Taliban kill boy for teaching English

H

Harry Dope

Guest
Think this is bad? You could have fooled me by the silence from the left
wing kooks.





TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan for
teaching English to his classmates, police said.

Taliban militants have killed a number of teachers and students in recent
years for attending government-run schools, taking part in classes for girls
or what the hardline Islamist militants consider un-Islamic subjects.

Armed men arrived at the school in the Sayed Karam district of Paktia
province and grabbed a 16-year-old student and dragged him outside.

"Taliban militants took the boy out and killed him outside the school just
because he was teaching English to his classmates," said General Esmatullah
Alizai, the police chief of Paktia province.

Police arrived on the scene and in the ensuing gun battle, two policemen and
two militants were killed, he said.

A Taliban spokesman denied the group was involved in the killing.

The militants often deny carrying out unpopular actions.

The Taliban are divided into a number of factions with no unified command
and individual units act with a high degree of autonomy.

Afghanistan has suffered from two years of steadily rising violence as the
Taliban have reignited their campaign to overthrow the pro-Western Afghan
government and eject foreign troops.

Taliban insurgents suffer heavy casualties whenever they engage with foreign
troops, but there are few signs they are suffering from a shortage of
recruits.

Both the number of clashes and their geographical range has gone up this
year.

Helmand fighting

US-led coalition forces killed several militants in clashes in southern
Afghanistan, the US military said today, and an explosion killed a British
soldier in the troubled region.

The latest clashes came in the Garmser district of Helmand province, where
mostly British and US troops are battling to extend Afghan government
authority to a string of towns along the fertile Helmand River that cuts
through the barren desert.

"During a search of compounds in the district, coalition forces encountered
armed militants in multiple buildings on the compounds," the US military
said.

"Coalition forces responded with a combination of small-arms fire; accurate,
conventional munitions and precision-guided munitions killing several
militants during the engagement."

Precision munitions normally refer to weapons launched in air strikes, but
can be ground-launched weaponry.

"Precision munitions were also used to kill several other militants who were
attempting to use a tree line outside one of the compounds as cover to
engage Coalition forces," it said.

There was no immediate comment from the Taliban.

In a separate incident, a British soldier was killed in an explosion in the
Sangin district, further north in Helmand province yesterday, the British
Defence Ministry said.

More than 7000 people have been killed in that period, the bloodiest since
Afghan and US-led forces toppled the Taliban for refusing to give up
al-Qaeda leaders in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US.


--
Quote Of The Week
"The Clintons Are A Terminally Unethical And Vulgar Couple, And They?ve
Betrayed Everyone Who Has Ever Believed In Them." - Bob Herbert, Columnist
NY Times Clinton
 
Harry Dope wrote:

> Think this is bad? You could have fooled me by the silence from the left
> wing kooks.


> TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan for
> teaching English to his classmates, police said.


Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
years ago!

--
Left wing kooks
 
Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
>Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
>years ago!
>

Because there is a never-ending supply of brainwashed assholes, coming
from the high country that is nominally part of Pakistan, but is
really no-man's-land. Same reason we're still in Iraq; it will take a
long time to exhaust the supply of inbred defective Islamists.
 
"Well Done" <WellDone@WellHoned.com> wrote in message
news:42fsj3t0nhoi3r3b0f4m7co6tib6dekjkj@4ax.com...
> Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
>>years ago!
>>

> Because there is a never-ending supply of brainwashed assholes, coming
> from the high country that is nominally part of Pakistan, but is
> really no-man's-land. Same reason we're still in Iraq; it will take a
> long time to exhaust the supply of inbred defective Islamists.


It won't take as long to deport anti-american republics.
 
>>Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
>>years ago!
>>

> Because there is a never-ending supply of brainwashed assholes, coming
> from the high country that is nominally part of Pakistan, but is
> really no-man's-land. Same reason we're still in Iraq; it will take a
> long time to exhaust the supply of inbred defective Islamists.


And Musharraf, from the capital, he ain't one of them guys, right?

And he's still our ally, right?

--
Phlip
 
"SilentOtto" <silentotto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b43e4bff-e70b-4917-b683-a77862ff0a9a@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> Why are rightards, like you, always shocked when you discover that the
> Taliban are fighting to win?


Because rightists are chickenhawks who've never been anywhere but the
mailbox for their nut checks.
Their only exercize is the elbow bending, cheetos to pie-hole while watching
Fox 'hate-channel' and hiding in the bushes when the '******' around the
corner takes out his trash.
 
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:21:40 -0500, "Harry Dope" <HHHA@aol.com> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>
>
>TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan for
>teaching English to his classmates, police said.


American soldiers meanwhile napalmed a school killing 30 children. No
motive was given, presumable it enhance their sadistic masturbatory
fantasties.
--
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
 
In article <v7msj3115de46tbuv88nd91fphlakv7qfq@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:21:40 -0500, "Harry Dope" <HHHA@aol.com> wrote,
> quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>
> >
> >
> >TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan for
> >teaching English to his classmates, police said.

>
> American soldiers meanwhile napalmed a school killing 30 children. No
> motive was given, presumable it enhance their sadistic masturbatory
> fantasties.


If so, what can one make of DemocRAT Franklin Roosevelt's fire bombing
of Dresden and Tokyo? He must have had on hell of an orgasm over them.

Snicker.
 
"Phlip" <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:wsadnfBSWqtTsKPanZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@adelphia.com...
> Harry Dope wrote:


>> TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan for
>> teaching English to his classmates, police said.

>
> Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
> years ago!


We did.
But we're not monsters - we didn't genocide 'em.
We've gotten past all that.
9/11 is like WWII - ancient history.

Now the enemy is [redacted].
 
"Well Done" <WellDone@WellHoned.com> wrote in message
news:42fsj3t0nhoi3r3b0f4m7co6tib6dekjkj@4ax.com...

> Because there is a never-ending supply of brainwashed assholes, coming
> from the high country that is nominally part of Pakistan, but is
> really no-man's-land.


It's pathetic, how you struggle to avoid admitting that your ally, Pakistan,
is the homeport for al Quaeda.

You've confused the Taliban with al Quaeda.
The Taliban is not Pakistani - they're Afghans.

What you demonstrate here is the kind of ignorance that caused you to think
that the Iraqi people were responsible for 9/11.
That being - that you can't tell one brown-skinned Muslim from the next.


> Same reason we're still in Iraq; it will take a
> long time to exhaust the supply of inbred defective Islamists.


We are not in Iraq -they are.
We are safely here at home.
If we thought it was a fight worth fighting, we'd fight it.
But you and I - we're smarter than that.
 
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:06:54 -0500, Harold Burton
<hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
who said :

>
>If so, what can one make of DemocRAT Franklin Roosevelt's fire bombing
>of Dresden and Tokyo? He must have had on hell of an orgasm over them.


It Roosevelt's day it was revenge, a very intense emotion. Americans
have no right to revenge in either Afghanistan or Iraq. Americans
have done almost all the killing and ALL the killing of innocents who
wanted no part of the war. No American kids or civilians have been
killed or tortured in the Iraq war.

--
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
 
"Phlip" <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:wsadnfBSWqtTsKPanZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@adelphia.com...
> Harry Dope wrote:
>
>> Think this is bad? You could have fooled me by the silence from the
>> left wing kooks.

>
>> TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan for
>> teaching English to his classmates, police said.

>
> Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
> years ago!
>


Why are there still rats in the sewers ?
Why are there all sorts of bugs in houses ?
You will never be able to completely eradicate ANY form of vermin
At best you can hold them at bay
But you have to keep on them otherwise they come back
 
"Phlip" <phlipcpp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eaGdnbvsCL-w0qPanZ2dnUVZ_uiknZ2d@adelphia.com...
>>>Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
>>>years ago!
>>>

>> Because there is a never-ending supply of brainwashed assholes, coming
>> from the high country that is nominally part of Pakistan, but is
>> really no-man's-land. Same reason we're still in Iraq; it will take a
>> long time to exhaust the supply of inbred defective Islamists.

>
> And Musharraf, from the capital, he ain't one of them guys, right?
>


Do you even have the ability to make intelligent comparisons ?
Has Musharaf gone around shooting 16 year-olds for teaching English ?

> And he's still our ally, right?
>


Yup
And doesn't that just burn you up ?
 
"Duke Of Earl" <stingray66@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:13jsoj4cpsd4768@corp.supernews.com...
> Where do come up with this crap
>


Where do you think crap comes from ?
Try boning up on basic anatomy
 
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:21:40 -0500, Harry Dope wrote:

> Think this is bad? You could have fooled me by the silence from the left
> wing kooks.



The US military has killed more innocent people the the Taliban

But you'd never know it from the silence of the right wing kooks
 
>> And Musharraf, from the capital, he ain't one of them guys, right?

> Do you even have the ability to make intelligent comparisons ?


You see that ? thing on the end of my sentence?

> Has Musharaf gone around shooting 16 year-olds for teaching English ?


Duh, he has people to do that, complete with patsies and cover stories!

>> And he's still our ally, right?


> Yup
> And doesn't that just burn you up ?


His nukes might.

Thank you, Bush, for letting a non-Jewish Mid-East dictator develop a
nuclear arsenal!!
 
>> Uh, exactly why is the Taliban still there? I thought we defeated them
>> years ago!


> Why are there still rats in the sewers ?


Because we also attacked the cats?
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-348FA8.22065416112007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <v7msj3115de46tbuv88nd91fphlakv7qfq@4ax.com>,
> Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:21:40 -0500, "Harry Dope" <HHHA@aol.com> wrote,
>> quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >TALIBAN militants shot dead a teenage boy in southeastern Afghanistan
>> >for
>> >teaching English to his classmates, police said.

>>
>> American soldiers meanwhile napalmed a school killing 30 children. No
>> motive was given, presumable it enhance their sadistic masturbatory
>> fantasties.

>
> If so, what can one make of DemocRAT Franklin Roosevelt's fire bombing
> of Dresden and Tokyo? He must have had on hell of an orgasm over them.
>
> Snicker.


You snicker over Tojo bombing innocent Americans at Pearl Harbor?
 
"Phlip" <phlipcpp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pp-dnVyt-oFwmaLanZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@adelphia.com...
>>> And Musharraf, from the capital, he ain't one of them guys, right?

>
>> Do you even have the ability to make intelligent comparisons ?

>
> You see that ? thing on the end of my sentence?
>
>> Has Musharaf gone around shooting 16 year-olds for teaching English ?

>
> Duh, he has people to do that, complete with patsies and cover stories!
>


And naurally you can back that up WITH EVIDENCE ?


>>> And he's still our ally, right?

>
>> Yup
>> And doesn't that just burn you up ?

>
> His nukes might.
>
> Thank you, Bush, for letting a non-Jewish Mid-East dictator develop a
> nuclear arsenal!!



Pakistan did that BEFORE Musharaf
Get a clue
 
Back
Top