The AGE of CONSENT

A couple debates here:

 

Do you think that the age of consent should be the same all across the country?

 

What do you think the age of consent should be?

 

At what point should the elder of the two in a relationship be punished for being with a person underage? (I wasn't quite sure how to word this. Example: Lulu is 15, Billy is 19: should he be put in jail? What if she was 14? Where is the line?)

 

Should those that break the age of consent laws be labeled a sex offender if the younger of the two is NOT under the age of 13? Should there be a new category for these "sex offenders"?

 

 

 

This (Sexual deviance) is my area of concentration within my major (Criminology). I am always curious as to what answers people have regarding sex crimes.

personally... I think age of consent is what ever age they're at when they consent to it... I personally won't touch anyone younger than 18 even if it was legal... But if she's 15 and wants to have sex with her 19 YO boy friend... that's her fucking problem.... and his! Let them hash it out....

Not really so much punishment if one is under age (Nothing wrong with a 17 y/o and an 18 y/o) but just have it low enough so that actual children and pre-teens who are flat out too young and therefore don't really know what sex is, and aren't physically and mentally devloped for it are off limits.

Considering the age of consent issue is a morality issue, and a cultural issue, and it will vary in all parts of the world, the LOGICAL age of consent, should be when the male or female reaches puberty and is able to reproduce. While that WILL make the age of consent somewhere like 11 or 12, it should be up to a parent to enforce an abstinence policy with there children. Pedophilia and other such crimes are crimes of culture. In some cultures, mainly uncivilized (supposedly) cultures, it is very common for a male or female to lose there virginity at a young age as this, and have sexual contact with others without anybody thinking it is wrong otherwise.

 

.

.

Sex after school is done. Point blank. If they don't go to school? 18 then.

Interesting case in our headlines not so long ago.

 

The residents of remote Pitcairn Island have been turning a blind eye to paedophile activity in their midst for so long, that it became passe.

 

There are so few men on Pitcairn, that the jail (gaol) that will house them had to be built by those who will reside in that prison.

 

I find that Pitcairn's problems don't necessarily reflect on society as a whole. This is just what happens when you place a small group of people in extremely isolated conditions. Pitcairn Islanders are direct descendants of the crew of The Bounty; an English exploratory ship. Mutineers, who set their captain and officers adrift in a lifeboat.

 

ADAMSTOWN (Pitcairn Island), october 20 In a wooden post office on a small rock in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, a confessed child molester is selling stamps. The postman is Dennis Christian, and his customers are two black-gowned lawyers, each clutching a postcard bearing the slogan

I think it should be 17!

I mean your about to be legal and you have made up your mind if your gonna have sex or not. I think if they are any younger, charges should be filed even if the parents dont want to. Kids think they are ready for adult activities but most of them would BITCH if you told them they had to get a job. SO 17...i dont care if both are 15 yrs old...TOO FUCKING YOUNG TO HAVE SEX!

And if you were living in a remote village with a tribe from say Africa that DID let younger people have sex, you would think NOTHING of the age if said person was 12. Like I said, it's a cultural issue. Pedophilia is ALSO a culture issue.

 

.

.

Yeah i meant in AMERICA!!!

Africa and other countries are different....but here i think as a society it should be 17 because maturity hasnt yet set in but most think it has so...

Considering the age of consent issue is a morality issue, and a cultural issue, and it will vary in all parts of the world, the LOGICAL age of consent, should be when the male or female reaches puberty and is able to reproduce. While that WILL make the age of consent somewhere like 11 or 12, it should be up to a parent to enforce an abstinence policy with there children. Pedophilia and other such crimes are crimes of culture. In some cultures, mainly uncivilized (supposedly) cultures, it is very common for a male or female to lose there virginity at a young age as this, and have sexual contact with others without anybody thinking it is wrong otherwise.

 

.

.

 

People usually freak out when I bring up the cultural issue. Excellent point.

First this issue is in the domain of the states. the federal government has no business in this. If it was up to me the age would be 14.

First this issue is in the domain of the states. the federal government has no business in this. If it was up to me the age would be 14.

 

I know it is a state issue, I am asking if it SHOULD be.

Yes, it should remain a state issue. The federal government was not granted the authority to infringe on the state's domain on this issue. Any attempt to nationalize age of consent laws would be blatantly unconstitutional. The people of Arkansas and the people of New York can disagree on the age of consent and both have their way.

If this were a morality or cultural thing, it wouldnt be a law, would it? Some parts of the world do think it's ok to make a girl a bride at 12, and to them, that' s normal.

I think there are more men everywhere interested in dating younger women than the other way around. I'm not really sure what the attraction is for a grown man to want a girl who's pre-teen. I get a hint of him having power over her maybe because I dont see the "thrill" of it.

 

It seems that these days young people are maturing faster, at least physically. And also that kids are starting to have sex at a younger age on average. I dont know the statistics of it all, that's just what I see. I know when I was in high school, I wasnt ready for all that. I didnt even kiss anyone till i was in high school. I think it's hard to dicatate when someone should be able to consent to having sex. Two 14 year olds could consent to having sex with each other and that's ok, but it's wrong if it's a 14 and an 18 year old?

 

I have gone to dating websites and most of the men on there put in their profile that the age they're looking for in a partner is significantly younger than their own age. Not many of them seem too interested in finding someone their own age. Does that mean that women their age are not attractive?

Maybe they want someone who still has a few eggs left or maybe they just want someone who's breast are perky? I dont know.

A 16 yr old can drive, an 18 yr old can join the military, a 21 yr old can drink.

The age at which a person acts with maturity is not universal. I've met some 20 year old who didnt know their ass fromtheir elbow, and some who had their shit together. I guess for the sake of putting down a number, I'd say 18. Becuase at 18 a person can leave their parent's house, sometimes is expected to leave, can join the military and so can therefore, make decisions for themselves.

Younger than that? well theyre only allowed to have sex with people their age.

Yes, it should remain a state issue. The federal government was not granted the authority to infringe on the state's domain on this issue. Any attempt to nationalize age of consent laws would be blatantly unconstitutional. The people of Arkansas and the people of New York can disagree on the age of consent and both have their way.

 

 

I disagree. I think there needs to be a nationwide agreement on this. How can we allow a state to label a man a sex offender in one state, when if he had been in another, he would have been perfectly fine?

What you are proposing, unless there is an amendment, is blatantly unconstitutional. There were solid reasons our founding fathers strongly limited the powers of the federal government 1) Localized power allows people to vote with their feet. If you do not like the laws of one state you can move to another, more importantly 2) the division of powers, our federal system which divides powers between the states and federal government, provides a check on federal tyranny. The conditions in states differ the voters of those states should decide these issues. Wasddhington DC does not need to tell someone in Montana who they can screw. There is no federal jurisdiction for people committing sex crimes within the boundaries of a state, unless on federal property. What you are proposing is ending the US's status as a republic.

What you are proposing, unless there is an amendment, is blatantly unconstitutional. There were solid reasons our founding fathers strongly limited the powers of the federal government 1) Localized power allows people to vote with their feet. If you do not like the laws of one state you can move to another, more importantly 2) the division of powers, our federal system which divides powers between the states and federal government, provides a check on federal tyranny. The conditions in states differ the voters of those states should decide these issues. Wasddhington DC does not need to tell someone in Montana who they can screw. There is no federal jurisdiction for people committing sex crimes within the boundaries of a state, unless on federal property. What you are proposing is ending the US's status as a republic.

 

 

You do bring up a good point, and it would be a sticky issue to try to get around this. I just cannot understand how there can be such a broad difference of political opinion from state to state on this issue. I feel it is unfair to the citizens of the state.

I just don't see anything that different. States also differ in what crimes are felonies and misdemeanors. It is just the citizens of the states exercising control of their criminal system. I personally think your average 14 year old can say no and that voluntarily sexual intercourse at that age , providing steps are taken to prevent pregnancy and disease, will do no harm. I think it is sad that people label ephebophila as pedophilia. The Catholic priest scandals really involved almost exclusively ephebophilia, sexual intercourse with a post puberty minor, not pedophilia.

Sex after school is done. Point blank. If they don't go to school? 18 then.

 

It would keep a LOT of people from fucking their lives up.

Yeah i think this should be a nationwide thing

I dont care what a lot of OLDER people think on this subject but I know having sex shouldnt be an activity every little kid should do after school.

Those things should be homework...sports....things like that. SEX is a grown persons sport. It is not what two 15 yr olds need to be doing while their parents are working so maybe their kids can go to college.

I think 17 like i said before because you about to be a LEGAL adult, you can join the military w/ parent consent so....17!

16 is still WAY to young....

How bad do you think this girl should be punished if punished at all.

My friend that is 19 went out and started dating this guy that turns out to be 15. Of course she didn't know this when she started going out with him he kept it a secret it's been almost a year and then she suddenly finds out. This "kid" has no curfew doesn't go to school and has regular full-time job, the only reason she found out is because she came across his baby book.

The dilemma with her is that she knows it's wrong but the relationship was going fine, I've never seen her as happy and he loves her they where planning on moving in together. He's more responsible than many "adult men", hell I think he's more responsible than my b/f, fiance whatever.

It would keep a LOT of people from fucking their lives up.

 

Exactly. 18. Or at least until they get out of school. Too many stupid kids and oblivious (or equally stupid) parents around for these people to be having sex and spreading their already sorry genetics. Not to mention the disease these careless rejects could possibly spread.

I say the younger the better.

 

Kidding.

 

Who knows? People mature much differently than one another, ie girls faster than boys, et.al.

 

I should say eighteen because they become legal, in my state, to purchase cigarettes at that age. And what better way to ring in the age of consent than to fire up a carton of Pall Malls?

LOL R.O Pall Malls? thats nasty.

But seriously how do you y'all think this girl should be punished?

I was quoting an insurance repair job today, in an inhabited house, and there was this striking young girl, with beautiful eyes, sitting under a doona. I would have picked her for thirteen at the most.

 

Not to be batting off, but every time I looked, she was making googly eyes at me. I was wondering why she wasn't at school.

 

As I made my way out, the young lass rose from her chair, revealing a mid-stage gestation tummy. WTF? Is it happening at that age? Of course it is.

 

Horniness knows no bounds. Is it right? Hell no. Enjoy your own childhood.