Trent Lott's Brother-In-Law, Nephew, Indicted On Federal Bribery Charges

H

Harry Hope

Guest
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/28/trent-lotts-brotherinl_n_74572.html

November 28, 2007

Trent Lott's Brother-In-Law, Nephew, Indicted On Federal Bribery
Charges

Max Follmer

Prominent Mississippi trial attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs, the
brother-in-law of outgoing GOP Sen. Trent Lott, was indicted by a
federal grand jury Wednesday on charges that he and four other men
tried to bribe a Mississippi state court judge.

According to the 13-page indictment, Scruggs and three other attorneys
-- including Lott's nephew Zach -- attempted to bribe Mississippi
Third Circuit Court Judge Henry L. Lackey with at least $40,000 in
cash.

Lackey was assigned to hear a lawsuit in which Scruggs' firm was named
as a defendant in a dispute involving $26.5 million in attorneys' fees
stemming from a court settlement with State Farm Insurance over
Hurricane Katrina claims.

The indictment alleges that the bribe was intended to resolve the case
in Scruggs' and his firm's favor.

Also charged was Sidney A. Backstrom, an attorney at Scruggs' firm;
Timothy R. Balducci, a New Albany, Miss., lawyer; and former State
Auditor Steven A. Patterson, an employee of Balducci's law firm.

Neither Scruggs nor an attorney for the firm, Joey Langston, returned
telephone messages seeking comment.

Langston does not work at The Scruggs Law Firm.

Lott's office did not respond to a request for comment.

Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
wrongdoing.

Lott, the second-highest ranking Republican in the Senate, announced
Monday he was resigning his seat after 35 years on Capitol Hill.

Lott's decision to leave Congress came one year after he won
re-election to his fourth term.

Scruggs, long a power player in Mississippi legal circles, rose to
prominence after securing huge verdicts for plaintiffs in asbestos
litigation, and from his role in brokering a multibillion dollar
settlement with tobacco companies in the 1990s.

He later represented hundreds of Gulf Coast homeowners -- including
Lott -- whose claims were denied by insurance companies in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina.

Lott's home in Pascagoula was destroyed by the storm.

The case at the center of the bribery allegations involves a fee
dispute between Scruggs' firm and an attorney, John Jones, who did
work on behalf of Katrina plaintiffs.

According to the indictment, the five defendants met at Scruggs'
Oxford, Miss. office in mid-March to discuss the scheme.

On March 28, Balducci allegedly traveled to Calhoun County, Miss. to
meet with the judge in order to make "an overture" to resolve the
lawsuit "favorably to the defendant Richard 'Dickie' Scruggs and The
Scruggs Law Firm."

The indictment says that Lackey immediately reported the bribery
scheme to the FBI, and began cooperating with federal authorities.

In May, Balducci allegedly had a conversation with Lackey where he
said "for over the last five or six years there, there are bodies
buried that, that you know, that [Scruggs] and I know where...where
are, and, and, my, my trust is his, mine in him and his i mine."

Between September 27 and November 1, Balducci allegedly made three
cash payments to Lackey, returning from the last meeting with a court
order favorable to the defendants.

"We paid for this ruling; let's be sure it says what we want it to
say," Balducci told Zach Scruggs and Backstrom, according to the
indictment.

On Tuesday FBI agents searched Scruggs' law office in Oxford, Miss.,
removing copies of a computer hard drive.

A statement issued by the FBI office in Jackson, Miss. said the search
was "in furtherance of an ongoing investigation," according to the
Associated Press.

____________________________________________________

Harry
 
Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
wrongdoing.


You ****ing idiot.
 
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:26:03 -0500, Harry Dope wrote:

> Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
> wrongdoing.
>


Did he say he was? Of course not , you ridiculous bush asshole licker.



>
> You ****ing idiot.
 
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 15:26:03 -0500, "Harry Dope"
<DemsHateAmerica1st@aol.com> wrote:

>Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
>wrongdoing.
>
>
>You ****ing idiot.


Give it time.

The man, after all, is a moralistic Christian Republican.

In other words, as corrupt as the devil's asshole.
>

--

What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"I simply can not believe this is what the Republican party has
become. I just can
 
"Harry Dope" <DemsHateAmerica1st@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4751c360$0$2323$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
> wrongdoing.


Lott is guilty of using his brother for criminal activity under the RICO
ACT.
 
"Harry Dope" <DemsHateAmerica1st@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4751c360$0$2323$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
> wrongdoing.
>
>
> You ****ing idiot.
>


Senator Clinton was not named in any indictment, either, although her
brother got into some **** with the cops.

So -- we should apply the same standard to her.

Thanks for clearing up that point, asshole.
 
In article <13l3kf47n46td99@corp.supernews.com>
Patrick Henry <phenery@revolution.now> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:26:03 -0500, Harry Dope wrote:
>
> > Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
> > wrongdoing.
> >

>
> Did he say he was? Of course not , you ridiculous bush asshole licker.


Hairy Dope just naturally assumes that good ol' Trent is somehow involved.
 
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:24:52 GMT, "Wm Clinton Prez '08" <ArbustoOil@WH.net> wrote:

>"Harry Dope" <DemsHateAmerica1st@aol.com> wrote in message news:4751c360$0$2323$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any
>> wrongdoing.

>
>Lott is guilty of using his brother for criminal activity under the RICO
>ACT.


Speaking of RICO, how about the way those 'voting machine'
racketeers threatened and lied and forced localities to violate
state laws with the threat of the feds to rob taxpayers for
their unreliable defective junk products?

The Voting Rights Act is now moot because observations of
'elections' are impossible due to the electronics.
 
Back
Top