M
Mickey MacMurphy
Guest
The French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the
history of Europe since the fall of Rome.
A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had a
mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other classes
in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and
with methods bearing not a trace of the principles enshrined in those
slogans.
Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all other
sections; and still less swept away every feature of the national life
and tradition, from King, religion, nobles, clergy, constitution, flag,
calendar, and place names, to coinage.
Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in view
of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in many
countries.
The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact:
the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It
was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything,
which had been France.
This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in
high places in the Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott,
but by Robes Pierre himself.
We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they
were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals; they
were, of course, Jews.
Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :
"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name
of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for
it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.
"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words
'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots
flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried
away the well-being of the world.
The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could
not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be
freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and
Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of
Zion-No. 1.
With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a
master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The
somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the
screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a
concerted and connected human drama.
When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of
1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936,
we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality.
"Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic."
Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization, and
vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary
are necessary for its successful preparation.
It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or "the
people" ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated and
costly operation. No mistake more-over could be more dangerous; for it
will result in total inability to recognize the true significance of
events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.
The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the
infliction of paralysis; and secondly, the striking of the blow or blows .
It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that the
secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are debt, loss of publicity
control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret organizations
in the doomed state .
Debt , particularly international debt, is the first and
over-mastering grip . Through it men in high places are suborned, and
alien powers and influences are introduced into the body politic. When
the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of
publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip
on industrialists.
The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the
right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the
revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow. Moral
corruption facilitates the whole process.
By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France.
The world's big financiers were firmly established.
"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver
stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France."
So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his /Life of Napoleon/ , and continues on
page 38:
"A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic
structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth
and had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in
lands, crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been
introduced, namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had
been given."
The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means
insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's advisers
decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of
France, the position could have been fairly easily righted. As it was
the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after another, who
either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the
international usurers.
Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only
grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or
silver, neither of which France produced.
And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these
manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside
down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon
millions of usurious loans?
The late Lady Queensborough, in her important work /Occult
Theocrac/ y gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from
/L'Anti-Semitisme/ by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.
In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother
Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses
Montifiore, as being directly concerned in financing the French
Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin and his son-in-law David
Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These names recall the
Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:
"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for
it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so
as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."
And Again:-
"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who .
. . come begging with outstretched palm."
No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France. Sir
Walter Scott in his /Life of Napoleon/ , Vol. 1, thus describes the
situation:-
"These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are
treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance
with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes
the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances.
By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights
granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought
to total confusion."
King Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of
growing confusion was Necker, "a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a
German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes:
"Necker had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a
representative of the debt system owning allegiance to that system."
We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in
Necker; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was
that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why the
national finances of France under his baneful aegis rapidly worsened, so
that after four years of his manipulations, the unfortunate King's
government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of
170,000,000 pounds.
By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England.
By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de
Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of
freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its
early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were ruthless
and unscrupulous men of blood.
The Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of
little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he
had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establishing of a
democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch. Having in addition but
little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the first and
most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he
probably scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine soon after
his base and ignominious role had been played .
The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure of
the Revolution was cast in much the same role. He was a much abler man
than d'Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all his
own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his own father.
He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of the
Jewish Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the Jewess
Mrs. Herz than was her husband. He was not only an early figure-head in
French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but introduced Illuminism
into France.
[Note: Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying
that: "Judaism is not a religion. It is a law religionized".
To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political
program (for World Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]
This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind
freemasonry. The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand
Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organized by cabalistic Jews.
It is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand
were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the latter
had introduced it into France, from Frankfurt, where its headquarters
had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.
In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as
though the heavenly powers themselves made a last moment attempt to warn
France and Europe against these massing powers of evil:
Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.
The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world
revolution.
Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the
Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered.
French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was
too far advanced, and no action resulted .
By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France
affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international
revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.
Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic
Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong
secret organization covering the whole of France.
Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under
that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was
converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans in
1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers that he was
invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were. The
name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were lit by
that light.
By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789,
the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret organizations was
complete.
Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well
advanced by then also.
This was the manner of its accomplishment.
By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his
reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.
In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over
his palace, estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his creditors, with
powers to form there a centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering,
gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres, art galleries,
athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form of every
variety of public debauchery.
In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property to
install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed
to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the enormous
crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and revolutionary output
of its printing presses and debating clubs.
As Scudder writes in /A Prince of the Blood/ :
"It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city."
It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the
creditors at the Palais royal was one de Laclos, a political adventurer
of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other pornographic
works, who was said "to study the politics of love because of his love
for politics."
This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was
linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and
most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins
thought likely to stand in their way. This process was known as
"L'infamie."
Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this
typically Jewish form of attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level
at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous than the weak and indolent
Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle to the
revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding
freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time
more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister
some years previously:
"I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much
about freemasonry. Here it is far from having the significance that
it may have elsewhere in Europe. Here everything is open and one
knows all. Then where could the danger be?
One might well be worried if it were a question of a political
secret society. But on the contrary the government lets it spread,
and it is only that which it seems, an association the objects of
which are union and charity.
One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion
to say that people who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing
plots. Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told God is on
the lips of all. They are very charitable. They bring up the
children of their poor and dead members. They endow their daughters.
What harm is there in all that?"
What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker
designs? Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on
to them the contents of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them
shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands
that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen; and
which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that would convert
secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the blood baths
of the guillotine.
In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an
elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain
speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and hunger
in Paris.
A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was
ordered at the Court jewellers in the Queen's name by an agent of the
Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the
necklace was brought round to her for acceptance, when she naturally
disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would
consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a
financial way.
The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full
blast on to the subject; and every kind of criticism leveled at the Queen.
A further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some
prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the
Queen; and by the forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced
to meet the supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal, supposing
he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the subject of
the necklace.
This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the
printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign
containing the foulest innuendoes that could be imagined concerning the
whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro, alias
Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabalistic art, and
a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by
Weishaupt in 1774.
When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent over
to London, where most of the stones were retained by the Jew Eliason.
Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other decent
people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs. After eight
years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of publicity was
complete.
In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced the
King to summon the Estates General, the first portion of their plans for
revolution (i.e. paralysis) were accomplished. It now only remained to
strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob France of her
throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy, her
gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in
their place, when the guillotine's work was done, citizen hewers of wood
and drawers of water under an alien financial dictatorship.
From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in
motion; each more violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking
fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders. In their turn
each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real powers behind the
revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to join
those of his victims of yesterday.
Phillipe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for
the revolution; to protect with his name and influence the infancy of
the revolutionary club; to popularize freemasonry and the Palais Royal;
and to sponsor such acts as the march of the women to Versailles.
The "women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise. d'Orleans
was under the impression that the King and Queen would be assassinated
by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic King. The real planners
of the march, however, had other schemes in view.
One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to
Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and under
the power of the Commune or Paris County Council in which the Jacobins
were supreme.
They continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the
vote on the King's life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading
the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin. His masters
thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very shortly
followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all
classes.
Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had intended
that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis as a
democratic monarch with himself as chief adviser. He had no desire to
see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in the last days before
he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to get the
King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still
commanding his army.
He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the
Jacobin club of Paris; that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which had
materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and
Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and resonant, that kept in
check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.
There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and
strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so industriously
to unchain. In his last attempt to save the royal family by getting them
out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down all opposition in
the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden and violent illness;
and, as the author of /The Diamond Necklace/ writes:
"Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."
Thus, like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre,
Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played.
We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:
"We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can
ever have a suspicion of it."
And again:
"In this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too much."
As Mr E. Scudder writes in his /Life of Mirabeau/ :
"He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been
checked."
The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important
occasions during these first revolutionary stages. He was one of those
simple freemasons, who are borne they know not wither, in a ship they
have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are
totally ignorant.
While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very
severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary violence,
notably in the march of the women to Versailles, during the attack on
the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too, desired the
establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no threat
to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with the utmost
hostility during and after the march of the women to Versailles,
believing on that occasion that Egalite intended the assassination of
the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.
He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the
revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the
Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did dash back to Paris in an
effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war.
Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.
The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics
of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.
In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September
massacres"; 8,000 persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris alone,
and many more over the country.
It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held
till the time of the massacre in the prisons by one Manuel, Procurer of
the Commune. Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much concerning the
influences which were at work behind the scenes. In his / Life of
Napoleon /, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:
"The demand of the Communaute de Paris, now the Sanhedrin of the
Jacobins, was, of course, for blood."
[ The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.]
Again, on page 56 he writes:
"The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes
Pierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."
Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:
"The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners."
Some of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:
There was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said
to be of Spanish origin.
There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already
mentioned. He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the
Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie
Antoinette.
There was David the painter, a leading member of the Committee
of Public Security, which "tried" the victims. His voice was always
raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this fiend
used to preface his "bloody work of the day with the professional
phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was who
inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized
"the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted
for every external sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter
Scott, / Life of Napoleon /, Vol. 2.)
There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who
with a Council of Elders became the government after the fall of
Robes Pierre, being known as the Directoire.
The terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course,
characteristically Jewish.
One other observation should be made here; it is that this
important work by Sir Walter Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of
the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his
other works, and is almost unobtainable.
Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full
significance of this fact; and the added importance it lends to Sir
Walter Scott's evidence regarding the powers behind the French Revolution.
To return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone,
and apparently master of the scenes; but this again was only appearance.
Let us turn to the /Life of Robes Pierre/ , by one G. Renier, who
writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal. He writes:
"From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was
at its height. It was never the dictatorship of a single man, least
of all Robes Pierre. Some 20 men (the Committees of Public Safety
and of General Security) shared the power."
To quote Mr. Renier again:
"On the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before
the Convention . . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists. . .
uttering vague general accusations.
'I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot
bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this
profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively
that among the authors of this plot are the agents of that
system of corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all
the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the
Republic; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the
immorality that is at its base'."
Mr Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction:
"Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"
In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and
crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's
allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was getting
altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth would be
out.
At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on
the following day dragged to the guillotine.
Again let us recall Protocol 15:
"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."
Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed
by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that
he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar
to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he had financed
the Civil War.
http://iamthewitness.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us
in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical
existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after
the war."
--- Israeli General Matityahu Peled,
Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.
history of Europe since the fall of Rome.
A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had a
mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other classes
in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and
with methods bearing not a trace of the principles enshrined in those
slogans.
Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all other
sections; and still less swept away every feature of the national life
and tradition, from King, religion, nobles, clergy, constitution, flag,
calendar, and place names, to coinage.
Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in view
of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in many
countries.
The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact:
the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It
was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything,
which had been France.
This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in
high places in the Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott,
but by Robes Pierre himself.
We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they
were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals; they
were, of course, Jews.
Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :
"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name
of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for
it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.
"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words
'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots
flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried
away the well-being of the world.
The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could
not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be
freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and
Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of
Zion-No. 1.
With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a
master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The
somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the
screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a
concerted and connected human drama.
When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of
1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936,
we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality.
"Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic."
Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization, and
vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary
are necessary for its successful preparation.
It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or "the
people" ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated and
costly operation. No mistake more-over could be more dangerous; for it
will result in total inability to recognize the true significance of
events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.
The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the
infliction of paralysis; and secondly, the striking of the blow or blows .
It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that the
secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are debt, loss of publicity
control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret organizations
in the doomed state .
Debt , particularly international debt, is the first and
over-mastering grip . Through it men in high places are suborned, and
alien powers and influences are introduced into the body politic. When
the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of
publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip
on industrialists.
The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the
right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the
revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow. Moral
corruption facilitates the whole process.
By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France.
The world's big financiers were firmly established.
"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver
stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France."
So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his /Life of Napoleon/ , and continues on
page 38:
"A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic
structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth
and had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in
lands, crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been
introduced, namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had
been given."
The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means
insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's advisers
decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of
France, the position could have been fairly easily righted. As it was
the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after another, who
either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the
international usurers.
Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only
grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or
silver, neither of which France produced.
And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these
manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside
down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon
millions of usurious loans?
The late Lady Queensborough, in her important work /Occult
Theocrac/ y gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from
/L'Anti-Semitisme/ by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.
In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother
Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses
Montifiore, as being directly concerned in financing the French
Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin and his son-in-law David
Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These names recall the
Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:
"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for
it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so
as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."
And Again:-
"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who .
. . come begging with outstretched palm."
No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France. Sir
Walter Scott in his /Life of Napoleon/ , Vol. 1, thus describes the
situation:-
"These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are
treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance
with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes
the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances.
By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights
granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought
to total confusion."
King Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of
growing confusion was Necker, "a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a
German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes:
"Necker had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a
representative of the debt system owning allegiance to that system."
We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in
Necker; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was
that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why the
national finances of France under his baneful aegis rapidly worsened, so
that after four years of his manipulations, the unfortunate King's
government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of
170,000,000 pounds.
By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England.
By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de
Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of
freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its
early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were ruthless
and unscrupulous men of blood.
The Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of
little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he
had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establishing of a
democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch. Having in addition but
little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the first and
most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he
probably scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine soon after
his base and ignominious role had been played .
The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure of
the Revolution was cast in much the same role. He was a much abler man
than d'Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all his
own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his own father.
He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of the
Jewish Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the Jewess
Mrs. Herz than was her husband. He was not only an early figure-head in
French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but introduced Illuminism
into France.
[Note: Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying
that: "Judaism is not a religion. It is a law religionized".
To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political
program (for World Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]
This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind
freemasonry. The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand
Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organized by cabalistic Jews.
It is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand
were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the latter
had introduced it into France, from Frankfurt, where its headquarters
had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.
In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as
though the heavenly powers themselves made a last moment attempt to warn
France and Europe against these massing powers of evil:
Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.
The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world
revolution.
Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the
Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered.
French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was
too far advanced, and no action resulted .
By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France
affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international
revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.
Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic
Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong
secret organization covering the whole of France.
Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under
that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was
converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans in
1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers that he was
invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were. The
name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were lit by
that light.
By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789,
the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret organizations was
complete.
Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well
advanced by then also.
This was the manner of its accomplishment.
By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his
reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.
In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over
his palace, estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his creditors, with
powers to form there a centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering,
gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres, art galleries,
athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form of every
variety of public debauchery.
In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property to
install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed
to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the enormous
crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and revolutionary output
of its printing presses and debating clubs.
As Scudder writes in /A Prince of the Blood/ :
"It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city."
It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the
creditors at the Palais royal was one de Laclos, a political adventurer
of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other pornographic
works, who was said "to study the politics of love because of his love
for politics."
This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was
linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and
most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins
thought likely to stand in their way. This process was known as
"L'infamie."
Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this
typically Jewish form of attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level
at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous than the weak and indolent
Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle to the
revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding
freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time
more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister
some years previously:
"I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much
about freemasonry. Here it is far from having the significance that
it may have elsewhere in Europe. Here everything is open and one
knows all. Then where could the danger be?
One might well be worried if it were a question of a political
secret society. But on the contrary the government lets it spread,
and it is only that which it seems, an association the objects of
which are union and charity.
One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion
to say that people who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing
plots. Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told God is on
the lips of all. They are very charitable. They bring up the
children of their poor and dead members. They endow their daughters.
What harm is there in all that?"
What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker
designs? Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on
to them the contents of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them
shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands
that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen; and
which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that would convert
secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the blood baths
of the guillotine.
In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an
elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain
speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and hunger
in Paris.
A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was
ordered at the Court jewellers in the Queen's name by an agent of the
Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the
necklace was brought round to her for acceptance, when she naturally
disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would
consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a
financial way.
The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full
blast on to the subject; and every kind of criticism leveled at the Queen.
A further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some
prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the
Queen; and by the forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced
to meet the supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal, supposing
he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the subject of
the necklace.
This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the
printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign
containing the foulest innuendoes that could be imagined concerning the
whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro, alias
Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabalistic art, and
a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by
Weishaupt in 1774.
When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent over
to London, where most of the stones were retained by the Jew Eliason.
Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other decent
people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs. After eight
years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of publicity was
complete.
In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced the
King to summon the Estates General, the first portion of their plans for
revolution (i.e. paralysis) were accomplished. It now only remained to
strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob France of her
throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy, her
gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in
their place, when the guillotine's work was done, citizen hewers of wood
and drawers of water under an alien financial dictatorship.
From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in
motion; each more violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking
fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders. In their turn
each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real powers behind the
revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to join
those of his victims of yesterday.
Phillipe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for
the revolution; to protect with his name and influence the infancy of
the revolutionary club; to popularize freemasonry and the Palais Royal;
and to sponsor such acts as the march of the women to Versailles.
The "women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise. d'Orleans
was under the impression that the King and Queen would be assassinated
by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic King. The real planners
of the march, however, had other schemes in view.
One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to
Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and under
the power of the Commune or Paris County Council in which the Jacobins
were supreme.
They continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the
vote on the King's life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading
the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin. His masters
thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very shortly
followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all
classes.
Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had intended
that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis as a
democratic monarch with himself as chief adviser. He had no desire to
see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in the last days before
he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to get the
King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still
commanding his army.
He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the
Jacobin club of Paris; that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which had
materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and
Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and resonant, that kept in
check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.
There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and
strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so industriously
to unchain. In his last attempt to save the royal family by getting them
out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down all opposition in
the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden and violent illness;
and, as the author of /The Diamond Necklace/ writes:
"Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."
Thus, like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre,
Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played.
We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:
"We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can
ever have a suspicion of it."
And again:
"In this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too much."
As Mr E. Scudder writes in his /Life of Mirabeau/ :
"He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been
checked."
The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important
occasions during these first revolutionary stages. He was one of those
simple freemasons, who are borne they know not wither, in a ship they
have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are
totally ignorant.
While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very
severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary violence,
notably in the march of the women to Versailles, during the attack on
the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too, desired the
establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no threat
to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with the utmost
hostility during and after the march of the women to Versailles,
believing on that occasion that Egalite intended the assassination of
the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.
He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the
revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the
Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did dash back to Paris in an
effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war.
Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.
The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics
of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.
In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September
massacres"; 8,000 persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris alone,
and many more over the country.
It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held
till the time of the massacre in the prisons by one Manuel, Procurer of
the Commune. Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much concerning the
influences which were at work behind the scenes. In his / Life of
Napoleon /, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:
"The demand of the Communaute de Paris, now the Sanhedrin of the
Jacobins, was, of course, for blood."
[ The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.]
Again, on page 56 he writes:
"The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes
Pierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."
Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:
"The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners."
Some of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:
There was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said
to be of Spanish origin.
There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already
mentioned. He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the
Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie
Antoinette.
There was David the painter, a leading member of the Committee
of Public Security, which "tried" the victims. His voice was always
raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this fiend
used to preface his "bloody work of the day with the professional
phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was who
inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized
"the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted
for every external sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter
Scott, / Life of Napoleon /, Vol. 2.)
There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who
with a Council of Elders became the government after the fall of
Robes Pierre, being known as the Directoire.
The terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course,
characteristically Jewish.
One other observation should be made here; it is that this
important work by Sir Walter Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of
the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his
other works, and is almost unobtainable.
Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full
significance of this fact; and the added importance it lends to Sir
Walter Scott's evidence regarding the powers behind the French Revolution.
To return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone,
and apparently master of the scenes; but this again was only appearance.
Let us turn to the /Life of Robes Pierre/ , by one G. Renier, who
writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal. He writes:
"From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was
at its height. It was never the dictatorship of a single man, least
of all Robes Pierre. Some 20 men (the Committees of Public Safety
and of General Security) shared the power."
To quote Mr. Renier again:
"On the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before
the Convention . . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists. . .
uttering vague general accusations.
'I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot
bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this
profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively
that among the authors of this plot are the agents of that
system of corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all
the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the
Republic; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the
immorality that is at its base'."
Mr Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction:
"Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"
In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and
crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's
allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was getting
altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth would be
out.
At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on
the following day dragged to the guillotine.
Again let us recall Protocol 15:
"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."
Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed
by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that
he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar
to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he had financed
the Civil War.
http://iamthewitness.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us
in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical
existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after
the war."
--- Israeli General Matityahu Peled,
Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.