B
baxter
Guest
i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
start over.
- bax
incognito sometimes.
start over.
- bax
incognito sometimes.
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
baxter wrote:
> i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> start over.
>
> - bax
>
> incognito sometimes.
If you do that, I will smite you.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
> i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> start over.
>
> - bax
>
> incognito sometimes.
If you do that, I will smite you.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
B
baxter
Guest
On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> baxter wrote:
> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> > start over.
>
> > - bax
>
> > ? incognito sometimes.
>
> If you do that, I will smite you.
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.
no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
- bax
this post is not icognito.
> baxter wrote:
> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> > start over.
>
> > - bax
>
> > ? incognito sometimes.
>
> If you do that, I will smite you.
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.
no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
- bax
this post is not icognito.
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
baxter wrote:
> On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> baxter wrote:
>> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>> > start over.
>>
>> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
> On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> baxter wrote:
>> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>> > start over.
>>
>> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
D
david hillstrom
Guest
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:35:03 -0800 (PST), baxter <district29@***.net>
wrote:
>i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>start over.
>
>- bax
>
> incognito sometimes.
wimp. and i wrote some short stories even.
--
dave hillstrom xrbj
wrote:
>i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>start over.
>
>- bax
>
> incognito sometimes.
wimp. and i wrote some short stories even.
--
dave hillstrom xrbj
B
baxter
Guest
On Dec 22, 8:12?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> baxter wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> baxter wrote:
> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> >> > start over.
>
> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> I was talking about your post, not your sig. ?Which you really should cut
> before you post. ?I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> to catch this one. ?Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.
****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
i'm not giving up.
- bax
> baxter wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> baxter wrote:
> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> >> > start over.
>
> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> I was talking about your post, not your sig. ?Which you really should cut
> before you post. ?I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> to catch this one. ?Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.
****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
i'm not giving up.
- bax
B
baxter
Guest
On Dec 22, 8:20?pm, david hillstrom <d...@meow.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:35:03 -0800 (PST), baxter <distric...@***.net>
> wrote:
>
> >i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> >start over.
>
> >- bax
>
> > ?incognito sometimes.
>
> wimp. ?and i wrote some short stories even. ?
>
> --
> dave hillstrom ? xrbj
i just can't sit here in front of the computer for days on
end....well, actually i can. which is the problem i'm facing these
days.
- bax
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:35:03 -0800 (PST), baxter <distric...@***.net>
> wrote:
>
> >i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> >start over.
>
> >- bax
>
> > ?incognito sometimes.
>
> wimp. ?and i wrote some short stories even. ?
>
> --
> dave hillstrom ? xrbj
i just can't sit here in front of the computer for days on
end....well, actually i can. which is the problem i'm facing these
days.
- bax
M
mimus
Guest
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:23:36 -0800, baxter wrote:
> On Dec 22, 8:20 pm, david hillstrom <d...@meow.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:35:03 -0800 (PST), baxter <distric...@***.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>>> start over.
>>
>> wimp. and i wrote some short stories even.
>
> i just can't sit here in front of the computer for days on end....well,
> actually i can. which is the problem i'm facing these days.
Hard keyboard-work for life. Sucks.
--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
A monitor manufacturer has just discovered
what most of us have known all along:
that computers make you sick and
we're all going to end up blind and crippled
as a result of excessive keyboard pounding.
< _The Register_
> On Dec 22, 8:20 pm, david hillstrom <d...@meow.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:35:03 -0800 (PST), baxter <distric...@***.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>>> start over.
>>
>> wimp. and i wrote some short stories even.
>
> i just can't sit here in front of the computer for days on end....well,
> actually i can. which is the problem i'm facing these days.
Hard keyboard-work for life. Sucks.
--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
A monitor manufacturer has just discovered
what most of us have known all along:
that computers make you sick and
we're all going to end up blind and crippled
as a result of excessive keyboard pounding.
< _The Register_
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
baxter wrote:
> On Dec 22, 8:12?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> baxter wrote:
>> > On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll jus
>> >> > t start over.
>>
>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> I was talking about your post, not your sig. ?Which you really should c
>> ut before you post. ?I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>> fai led to catch this one. ?Careful or you may be in for a double
>> smiting.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
I had to do it again, dammit. First thing to do is get a real newsreader
and quit using Google.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
> On Dec 22, 8:12?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> baxter wrote:
>> > On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll jus
>> >> > t start over.
>>
>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> I was talking about your post, not your sig. ?Which you really should c
>> ut before you post. ?I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>> fai led to catch this one. ?Careful or you may be in for a double
>> smiting.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
I had to do it again, dammit. First thing to do is get a real newsreader
and quit using Google.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
P
pscissons@sbcglobal.net
Guest
"baxter" <district29@***.net> wrote in message
news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> baxter wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> baxter wrote:
> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> >> > start over.
>
> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.
****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
i'm not giving up.
Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Smee
- bax
news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> baxter wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> baxter wrote:
> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> >> > start over.
>
> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.
****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
i'm not giving up.
Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Smee
- bax
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
wrote:
>
> "baxter" <district29@***.net> wrote in message
> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> baxter wrote:
>> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
just
>> >> > start over.
>>
>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
>> before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
>> to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
>> --
>> Tim Weaver
>>
>> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure
>> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
>
> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing.
>
> Smee
>
>
> - bax
Now, you're two are switching accounts. Cheaters, the both of you.
<evil>
So, fine. No more pointers, no more assistance. Post your trash. No more
trying to assist and being Mr. Good Guy.
Phhblblblltlltt!!!!!!!
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
>
> "baxter" <district29@***.net> wrote in message
> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> baxter wrote:
>> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
just
>> >> > start over.
>>
>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
>> before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
>> to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
>> --
>> Tim Weaver
>>
>> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure
>> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
>
> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing.
>
> Smee
>
>
> - bax
Now, you're two are switching accounts. Cheaters, the both of you.
<evil>
So, fine. No more pointers, no more assistance. Post your trash. No more
trying to assist and being Mr. Good Guy.
Phhblblblltlltt!!!!!!!
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
B
baxter
Guest
On Dec 25, 1:18?am, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ?wrote:
>
> > "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
> >news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> baxter wrote:
> >> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> baxter wrote:
> >> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
> just
> >> >> > start over.
>
> >> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> >> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> >> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not..
>
> >> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> >> before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> >> to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> >> --
> >> Tim Weaver
>
> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure
> >> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> > i'm not giving up.
>
> > Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
> nothing.
>
> > Smee
>
> > - bax
>
> Now, you're two are switching accounts. ?Cheaters, the both of you.
>
> <evil>
>
> So, fine. ?No more pointers, no more assistance. ?Post your trash. ?No more
> trying to assist and being Mr. Good Guy.
>
> Phhblblblltlltt!!!!!!!
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
no! that was pcississiiii, person. for whom i have nothing against!
no! not on christmas! for jebus, not on christmas.
-bax
> ?wrote:
>
> > "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
> >news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> baxter wrote:
> >> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> baxter wrote:
> >> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
> just
> >> >> > start over.
>
> >> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> >> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> >> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not..
>
> >> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> >> before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> >> to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> >> --
> >> Tim Weaver
>
> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure
> >> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> > i'm not giving up.
>
> > Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
> nothing.
>
> > Smee
>
> > - bax
>
> Now, you're two are switching accounts. ?Cheaters, the both of you.
>
> <evil>
>
> So, fine. ?No more pointers, no more assistance. ?Post your trash. ?No more
> trying to assist and being Mr. Good Guy.
>
> Phhblblblltlltt!!!!!!!
> --
> Tim Weaver
>
> I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> what I meant.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
no! that was pcississiiii, person. for whom i have nothing against!
no! not on christmas! for jebus, not on christmas.
-bax
B
baxter
Guest
On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > baxter wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> baxter wrote:
> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> > >> > start over.
>
> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> > before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> > to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> > --
> > Tim Weaver
>
> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> > but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> > what I meant.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
>
> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
>
> Smee
>
> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
"weirdos" on the interbernets??
- bax
> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > baxter wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> baxter wrote:
> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
> > >> > start over.
>
> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> > before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
> > to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> > --
> > Tim Weaver
>
> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> > but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> > what I meant.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
>
> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
>
> Smee
>
> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
"weirdos" on the interbernets??
- bax
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
baxter wrote:
> On Dec 25, 1:18?am, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ?wrote:
>>
>> > "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-
2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
>> >> >> > just start over.
>>
>> >> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm no
>> >> >> t sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> >> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not
>> >> > .
>>
>> >> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should c
>> >> ut before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>> >> fai led to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double
>> >> smiting. --
>> >> Tim Weaver
>>
>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not s
>> >> ure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> > i'm not giving up.
>>
>> > Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
>> > nothing.
>>
>> > Smee
>>
>> > - bax
>>
>> Now, you're two are switching accounts. ?Cheaters, the both of you.
>>
>> <evil>
>>
>> So, fine. ?No more pointers, no more assistance. ?Post your trash. ?No
>> more trying to assist and being Mr. Good Guy.
>>
>> Phhblblblltlltt!!!!!!!
>> --
>> Tim Weaver
>>
>> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure
>> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> no! that was pcississiiii, person. for whom i have nothing against!
> no! not on christmas! for jebus, not on christmas.
OK, whatever that means.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
> On Dec 25, 1:18?am, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ?wrote:
>>
>> > "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-
2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> baxter wrote:
>> >> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
>> >> >> > just start over.
>>
>> >> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm no
>> >> >> t sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> >> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not
>> >> > .
>>
>> >> I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should c
>> >> ut before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>> >> fai led to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double
>> >> smiting. --
>> >> Tim Weaver
>>
>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not s
>> >> ure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> > i'm not giving up.
>>
>> > Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
>> > nothing.
>>
>> > Smee
>>
>> > - bax
>>
>> Now, you're two are switching accounts. ?Cheaters, the both of you.
>>
>> <evil>
>>
>> So, fine. ?No more pointers, no more assistance. ?Post your trash. ?No
>> more trying to assist and being Mr. Good Guy.
>>
>> Phhblblblltlltt!!!!!!!
>> --
>> Tim Weaver
>>
>> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure
>> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> no! that was pcississiiii, person. for whom i have nothing against!
> no! not on christmas! for jebus, not on christmas.
OK, whatever that means.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
baxter wrote:
> On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > baxter wrote:
>> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> baxter wrote:
>> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll j
>> > >> > ust start over.
>>
>> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cu
>> > t before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>> > fail ed to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double
>> > smiting. --
>> > Tim Weaver
>>
>> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> > sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> i'm not giving up.
>>
>> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothin
>> g.
>>
>> Smee
>>
>> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
> "weirdos" on the interbernets??
OK, whatever that means.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
> On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > baxter wrote:
>> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> baxter wrote:
>> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll j
>> > >> > ust start over.
>>
>> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cu
>> > t before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>> > fail ed to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double
>> > smiting. --
>> > Tim Weaver
>>
>> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> > sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> i'm not giving up.
>>
>> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothin
>> g.
>>
>> Smee
>>
>> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
> "weirdos" on the interbernets??
OK, whatever that means.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
P
pscissons@sbcglobal.net
Guest
"baxter" <district29@***.net> wrote in message
news:037e032d-7eab-4120-86c3-0fcd1873ec4c@g38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 25, 12:58 am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > baxter wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> baxter wrote:
> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
just
> > >> > start over.
>
> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> > before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
failed
> > to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> > --
> > Tim Weaver
>
> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> > but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> > what I meant.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
>
> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing.
>
> Smee
>
> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
"weirdos" on the interbernets??
- bax
Of course not, Bax. pat pat Nobody here but us normal folks.
Smee
news:037e032d-7eab-4120-86c3-0fcd1873ec4c@g38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 25, 12:58 am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > baxter wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> baxter wrote:
> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll
just
> > >> > start over.
>
> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>
> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>
> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
> > before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
failed
> > to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
> > --
> > Tim Weaver
>
> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
> > but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
> > what I meant.
>
> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>
> i'm not giving up.
>
> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing.
>
> Smee
>
> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
"weirdos" on the interbernets??
- bax
Of course not, Bax. pat pat Nobody here but us normal folks.
Smee
M
metro-golden-meower
Guest
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:28:08 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
<tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>baxter wrote:
>
>> On Dec 22, 8:12?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> baxter wrote:
>>> > On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> baxter wrote:
>>> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll jus
>>> >> > t start over.
>>>
>>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>>> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>>
>>> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>>
>>> I was talking about your post, not your sig. ?Which you really should c
>>> ut before you post. ?I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>>> fai led to catch this one. ?Careful or you may be in for a double
>>> smiting.
>>
>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> i'm not giving up.
>
>I had to do it again, dammit. First thing to do is get a real newsreader
>and quit using Google.
iawtp.
<tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>baxter wrote:
>
>> On Dec 22, 8:12?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> baxter wrote:
>>> > On Dec 22, 4:46?pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> baxter wrote:
>>> >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll jus
>>> >> > t start over.
>>>
>>> >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>>> >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>>
>>> > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>>
>>> I was talking about your post, not your sig. ?Which you really should c
>>> ut before you post. ?I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I
>>> fai led to catch this one. ?Careful or you may be in for a double
>>> smiting.
>>
>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> i'm not giving up.
>
>I had to do it again, dammit. First thing to do is get a real newsreader
>and quit using Google.
iawtp.
M
metro-golden-meower
Guest
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:41:07 -0800 (PST), baxter <district29@***.net>
wrote:
>On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > baxter wrote:
>> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> baxter wrote:
>> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>> > >> > start over.
>>
>> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
>> > before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
>> > to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
>> > --
>> > Tim Weaver
>>
>> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
>> > but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
>> > what I meant.
>>
>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> i'm not giving up.
>>
>> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
>>
>> Smee
>>
>> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
>"weirdos" on the interbernets??
so you've not had a look at alt.usenet.kooks then? btw its not just
the kooks over there that are weirdos. assuming you can work out who's
who and what's what.
>- bax
wrote:
>On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > baxter wrote:
>> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> baxter wrote:
>> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts. i'll just
>> > >> > start over.
>>
>> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>> > >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>
>> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe not.
>>
>> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should cut
>> > before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but I failed
>> > to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double smiting.
>> > --
>> > Tim Weaver
>>
>> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
>> > but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
>> > what I meant.
>>
>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>
>> i'm not giving up.
>>
>> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
>>
>> Smee
>>
>> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
>"weirdos" on the interbernets??
so you've not had a look at alt.usenet.kooks then? btw its not just
the kooks over there that are weirdos. assuming you can work out who's
who and what's what.
>- bax
T
Tim Weaver
Guest
metro-golden-meower wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:41:07 -0800 (PST), baxter <district29@***.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com..
>>> . On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > baxter wrote:
>>> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> baxter wrote:
>>> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts.
>>> > >> > i'll just start over.
>>>
>>> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm
>>> > >> not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>>
>>> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe
>>> > > not.
>>>
>>> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should
>>> > cut before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but
>>> > I failed to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double
>>> > smiting. --
>>> > Tim Weaver
>>>
>>> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>>> > sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>>
>>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>>
>>> i'm not giving up.
>>>
>>> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
>>> nothing.
>>>
>>> Smee
>>>
>>> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
>>"weirdos" on the interbernets??
>
> so you've not had a look at alt.usenet.kooks then? btw its not just
> the kooks over there that are weirdos. assuming you can work out who's
> who and what's what.
This is where x-posting, changing nyms and sock puppets get interesting.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:41:07 -0800 (PST), baxter <district29@***.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 12:58?am, <psciss...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> "baxter" <distric...@***.net> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:f963d537-32e1-4a4c-8d95-2f1760d88bbe@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com..
>>> . On Dec 22, 8:12 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > baxter wrote:
>>> > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> baxter wrote:
>>> > >> > i split for the weekend, and now there's tons of new posts.
>>> > >> > i'll just start over.
>>>
>>> > >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm
>>> > >> not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>>
>>> > > no, it was a joke signature. like it's obviously me....but maybe
>>> > > not.
>>>
>>> > I was talking about your post, not your sig. Which you really should
>>> > cut before you post. I usually try to fix up your posts for you, but
>>> > I failed to catch this one. Careful or you may be in for a double
>>> > smiting. --
>>> > Tim Weaver
>>>
>>> > I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
>>> > sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
>>>
>>> ****. so much to learn about posting with the pro's.
>>>
>>> i'm not giving up.
>>>
>>> Don't listen to him, Bax. He is full of sound and fury, signifying
>>> nothing.
>>>
>>> Smee
>>>
>>> - bax- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>i'm so confused. this is new guy hazing, right?? certainly there's no
>>"weirdos" on the interbernets??
>
> so you've not had a look at alt.usenet.kooks then? btw its not just
> the kooks over there that are weirdos. assuming you can work out who's
> who and what's what.
This is where x-posting, changing nyms and sock puppets get interesting.
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.