V
Vasi
Guest
Professor Daniel McGowan is a human rights activist and couldn't in
any way be considered a "racist," yet the MSM goes after him as if he
were because he dares to question the official holohoax narrative.
March 27, 2007
Professor Daniel McGowan wrote an op-ed for publication called "What
Does "Holocaust Denial" Really Mean?" I wrote him this note to thank
him for his effort:
Dear Professor Daniel McGowan,
Thank you, thank you, for bringing to light what should be taught in
every school, posted in every public library and preached from every
Christian pulpit.
And talking of 'hate speech'! Is not the entire 'Holocaust' narrative
the ultimate expression of hate speech, based on the use of lies,
extorted testimonies from tortured victims and by the use of war time
propaganda from over 60 years ago?
Seeing how Mearsheimer and Walt, President Jimmy Carter and countless
others are treated I fear for you. I also want to let you know that I
am proud of you for saying and writing what you did and for having had
the courage to put your name and address under it as well.
Bless you, F.J. Adam,
Fayetteville, GA
I received this response from Professor Daniel McGowan. He wrote:
"To date this op-ed has been rejected at over 30 newspapers. Even
Counterpunch won't touch it [As if Counterpunch really touches
anything of any real importance - the PC Apostate's opinion]. No one
argues with its veracity or its timeliness.
Most ignore it or warn that publishing it will only damage my
reputation and/or that of Deir Yassin Remembered. Feel free to
distribute it as you like. I attach herewith another copy.
Daniel McGowan"
What Does 'Holocaust Denial' Really Mean?
By Daniel McGowan
Professor Emeritus
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
3-22-7
The Holocaust[1] (spelled with a capital H) usually refers to the
killing of six million Jews by the Nazis during World War II. It is
supposed to be the German's "Final Solution" to the Jewish problem.
Much of the systematic extermination was to have taken place in
concentration camps by shooting, gassing, and burning alive innocent
victims of the Third Reich.
Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Robert Faurisson, and others who do not
believe this account and who dare to say so in public are reviled as
bigots, anti-Semites, racists, and worse.
{Ed note: worse indeed, all of the above have been sentenced to
prison for their heresy for questioning the Orthodox Holocaust
Story}
Their alternate historical scenarios are not termed simply
revisionist, but are demeaned as Holocaust denial.
Politicians pandering to the Jewish or Christian Zionist vote label
Holocaust revisionist papers and conferences "beyond the pale of
international discourse and acceptable behavior."[2] Non-Zionist Jews,
like Rabbi Dovid Weiss of the Neturei Karta, are denounced as "self-
haters" and are shunned and spat upon. Even Professor Norman
Finkelstein, whose parents were both Holocaust survivors and who wrote
the book, The Holocaust Industry, has been branded a Holocaust denier.
But putting aside the virile hate directed against those who question
the veracity of the typical Holocaust narrative, what is it that these
people believe and say at the risk of imprisonment and bodily harm?
For most Holocaust revisionists, or deniers if you prefer, their
arguments boil down to these three simple contentions:
1. Hitler's "Final Solution" was intended to be ethnic cleansing, not
extermination.
2. There were no homicidal gas chambers used by the Third Reich.
3. There were fewer than 6 million Jews killed of the alleged 55
million who died in WWII.
Are these revisionist contentions so odious as to cause those who
believe them to be reviled, beaten, and imprisoned? More importantly,
is it possible that revisionist contentions are true, or even
partially true, and that they are despised because they contradict the
story of the Holocaust, a story which has been elevated to the level
of a religion in hundreds of films, memorials, museums, and docu-
dramas?
Is it sacrilegious to ask, "If Hitler was intent on extermination, how
did Elie Wiesel, his father, and two of his sisters survive the worst
period of incarceration at Auschwitz?" Wiesel claims that people were
thrown alive into burning pits, yet even the Israeli- trained guides
at Auschwitz do not make this claim.
Is it really "beyond international discourse" to question the efficacy
and the forensic evidence of homicidal gas chambers? If other myths,
like making soap from human fat, have been dismissed as Allied war
propaganda, why is it "unacceptable behavior" to ask if the gas
chamber at Dachau was not reconstructed by the Americans because no
other homicidal gas chamber could be found and used as evidence at the
Nuremburg trials?
For more than fifty years Jewish scholars have spent hundreds of
millions of dollars to document each Jewish victim of the Nazi
Holocaust. The Nazis were German, obsessed with record keeping.
Yet only 3 million names have been collected and many of them died of
natural causes. So why is it so wrong to doubt that fewer than 6
million Jews were murdered in the Second World War?
"Holocaust Denial" might be no more eccentric or no more criminal than
claiming the earth is flat, except that the Holocaust itself has been
used as the sword and shield in the quest to build a Jewish state
between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, where even today
over half the population is not Jewish.
Read the rest at Rense
http://www.rense.com/general75/viv.htm
any way be considered a "racist," yet the MSM goes after him as if he
were because he dares to question the official holohoax narrative.
March 27, 2007
Professor Daniel McGowan wrote an op-ed for publication called "What
Does "Holocaust Denial" Really Mean?" I wrote him this note to thank
him for his effort:
Dear Professor Daniel McGowan,
Thank you, thank you, for bringing to light what should be taught in
every school, posted in every public library and preached from every
Christian pulpit.
And talking of 'hate speech'! Is not the entire 'Holocaust' narrative
the ultimate expression of hate speech, based on the use of lies,
extorted testimonies from tortured victims and by the use of war time
propaganda from over 60 years ago?
Seeing how Mearsheimer and Walt, President Jimmy Carter and countless
others are treated I fear for you. I also want to let you know that I
am proud of you for saying and writing what you did and for having had
the courage to put your name and address under it as well.
Bless you, F.J. Adam,
Fayetteville, GA
I received this response from Professor Daniel McGowan. He wrote:
"To date this op-ed has been rejected at over 30 newspapers. Even
Counterpunch won't touch it [As if Counterpunch really touches
anything of any real importance - the PC Apostate's opinion]. No one
argues with its veracity or its timeliness.
Most ignore it or warn that publishing it will only damage my
reputation and/or that of Deir Yassin Remembered. Feel free to
distribute it as you like. I attach herewith another copy.
Daniel McGowan"
What Does 'Holocaust Denial' Really Mean?
By Daniel McGowan
Professor Emeritus
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
3-22-7
The Holocaust[1] (spelled with a capital H) usually refers to the
killing of six million Jews by the Nazis during World War II. It is
supposed to be the German's "Final Solution" to the Jewish problem.
Much of the systematic extermination was to have taken place in
concentration camps by shooting, gassing, and burning alive innocent
victims of the Third Reich.
Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Robert Faurisson, and others who do not
believe this account and who dare to say so in public are reviled as
bigots, anti-Semites, racists, and worse.
{Ed note: worse indeed, all of the above have been sentenced to
prison for their heresy for questioning the Orthodox Holocaust
Story}
Their alternate historical scenarios are not termed simply
revisionist, but are demeaned as Holocaust denial.
Politicians pandering to the Jewish or Christian Zionist vote label
Holocaust revisionist papers and conferences "beyond the pale of
international discourse and acceptable behavior."[2] Non-Zionist Jews,
like Rabbi Dovid Weiss of the Neturei Karta, are denounced as "self-
haters" and are shunned and spat upon. Even Professor Norman
Finkelstein, whose parents were both Holocaust survivors and who wrote
the book, The Holocaust Industry, has been branded a Holocaust denier.
But putting aside the virile hate directed against those who question
the veracity of the typical Holocaust narrative, what is it that these
people believe and say at the risk of imprisonment and bodily harm?
For most Holocaust revisionists, or deniers if you prefer, their
arguments boil down to these three simple contentions:
1. Hitler's "Final Solution" was intended to be ethnic cleansing, not
extermination.
2. There were no homicidal gas chambers used by the Third Reich.
3. There were fewer than 6 million Jews killed of the alleged 55
million who died in WWII.
Are these revisionist contentions so odious as to cause those who
believe them to be reviled, beaten, and imprisoned? More importantly,
is it possible that revisionist contentions are true, or even
partially true, and that they are despised because they contradict the
story of the Holocaust, a story which has been elevated to the level
of a religion in hundreds of films, memorials, museums, and docu-
dramas?
Is it sacrilegious to ask, "If Hitler was intent on extermination, how
did Elie Wiesel, his father, and two of his sisters survive the worst
period of incarceration at Auschwitz?" Wiesel claims that people were
thrown alive into burning pits, yet even the Israeli- trained guides
at Auschwitz do not make this claim.
Is it really "beyond international discourse" to question the efficacy
and the forensic evidence of homicidal gas chambers? If other myths,
like making soap from human fat, have been dismissed as Allied war
propaganda, why is it "unacceptable behavior" to ask if the gas
chamber at Dachau was not reconstructed by the Americans because no
other homicidal gas chamber could be found and used as evidence at the
Nuremburg trials?
For more than fifty years Jewish scholars have spent hundreds of
millions of dollars to document each Jewish victim of the Nazi
Holocaust. The Nazis were German, obsessed with record keeping.
Yet only 3 million names have been collected and many of them died of
natural causes. So why is it so wrong to doubt that fewer than 6
million Jews were murdered in the Second World War?
"Holocaust Denial" might be no more eccentric or no more criminal than
claiming the earth is flat, except that the Holocaust itself has been
used as the sword and shield in the quest to build a Jewish state
between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, where even today
over half the population is not Jewish.
Read the rest at Rense
http://www.rense.com/general75/viv.htm
