Jump to content

THE UNDECLARED WAR: Black anti-White Genocide in America


Guest Darrick

Recommended Posts

Guest Darrick

Justice Department Statistics About Black On White Race Violence

'The Race War Of Black Against White' by Paul Sheehan

The Sydney Morning Herald , Australia, 20 May 1995

The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is

not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25

million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.

It determined the result of last year's congressional election.

Yet the American news media does not want to talk about the Dirty War,

which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even

suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start

suggesting, immediately;

 

No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to

acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing

ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30

years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent

retribution against white America.

 

And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,

violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the

population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous

generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder

than young whites.

Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not

been reported in America:

 

According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime

victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault

and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per

cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.

Most victims of race crime about 90 percent are white, according to

the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims",

published in 1993.

Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or

raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks

who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by whites, according to

the same survey.

Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than

whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size

of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per

capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are

committing more than 50 times the number of violent racial crimes of

whites.

According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau

of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants

and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate

that whites murder blacks.

 

 

These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960's, when

there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge

which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of

the modern civil rights movement.

Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice

Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more

than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,

overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more

than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparisons

58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean

war.

When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal

theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The

Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were

omitted in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of

the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2

per cent in the reverse).

When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black

Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white

Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of

American life and American ideals since World War II.

All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling

the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news

media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double-standard in its

coverage of black America, a lower standard

 

Adult black males only make up 1.2 % of the population (ages 16 - 45),

yet commit 74% of all severe violent crime.

 

 

"Blacks are as much more likely to be arrested for violent crimes as

men are more likely to be arrested than women. To the extent that

arrest rates are a good indication of actual criminal behavior - and

there is very strong evidence that they are - blacks are as much more

dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous than women. If people

feel more threatened by unknown men than by unknown women and are

justified in taking additional precautions against them, from a

statistical point of view, they are equally justified in making the

same distinctions between blacks and whites." (New Century Foundation,

"The Color of Crime," 1998, p.1) Want to check for yourself?

http://www.amren.com/color.pdf

 

While the Census Bureau often categorizes real Whites separately from

mestizos, the FBI and the Justice Department usually do not. The law-

enforcement agencies of the federal government lump together crimes

committed by Whites, mestizos, Arabs, Jews, various North Africans and

Middle Easterners, and certain Filipinos into the same category,

deceptively labeled "Whites," skewing the apparent White crime total

upwards. When the FBI reports a percentage of crimes as having "White"

perpetrators, we must keep in mind that the report refers to the

combination of Whites and these others, who together formed about 84%

of the US population in 1995. To prevent confusion between real Whites

and all those whom the FBI calls "Whites," we will put the category of

FBI "Whites" in quotation marks.

 

The FBI Uniform Crime Reports are available on the Internet at

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm In one of these reports, titled Crime in the

United States, 1995, we can draw several interesting conclusions from

Table 2.8. In 1995, there were 10032 US murders having a single

perpetrator and a single victim. Of these murders, Blacks committed

5175 (51.6%) and "Whites" committed 4476 (44.6%). The Black per capita

murder perpetration rate was over seven times higher than the "White"

rate. There were at least 1303 interracial murders (13.0% of total

murders), of which 753 were committed by Blacks (57.8% of interracial

murders) and 352 were committed by "Whites" (27.0%). The Black per

capita interracial murder perpetration rate was about fourteen times

higher than that for "Whites." There were 699 murders in which Blacks

killed "Whites" (53.6% of interracial murders) and 281 murders in

which "Whites" killed Blacks (21.6%). The average Black was 16.4 times

more likely to kill a "White" than the reverse. How does that square

with what you heard in television news reports during the same period?

And what does that tell you about the media?

 

A well-known, but little examined, publication is Statistical Abstract

of the United States, 1996, which is available on the Internet at:

http://www.census.gov/prod/2/gen/96statab/96statab.html or can be

purchased at a bookstore under the title The American Almanac

1995-1996. Several tables of data in this publication contain racial

information that is generally unknown by the American public, though

usually data from two or more tables must be brought together in order

for the racial significance to become clear. For example, when the

racially resolved populations of major US cities are taken from Table

46 and correlated with the per capita murder rates of the same cities

taken from Table 311, it becomes clear that cities that, in 1995, were

nearly all-White had relatively very few murders (e.g., Mesa,

Anchorage, St. Paul, Colorado Springs) and that the per capita murder

rate rises with increasing percentages of non-Whites (Miami, Los

Angeles, Newark), especially Blacks (Detroit, Atlanta, Baltimore, St.

Louis, Birmingham, New Orleans). It is interesting that the government

publication had no special table to permit someone to more easily

appreciate that fact.

 

Table 2.6 in Crime in the United States, 1995, contains murder rates

that are broken down by both race and age. When this information is

correlated with the racially resolved US population data in Table 24

of Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996, we can determine

that Blacks in any age group are more likely to commit murder than

"Whites" of the same age. In fact, there is no age group for which the

Black per capita murder perpetration rate is low enough to be "merely"

triple the "White" rate. If you feel up to doing interpolations and

more UCR file downloading, you can determine that the fact expressed

by the previous sentence holds true for 1996, 1997 and 1998 (latest

available figures), as well as for 1995.

 

Liberals often try to blame Black violence on poverty. The Census

data, however, disproves that hypothesis. How? In 1995, among the

American poor, there were 16.3 million Whites (real ones), 10.0

million Blacks, 8.6 million "Hispanics," and 1.4 million Asians.

Blacks comprised about 27.6% of the American poor. Those poverty

numbers can be verified at http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/pov95/povest1.html.

During that year, Blacks committed about 54% of all US murders.

Remember that the FBI, from whom the murder information comes, counts

"Hispanics" as "Whites," making the total number of poor persons

eligible to be committing murders as "Whites" about 24.8 million.

These "Whites" comprised 68.5% of the American poor, but committed -

at most - only 46% of 1995 US murders, if we make the doubtful

assumption that Asians and Amerindians committed none. The evidence

argues against the liberal hypothesis that poverty causes crime.

 

Indeed, the US Department of Justice states baldly, "Racial

differences exist" at

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm. The BJS recently also

began to publicize the fact that Blacks are 7 times more likely than

Whites to "commit homicide," in addition to their earlier statement

that Blacks are 6 times more likely to "be murdered" than Whites. Even

allowing for the slight language bias with respect to the use of the

words "homicide" and "murder," that is a remarkable departure from

"political correctness" for a federal government agency to permit

itself.

 

Not every homicide is a murder, however the Bureau of Justice

Statistics would have no official interest in justifiable homicides,

as these are not crimes, and it would have limited interest in

accidental homicides, as these are often not crimes, though they may

be the occasion for action by civil courts.

 

Sometimes, after liberals see their "poverty causes crime" hypothesis

go down in flames, they shift over to a kind of "class envy" argument.

Suddenly, it isn't primal necessity that drives all those poor Blacks

to crime - it's envy instead, for which of course the Black murderers

should not be blamed. In the rural areas, the liberals say, people are

spread out and rich and poor don't necessarily have to interact. But

in the cities, the economic differences are more visible, and so more

likely to incite violence, and hence the liberals give us the "degree

of urbanization" hypothesis to explain Black violence. In the

preceding graph, the US states and the District of Columbia are

positioned according to their respective percentages of Blacks and

mestizos in the resident population. It is rather easy to see that the

Whitest states have the lowest rates for violent crime (murder, rape,

armed robbery and aggravated assault were considered in making the

graph). Somewhat higher rates of violence come with increasing

percentages of mestizos, but the largest increase comes with

increasing percentages of Blacks. Anomalous points are probably the

result of anomalous situations, but the trend is clear.

 

Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate

racial group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer

distinguish between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking

Indians for the most part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped

together in one ethnic pot. The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the

U.S. do not exist, at least not in the ethnic sense when it comes to

the FBI compiling criminal statistics for mainstream and news

organizations. Included by the FBI as "WHITES" are not only Hispanics,

but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North Africans,

Iranians, Iraqis, Libyans, Palestinians, and Jewish refugees from the

former Soviet Union.

 

The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and

the U.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being

white?" The answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census

Bureau, along with mainstream media purposely distort criminal

statistics and conveniently classify Mexican-Americans as white

because they do not want the American public to know the truth--that

Blacks are responsible for committing the vast majority of crimes here

in the United States.

 

For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks,

who compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or

a whopping 58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8

per 100,000. Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed

an estimated 2,242 murders in 1993. This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76

percent of the U.S. is White (European-American) and they committed

only 29.5 percent of the murders. On the other hand, Black and

Hispanic minorities combined constitute 21 percent of the population,

yet they committed a staggering 68.7 percent of the murders in the

U.S. during 1993.

 

This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as

likely to commit murder as a White person. Since this information is

not deemed "politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black

segment of society, it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita

basis for whites by backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic

groups.

 

Here are some more shocking statistics:

 

More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year.

Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.

About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by

Blacks in 1992.

In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were

committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S. Blacks under 18 are

more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than Whites

the same age. Some 90% of the victims of race crimes are Whites.

Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites,

although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population. On a

per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than

Whites. Some 27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S.

in 1992 alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White

victims; only 2% involved White offenders and Black victims.

1.3 million of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S.

each year are interracial. Between 1964 and 1994, more than 45,000

people were killed in interracial murders in the U.S., compared to

58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam and 38,000 killed in Korea.

 

The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil

Sheehan, who dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article

in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his

article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in

the U.S. mainstream media. One wonders how many Whites have to be

killed by Blacks before the N.Y. Times and Dan Rather types break the

conspiratorial silence about the number of White casualties in the

guerrilla war being waged against them by Blacks.

 

Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime

statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12%

of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males

about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent

crime.

 

Mr. Taylor reveals:

 

1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.

2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.

3) 73% of all "justified self-defense" killings are committed by

Blacks.

4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all

times.

5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are

Blacks.

 

In 1989, the FBI reported the following:

 

A) Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than Whites.

B) Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites.

C) Blacks commit 14 times more murders than Whites.

D) Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies.

E) Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than White

neighborhoods.

F) There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed in 1985 (the

last year the FBI

"chose" to report this information). Some nine out of every

ten were committed by

Blacks against Whites.

G) Black males (6% of the population) make up 46% of the nation's

prison population.

 

 

Arrests by Race, 1993:

 

The following statistics are contained within the Information Please

Almanac 1996,

p. 853. The original source of this information is the Department of

Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports for

the United States, 1993, released Dec. 4, 1994.

 

These statistics once again indicate that Blacks are committing a

grossly disproportionate amount of the crimes. However, once again it

should be noted that the classification, "White," is very misleading

because even though Hispanics are not White and do not even consider

themselves White, the FBI has chosen to include their crimes among

those committed by Whites.

 

As a consequence, crimes by White people are substantially less than

the numbers would otherwise indicate. In fact, the statistics below

indicate that White European people actually commit far fewer crimes

percentage-wise than their percentage of the population.

 

 

I am the president of New Century Foundation, which Mr. Hutchinson

says is behind "a full-blown national campaign to alert whites to the

danger of hate crimes committed by blacks." In fact, we are interested

in inter-racial crime of all kinds, of which officially-classified

"hate crimes" are an insignificant percentage.

 

Among the findings we have reported but that the media are deeply

reluctant to publicize:

 

Blacks commit 90 percent Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial

crimes of violence that occur in the United States every year, and are

more than 50 times more likely to commit violence against whites than

vice versa. In the case of robbery, or "mugging," blacks are more than

200 times more likely to attack whites than vice versa.

 

There is actually more black-on-white than black-on-black violence.

When blacks commit violent crime they target whites just over half the

time. When whites commit violent crime, only two to three percent of

their victims are black.

 

High rates of anti-white violence cannot be explained by arguing

that blacks are victimizing the people they think more likely to have

money. Only 15 percent of black-on-white violent crimes are robberies,

which have an obvious monetary motive. The rest are simple and

aggravated assaults, rapes, and murders--few of which are likely to

have a monetary motive.

 

Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit what are officially

classified as hate crimes. The "white" rate is actually inflated by a

misleading classification system in which Hispanics are a victim

category but not a perpetrator category. The same Mexican who is a

"Hispanic" victim of a hate crime becomes "white" if he is a

perpetrator.

 

Blacks are as much more likely than whites to commit violent crime,

just as men are more likely than women--which, of course, is why there

is racial profiling by the police (and by everyone else, for that

matter).

 

These findings and many more are explained in meticulously documented

detail in our recent report, The Color of Crime. Ordering information

is on our web page at: http://www.AmRen.com.

 

We think it is important to understand the extent and nature of inter-

racial crime, not for the reasons Mr. Hutchinson attributes to us but

because policy should be based on knowledge rather than ignorance.

 

Jared Taylor, President

New Century Foundation

Oakton, VA

703 716-0900

JarTaylor@aol.com

 

America's Victims - 12,000 Daily

 

American newspapers and TV endlessly run clips of the regrettable

incident

where four White policemen beat a Black named Rodney King.

 

To do this the media has to step over hundreds and thousands of bodies

of White

men, women and children to find a flyspeck on an iceberg. Whites are

virtually

ignored to concentrate on an incident in which a Black is a victim.

 

It is the medias policy to conceal a Black criminal's race. But, in

spite of their "paper

curtain" - certain information still manages to slip through to the

public.

 

The Truth At Last, #353, P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, Georgia 30061 ( $15/

yr, Subscription)

carried Pat Buchanan's answer to the media's charge of White "Hate

crimes."

They reported Buchanan, on May 7th, as saying:

 

Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than Whites.

Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites.

Blacks commit 14 times more murders.

Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies.

Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than White communities.

There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed in 1985.

9 out of every 10 attacks were committed by Blacks against Whites.

 

[ED: The actual figure is many, many times this "official" figure.

Most crime is

underreported and un-reported - unless it is violent or involves a

great deal of money. Rape is seldom reported because the media always

tries to print the victims name - to discourage reporting. Vandalism

and petty theft is so commonplace as to not be newsworthy, and

reporting seldom produce those guilty. The daily beatings and robbery

practiced against White children in the public schools usually goes

unreported because there is no way to protect against retaliation.]

 

Blacks make up only 12% of the population. Still, Blacks make up 46%

of the nation's

prison population. Nearly 1/4 of all Negroes ages 20 to 29 are either

in prison, on

probation or on parole, which compares to 10% for Hispanics and 6% for

Whites.

Most interracial crime is overwhelmingly committed by Blacks against

Whites.

 

These figures in themselves present a wholly different picture from

that which the media would have us believe, and, Buchanan merely

touched on Hispanic crime while leaving

out Oriental and Indian crime entirely. If total "stranger-crime" were

honestly reported, we might be dumbfounded to discover that as much as

85%-90% of all crime in the U. S. is committed by strangers, and much

of it (if not most) is committed against Whites.

 

 

About 250,000,000 people live in the U.S. Some 180 million are

Westerners. A

one in ten victim rate produces 18 million crimes against them yearly.

If strangers

commit only half, this is 9,000,000. If half of them are committed

against Whites

it results in about 12,000 crimes committed against Whites by

strangers each

and every day.

 

Once again, the California incident where the Black was beaten by

White policemen is regrettable, but, what about the more than 5

million Whites who have fallen victim to strangers since that incident

occurred? Don't any of the rapes and cold blooded butcheries suffered

by Whites merit the same careful tear-jerk treatment, and endless

showings on television screens?

 

"One category is interracial crimes. Its most recent publication

(1997), "Criminal Victimization in the U.S.," reports on data

collected in 1994. In that year, there were about 1,700,000

interracial crimes, of which 1,276,030 involved whites and blacks.

In 90 percent of the cases, a white was the victim and a Black was the

perpetrator,

while in only 10 percent of the cases it was the reverse."

 

"Another finding of the NCVS report is that of the 2,025,464 violent

crimes committed by blacks in 1994, 1,140,670 were against whites --

that's slightly over 56 percent. Whites committed 5,114,692 violent

crimes; 135,360, or only 2.6 percent were against blacks."

 

BLACKS AND CRIME:

 

Blacks are 12.1% of the US population, while American Indians and

Asians together are 3.5%. Thus, the FBI's "Whites" [includes Mexicans,

Arabs, Jews, etc.] are the remaining 84.4% of the population.. Blacks

are 5.6 times as likely to commit violent crimes as are "Whites." In

other words, the average Black is 460% more likely to attack someone

than the average "White" is. As compared to "Whites," Blacks are 4.5

times as likely to rape, 5.2 times as likely to commit aggravated

assault, and 10.3 times as likely to commit armed robbery. If you had

read that Blacks were 30% more likely to be armed robbers

than "Whites," you might not have been surprised. In fact, Blacks are

930% more likely to be armed robbers, since the 12% of the US

population that is Black commits 58% of the armed robberies in this

country.

 

In 1996 law enforcement agencies reported to the FBI that they

arrested 14,439 murderers. Of these murderers, 7,928 or 55% were

Black. The murderer rate for Blacks is more than 26 per 100,000, while

the "White" rate is less than 3 per 100,000. A Black

is 9 times as likely to murder than the average "White" is.

 

HISPANIC CRIME IS HIGH:

 

Recall that we said that what the FBI calls "Whites" is really a

conglomeration of Whites,

Hispanics, and others. For data on Hispanic crime, we have to take a

look at the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Report, which lists the

actual data submitted by 10,000 law enforcement agencies before it is

sanitized by the FBI. Five states - Arizona, California,

Oklahoma, Oregon, and Texas-still keep track of Hispanic crime as a

separate category. In one year in these five states, we find under

murderers: 1,156 Whites, 2,015 Hispanics, 1,526 Blacks, 134 Asians,

and 54 Indians. Adjusted for population, Hispanics are 4.8 times as

likely to murder as real Whites are, Blacks are 10 times as likely to

commit murder, and Indians are twice as likely to murder. Before we

leave the subject of Hispanics, let us briefly mention what the

California Department of Justice reports about murder and robbery. Of

the 2,644 California murderers in 1995, 18% or 467 were White.

California had 1,250 Hispanic murderers and 794 Black murderers. This

data shows that in California, as compared to a White, a Hispanic is

6.1 times as likely to murder, and a

Black is 13.2 times as likely to murder.

 

A California Hispanic is more than 5 times as likely to commit armed

robbery than a White, and a Black is nearly 20 times as likely to be

an armed robber than a White.

 

BLACK WOMEN AND MURDER:

 

Removing Hispanics from the FBI's "White" category exposes another

interesting fact. In

the five states keeping track of Hispanic crime, we found that Black

women are actually 5% more likely to murder than White men are. This

is also true in almost all parts of the US where separate data is kept

on Hispanics or where there are too few Hispanics to obscure the data.

For example in seven Southern states, Black women are 15% more likely

to commit murder than White men are.

 

Since we said that in the South, Black women are 15% more likely to

murder than White men are, to be fair we must also compare White women

to Black men. In these same seven Southern states, a Black man is 52

times more likely to murder than a White woman is. Stated as a

percentage, a Black man is 5,200% more likely to commit murder than a

White woman is from the same geographical area.

 

OUTSIDE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE FBI DATA:

Professor Levin [in his 1997 book, "Why Race Matters: Race Differences

and What They Mean"] reviews some of the statistics on Black criminals

that you may have heard.

 

For example, a Black is 7.8 times as likely to be in prison as a

"White." Over 30% of

the Black men between 23 and 29 are imprisoned for a felony. In major

cities, it is worse. At any one time 42% of the Black males in

Washington DC were in jail, on parole, on probation, or being sought

by police. In Detroit, the number is somewhere between

45% and 50%. In Baltimore, it is 56%. While another study found that

in one year, 25% of the Black men in Little Rock, Arkansas were

arrested for a felony. And yet, another study shows that in the

District of Columbia, 85% of all of the Black males that live there

will be arrested for a crime at some point in their life.

 

 

INTERRACIAL CRIME:

 

Perhaps the best place to look at interracial crime is in the South,

because the media depicts the South's Whites as a bunch of violent gun-

toting, Black-hating rednecks. In one

year alone, in seven Southern states, Blacks killed 226 Whites, while

Whites killed only 66 Blacks. After adjusting the data for population

size, it shows that a southern Black is 11.2 times more likely to

commit murder as a southern White is. Table 2.8 of the FBI's 1996

Uniform Crime Report, lists interracial crime figures for the US as a

whole. It shows that adjusted for population size, nationally a Black

is nearly 16 times as likely to murder a "White," than visa versa.

 

Here are some of the results cited in the university studies reviewed

by Dr. Levin.

Note that we don't know how each researcher defined White. One study

shows that in the South, a Black is 10 times more likely to murder a

White than visa-versa. A second

study demonstrates that proportionally, Blacks kill 22 times as many

Whites as Whites kill Blacks. A third study shows that Blacks are

about 11 times more likely to rape a White than a White is to rape a

Black. He concludes that overwhelming evidence exists to support the

stereotypical belief that Black men lust after White women.

 

Professor Levin cites additional research showing that less than 3% of

White crime is directed against Blacks, while one-half to two-thirds

of the Black crime wave is directed against Whites. In yet another

study, he found that the average Black is 25 times more likely to

assault a White than the average White is likely to assault a Black.

 

CRIME FACT #31:

The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen times that of

Whites. Rape and assault, is ten times that of Whites. These figures,

as given by the F.B.I reports, vary somewhat from year to year but

fairly represent the trend for the past decade. (27) (6) (13)

 

FACT #32:

According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black males between the

ages of 20 and 29 is

currently in prison or on probation or parole. (32) (6) (3)

 

FACT #33:

Though only 12% of the U.S. population, Blacks commit more than half

of all rapes and

robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (32) (27) (6)

 

FACT #34:

Approximately 50% of all Black males will be arrested and charged with

a serious felony

during their lifetime. (27)

 

FACT #35:

A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a White person than

Vice Versa. (3) (32)

 

FACT #36:

Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time,

30times as often as Whites choose Blacks. (2) (32) (28)

 

FACT #37:

The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when

Whites commit violence they choose Blacks victims only 2.4% of the

time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF

the time. (3)

 

FACT #38:

In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be

assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites.

(32)

 

FACT #39:

Many Blacks argue that high Black incarceration rates show that police

center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar crimes.

However, Blacks commit a disproportionate number of white-collar

offenses as well. In 1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be

arrested for forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites.

(32) (6)

 

FACT #40:

Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of

"advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the

highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in

personal income per capita, leads the nation in just about every

category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and

vehicle theft.

D.C. also has the country's strictest gun controls, highest police

costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers

per citizen, and yet, it also has the highest rate

of incarceration. Is it any surprise that its permanent population is

over 80% Black.

By comparison, West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime

rate, suffers from chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment in

the U.S. It also has the fewest police per capita. The difference is

that West Virginia is over 96% White. (33)

 

SOURCES

 

1. African Business Magazine, Dec. '91

 

2. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pg 822+

 

 

3. American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026

 

4. American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859

 

5. Basham, A.L., The Wonder That Was India, Grove Press, New York,

NY 1954

 

6 .Buckley, William F. syndicated column, Jan. 5. 1993

 

7. "But What about Africa?" Harper's, May '90

 

8. "The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under Attack!", Peter

Hammond, Herald the

Coming, Dec. '92.

 

9. Coon, Carleton S. The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf

 

10. Fagan, Myron C. How the Greatest White Nations Were Mongrelized -

Then

Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books.

 

11. Fields, Dr. Ed, The Dangers of Interracial Marriage, The Truth at

Last,

PO Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061

 

12. Howells, William. Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden City, NY 1945.

 

13. Harris, Marvin, 1981. Why Nothing Works. Simon & Schuster, New

York, NY

 

14. Jacob, A. White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ. by author.

 

15. Jensen, Arthur R. Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York

1980

 

16. Jensen, Arthur R. Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the Free

Press. (Macmillan)

New York,1981

 

17. McCall's, May '92, pg 76

 

18. McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on Race Differences." U.S.

News and World

Report, Sept. 21, 1956. Washington, D.C.

 

19. Pearson, Roger, Eugenics and Race, 1966, Noontide Press

 

20. Pearson, Roger. Race, Intelligence, and Bias in Academe, Scott-

Townsend Publishers,

N.W. Washington, D.C.

 

21. Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization, Noontide Press.

 

22. Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape

Canaveral, FL

 

23. Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967,

Howard Allen,

P.O. Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920

 

24. Putnam, Carleton. A Study in Racial Realities, an address at the

University of

California at Davis, Dec. 17, 1964

25. Scott, Ralph. Education and Ethnicity: The U.S. Experiment in

School Integration,

Scott-Townsend. Washington, D.C. 1989

 

26. Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social

Science Press,

New York, 1966

 

27. Simpson, William Gayley. Which Way Western Man? 1978, National

Alliance Press,

P.O. Box 3535, Washington, D. C. 20007

 

28. Social Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90

 

29. "South Africa: Time to Choose Sides" Soldier of Fortune, Dec. '89.

 

30. Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely. The IQ Controversy, the

Media and Public

Policy. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ 1990.

 

31. Stell v Savannah-Chattham County Board of Education, U.S. District

Court, Southern

Georgia, May 13, 1963.

 

32. Taylor, Jared, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race

Relations in

Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY

 

33. World Almanacs, '88, '89, '90, '91, '92

 

34. United Nations World Census, 1990

 

35. Van Loon, Henrick, 1940, Van Loon's Geography, Garden City Publ.

 

36. The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990.

 

37. Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press,

Hollywood, CA

 

38. Weisman, Charles A. America: Free, White and Christian, 1989,

SFA,

P.O. Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535

 

39. Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990,

SFA

 

40. Weyl, Nathaniel. The Geography of American Achievement, Scott-

Townsend,

Washington, D.C. 1989.

 

41. Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth) by Des Griffin.

 

FrontpageMagazine.com | March 20, 2001

 

Inter-Racial Crime: The Dirty Little Secret

By John Perazzo

 

FrontpageMagazine.com | March 20, 2001

 

 

IN RESPONSE TO a white-on-black killing in Brooklyn a few years ago,

an

infuriated Al Sharpton instantly took to the airwaves and proclaimed

that such attacks

constituted "a national epidemic."

 

At the 1996 Million Man March, an impassioned Jesse Jackson thundered

to his huge

black audience, "We're despised. . . . We're attacked for sport."

 

The Reverend Herbert Daughtry of New York asserts that white violence

against blacks has rendered the latter "a hunted and endangered

species."

 

Mary Frances Berry, who chairs the U.S. Civil Rights Commission,

attributes

white-on-black violence to white people's persistent "belief in the

inferiority of blacks."

 

Ivy League professor and activist Cornel West calls African Americans

our country's "exemplary targets of racial hatred."

 

Given their outspokenness on the subject of interracial crime, it is

indeed noteworthy that none of the aforementioned individuals -- nor

any other prominent civil rights spokesman in the country, for that

matter -- has had even a word to say about the recent Fat Tuesday riot

that erupted in Seattle. In the mayhem that occurred there, three-

fourths of the rioters

were black, and many of them deliberately targeted white victims for

purely racial reasons.

One witness, for instance, said she observed several incidents where

groups of black men singled out and assaulted whites, in one case

punctuating their attack with shouts of "That's what you stupid white

people get."

 

In the most notorious attack, a twenty-year-old white man named

Kristopher Kime was clubbed in the back of the head as he tried to

help an injured female victim who was lying on the road. The force of

the blow to Kime's head sent him tumbling onto the pavement,

where he was kicked and stomped to death by several black men.

Notwithstanding the brutal nature of this attack and others, we never

heard not even a whisper of protest from our purported guardians of

"civil rights."

 

We never heard them utter not even a syllable lamenting the tragic

fact that innocent people were set upon for no reason other than their

skin color. Presumably, these watchdogs of racism are all to busy

attending to matters more pressing. Sharpton, for one, was in Florida

fighting to protect the civil rights of a black youngster who was

sentenced to life-in-prison for the unspeakably barbaric murder and

mutilation of a six-year-old girl. If the awful fate that befell

Kristopher Kime were rare, perhaps the subsequent silence of our self-

anointed civil rights defenders could be excused. After all, rational

people understand that busy social critics are under no obligation to

publicly denounce every misguided, bigoted lunatic who happens to do

something wicked. Yet such attacks against Whites are by no means

rare, but in fact are alarmingly commonplace.

 

Each year, some 1.2 million violent crimes involving Blacks and Whites

occur nationwide. In fully 90 percent of those cases, according to

U.S. Justice Department

figures, the perpetrators are Black and the victims are White. Violent

White felons choose Black victims for fewer than 3 percent of their

attacks, whereas violent Black felons choose White victims about 56

percent of the time. Statistically, the "average" African American is

an astonishing 56 times more likely to attack a White than vice versa.

In

one recent year, approximately 100 Black women were raped by White

men. In the same year, the corresponding number of White women raped

by black men was over 20,000, according to Dinesh D'Souza in The End

of Racism.

 

These numbers are staggering. If America were teeming with White

racism, surely the perpetrators of interracial crime would be

disproportionately White.

Clearly, however, that is not at all the case. Though contemporary

civil rights leaders strive to portray White-on-Black crime as

commonplace, their rhetoric rings pathetically hollow. With tortured

faces and ostensibly anguished hearts, they will seek out any one of

their willing accomplices in the media with a microphone or TV camera

to publicize their

lamentations about even the rarest instances of White racism in

action. Meanwhile, they turn a deaf ear to the desperate screams of

the tens of thousands of White, and Black, victims who fall prey to

Black assailants each year.

 

Consequently unfortunate individuals like Kristopher Kime die in

anonymity, their names fading from public memory as quickly as their

graves are refilled with earth. Isn't it time that the truth about

interracial crime was finally, fearlessly told? Don't all Americans --

Black and White alike -- have a right to be freed from the

intellectual shackles of our country's quintessential frauds, commonly

known as "civil rights crusaders"?

 

" There is more Black-on-White than there is Black-on-Black violent

crime.

" Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence

involving Blacks and Whites, 90 percent of them are committed by

Blacks against Whites. Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more

likely to do criminal violence to Whites than the reverse.

" Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the White rate,

and Asians are at one half to three quarters that of the White rate."

Blacks are twice as likely as Whites to commit hate crimes." Hispanics

are a hate crime victim category but are not a perpetrator category.

Hispanic offenders are classified as Whites, which inflates the White

offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit no hate

crimes. " Blacks are much more dangerous than Whites, just as men are

more dangerous than women.

>From "THE COLOR OF CRIME"

available at: New Century Foundation, 2717 Clarkes Landing, Oakton, VA

22124

(703) 716-0900or go to: http://www.amren.com/colrcrim.html

THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE

 

Paul Sheehan

 

Racial Realities

Race And Crime In America

 

Have you ever noticed that the media rarely tells us about Black

crime, and if they do mention a crime that has occurred and the

perpetrator was a Negro, they would not tell you or show you? But if a

White commits a crime, especially against a Black, it is the top story

for weeks.

 

Did you hear about the Negro car-jacker who, just a few months ago,

assaulted and pushed to the ground a White mother to steal her car? As

he was driving away, the young mother tried to grab her child out of

the back seat, but he got tangled in the seat belts half way out the

door. The Negro took off, dragging the poor child bouncing on the

pavement while the mother was screaming for

the car-jacker to stop. He didn't. Five miles later, White motorists

forced the Negro off the road-the child was shredded and dead. Perhaps

you heard about that incident just once-maybe not at all.

 

Of course, if that had been a White man who was the carjacker and

killed a Negro child in the same way it would have been the major

headlines day after day for months. It's a highly controlled media

game to manipulate your thinking to believe there is no real

difference between races or any racial connection with crime. They do

this by ignoring real Black crime and focusing on the

Whites to make it look like the Whites are the bad guys.

 

A study was done in 1983 that showed that on prime time T.V. only

about 10% portrayed as criminals were Black (Rocher, L. and Lickster,

R. Prime Time Crime. Washington D.C.: The Media Initiative.)

 

The truth is, the media is portraying a lie to you. Here are the facts

they do not want you to know. The F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports in the

1990s demonstrate that Negroes commit 1,200% or 12 times the per

capita robbery rate of White and 900% or 9 times the per

capita murder rate. Interestingly, the "White" group analyzed included

non-White Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and other Hispanic people. So, if

only Caucasian folks and their crime was compared with Blacks, the

difference would be even greater.

 

Put another way, Blacks who make up only 12.1% of the population in

America commit 55% of the murder, whereas Whites (including Mexicans,

et. al.) commit 43%. The murder rate for Blacks is 44.9 per 100,000.

For Whites (including non-White elements), the rate is 4.78 per

100,000.

 

Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites, 8 times more assaults

and 19 times more armed robberies, according to Pat Buchanan.

 

Jared Taylor in his book Paved With Good Intentions reveals that 60%

of people killed by police are

Blacks, 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks and 64%

of all arrests for violent crimes are

Blacks.

 

What about Black on White crime? The lying media would have us believe

that Whites hate Blacks and

commit more crimes against Blacks. Again, the F.B.I. Uniform Crime

Reports for 1993:

 

Blacks are 2,200% (22 times) more likely to kill Whites than Whites

kill Blacks.

 

Blacks victimized Whites in armed robbery 167,924 times versus 7,031

times for Whites against Blacks.

 

As far as rapes go, in 1991 there were only 100 rapes of Black females

by White men but 20,204 White women were raped by Black males (U.S.

Department of Justice, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1991

(1992), Washington, DC: U.S. Government PrintingOffice).

 

Why is there grossly disproportionate crime statistics between Blacks

and Whites? Is it poverty that causes crime? If that is true, then one

would expect Black crime to go down as their standard of living

raises. However, since the civil rights push in the 1960s with

affirmative action, etc., Black crime has gone up.

 

 

Distorted Statistics

 

Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate

racial group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer

distinguish between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking

Indians for the most part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped

together in one ethnic pot.

 

The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the U.S. do not exist, at least not

in the ethnic sense when it comes to the FBI compiling criminal

statistics for mainstream and news organizations. Included by the FBI

as "WHITES" are not only Hispanics, but also West Asians, Jews, Middle

Easterners, North Africans, Iranians, Iraquis, Libyans, Palestinians,

and Jewish refugees from the former Soviet Union.

 

The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and

the U.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being

white?" The answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census

Bureau, along with mainstream media purposely distort criminal

statistics and conveniently classify Mexican-Americans as white

because they do not want the American

public to know the truth--that Blacks are responsible for committing

the vast majority of crimes here in the United States.

 

For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks,

who compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or

a whopping 58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8

per 100,000.

Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed an estimated

2,242 murders in 1993. This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76 percent of the

U.S. is White (European-American) and they committed only 29.5 percent

of the murders. On the other hand, Black and Hispanic minorities

combined constitute 21 percent of the population, yet they committed a

staggering 68.7 percent of the murders in the U.S. during 1993.

 

This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as

likely to commit murder as a White person. Since this information is

not deemed "politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black

segment of society, it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita

basis for whites by backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic

groups.

 

 

Here's the facts on interracial rape:

 

Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race

Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf,

1992), 92-93:

 

"When whites do violence - rape, murder, assault - how often do they

choose black victims? Shouldn't a nation of bigots target

blacks most of the time? At least half of the time? Of course, it does

not. When whites commit violence, they to it to blacks 2.4

percent of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose white victims

more than half the time. (n.317)

In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks kill

twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white

robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than

white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize

whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks. (n318)

 

The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial rape.

Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority of rapes

were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958

and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-

white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black. Since that time,

the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in

Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one

case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s,

black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-

black rape. (n.319)

Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has

become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics.

The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it

presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies

it. Dr. William Wilbanks, a criminologist at Florida International

University, had to sift carefully through the data to find that in

1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten

cases of white-on-black rape. (n.320) Another researcher concludes

that in 1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit

rape than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as

often as white men raped black women.(n.321) Interracial crime figures

are even worse than they sound. Since there are more than six times as

many whites as blacks in America, it means that any given black person

is vastly more

likely to commit a crime against a white than vice versa."

 

Notes

n. 317. "What Should Be Done," US News & World Report (August

22, 1989), p. 54. See also Department of Justice, Criminal

Victimization in the United States, 1987 (Washington, DC: U.S.

Government Printing Office, 1989), p.7.

n. 318. Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the

United States , 1987.

n. 319. Gary D. LaFree, "Male Power and Female Victimization:

Toward a Theory of Interracial Rape," American Journal of

Sociology , Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 1982).

n. 320. William Wilbanks, "Frequency and Nature of Interracial

Crimes," submitted for publication to the Justice Professional

(November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice,

Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987 , p. 53.

n. 321. Andrew Hacker, Two Nations , pp. 183, 185.

 

 

The annual Department of Justice Victimization Surveys report that in

nine cases out of ten interracial violent crime is perpetrated by

blacks on whites.

 

Figures for 1996 show that on a per capita basis, blacks are three

times as likely as whites to commit crimes driven by racial prejudice.

 

 

1999 Total White Black

Violent crime 419,473 248,120 162,264

 

1999

White population 224,611,000

Black population 34,862,000

 

Rate of white arrests for violent crimes to white population per

100,000

248,120 / 224,611,000 x 100,000 = 110

 

Rate of black arrests for violent crimes to black population per

100,000

162,264 / 34,862,000 x 100,000 = 465

 

Black arrest for violent crimes are 4 times the white arrests.

 

http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/t410.pdf

http://www.census.gov/population/es.../intfile3-1.txt

 

 

Black defendants were the most likely to have a criminal history.

Seventy percent of black defendants compared to 60% of whites and 35%

of Hispanics had previously been convicted. Additionally, black

defendants had more extensive criminal histories than whites or

Hispanics. Of those defendants with a prior conviction, 34% of blacks

had been convicted 5 or more times compared to 26.4% of whites and

14.2% of Hispanics.

 

About 40% of those incarcerated during 1997 were black; 33% Hispanic;

24%, white; and 3%, other racial or ethnic groups. Hispanic inmates

were among those most likely to report being involved with opiates,

cocaine powder, and marijuana. Black inmates most often reported being

involved with cocaine powder and crack cocaine; white inmates,

methamphetamine and marijuana.

 

----------------------------------------

The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the statistical agency in the U.S.

Department of Justice. Lawrence A. Greenfeld is acting director.

 

BJS Special Reports address a specific topic in depth from one or more

data sets that cover many topics.

 

John Scalia wrote this report. Urban Institute staff, under the

supervision of Laura Winterfield, and Matthew Hickman of BJS, provided

statistical review. Tina Dorsey produced and edited the report. Jayne

Robinson prepared the report for final publication.

 

 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/fdo99.txt

 

====================================

 

 

 

Charles Reese, writing in the Florida Sentinel, tells us

 

Whilst 100 rapes were carried out by whites on blacks, blacks carried

out 20,202 rapes on whites. Against the 7,031 robberies which

involved a white perpetrator and a black victim, we have to balance

the 167,924 robberies where the roles were reversed.

 

 

The number of assaults by whites on blacks was 49,800, but black on

white assaults were a massive 431,670.

 

In the category of all violent crime, 55,301 involved white

perpetrators and a black victim, whilst the reverse situation was an

unbelievable 572, 458.

 

 

WHILE OUTNUMBERED BY ALMOST 9 TO 1

 

Charles Reese, writing in the Florida Sentinel, tells us

 

In the category of all violent crime, 55,301 involved white (and

hispanic) perpetrators and a black victim, whilst the reverse

situation was an unbelievable 572, 458.

 

 

White and hispanic violent crimes against s = 55,301

 

violent crimes against Whites = 572,458

 

populations:

 

s 12%

Whites 70%

 

It doesn't get any more obvious than this.

 

Getting down to the facts...

 

The facts about interracial crime, of which "hate" crime is an

insignificant subset, are at once known, skewed and hidden.

 

The main fact you need to know is that there are under 10,000 so-

called hate crimes a year, less than half of which are violent. But

there are 1.7 million interracial crimes each year -- more than ninety

percent of which are black on White.

 

The only reason we are discussing such a tiny subset of crimes is that

Jews, who control the media and can make their lies stick, find it

politically useful.

Their agitprop artists created the very category and concept of hate

crimes; their TV stations broadcast the brainwashing until it sinks

in; and their lobbyists will pester the Congress until the mere

existence of White males is criminalized. Jews are like that. To them,

Whites and White males are by their very nature and existence hate

criminals. As Jewess Susan Sontag said, speaking for all Jews, "The

White race is the cancer of human history." Jews truly believe this.

They are our enemy. We Whites are just too naive and gullible and

decent and unassuming to realize it.

 

As I write, black savages have gone on White-attacking sprees at Mardi

Gras celebrations in Philadelphia and Seattle. Both have been covered

up by the Jewish media, which consistently point the finger away from

the black man when apportioning blame.

Drunken revelers, weak cops, The Beast -- anything will be blamed

except black criminals. Were it not for Jewish-inspired "civil rights"

laws, s who punched blonde White girls in the head would be

cowering in their ghettos afraid of being lynched. Now these savages

are out among us, terrorizing us, and we are afraid to fight back out

of our cowardice and fear of committing a hate crime by defending

ourselves.

 

Such is the world Hymie has led us to.

 

And if the criminals aren't blacks, they are Asians or Mexicans --

street scum that wouldn't be here if the Jew hadn't destroyed our

racial homogeneity through the 1965 Immigration Act. Before that act,

America was 90% white, and civilized. After that act, America is

barely seventy percent white, and the number is dropping rapidly.

Before that act, there were more Americans of Swiss ancestry than

Mexican. Today one in ten -- nine? -- Americans is a Mexican.

 

All this disintegration, this crime, this misery, can be laid at the

feet of the Jew. He encouraged The Act knowing full well the results,

and he glories in what he has achieved: the destruction of cohesive,

civilized WHITE America. Shows like MTV's Hate Whitey Day

are one of myriad ways he pulls the wool over your eyes, White man,

while laughing in your face. He doesn't think you have the guts or

brains to call him on it. And don't expect any help from the

conservatives. The conservatives are Christian cowards, constrained by

their paychecks to toe the Semites' line. White nationalism is where

we must turn to find the only genuine opposition to the Jew

controlling our schools, media and government....

 

Now back to the crime data.

 

The data come from the corrupt Department of Justice, whose FBI

collects statistical information from counties all over the United

States. Before digging into it directly, let's just observe that the

data show that interracial crime is hugely and disproportionately

committed by minorities, and that these same go out of their way to

attack White victims.

 

For example, a White man is fifty-six times as likely to be attacked

by a black man as the reverse.

 

Fifty-six times.

 

That is what FBI data forwarded from the counties show. And rest

assured, the actual picture is even worse, because the FBI

discriminates -- commits a hate crime in the same way MTV does -- in

categorizing the data.

 

The FBI years ago eliminated the Hispanic offender category. So that

crimes committed by the brown invaders are lumped into the White

perpetrator file.

That's right: the government that takes your tax money at gunpoint

makes sure that you and your fellow Whites receive full credit for

violent "hate" crimes committed by Hispanics.

 

Whites are blamed for crimes that Mexicans commit, by federal decree.

 

Are we living under a hate government? Is the FBI a hate group? It

would appear so....

 

In the ultimate absurdity, if a brown commits a hate crime against a

White, the statistics reflect it as a White-on-White hate crime. There

are hundreds of these White-on-White cases annually.

 

Let's cut to the chase with an easy-reference guide to interracial

crime, data taken from The Color of Crime, a special report prepared

by Jared Taylor's outfit, American Renaissance:

 

1,700,000 interracial crimes are committed each year

 

90% of interracial crimes are black on White

 

blacks commit interracial crime at 56x the rate of Whites: 10 per

100k vs 560 per 100k

 

94% of multiple-offender interracial crimes were black on White --

nig packs

 

about 500,000 of these in average year

 

robbery was motive in less than 1/3 (nigs beat Whites for fun)

 

1990 Hate Crimes Statistics Act compels FBI to collect data on acts

motivated in whole or part by bias.

 

Most counties (83%) supply info, although not legally required to

 

1997 report showed under 10,000 "hate" crimes

 

7,000 were ethnic/racial bias

 

less than half were violent (graffiti, cross burnings, etc.)

 

blacks are twice as likely to commit a hate crime as Whites

 

blacks are 2.2x as likely to commit a violent hate crime as whites

 

s are 38x likelier to rape White women than Whites are to rape

blacks

 

30,000 White women were raped by s (1994)

 

5,400 blacks were raped by Whites (how many of these Whites were

Mexicans?)

 

56% of black violent crime is committed against Whites

 

2.6% of White violent crime is against blacks

 

After reviewing these data, ask yourself who are the real haters: The

Whites who suffer from negro depredations? Or the s who have

laws and admissions and employment policies twisted in their favor?

The answer is neither. The 's just doing what comes naturally,

proving Jefferson's words about the "indelible lines of distinction"

nature has drawn between jungle blacks and civilized Whites, and

bearing out his truth that the "two races, equally free, cannot live

in the same government." No, the real hater is neither race. The real

hater is the Jew who bans these facts from the television and public

sheets, confines them to corners of the Internet -- and even there

works night and day to get them filtered, censored, banned and

ultimately criminalized. The MTV Jew who replaces the truth with his

lies is the hater. The Jew is your enemy, White man. As is MTV, which

is owned and run by Jews.

 

 

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index57.htm

 

 

 

"In its last complete National Criminal Victimization Survey

(1994),the Justice Department revealed blacks to have committed

1,600,951 violent crimes against whites. Only 15 percent of these had

robbery as a motive. We can safely infer that most of the rest had

race as at least a partial motive. Eighty-five percent of the attacks

were assaults and rapes. While blacks were committing these 1.6

million crimes against whites, whites were reciprocating with 165,345

violent offenses against blacks. Blacks, representing thirteen percent

of the nation, committed more than 90 percent of the violent inter-

racial crime.

Fifty-seven percent of the violent crime committed by blacks had white

victims. Less than 3 percent of violence committed by whites had black

victims. In 1994, a black was 64 times more likely to attack a white

than vice versa. This is the real story of hate in America. It is the

media's well-kept secret."

 

 

http://www.ety.com/HRP/hatecrime/blackwhite.htm

 

 

 

That blacks have higher crime rates

because of:

 

higher sexuality

Lower intelligence

Higher agression

Lower levels of parental care

Inferior personality traits such as self

esteem, impulsiveness

 

 

Walter E. Williams is a professor at George Mason University at

Fairfax, Va:

 

Experts love to blame crime on poverty. That's nonsense! From 1900 to

1929, the nation's murder rate rose from 1.2 per 1 00,000 of the

population to 8.4. However, during parts of the 1930s, when the

unemployment rate stood at 37 percent, the murder rate had fallen to

6.3 per 1 00,000 and to 4.7 per 1 00,000 by 1960. After 1960, violent

crime rates shot up. By 1993, the murder rate was 9.5 per 100,000,

falling to 8.2 in 1995. Rather than poverty causing crime, one might

more easily make the case that crime causes poverty.

 

http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_anchdn-voice.htm

AS OF 06/02

 

For Daily news of these surpressed attrocities and massacres of whites

go to http://newnation.com or http://www.halturnershow.com or http://amren.com.

 

POSTED BY THE ARYAN-AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT (AAIM)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...