URGENT: STOPPING AN IRS AUDIT

32 Questions: Stopping an IRS Audit

"Our system of taxation is based upon voluntary assessment and payment, not

upon distraint" Flora v. U.S. 362 US 145 [unless, of course, you neglect to

"volunteer".

Notice: The following is presented to you via Bill Drexler's newsletter,

with permission. Before, and if, you use it , be sure the case cites are

correct. [and you understand and can EXPLAIN them.

Certified Mail:

To: IRS Representative/Agent:

It is required of you in your official capacity, and requested of you as an

individual person acting under color of law, that you answer the following

list of questions, 32 in number, WHICH

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER under the provisions of the

Privacy Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and various court decisions.

Under each question the pertinent authorities have been cited which mandate

a complete answer from you upon this request. Thank you for your

cooperation.

1) State the authority, giving the specific section of the IRC for the

solicitation of the information that you desire (Freedom of Information Act;

Privacy Act; US v. Newman, 441 F2d 170; Treasury Form Letter L-423 with

Publication 876 - same authorities cited for #1 thru #5).

2) State whether the disclosure of the requested information is mandatory or

voluntary. If mandatory, what penalties may/will result from non-compliance

in furnishing the data you

requested?

3) State the principal and specific purposes for which the information

requested is to be used in any and all capacities.

4) State the routine uses which may be made of the requested information, or

any other use to be made of the requested information.

5) State the effects upon this person of whom you have requested

information, specifically the taxpayer, for not providing to you the

information requested.

6) Explain and show that the investigation involved is of the kind

authorized by federal statute (Martin v. Chandid, 128 F2d 731; Pacific Mills

v. Kenefick, 99 F2d 188).

7) Explain how and why the demand for information is not too vague and/or

broad in scope (US v. Newman, 441 F2d 170; US v. Williams, 337 F Supp 1114;

First National Bank of Mobile v. US, 160 F2d 532; US v. Coopers and Lybrand,

FSupp 942; Hubner v. Tucker, 245 F2d 35).

8) Explain and show that the information sought is relevant or material as a

lawful subject of inquiry (US v. Powell, 379 US 48; International

Brotherhood of Teamsters v. US, 240 F2d 387; US v. Michigan Bell Telephone

Co., 415 F2d 1284; May v. Davis, 7 F Supp 596; US v. Brown, 536 F2d 117).

9) Explain why and how the investigation is pursuant to legitimate

purpose(s) (same authorities as #6 thru #8).

10) Explain why and how the inquiry for information may be relevant to the

purpose(s) (same authorities as #6 thru #8)

11) Show and prove that the information is not already in your possession or

can not be obtained from other sources (same authorities as #6 thru #8).

12) Show and prove that the Secretary or his delegate has determined that

this further examination is necessary (IRC Section 7605).

13) Show and prove that all other administrative steps required by the

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) have been followed to the letter of the law

(Martin v. Chandis, 128 F2d 731; US v. Powell, 379 US 48).

14) Show and prove that after initial investigation, the Secretary or his

delegate has determined that further examination is necessary and warranted

(US v. Powell, 379 US 48; US v. Cooppers & Lybrand, F Supp 942; US v.

Williams, 337 F Supp 1114; Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F2d 945).

15) Show and prove that the taxpayer has been properly notified that further

examination is necessary (US v. Powell, 379 US 48; IRC Section 7605).

16) State the exact reason(s), in detail, for the examination of each year

specific information is requested (US v. Third Northwestern National Bank,

102 F Supp 879; FOIA).

17) State whether there is a misconception and/or mistake in the tax return

for each year that information is requested (US v. Powell, 379 US 48; US v.

Wright Motor Co., 536 F2d 1090).

18) State exactly wherein the mistake lies, or if in fact one exists (US v.

London Insurance Agency, Inc. 72-2 T.C.; US v. Powell, 379 US 48; Hubner v.

Tucker, 245 F2d 35).

19) Specify exactly which item(s) of income or expense item(s) is (are) in

question on the tax return(s), if any. (same as # 18).

20) State why the specific income and/or expense item is in question, or is

being examined (same as # 18).

21) Explain why and what issue in law or in fact is questioned, if any

(FOIA; US v. McCarthy, 514 F2d 368).

22) State the name, address, and telephone number of any person or persons

informing you of any questions or concern involved in any item or any tax

return or any activity of the taxpayer

(Sixth Amendment; US v. Zack, D.C. Nev 4/20/74; Favre v. Henderson, 409 US

942; FOIA).

23) State exactly what was said, either verbal and/or written concerning any

item, tax return or activity of the taxpayer by any person(s) informing or

directing you to conduct an examination,

directly, and/or indirectly (Same as # 22).

24) State and prove that the taxpayer is not being subjected to an

examination based on or for any political, ideological, harassment, pressure

tactic, or bad-faith purpose, and is not being singled out for prosecution

as an example to other taxpayers for any reason (US v. Powell, 379 US 48; US

v. Wright Motor Co., 536 F2d 1090; US v. McCarthy, 514 F2d 368; US v.

Roundtree, 420 F2d 845; Chaukin v. Alexander, 401 F Supp 817; FOIA).

25) State and explain why the examination can not and will not amount to an

inquisition or arbitrary inquiry on the part of the examiner (Local 174

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

v. US, 240 F2d 387; US v. McKay, 372 F2d 174; US v. Powell, 379 US 48; US v.

Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 415 F2d 1284; US v. Third Northwestern Bank,

102 F Supp 879).

26) State and explain why IRC Section 7605 does not apply to any

examination where "...No taxpayer shall be subjected to unnecessary

examination or investigation..." (Pacific Mills v.

Kenefick, 99 F2d 188).

27) State the exact methods used, either past and/or present to gather

information concerning this taxpayer, and whether information was gathered

through the use of surveillance, telephone wire-tapping, mail coverage,

interviews, illegal entry, informers, spies, or otherwise (FOIA; US v.

Wright Motor Co., 536 F2d 1090; Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F3d 945).

28) State whether the verification of specific deductions would be the

limited scope of the examination (US v. Powell, 379 US 48).

29) State and explain any objection to the use of electronic recorder(s)

during the pursuit of this examination (IRS Manual MT 9900-26, 1/29/75,

paragraph 241.5).

30) State whether the examiner would be prejudiced against a taxpayer who

arranges his affairs to minimize his taxes as the law permits( Gregory v.

Helvering, 293 US 465; Knetsch v. US, 361).

31) Show and prove to this Citizen how the IRS Commissioner has jurisdiction

over any subject matter concerning this Citizen (Hale v. Hinkle, 201 US 43;

Murdock v. Pa, 319 US 105; US v. LaSalle Bank, 437 US 298; 26 USC Section

6011).

32) Unless otherwise shown, this Citizen hereby pleads and does give public

notice that the IRS Commissioner has an absence of jurisdiction over this

Citizen's person (Same as # 31)

What can you do? File your UCC-1 claim on the CORPORATION that carries your

name in their ledgers and take control of your Treasury Direct Account. You

are considered a citizen of a Federal territory because of Fourteenth

Amendment citizenship. Since you have not objected to your status as a

subject of the Federal jurisdiction, you may be presumed to be content with

your Federal citizenship. To guide you through the legal brambles to freedom

you will need the help of an experienced advisor. GET STARTED NOW!

History of Banking Fraud: The Coming Battle By M. W. WALBERT

The Coming Battle documents from Congressional records, newspaper reports

and writings by the founding fathers and others a chronology of events long

forgotten that shaped our fledgling nation from 1776 to 1899. Read about the

manipulation of our money and its supply, the intentional creation of

recessions, depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock markets, and

the demonetization of silver.

Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins

Eustace Mullins' carefully researched and documented treatise picks up from

Walbert's expose' and brings it to the mid 1980's

The World Order by Eustace Mullins

How control of the world's money has inexorably led to an ever tighter grip

on control of the world's people.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays

Walter Lippmann's book, Public Opinion, published in 1922, detailed the

study in which he and Edward Bernays were involved while in London during

the First World War. It had to do with painting pictures inside people's

heads, which were cunningly and deliberately designed by expert craftsmen to

mislead not only individuals but entire societies.

Uranium Wars by Leuren Moret

How control of the world's people has inexorably led to wider use of

depopulation methods which include spreading radioactivity in food, water,

air, and the human genome.

Taking Back Your Power by Allen Aslan Heart

WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game. Take back your power. Stop paying

taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop paying bills you don't really owe.

Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if you open your mind and look for

the gaps in their fences that keep the sheeple in their pasture. Are you

chattel or a real person? You are the one who makes that choice.

Our experienced debt elimination service professionals have been helping

people with debt elimination, tax freedom, and credit repair for over ten

years. To contact them click here.

FAMILY PROTECTIONELIMINATE CREDIT CARD DEBT - STUDENT LOAN DEBT TAX FREEDOM

MORTGAGE ANALYSIS CREDIT REPAIRDRAFT FREEDOM

This Real Debt Elimination information is for the purpose of education and

broadening horizons ONLY.

See Real Debt Elimination links

"sandman" <sandman@hotmail.com> allegedly said in

news:1peeo6.c39.19.1@news.alt.net:

> 32 Questions: Stopping an IRS Audit

>

rotfl...

Hey skippy let us know how it works out for you..

Thanks to those commie lovers at the ACLU, prisoners ARE allowed

"reasonable" communications.

We look forward to hearing from you.

<snicker>

--

AW

<small but dangerous>

"sandman" <sandman@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1peeo6.c39.19.1@news.alt.net...

> 32 Questions: Stopping an IRS Audit

Time to audit Bush / Cheney.

"Bush Patraed Us" <Hanoi Radio McCain@maverickcocksucker.net> wrote in

message news:0x4Lj.31$ix6.23@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...

>

> "sandman" <sandman@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:1peeo6.c39.19.1@news.alt.net...

>> 32 Questions: Stopping an IRS Audit

>

> Time to audit Bush / Cheney.

Done:

The couple contributed $75,560 to churches and charitable organizations,

about $2,200 less than last year. Those included the American Red Cross and

the Salvation Army

How this bozo added the totally bogus uranium wars by Leuren Moret to

a post on an IRS audit is beyond me,

Leuren Moret is not an expert in anything, not in uranium, not in

radiation, not in atmospheric dust -- what she is expert in is self-

promotion and she has DVDs to sell - she also expects that no one will

actually decide to find out who she really is as opposed to who she

markets herself as being. She really is a graduate of the University

of California at Davis with a Bachelor of Science in Geology. She

really did work at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, but she

really only worked there for less than a year as a Senior Scientific

Technologist in the Center for Applied Scientific Computing. Most of

her bios claim two years of employment as a "staff scientist", but the

real Moret is not a "scientist" unless having a baccalaureate degree

in science makes one a scientist. Most people, though, expect that a

scientist has an advanced degree and either long work experience in a

scientific field or some in depth academic and laboratory experience.

Real scientists also generally make discoveries. Real scientists

don't lie about what they know or why you should listen to them.

Moret does that. The link to my name will take you to a public

message with links to international scientific reports. That same

Yahoo Group has another message http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DUStory/message/57

that provides the reader the opportunity to explore the Files Section

where they can read about the real Leuren Moret. Anyone may contact

me through this Yahoo group. You can also learn a great deal about

uranium and DU at http://www.depletedcranium.com

On Apr 8, 11:54