The Hitlary KKKlinton KKKorruption Stench Is Driving Away Voters Of All Ages

"Clinton Donor Under a Cloud in Fraud Case

By MIKE McINTIRE and LESLIE EATON

Published: August 30, 2007

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign said yesterday that it would

give to charity $23,000 it had received from a prominent Democratic

donor, and review thousands of dollars more that he had raised, after

learning that the authorities in California had a warrant for his

arrest stemming from a 1991 fraud case."

(Democ)RATS! YOU WILL BE STUPID ENOUGH TO NOMINATE HER!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/30/us/politics/30bundler.html?ex=1189051200&en=00ee337c9e083c5f&ei=5099&partner=TOPIXNEWS

The donor, Norman Hsu, has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for

Democratic candidates since 2003, and was slated to be co-host next

month for a Clinton gala featuring the entertainer Quincy Jones.

The event would not have been unusual for Mr. Hsu, a businessman from

Hong Kong who moves in circles of power and influence, serving on the

board of a university in New York and helping to bankroll Democratic

campaigns.

But what was not widely known was that Mr. Hsu, who is in the apparel

business in New York, has been considered a fugitive since he failed

to show up in a San Mateo County courtroom about 15 years ago to be

sentenced for his role in a scheme to defraud investors, according to

the California attorney general's office.

Mr. Hsu had pleaded no contest to one count of grand theft and was

facing up to three years in prison.

The travails of Mr. Hsu have proved an embarrassment for the Clinton

campaign, which has strived to project an image of rectitude in its

fund-raising and to dispel any lingering shadows of past episodes of

tainted contributions.

Already, Mrs. Clinton's opponents were busy trying to rekindle

remembrances of the 1996 Democratic fund-raising scandals, in which

Asian moneymen were accused of funneling suspect donations into

Democratic coffers as President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al

Gore were running for re-election.

Some Clinton donors said yesterday that they did not expect the Hsu

matter to hurt Mrs. Clinton unless a pattern of problematic fund-

raising or compromised donors emerged, which would raise questions

about the campaign's vetting of donors. Mr. Hsu's legal problems were

first reported yesterday by The Los Angeles Times; The Wall Street

Journal reported Tuesday about his bundling of questionable

contributions.

"Everyone is trying to make the implications that it's Chinese money,

that it's the Al Gore thing all over again, but I haven't seen any

proof of that," said John A. Catsimatidis, a leading donor and fund-

raiser for Mrs. Clinton in New York.

Some donations connected to Mr. Hsu raise questions about his bundling

activities, although there is no evidence he did anything improper.

The Wall Street Journal reported that contributors he solicited

included members of an extended family in Daly City, Calif., who had

given $213,000 to candidates since 2004, even though some of them did

not appear to have much money.

A lawyer for Mr. Hsu, E. Lawrence Barcella Jr., has said that Mr. Hsu

was not the source of any of the money he raised from other people,

which would be a violation of federal election laws.

On his own, Mr. Hsu wrote checks totaling $255,970 to a variety of

Democratic candidates and committees since 2004. Even though he was a

bundler for Mrs. Clinton, his largess was spread across the Democratic

Party and included $5,000 to the political action committee of Senator

Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois.

Last month, Mr. Hsu was among the honored guests at a fund-raiser for

Representative Patrick J. Kennedy, Democrat of Rhode Island, given by

Stephen A. Schwarzman of the Blackstone Group at the New York Yacht

Club.

Al Franken, a Democratic Senate candidate in Minnesota, said he would

divest his campaign of Mr. Hsu's donations, as did Representatives

Michael M. Honda and Doris O. Matsui of California and Representative

Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania, all Democrats.

Mr. Hsu's success on the political circuit was not always matched by

success in business.

Born and raised in Hong Kong, Mr. Hsu came to the United States when

he was 18 to attend the University of California, Berkeley, as a

computer science major. He later received an M.B.A. at the Wharton

School at the University of Pennsylvania, according to a brief

biography that appeared in apparel industry trade publications in

1986.

With a group of partners from Hong Kong, Mr. Hsu started a sportswear

company in 1982 called Laveno that went bankrupt two years later, not

long after he left the company. From that, he cycled through several

other enterprises, mostly men's sportswear, under the Wear This, Base

and Foreign Exchange labels.

Mr. Hsu's career hit a low in 1989, when he began raising $1 million

from investors as part of a plan to buy and resell latex gloves.

Ronald Smetana, a lawyer with the California attorney general's

office, said Mr. Hsu was charged with stealing the investors' money

after it turned out he never bought any gloves and had no contract to

resell them.

When Mr. Hsu was to attend a sentencing hearing, he faxed a letter to

his lawyer saying he had to leave town for an emergency and asking

that the court date be rescheduled, Mr. Smetana said.

He failed to show up for the rescheduled appearance, and a bench

warrant was issued for his arrest. That was the last that prosecutors

saw of Mr. Hsu.

"We assumed he would go back to Hong Kong, where he could recede into

anonymity," Mr. Smetana said.

The California attorney general's office declined to comment on how it

intends to pursue Mr. Hsu.

Mr. Hsu issued a statement yesterday, saying he was "surprised to

learn that there appears to be an outstanding warrant" and insisting

that he had "not sought to evade any of my obligations and certainly

not the law."

"I would not consciously subject any of the candidates and causes in

which I believe to any harm through my actions," he said.

At some point, Mr. Hsu resurfaced in New York, where he was connected

to several clothing-related businesses, according to campaign finance

records, which list his occupation variously as an apparel consultant,

clothing designer, retailer or company president. He also began to

donate to the Democratic Party, and arranged for friends to do the

same.

He has been referred to in news accounts of campaign fund-raising

events as an "apparel magnate" and his quick rise in the New York

political and social scene - as well as his open checkbook -

catapulted him into the big leagues.

He became a trustee at the New School and was elected to the Board of

Governors of Eugene Lang College there. He endowed a scholarship in

his name at the college and was co-chairman of a benefit awards dinner

in 2006 that featured Mrs. Clinton, who had secured a $950,000 earmark

for a mentoring program at the college for disadvantaged city youths.

Asked yesterday about Mr. Hsu, Brian Krapf, a spokesman for the New

School, said in a statement that "it is inappropriate to talk about a

matter involving one of our trustees, particularly while we are still

gathering all the facts."

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:58:44 -0700, PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com

wrote:

>"Clinton Donor Under a Cloud in Fraud Case

>By MIKE McINTIRE and LESLIE EATON

>Published: August 30, 2007

>Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign said yesterday that it would

>give to charity $23,000 it had received from a prominent Democratic

>donor, and review thousands of dollars more that he had raised, after

>learning that the authorities in California had a warrant for his

>arrest stemming from a 1991 fraud case."

>(Democ)RATS! YOU WILL BE STUPID ENOUGH TO NOMINATE HER!!!!!!!!!!

>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/30/us/politics/30bundler.html?ex=1189051200&en=00ee337c9e083c5f&ei=5099&partner=TOPIXNEWS

>The donor, Norman Hsu, has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for

>Democratic candidates since 2003, and was slated to be co-host next

>month for a Clinton gala featuring the entertainer Quincy Jones.

Gosh, you would THINK those "law and order Republicans" would have

picked him up at some point over the past six years, what we him being

a federal fugitive out in plain sight and all.

Isn't Homeland Security supposed to be an falible protection against

criminals and terrorists?

>

>The event would not have been unusual for Mr. Hsu, a businessman from

>Hong Kong who moves in circles of power and influence, serving on the

>board of a university in New York and helping to bankroll Democratic

>campaigns.

>

>But what was not widely known was that Mr. Hsu, who is in the apparel

>business in New York, has been considered a fugitive since he failed

>to show up in a San Mateo County courtroom about 15 years ago to be

>sentenced for his role in a scheme to defraud investors, according to

>the California attorney general's office.

>

>Mr. Hsu had pleaded no contest to one count of grand theft and was

>facing up to three years in prison.

>

>The travails of Mr. Hsu have proved an embarrassment for the Clinton

>campaign, which has strived to project an image of rectitude in its

>fund-raising and to dispel any lingering shadows of past episodes of

>tainted contributions.

>

>Already, Mrs. Clinton's opponents were busy trying to rekindle

>remembrances of the 1996 Democratic fund-raising scandals, in which

>Asian moneymen were accused of funneling suspect donations into

>Democratic coffers as President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al

>Gore were running for re-election.

>

>Some Clinton donors said yesterday that they did not expect the Hsu

>matter to hurt Mrs. Clinton unless a pattern of problematic fund-

>raising or compromised donors emerged, which would raise questions

>about the campaign's vetting of donors. Mr. Hsu's legal problems were

>first reported yesterday by The Los Angeles Times; The Wall Street

>Journal reported Tuesday about his bundling of questionable

>contributions.

>

>"Everyone is trying to make the implications that it's Chinese money,

>that it's the Al Gore thing all over again, but I haven't seen any

>proof of that," said John A. Catsimatidis, a leading donor and fund-

>raiser for Mrs. Clinton in New York.

>

>Some donations connected to Mr. Hsu raise questions about his bundling

>activities, although there is no evidence he did anything improper.

>The Wall Street Journal reported that contributors he solicited

>included members of an extended family in Daly City, Calif., who had

>given $213,000 to candidates since 2004, even though some of them did

>not appear to have much money.

>

>A lawyer for Mr. Hsu, E. Lawrence Barcella Jr., has said that Mr. Hsu

>was not the source of any of the money he raised from other people,

>which would be a violation of federal election laws.

>

>On his own, Mr. Hsu wrote checks totaling $255,970 to a variety of

>Democratic candidates and committees since 2004. Even though he was a

>bundler for Mrs. Clinton, his largess was spread across the Democratic

>Party and included $5,000 to the political action committee of Senator

>Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois.

>

>Last month, Mr. Hsu was among the honored guests at a fund-raiser for

>Representative Patrick J. Kennedy, Democrat of Rhode Island, given by

>Stephen A. Schwarzman of the Blackstone Group at the New York Yacht

>Club.

>

>Al Franken, a Democratic Senate candidate in Minnesota, said he would

>divest his campaign of Mr. Hsu's donations, as did Representatives

>Michael M. Honda and Doris O. Matsui of California and Representative

>Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania, all Democrats.

>

>Mr. Hsu's success on the political circuit was not always matched by

>success in business.

>

>Born and raised in Hong Kong, Mr. Hsu came to the United States when

>he was 18 to attend the University of California, Berkeley, as a

>computer science major. He later received an M.B.A. at the Wharton

>School at the University of Pennsylvania, according to a brief

>biography that appeared in apparel industry trade publications in

>1986.

>

>With a group of partners from Hong Kong, Mr. Hsu started a sportswear

>company in 1982 called Laveno that went bankrupt two years later, not

>long after he left the company. From that, he cycled through several

>other enterprises, mostly men's sportswear, under the Wear This, Base

>and Foreign Exchange labels.

>

>Mr. Hsu's career hit a low in 1989, when he began raising $1 million

>from investors as part of a plan to buy and resell latex gloves.

>

>Ronald Smetana, a lawyer with the California attorney general's

>office, said Mr. Hsu was charged with stealing the investors' money

>after it turned out he never bought any gloves and had no contract to

>resell them.

>

>When Mr. Hsu was to attend a sentencing hearing, he faxed a letter to

>his lawyer saying he had to leave town for an emergency and asking

>that the court date be rescheduled, Mr. Smetana said.

>

>He failed to show up for the rescheduled appearance, and a bench

>warrant was issued for his arrest. That was the last that prosecutors

>saw of Mr. Hsu.

>

>"We assumed he would go back to Hong Kong, where he could recede into

>anonymity," Mr. Smetana said.

>

>The California attorney general's office declined to comment on how it

>intends to pursue Mr. Hsu.

>

>Mr. Hsu issued a statement yesterday, saying he was "surprised to

>learn that there appears to be an outstanding warrant" and insisting

>that he had "not sought to evade any of my obligations and certainly

>not the law."

>

>"I would not consciously subject any of the candidates and causes in

>which I believe to any harm through my actions," he said.

>

>At some point, Mr. Hsu resurfaced in New York, where he was connected

>to several clothing-related businesses, according to campaign finance

>records, which list his occupation variously as an apparel consultant,

>clothing designer, retailer or company president. He also began to

>donate to the Democratic Party, and arranged for friends to do the

>same.

>

>He has been referred to in news accounts of campaign fund-raising

>events as an "apparel magnate" and his quick rise in the New York

>political and social scene - as well as his open checkbook -

>catapulted him into the big leagues.

>

>He became a trustee at the New School and was elected to the Board of

>Governors of Eugene Lang College there. He endowed a scholarship in

>his name at the college and was co-chairman of a benefit awards dinner

>in 2006 that featured Mrs. Clinton, who had secured a $950,000 earmark

>for a mentoring program at the college for disadvantaged city youths.

>

>Asked yesterday about Mr. Hsu, Brian Krapf, a spokesman for the New

>School, said in a statement that "it is inappropriate to talk about a

>matter involving one of our trustees, particularly while we are still

>gathering all the facts."

Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:

"German women, German men !

It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the

Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.

Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not

forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National

Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily

politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very

unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic

intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not

respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the

woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different

value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German

woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best

sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other

areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but

also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in

the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices

and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best

suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless

devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the

past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea

of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread

winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the

man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is

not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her

talents and abilities.

Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the

frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men

were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to

the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men

always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all

great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination

have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually

loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the

woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must

be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our

attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in

government, politics, economics and social relations has not left

women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought

impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some

good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that

are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations

have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set

in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a

distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with

former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary

and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most

suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious

duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can

continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of

the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the

builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's

source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place

for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,

in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that

those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in

the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their

abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other

ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially

reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to

fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.

It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no

intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer

and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.

But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in

motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the

living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning

to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more

rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected

to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and

her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in

our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now

the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most

evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's

birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without

emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The

government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the

resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental

change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is

responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying

about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each

elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by

1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are

the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it

will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine

the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our

national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The

national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation

on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the

woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends

to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of

our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our

blood is assured..."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html