The Nameless War - 1933: Jewry Declares War

The English edition of Mein Kampf was still in the process of

printing and publication when Jewry declared war on the national

Socialist regime, and started an intensive blockade against Germany.

The International Jewish Boycott Conference was assembled in

Holland in the summer of 1933 under the Presidency of Mr. Samuel

Untermeyer <http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/unt.htm>, of the

U.S.A., who was elected President of the World Jewish Economic

Federation formed to combat the opposition to Jews in Germany.

On his return to the U.S.A., Mr. Untermeyer gave an address over

Station W.A.B.C., the text of which, as printed in the New York Times of

August 7th, 1933

<http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/untermeyer.htm>, I have

before me. Mr. Untermeyer referred in the opening phrases to:

"The holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked";

and proceeded to develop the subject at great length, describing

the Jews as the aristocrats of the world.

"Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in

this sacred war should do so now and here."

Those Jews who did not join in he denounced, declaring:

"They are traitors to their race."

In January 1934 Mr. Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism,

wrote in / Natcha Retch /:

"The fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every

Jewish community, conference, trade organisation, by every Jew in

the world . . . we shall let loose a spiritual and a material war of

the whole world against Germany."

This is perhaps the most confident assertion extant on the Jewish

claim, set out in the Protocols of Zion, that they can bring about war.

Protocol Number 7 states:

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by a

State by war with its neighbour. If these should venture to stand

collectively, by universal war."

[Like the neverendingwar on "terror" today]

It should be remembered here that a copy of these Protocols was

filed in the British Museum in 1906.

By 1938 the Jewish war was in full swing; and already through their

influence or pressure many Gentile persons and groups were being drawn

into the vortex. Various members of the British Socialist Party were

openly advocating joining in this cold war; and a vigorous and

uncompromising clique was growing in all Parties under the leadership of

Messrs. Churchill, Amery, Duff, Cooper and others.

"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this

year, but later on,"

screamed the Jew Emil Ludwig in the June copy of /Les Aniles/ 1934.

On June 3rd, 1938, matters were carried a long step further by an

article in the /American Hebrew/ , the weekly organ of American Jewry.

This article, which opened by showing that Hitler never deviated from

his Mein Kampf doctrine, went on to threaten the direst retaliation.

"It has become patent that a combination of Britain, France and

Russia will sooner or later bar the triumphant march (of Hitler) . . .

Either by accident or design, a Jew has come to a position of

foremost importance in each of these nations. In the hands of

non-Aryans lies the fate and the very lives of millions . . .

In France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum . . . Leon Blum may yet

be the Moses who will lead . . .

Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet super salesman, is the Jew who sits at the

right hand of Stalin, the little tin soldier of communism . . .

The English Jew of prominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha, Tommy Atkins'

new boss."

Later in this article we read:

"So it may come to pass that these three sons of Israel will form

the combine that will send the frenzied Nazi dictator to hell. And

when the smoke of battle clears ... and the man who played the

swastikaed Christus . . . is lowered into a hole in the ground . . .

as the trio of non-Aryans intone a ramified requiem . . .

a medley of the marseillaise, God Save the King, and the

Internationale, blending with a proud and aggressive rendering of

Eli Eli."

Two points in the above extract are worthy of special note.

Firstly, it is taken for granted that these three Jews will not for one

moment think or act as anything but Jews; and can be relied upon to

guide their Gentile dupes to ruin in a plainly Jewish war; secondly,

should be noted the contemptuous reference to the "swastikaed Christus,"

which Jewry looks forward to burying; and which reveals by its

classification the Jewish hatred of Christianity.

Meantime Jewish pressure was exerted to the utmost to incite

clashes between Sudeten, Czechs, Poles and Germans.

By September of 1938 matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr.

Chamberlain himself flew out to Munich and achieved the historic

settlement with Hitler. It seemed as though the war mongers had been

frustrated, and Europe saved. Rarely had such scenes and evidences of

spontaneous delight and thankfulness been evoked as were witnessed

throughout Britain and Europe at that triumph.

Those who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr

Chamberlain's work was certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember

remarking, on the very evening of his return from Munich, that within a

week every newspaper in this country and the war mongers in Parliament,

would be attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace; regardless

of the fact that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real

wishes of the people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.

Nowhere was the Jewish fury so obvious, of course, as in Moscow. I

have before me a leaflet of my own designing put out in October 1938. It

runs:

"Are you aware that Mr. Chamberlain was burnt in effigy in Moscow as

soon as it was known that he had secured peace;

Showing very clearly Who Wanted War, and who are still ceaselessly

working to stir up strife all the world over." See Appendix 4.

The attempt to provoke war over Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia

having failed, there remained only the detonator in the Polish Corridor,

that monstrosity born of the unholy Versailles Conference, and denounced

by honest men from Marshal Foch and Arthur Henderson, from that time

onwards.

One feature about the Versailles Conference has been kept secret by

those who possess the power to keep things from the public or to

proclaim things from the house tops. It is this:

All important decisions were taken by the "Big Four" - Britain,

France, Italy and the U.S.A., represented respectively by Mr. Lloyd

George, M. Clemencau, Baron Sonino and President Wilson. So much is

known. What is not known is that:

the secretary of Mr. Lloyd George was the Jew Sassoon;

of M. Clemencau the Jew Mandel Rothschild, now known as Mandel;

Baron Sonino was himself half a Jew: and President Wilson had

the Jew Brandeis;

the interpreter was another Jew named Mantoux; and

the Military Adviser yet another Jew called Kish.

It is known that Mr. Lloyd George and others were hazy about

geography. Their Jewish secretaries, however, were on the contrary very

much on the spot on such matters. These Jews met at 6 p.m. in the

evenings; and mapped out the decisions for the following day's

conference of the "Big Four."

The results were disastrous from the point of view of all decent

people, who hoped for an honourable treaty, with terms which, though

they might be stringent, would at least be just and thereby secure

lasting peace.

Foch himself loudly denounced the treaty; declaring that it

contained the certain makings of another war and deprecating in

particular the provision relating to Danzig and the Corridor.

Arthur Henderson and many public men joined in the denunciation;

but all to no avail. From the point of view of men planning another war,

however, nothing could have been better than this treaty.

All sorts of glaring injustices were ingrained in its text. In

addition to the Corridor, and the position at Danzig, a bastard State

was brought into being, in which Germans, Slovaks, etc., together

forming a majority of the country, were put under the tyrannical control

of the Czech minority, an element which had thrown in its lot with the

bolshevik Jews and fought against the Allies in 1918.

The design of this State was such geographically that it was

styled, and correctly styled, a dagger pointed at the heart of Germany.

It received the outlandish name of Czechoslovakia.

The whole of the industrial life from the huge Skoda arsenal

downwards was controlled by Jewish banking interests; while we have it

on the evidence of Lord Winterton that practically all the land was

mortgaged to the Jews (Hansard, October 1936).

Under this Messianic domination were enslaved huge sections of

populations, belonging to other nations, henceforward condemned to be

held down by force until some country should grow strong enough to

champion them.

This eventuality was, in my opinion, visualised and actually

fostered as we know by the huge loans to Germany from international

banking interests.

Let it not be forgotten that while Jewish bankers were pouring

money into Germany which was rebuilding the Wehrmacht on a bigger scale

than ever, a colossal campaign for peace and disarmament was launched in

this country. This not only succeeded in substantially disarming us; but

in creating an atmosphere in which Mr. Baldwin had to admit that he

dared not go to the country asking for more armaments, vital though he

knew our needs in sea, air and land forces to be. All prior of

course to the rise of Hitler.

To anyone who made a study of the personalities and powers behind

this so-called peace propaganda, as I did, there can be no doubt as to

whence the real drive and finance emanated.

To anyone appreciating the attitude of the press at that time, and

realising that had this disarmament propaganda been distasteful to those

who influence our publicity services, there would have blared forth a

torrent of invective against our "peace ballotters"; there is additional

proof that this campaign had the support of international Jewry, as had

the rearmament of Germany. But why? the simple will ask.

The answer is fairly simple, if once the purpose behind the Jewish

plan is understood.

"Out of the last war we brought the Soviet States of Russia; out of

the next war we will bring the Soviet States of Europe. . ."

had been the pronouncement at a world meeting of communist parties about

1932. To make the next war possible, therefore, the see-saw must be

balanced again; German strength built up, and British strength whittled

down.

Then the Europeans can fight each other to the death of one and

complete exhaustion of the other.

A dramatic surprise is in store for both sides. Neither is to be

the real winner. The real winner is quite a different army. This army is

the one that will receive the real attention. For 25 years it will be

built up under conditions of the greatest secrecy. Its leaders will not

show their strength until the conflict is well under way.

Not until a critical moment in the war will the European armies be

permitted to guess at the existence of the huge factories beyond the

Urals, or of the colossal proportions of the heavily mechanised hordes

which will then commence to roll westwards over Europe under the red

flag of Marxism.

[Note: These "huge factories" and "colossal proportions of the heavily

mechanised hords" are thanks to the American people, via the Lend Lease

Act <http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/lendlease.html>,

implemented before Americans were sucked into that war, and minutely

detailed in the Diaries of Major Jordan

<http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/01.html> (George Racey

Jordan).? Jackie]

In March 1939 a British guarantee to Poland was given by Mr.

Chamberlain on the strength of a false report to the effect that a

48-hour ultimatum had been delivered by Germany to the Poles.

This report subsequently turned out to be quite untrue.

The guarantee had been given, however, and the decision of peace or

war was now no longer in British hands. Jewry had the ball at its feet.

Can we doubt but that Poland was encouraged to ignore the German note of

March which set forth eminently reasonable suggestions for a peaceful

solution of the problem of the Corridor?

[Note: See Appendix 6 (we've added) for the Internet readers of this

book; information from the German White Book that correlates with

Captain Ramsey's statements here. -j]

Month after month no reply was vouchsafed by Poland to the German

note. Meanwhile, insult and outrage occurred with suspicious frequency

all along the German frontier, similar to the technique to which the

Jews later introduced the British in Palestine.

Day after day the British public was deluged with war propaganda

and misrepresentation of the situation. Finally their minds were closed

against any further regard to the demands of justice or reason by a new

slogan,

"You cannot trust Hitler's word."

With this lie the British public was finally stampeded into

throwing all reason and judgment to the winds and accepting at their

face value the war propaganda in the press.

This slogan was founded upon a misrepresentation of Hitler's

assurance given on more than one occasion after a "putsch" such as that

into Sudetenland, that he "intended to make no further demands."

The misrepresentation lay in the fact that the press steadily

obscured the major fact, that the "demands" to which Hitler referred

were all along five fold in character; and covered those five areas

taken from Germany by a dictated peace in which the population was

overwhelmingly German, i.e. Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia, parts

of Poland, the Corridor and Danzig.

As German troops occupied each successive section, it is, I

believe, accurate to say that Hitler declared, that he had no additional

demands to make. But here it must be clearly stated in the interests of

justice that he never said that this entailed reducing the demands which

he had originally very clearly delineated, and repeated on many

occasions, namely, the five areas in question.

The British public was deluded by its press into supposing that

when Hitler said he had no further demands, that there had never been

any statement of his full demands, some of which were still unfulfilled.

They were led to believe that Hitler either never had any other demands,

or that he had abandoned the rest as soon as he had obtained some of them.

When, therefore, the next installment was added, the press built on

this misunderstanding the fallacy that Hitler's word could not be

trusted. Honest dealing needs no such trickery and deception. Such

methods are only necessary to bolster up bad or unjust causes.

Fortunately we have the calm and dispassionate judgment in this

matter by no less a person than the late Lord Lothian, recently British

Ambassador to the U.S.A. In his last speech at Chatham House on this

subject he remarked:

"If the principle of self-determination had been applied in

Germany's favour, as it was applied against her, it would have meant

the return of Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the

Polish Corridor, and Danzig to the Reich."

Here is a very different presentment of the case to the one which

was foisted upon the British public in 1939; and it is the true one.

Small wonder that these facts had to be withheld from the ordinary citizen.

Had the British public realised the truth, that each of these

demands of Hitler's rested on a foundation of reasonable fairness, the

people of this island would have ruled out any question of war; and it

was war, not truth or justice, upon which international Jewry was resolved.

http://iamthewitness.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"If it were not for the strong support of the

Jewish community for this war with Iraq,

we would not be doing this.

The leaders of the Jewish community are

influential enough that they could change

the direction of where this is going,

and I think they should."

"Charges of 'dual loyalty' and countercharges of

anti-Semitism have become common in the feud,

with some war opponents even asserting that

Mr. Bush's most hawkish advisers "many of them Jewish"

are putting Israel's interests ahead of those of the

United States in provoking a war with Iraq to topple

Saddam Hussein," says the Washington Times.