S
sandman
Guest
Below is an article that just rubs it in........Plus they are STILL playing
that security announcement, "Code Orange has been declared.....etc...." over
and over every 15 minutes throughout every airport in the country 24/7 for
the past 6 years. It is insulting, humilitating, infuriating, especially
to those who know 9/11 was an inside/outside job, devoid of hijackers, and
the only terrorists are in D.C. I hate having to fly now.
--------------------------------
No proof that airport security makes flying any safer. Main purpose is to
keep people focused on terrorism and submissive to government. Reuters
Posted 2007 Dec 22 (Cached)
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N20228618.htm
No proof airport security makes flying safer-study 21 Dec 2007 01:44:02 GMT
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON, Dec 20 (Reuters) - Airport security lines can annoy passengers,
but there is no evidence that they make flying any safer, U.S. researchers
reported on Thursday.
A team at the Harvard School of Public Health could not find any studies
showing whether the time-consuming process of X-raying carry-on luggage
prevents hijackings or attacks.
They also found no evidence to suggest that making passengers take off their
shoes and confiscating small items prevented any incidents.
The U.S. Transportation Security Administration told research teams
requesting information their need for quick new security measures trumped
the usefulness of evaluating them, Eleni Linos, Elizabeth Linos, and Graham
Colditz reported in the British Medical Journal.
"We noticed that new airport screening protocols were implemented
immediately after news reports of terror threats," they wrote.
"Even without clear evidence of the accuracy of testing, the Transportation
Security Administration defended its measures by reporting that more than 13
million prohibited items were intercepted in one year," the researchers
added. "Most of these illegal items were lighters."
The researchers said it would be interesting to apply medical standards to
airport security. Screening programs for illnesses like cancer are usually
not broadly instituted unless they have been shown to work.
"We'd like airport security screening to be of value. As passengers and
members of the public we'd like to know the evidence and the reasoning
behind these measures," Linos said in a telephone interview.
"Can you hide anything in your shoes that you cannot hide in your
underwear?" they asked.
TSA spokesman Christopher White said the agency has not had a chance to read
the article.
"If anyone has questions about whether our efforts have been fruitful over
the past five years -- come on," White said in a telephone interview.
"While we can't publicize everything that we've done, every event, we can
say definitively that our efforts over the last five years have not been for
nothing," White added.
With $5.6 billion spent globally on airport protection each year, the public
should be encouraged to query some screening requirements -- such as forcing
passengers to remove their shoes, the researchers said.
White said the agency has pictures of shoe bombs on its Web site at
(http://www.tsa.gov/) and welcomes people to examine them. "We encourage a
legitimate public dialogue. We want passengers to understand why we do what
we do," he said. (Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Eric Walsh)
that security announcement, "Code Orange has been declared.....etc...." over
and over every 15 minutes throughout every airport in the country 24/7 for
the past 6 years. It is insulting, humilitating, infuriating, especially
to those who know 9/11 was an inside/outside job, devoid of hijackers, and
the only terrorists are in D.C. I hate having to fly now.
--------------------------------
No proof that airport security makes flying any safer. Main purpose is to
keep people focused on terrorism and submissive to government. Reuters
Posted 2007 Dec 22 (Cached)
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N20228618.htm
No proof airport security makes flying safer-study 21 Dec 2007 01:44:02 GMT
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON, Dec 20 (Reuters) - Airport security lines can annoy passengers,
but there is no evidence that they make flying any safer, U.S. researchers
reported on Thursday.
A team at the Harvard School of Public Health could not find any studies
showing whether the time-consuming process of X-raying carry-on luggage
prevents hijackings or attacks.
They also found no evidence to suggest that making passengers take off their
shoes and confiscating small items prevented any incidents.
The U.S. Transportation Security Administration told research teams
requesting information their need for quick new security measures trumped
the usefulness of evaluating them, Eleni Linos, Elizabeth Linos, and Graham
Colditz reported in the British Medical Journal.
"We noticed that new airport screening protocols were implemented
immediately after news reports of terror threats," they wrote.
"Even without clear evidence of the accuracy of testing, the Transportation
Security Administration defended its measures by reporting that more than 13
million prohibited items were intercepted in one year," the researchers
added. "Most of these illegal items were lighters."
The researchers said it would be interesting to apply medical standards to
airport security. Screening programs for illnesses like cancer are usually
not broadly instituted unless they have been shown to work.
"We'd like airport security screening to be of value. As passengers and
members of the public we'd like to know the evidence and the reasoning
behind these measures," Linos said in a telephone interview.
"Can you hide anything in your shoes that you cannot hide in your
underwear?" they asked.
TSA spokesman Christopher White said the agency has not had a chance to read
the article.
"If anyone has questions about whether our efforts have been fruitful over
the past five years -- come on," White said in a telephone interview.
"While we can't publicize everything that we've done, every event, we can
say definitively that our efforts over the last five years have not been for
nothing," White added.
With $5.6 billion spent globally on airport protection each year, the public
should be encouraged to query some screening requirements -- such as forcing
passengers to remove their shoes, the researchers said.
White said the agency has pictures of shoe bombs on its Web site at
(http://www.tsa.gov/) and welcomes people to examine them. "We encourage a
legitimate public dialogue. We want passengers to understand why we do what
we do," he said. (Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Eric Walsh)
