Study: Abstinence classes don't stop sex

R

Roger

Guest
Study: Abstinence classes don't stop sex
By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press Writer 48 minutes ago

Students who took part in sexual abstinence programs were just as likely to
have sex as those who did not, according to a study ordered by Congress.

Also, those who attended one of the four abstinence classes that were
reviewed reported having similar numbers of sexual partners as those who did
not attend the classes. And they first had sex at about the same age as
other students - 14.9 years, according to Mathematica Policy Research Inc.

The federal government now spends about $176 million annually on
abstinence-until-marriage education. Critics have repeatedly said they don't
believe the programs are working, and the study will give them
reinforcement.

However, Bush administration officials cautioned against drawing sweeping
conclusions from the study. They said the four programs reviewed - among
several hundred across the nation - were some of the very first established
after Congress overhauled the nation's welfare laws in 1996.

Officials said one lesson they learned from the study is that the abstinence
message should be reinforced in subsequent years to truly affect behavior.

"This report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines. You
can't expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective
all throughout the youth's high school career," said Harry Wilson, the
commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau at the Administration
for Children and Families.

For its study, Mathematica looked at students in four abstinence programs
around the country as well as students from the same communities who did not
participate in the abstinence programs. The 2,057 youths came from big
cities - Miami and Milwaukee - as well as rural communities - Powhatan, Va.,
and Clarksdale, Miss.

The students who participated in abstinence education did so for one to
three years. Their average age was 11 to 12 when they entered the programs
back in 1999.

Mathematica then did a follow up survey in late 2005 and early 2006. By that
time, the average age for participants was about 16.5. Mathematica found
that about half of the abstinence students and about half from the control
group reported that they remained abstinent.

"I really do think it's a two-part story. First, there is no evidence that
the programs increased the rate of sexual abstinence," said Chris Trenholm,
a senior researcher at Mathematica who oversaw the study. "However, the
second part of the story that I think is equally important is that we find
no evidence that the programs increased the rate of unprotected sex."

Trenholm said his second point of emphasis was important because some
critics of abstinence programs have contended that they lead to less
frequent use of condoms.

Mathematica's study could have serious implications as Congress considers
renewing this summer the block grant program for abstinence education known
as Title V. The federal government has authorized up to $50 million annually
for the program. Participating states then provide $3 for every $4 they get
from the federal government. Eight states decline to take part in the grant
program.

Some lawmakers and advocacy groups believe the federal government should use
that money for comprehensive sex education, which would include abstinence
as a piece of the curriculum.

"Members of Congress need to listen to what the evidence tells us," said
William Smith, vice president for public policy at the Sexuality Information
and Education Council of the United States, which promotes comprehensive sex
education.

"This report should give a clear signal to members of Congress that the
program should be changed to support programs that work, or it should end
when it expires at the end of June," Smith said.

Smith also said he didn't have trouble making broader generalizations about
abstinence programs based on the four reviewed because "this was supposed to
be their all-star lineup."

But a trade association for abstinence educators emphasized that the
findings represent less than 1 percent of all Title V abstinence projects
across the nation.

"This study began when (the programs) were still in their infancy," said
Valerie Huber, executive director of the National Abstinence Education
Association. "The field of abstinence has significantly grown and evolved
since that time and the results demonstrated in the Mathematica study are
not representative of the abstinence education community as a whole."

The four programs differed in many respects. One was voluntary and took
place after school. Three had mandatory attendance and served youth during
the school day. All offered more than 50 hours of classes. Two were
particularly intensive. The young people met every day of the school year.

Common topics included human anatomy and sexually transmitted diseases.
Also, classes focused on helping students set personal goals and build
self-esteem. The young people were taught to improve communication skills
and manage peer pressure.

___

On the Net:

Abstinence study:
http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/impactabstinence.pdf

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070413/ap_on_he_me/abstinence_study_11
 
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:462017e1$0$24778$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Study: Abstinence classes don't stop sex
> By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press Writer 48 minutes ago
>
> Students who took part in sexual abstinence programs were just as likely

to
> have sex as those who did not, according to a study ordered by Congress.
>
> Also, those who attended one of the four abstinence classes that were
> reviewed reported having similar numbers of sexual partners as those who

did
> not attend the classes. And they first had sex at about the same age as
> other students - 14.9 years, according to Mathematica Policy Research Inc.
>
> The federal government now spends about $176 million annually on
> abstinence-until-marriage education. Critics have repeatedly said they

don't
> believe the programs are working, and the study will give them
> reinforcement.
>
> However, Bush administration officials cautioned against drawing sweeping
> conclusions from the study. They said the four programs reviewed - among
> several hundred across the nation - were some of the very first

established
> after Congress overhauled the nation's welfare laws in 1996.
>
> Officials said one lesson they learned from the study is that the

abstinence
> message should be reinforced in subsequent years to truly affect behavior.
>
> "This report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines. You
> can't expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective
> all throughout the youth's high school career," said Harry Wilson, the
> commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau at the Administration
> for Children and Families.
>
> For its study, Mathematica looked at students in four abstinence programs
> around the country as well as students from the same communities who did

not
> participate in the abstinence programs. The 2,057 youths came from big
> cities - Miami and Milwaukee - as well as rural communities - Powhatan,

Va.,
> and Clarksdale, Miss.
>
> The students who participated in abstinence education did so for one to
> three years. Their average age was 11 to 12 when they entered the programs
> back in 1999.
>
> Mathematica then did a follow up survey in late 2005 and early 2006. By

that
> time, the average age for participants was about 16.5. Mathematica found
> that about half of the abstinence students and about half from the control
> group reported that they remained abstinent.
>
> "I really do think it's a two-part story. First, there is no evidence that
> the programs increased the rate of sexual abstinence," said Chris

Trenholm,
> a senior researcher at Mathematica who oversaw the study. "However, the
> second part of the story that I think is equally important is that we find
> no evidence that the programs increased the rate of unprotected sex."
>
> Trenholm said his second point of emphasis was important because some
> critics of abstinence programs have contended that they lead to less
> frequent use of condoms.
>
> Mathematica's study could have serious implications as Congress considers
> renewing this summer the block grant program for abstinence education

known
> as Title V. The federal government has authorized up to $50 million

annually
> for the program. Participating states then provide $3 for every $4 they

get
> from the federal government. Eight states decline to take part in the

grant
> program.
>
> Some lawmakers and advocacy groups believe the federal government should

use
> that money for comprehensive sex education, which would include abstinence
> as a piece of the curriculum.
>
> "Members of Congress need to listen to what the evidence tells us," said
> William Smith, vice president for public policy at the Sexuality

Information
> and Education Council of the United States, which promotes comprehensive

sex
> education.
>
> "This report should give a clear signal to members of Congress that the
> program should be changed to support programs that work, or it should end
> when it expires at the end of June," Smith said.
>
> Smith also said he didn't have trouble making broader generalizations

about
> abstinence programs based on the four reviewed because "this was supposed

to
> be their all-star lineup."
>
> But a trade association for abstinence educators emphasized that the
> findings represent less than 1 percent of all Title V abstinence projects
> across the nation.
>
> "This study began when (the programs) were still in their infancy," said
> Valerie Huber, executive director of the National Abstinence Education
> Association. "The field of abstinence has significantly grown and evolved
> since that time and the results demonstrated in the Mathematica study are
> not representative of the abstinence education community as a whole."
>
> The four programs differed in many respects. One was voluntary and took
> place after school. Three had mandatory attendance and served youth during
> the school day. All offered more than 50 hours of classes. Two were
> particularly intensive. The young people met every day of the school year.
>
> Common topics included human anatomy and sexually transmitted diseases.
> Also, classes focused on helping students set personal goals and build
> self-esteem. The young people were taught to improve communication skills
> and manage peer pressure.


What ISN'T taught in "abstinence only" classes is more important than what
IS taught. What ISN'T taught is how to use a condom and alternative methods
of controlling contraception. Since those who are taught other methods,
besides abstinence, of not getting pregnant (or getting someone else
pregnant) are turning out to be no more sexually active than those who only
know enough to do their best to keep their legs closed, which group do you
think might have a higher rate of teen pregnancy?

--

"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
 
"WF Peifer" <WFPeifer@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:yr6dnSrWl9Z-tL3bnZ2dnUVZ_silnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:462017e1$0$24778$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Study: Abstinence classes don't stop sex
>> By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press Writer 48 minutes ago
>>
>> Students who took part in sexual abstinence programs were just as likely

> to
>> have sex as those who did not, according to a study ordered by Congress.



In another study, those who attended these "abstinence only" sessions were
more likely to get pregnant or get an STD than others who did not subscribe
to abstinence only.


>>
>> Also, those who attended one of the four abstinence classes that were
>> reviewed reported having similar numbers of sexual partners as those who

> did
>> not attend the classes. And they first had sex at about the same age as
>> other students - 14.9 years, according to Mathematica Policy Research
>> Inc.
>>
>> The federal government now spends about $176 million annually on
>> abstinence-until-marriage education. Critics have repeatedly said they

> don't believe the programs are working, and the study will give them
>> reinforcement.
>>
>> However, Bush administration officials cautioned against drawing sweeping
>> conclusions from the study. They said the four programs reviewed - among
>> several hundred across the nation - were some of the very first

> established after Congress overhauled the nation's welfare laws in 1996.
>>
>> Officials said one lesson they learned from the study is that the

> abstinence message should be reinforced in subsequent years to truly
> affect behavior.
>>
>> "This report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines. You
>> can't expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective
>> all throughout the youth's high school career," said Harry Wilson, the
>> commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau at the
>> Administration
>> for Children and Families.


IOW - just like the Bush war policy - if it doesn't work - all you need do
is spend more money, and spreda more propangada, and it will work.
Which is the EXACT opposite of the argument they use when trying to
underfund exucation and support vouchers.

Which leads to the conclusion that religious zealots and conservative
republicans should push for "Sex Education" vouchers.
Give the money (tax credits) to the FAMILIES - and let THEM decide which
program to spend it on!

Logic tells me, "abstinence only" programs would only be the choice of
ignorant morons who are pushing that program now.



>>
>> For its study, Mathematica looked at students in four abstinence programs
>> around the country as well as students from the same communities who did

> not participate in the abstinence programs. The 2,057 youths came from big
>> cities - Miami and Milwaukee - as well as rural communities - Powhatan,

> Va.,
>> and Clarksdale, Miss.
>>
>> The students who participated in abstinence education did so for one to
>> three years. Their average age was 11 to 12 when they entered the
>> programs
>> back in 1999.
>>
>> Mathematica then did a follow up survey in late 2005 and early 2006. By

> that
>> time, the average age for participants was about 16.5. Mathematica found
>> that about half of the abstinence students and about half from the
>> control
>> group reported that they remained abstinent.
>>
>> "I really do think it's a two-part story. First, there is no evidence
>> that
>> the programs increased the rate of sexual abstinence," said Chris

> Trenholm,
>> a senior researcher at Mathematica who oversaw the study. "However, the
>> second part of the story that I think is equally important is that we
>> find
>> no evidence that the programs increased the rate of unprotected sex."
>>
>> Trenholm said his second point of emphasis was important because some
>> critics of abstinence programs have contended that they lead to less
>> frequent use of condoms.


But that's what ANOTHER study showed.
Given abstinence only; when those students DID engage in sex, they were
UNEDUCATED about SAFE SEX!


>>
>> Mathematica's study could have serious implications as Congress considers
>> renewing this summer the block grant program for abstinence education

> known
>> as Title V. The federal government has authorized up to $50 million

> annually
>> for the program. Participating states then provide $3 for every $4 they

> get
>> from the federal government. Eight states decline to take part in the

> grant
>> program.
>>
>> Some lawmakers and advocacy groups believe the federal government should

> use
>> that money for comprehensive sex education, which would include
>> abstinence
>> as a piece of the curriculum.
>>
>> "Members of Congress need to listen to what the evidence tells us," said
>> William Smith, vice president for public policy at the Sexuality

> Information
>> and Education Council of the United States, which promotes comprehensive

> sex
>> education.
>>
>> "This report should give a clear signal to members of Congress that the
>> program should be changed to support programs that work, or it should end
>> when it expires at the end of June," Smith said.
>>
>> Smith also said he didn't have trouble making broader generalizations

> about
>> abstinence programs based on the four reviewed because "this was supposed

> to
>> be their all-star lineup."
>>
>> But a trade association for abstinence educators emphasized that the
>> findings represent less than 1 percent of all Title V abstinence projects
>> across the nation.
>>
>> "This study began when (the programs) were still in their infancy," said
>> Valerie Huber, executive director of the National Abstinence Education
>> Association. "The field of abstinence has significantly grown and evolved
>> since that time and the results demonstrated in the Mathematica study are
>> not representative of the abstinence education community as a whole."
>>
>> The four programs differed in many respects. One was voluntary and took
>> place after school. Three had mandatory attendance and served youth
>> during
>> the school day. All offered more than 50 hours of classes. Two were
>> particularly intensive. The young people met every day of the school
>> year.
>>
>> Common topics included human anatomy and sexually transmitted diseases.
>> Also, classes focused on helping students set personal goals and build
>> self-esteem. The young people were taught to improve communication skills
>> and manage peer pressure.

>
> What ISN'T taught in "abstinence only" classes is more important than what
> IS taught. What ISN'T taught is how to use a condom and alternative
> methods
> of controlling contraception. Since those who are taught other methods,
> besides abstinence, of not getting pregnant (or getting someone else
> pregnant) are turning out to be no more sexually active than those who
> only
> know enough to do their best to keep their legs closed, which group do you
> think might have a higher rate of teen pregnancy?
>
> --
>
> "This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some people
> call you the elites; I call you my base." - George W. Bush
>
>
 

Similar threads

Back
Top