This Is Gay: No Offense

ImWithStupid

New member
There is no excuse that this shouldn't have been signed and approved by President Bush. It's down right shameful and embarrassing...

Sources: US to sign UN gay rights declaration

By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer Matthew Lee, Associated Press Writer – 26 mins ago

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration will endorse a U.N. declaration calling for the worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality that then-President George W. Bush had refused to sign, The Associated Press has learned.

U.S. officials said Tuesday they had notified the declaration's French sponsors that the administration wants to be added as a supporter. The Bush administration was criticized in December when it was the only western government that refused to sign on.

The move was made after an interagency review of the Bush administration's position on the nonbinding document, which was signed by all 27 European Union members as well as Japan, Australia, Mexico and three dozen other countries, the officials said.
Sources: US to sign UN gay rights declaration

Thank you, in advance, Mr. President.

 

snafu

New member
What **** *** law?

Sodomy laws in the United States were largely a matter of state rather than federal jurisdiction, except for laws governing the U.S. Armed Forces. By 2002, 36 states had repealed all sodomy laws or had them overturned by court rulings. The remaining anti-homosexual sodomy laws have been invalidated by the 2003 U.S.Supreme Court decision.
Shows how much I know. :rolleyes: Not much into **** ing.

 

snafu

New member
They say don't knock something until you've tried it but I have had a colonscopy before. I didn't like it. Maybe if the doctor kissed my neck or tweaked my nipples a bit I would've gotten into it.
 

phreakwars

New member
I can think of no reason in the world that I would ever want to be compelled to look up the law on the legalities of fudge packing.... nope, none what so ever.... eww..

.

.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
I can think of no reason in the world that I would ever want to be compelled to look up the law on the legalities of fudge packing.... nope, none what so ever.... eww...

.
How about, personal freedoms?

You do realize that ant-sodomy laws apply to heterosexual interaction too, right?

 

snafu

New member
Uhm, sure, but I STILL have no reason to ever look that up. EWWW.. :cool: .

.
I did it for you! You know that! It was the least I could do! You were informed too were you not?

 

phreakwars

New member
I didn't realize you were such a homophobe.
I am not a homophobe in anyway. But I have to question the whole idea of using your **** shoot as a pleasure orifice. Don't care if your gay or into kinky *** with your wife. That is not a natural pleassure spot and was never intended to be. If it were, so many men and women wouldn't suffer from internal rectal problems resulting from **** ***.
I would have no desire in participating in, or viewing such sodomy on another human being, much less feel the need to find the legalities of doing it.

P.S. EWWW!!

.

.

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
I can think of no reason in the world that I would ever want to be compelled to look up the law on the legalities of fudge packing.... nope, none what so ever.... eww...

.

How about, personal freedoms?
You do realize that ant-sodomy laws apply to heterosexual interaction too, right?

Uhm, sure, but I STILL have no reason to ever look that up. EWWW.. :cool: .

.
Any legalities placed on what two consenting adults do behind closed doors or what a person of legal age wishes to view and/or participate, were mandated by the church and enforced through government.

 
Top Bottom