U.S. Intelligence report debunks Republican administration policies on Iraq

H

Harry Hope

Guest
From The International Herald Tribune, 8/24/07:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/24/asia/assess.php

Intelligence report at odds with U.S. policies on Iraq

By Damien Cave

BAGHDAD:

The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate has effectively discredited
the dominant American hypothesis of the past seven months:

that safer streets, secured by additional troops, would create enough
political calm for Iraq's leaders to reconcile.

They have failed to do so in part, suggests the report, which was
released Thursday, because the security gains remain too modest to
reverse Iraq's dynamic of violence and fear.

Baghdad after all, remains a place where women at the market avoid
buying river fish for fear that they've been eating bodies.

But just as important, according to Iraqi political analysts and
officials, Iraq has become a cellular nation, dividing and redividing,
where the constituency for chaos now outnumbers the constituency for
compromise.

The central government has not held.

Provinces and even neighborhoods have become the stage where power
struggles play out, and as a result, Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds - or
elements of each faction - have come to feel that they could do a
better job on their own.

___________________________________________

Says it all

Harry
 
On Aug 24, 5:03 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> From The International Herald Tribune, 8/24/07:http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/24/asia/assess.php
>
> Intelligence report at odds with U.S. policies on Iraq
>
> By Damien Cave
>
> BAGHDAD:
>
> The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate has effectively discredited
> the dominant American hypothesis of the past seven months:
>
> that safer streets, secured by additional troops, would create enough
> political calm for Iraq's leaders to reconcile.
>
> They have failed to do so in part, suggests the report, which was
> released Thursday, because the security gains remain too modest to
> reverse Iraq's dynamic of violence and fear.
>
> Baghdad after all, remains a place where women at the market avoid
> buying river fish for fear that they've been eating bodies.
>
> But just as important, according to Iraqi political analysts and
> officials, Iraq has become a cellular nation, dividing and redividing,
> where the constituency for chaos now outnumbers the constituency for
> compromise.
>
> The central government has not held.
>
> Provinces and even neighborhoods have become the stage where power
> struggles play out, and as a result, Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds - or
> elements of each faction - have come to feel that they could do a
> better job on their own.
>
> ___________________________________________
>
> Says it all
>
> Harry


So lets see this actual intelligence report the Tribune writes about.
 
Is success in Iraq important or is it not important, and why?

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:atouc35tqj72ttj87oulkmo3ae65d69d7m@4ax.com...
>
> From The International Herald Tribune, 8/24/07:
> http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/24/asia/assess.php
>
> Intelligence report at odds with U.S. policies on Iraq
>
> By Damien Cave
>
> BAGHDAD:
>
> The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate has effectively discredited
> the dominant American hypothesis of the past seven months:
>
> that safer streets, secured by additional troops, would create enough
> political calm for Iraq's leaders to reconcile.
>
> They have failed to do so in part, suggests the report, which was
> released Thursday, because the security gains remain too modest to
> reverse Iraq's dynamic of violence and fear.
>
> Baghdad after all, remains a place where women at the market avoid
> buying river fish for fear that they've been eating bodies.
>
> But just as important, according to Iraqi political analysts and
> officials, Iraq has become a cellular nation, dividing and redividing,
> where the constituency for chaos now outnumbers the constituency for
> compromise.
>
> The central government has not held.
>
> Provinces and even neighborhoods have become the stage where power
> struggles play out, and as a result, Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds - or
> elements of each faction - have come to feel that they could do a
> better job on their own.
>
> ___________________________________________
>
> Says it all
>
> Harry
 
On Aug 27, 4:56 pm, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
> Is success in Iraq important or is it not important, and why?



"Success" in Iraq is not achievable.



>
> > From The International Herald Tribune, 8/24/07:
> >http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/24/asia/assess.php

>
> > Intelligence report at odds with U.S. policies on Iraq

>
> > By Damien Cave

>
> > BAGHDAD:

>
> > The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate has effectively discredited
> > the dominant American hypothesis of the past seven months:

>
> > that safer streets, secured by additional troops, would create enough
> > political calm for Iraq's leaders to reconcile.

>
> > They have failed to do so in part, suggests the report, which was
> > released Thursday, because the security gains remain too modest to
> > reverse Iraq's dynamic of violence and fear.

>
> > Baghdad after all, remains a place where women at the market avoid
> > buying river fish for fear that they've been eating bodies.

>
> > But just as important, according to Iraqi political analysts and
> > officials, Iraq has become a cellular nation, dividing and redividing,
> > where the constituency for chaos now outnumbers the constituency for
> > compromise.

>
> > The central government has not held.

>
> > Provinces and even neighborhoods have become the stage where power
> > struggles play out, and as a result, Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds - or
> > elements of each faction - have come to feel that they could do a
> > better job on their own.

>
> > ___________________________________________

>
> > Says it all

>
> > Harry- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -
 
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:56:34 -1000, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj005@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:

>Is success in Iraq important or is it not important, and why?


By 'success', you mean bankrupting the USA
and destroying its military, don't you, traitor.

>"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
>news:atouc35tqj72ttj87oulkmo3ae65d69d7m@4ax.com...
>>
>> From The International Herald Tribune, 8/24/07:
>> http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/24/asia/assess.php
>>
>> Intelligence report at odds with U.S. policies on Iraq
>>
>> By Damien Cave
>>
>> BAGHDAD:
>>
>> The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate has effectively discredited
>> the dominant American hypothesis of the past seven months:
>>
>> that safer streets, secured by additional troops, would create enough
>> political calm for Iraq's leaders to reconcile.
>>
>> They have failed to do so in part, suggests the report, which was
>> released Thursday, because the security gains remain too modest to
>> reverse Iraq's dynamic of violence and fear.
>>
>> Baghdad after all, remains a place where women at the market avoid
>> buying river fish for fear that they've been eating bodies.
>>
>> But just as important, according to Iraqi political analysts and
>> officials, Iraq has become a cellular nation, dividing and redividing,
>> where the constituency for chaos now outnumbers the constituency for
>> compromise.
>>
>> The central government has not held.
>>
>> Provinces and even neighborhoods have become the stage where power
>> struggles play out, and as a result, Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds - or
>> elements of each faction - have come to feel that they could do a
>> better job on their own.
>>
>> ___________________________________________
>>
>> Says it all
>>
>> Harry
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
3
Views
17
HannityIsAnIdiot
H
M
Replies
15
Views
22
Anonymous Infidel - the anti-polit
A
J
Replies
0
Views
24
John B.
J
Back
Top