet Nam vet and a war hero, he MUST be supported by you dems, just as
>> you stood behind Kerry.
>>
>
> WTF has THAT to do with whether he is "******* around" on cindy ?
what do you care whether or not he is getting something on the side?
>
>>
>>>
>>> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane
>>> mafia to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>>
>> Why is the Times in the same business as the Globe and the Enquirer?
>> thought you folks believed in personal privacy?
>>
>
> Gee.. you don't think it's relevant that the randy old goat may have been
> getting the leg over with a lobbyist ??? A lobbyist for the Telecom
> industry while the matter was before the Senate ??? Of course old Cindy
> was zonked out on "hillbilly heroin" that she stole from her employer at
> the time, so she probably doesn't care.
as soon as you start outing dems for their sleazeball realtionships with
lobbyists, you will have some credibility on this one. fact is you're a
hypocrite who has no interest in eliminating the problem.
>
> REAL "family values" at work eh ???
define "family values"
then tell us all how you denounce anyone (including leftists like SF mayor
Gavin Newsome) for violating those values that you subscribe to.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so
>>> why all the fuss ???
>>
>>
>> right on! see.... an old guy CAN compete with the Clintons. He didnt
>> even need ******!
>>
>
> Unlike your other hero Limpballs
G
Gogarty
Guest
In article <d36ea826-7b26-4053-a8d2-e0184c98972d@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
hoofhearted07@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>Do you have proof McBeaner was whacking some lobbyist or is just
>something the NY Slime decided to throw against the wall to see if it
>would stick? Sounds like something the Clinton's would d
samas
>next.She has his FBI file.
I don't have proof of anything and also don't care. But I do suspect that the
NY Times is sitting on a lot of stuff they have not published and denials to
the contrary (I did not have *** with that woman) McCain was in fact diddling
a lobbyist who had business before his committee. It's the hypocrisy factor,
stupid.
hoofhearted07@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>Do you have proof McBeaner was whacking some lobbyist or is just
>something the NY Slime decided to throw against the wall to see if it
>would stick? Sounds like something the Clinton's would d
samas>next.She has his FBI file.
I don't have proof of anything and also don't care. But I do suspect that the
NY Times is sitting on a lot of stuff they have not published and denials to
the contrary (I did not have *** with that woman) McCain was in fact diddling
a lobbyist who had business before his committee. It's the hypocrisy factor,
stupid.
G
Gogarty
Guest
And isn't that Cindy the hardest looking broad this side of Damon Runyon?
N
Nicklas@Click.com
Guest
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:10:13 -0800 (PST), Christopher
Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>denied it and that's the end of that.
S0--- Are you saying it's NOT okay if a loony
billionaire "digs up" some bimbo to make accusations,
pays witnesses, pays her lawyers to smear him?
If so, why was it okay against Clinton?
Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>denied it and that's the end of that.
S0--- Are you saying it's NOT okay if a loony
billionaire "digs up" some bimbo to make accusations,
pays witnesses, pays her lawyers to smear him?
If so, why was it okay against Clinton?
E
Eddie Haskell
Guest
<Nicklas@Click.com> wrote in message
news:e4srr3hs5b8hfeekgbqk9c904o1ie0j9kh@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:10:13 -0800 (PST), Christopher
> Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>denied it and that's the end of that.
>
>
> S0--- Are you saying it's NOT okay if a loony
> billionaire "digs up" some bimbo to make accusations,
> pays witnesses, pays her lawyers to smear him?
>
> If so, why was it okay against Clinton?
Because he was guilty.
-Eddie Haskell
news:e4srr3hs5b8hfeekgbqk9c904o1ie0j9kh@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:10:13 -0800 (PST), Christopher
> Helms <Chrishelms132@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
>>denied it and that's the end of that.
>
>
> S0--- Are you saying it's NOT okay if a loony
> billionaire "digs up" some bimbo to make accusations,
> pays witnesses, pays her lawyers to smear him?
>
> If so, why was it okay against Clinton?
Because he was guilty.
-Eddie Haskell
T
Titix
Guest
"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ff167f54-a265-4f5d-a6cd-8c8f85eca3a6@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote:
> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said
innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
> >> D O N E
>
> > Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
> > denied it and that's the end of that.
>
> rotfl...
>
> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>
> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
>
> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>
> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
> the fuss ???
>
> <snicker>
>
> --
> AW
>
> <small but dangerous>
WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a
person does in his *** life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened??
Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name.
---------------------------------------------
You must be new in this group. If you scroll up you will find Bill Clinton's
name
all over here, about Monica, something that happened many yrs.ago.
Do you think it only should matter if the person has a (D) in front of his
name?
The (R's) have way more episodes on this matter than D's. Going as far as
tapping
toes in men's public restrooms, codes that most people didn't know existed.
If the R's didn't preach morality, maybe it won't be so news worthy.
news:ff167f54-a265-4f5d-a6cd-8c8f85eca3a6@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 21, 10:44 am, Amanda Williams <p...@fu.com> wrote:
> Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> allegedly said
innews:42890510-faf5-4997-a70b-45c9e3e77723@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Feb 21, 8:50 am, "ned" <n...@1.com> wrote:
> >> D O N E
>
> > Oh, no way. They asked him if he was ******* around on his wife, he
> > denied it and that's the end of that.
>
> rotfl...
>
> Yeah, if grandpa smurf sezs it, it MUST be true eh?
>
> We KNOW he "****** around" on his FIRST wife, you know the one who waited
> faithfully while he was a POW only to get dumped for a younger model, so
> why would it be a surprise that he ****** around on the second ???
>
> What IS interesting is the amount of effort put out by the mcInsane mafia
> to get the NYT to "bin" the story.
>
> But, this just shows that he IS a REAL "conservative" after all so why all
> the fuss ???
>
> <snicker>
>
> --
> AW
>
> <small but dangerous>
WAIT JUST A DAMNED MINUTE!! We heard all through the 90's that what a
person does in his *** life is NOBODY'S BUSINESS!! WTF happened??
Oh,that's right McBeaner has an ® in front of his name.
---------------------------------------------
You must be new in this group. If you scroll up you will find Bill Clinton's
name
all over here, about Monica, something that happened many yrs.ago.
Do you think it only should matter if the person has a (D) in front of his
name?
The (R's) have way more episodes on this matter than D's. Going as far as
tapping
toes in men's public restrooms, codes that most people didn't know existed.
If the R's didn't preach morality, maybe it won't be so news worthy.
N
Name Stolen
Guest
ned wrote:
> D O N E
>
>
>
>
You are so confused...
> D O N E
>
>
>
>
You are so confused...
