K
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
Guest
Just as the American people and the world are beginning to recognize
the necessity of shifting to renewable energies, Big Coal, in
collusion with an out-of-step administration, is pushing their dirty
fossil fuel as the solution to our nation's energy crisis.
Big Coal and its cohorts envision a "clean coal technology" future
fueled by liquifying and gasifying coal, capturing the carbon
emissions and injecting them underground. By 2030 the West Virginia
Division of Energy -- a nascent state agency formed in July, 2007 --
wants to oust oil and exalt coal by displacing the 1.3 billion gallons
of foreign oil the state currently imports every year.
The WVDoE believes "that higher energy prices are providing and will
continue to provide market opportunities" for a variety of alternative
coal technologies including "coal waste, coal fines and coal bed
methane," according to a document released in December 2007 called, "A
Blueprint for the Future."
But scientists and environmentalists say "clean coal" does not exist;
it is a misnomer and an oxymoron. The National Resources Defense
Council has said, using the term "clean coal" makes about as much
sense as saying "safe cigarettes." The extraction and cleaning of coal
inevitably decimate ecosystems and communities.
Citing abundant supplies of quality domestic coal, escalating oil
prices that are hoving around $100 per barrel, and security concerns
raised by dependence on foreign oil, the coal industry is chomping at
the bit to secure their stake in the false pursuit of domestic energy
independence through a federally assisted coal-based economy. But as
the world wakes up to the climate crisis and people learn more about
modern coal mining and the continuing exploitation of Appalachia,
which has sickened entire communities, polluted the water and air, and
condemned vast sections of an ecologically extraordinary land to
death, the coal industry faces an increasingly uphill battle against
growing public awareness and concern.
Just this year, plans for a dozen new coal plants in Texas, Florida,
Oklahoma, Minnesota, Kansas and others have been repudiated by the
growing public awareness and concern about the role of coal and other
fossil fuels in our climate crisis. Playing on stereotypes and
employing scare tactics about the unpredictability of the Middle East,
the coal industry is developing a Frankenstein-like future for U.S.
energy needs.
In Kansas, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius recently blocked plans for two coal-
fired electricity plants; afterwards, on Nov. 5, a full page ad in
Kansas newspapers explained that now, because of Sebelius' decision,
"Kansas will import more natural gas from countries like Russia,
Venezuela and Iran." The ad displayed the grinning faces of the
leaders of these countries and continued, "Without new coal-fueled
plants in our state, experts predict that electric bills will
skyrocket and Kansans will be more dependent than ever on hostile,
foreign energy sources." In fact, Kansas exports natural gas to other
states and the United States does not even import natural gas from
Russia, Venezuela or Iran, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
Why carbon capture is no safety net
Nationwide there are grandiose plans for more than 100 new coal-fired
power plants but that will all hinge on being able to sell the public
and legislators on outfitting and funding these new plants with Carbon
Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technology. This process siphons off
or "captures" carbon dioxide before it can escape into the atmosphere,
contributing to acid rain, smog and warming the planet. The
sequestered carbon would then be pumped and stored underground.
But is it really possible to bury our daily CO2 emission? Australia's
renown physicist, Karl Kruszelnicki, who is running for public office
on the Climate Change Coalition ticket, told the Sydney Morning Herald
on Nov. 1, "One cubic kilometer of CO2 to get rid of every day? It's
not possible! But they don't tell you that that's what they've got to
get rid of. They make reassuring noises that they're spending millions
looking for underground caverns. But I'm here to tell you that they're
not going to find it ... The point is that they can only store 1,000th
of 1 percent, not all their daily output."
Not only do we not have the capacity to store all the CO2 we produce,
but the technology isn't there yet. The coal industry acknowledges
that CCS is 15 years away, but continues to promulgate the myth of
"clean coal technology" and to guide generous government subsidies to
themselves and to West Virginia universities, assigning valuable
research money to dirty technology. The Massachusetts Institute of
Technology's 2007 report "The Future of Coal" stated that "there is no
standard for measurement, monitoring, and verification of CO2
distribution. Duration of post-injection monitoring is an unresolved
issue."
In other words, Big Coal is betting on a pipe dream with an entire
ecosystem at stake. Adding CCS to plans for the more than 100 proposed
coal-fired power plants on the drawing board would increase operating
budgets by 50 percent to 80 percent. And the gasifying and liquifying
of coal into syn-gas and diesel would create potential emissions twice
as carbon-rich as petroleum based gasoline or natural gas. If Big Coal
gets its way, the U.S. Air Force will cruise the skies on liquid coal
fuel -- spewing dangerously concentrated CO2 into our fragile
atmosphere, and we'll be building more polluting plants based on false
promises from an outlaw industry.
Exacerbating the water crisis
To many observers, the next natural resource wars will be waged over
water, not oil or coal. People in the United States are waking up to
the reality of a looming water crisis, but the coal industry is still
advocating for a technology that is part of the problem, not the
solution.
The U.S. Department of Energy stated in December 2006, that the demand
for water to produce coal conversion fuels "threaten our limited water
supply." Coal conversion -- gasification or liquefaction -- requires
an absurd amount of fresh water. Each new Integrated Gasification
Combined Cycle (IGCC) or Coal to Liquid (CTL) plant will require
millions of gallons of fresh water every day. And these new plants
will require even more coal.
Big Coal's proposed plans will require a large increase in coal
extraction -- at least 15 percent more, though some reports quote as
high as a 45 percent increase in coal production would be necessary to
fuel "clean coal technology." The surge in demand for coal would be
met with a surge in mountaintop removal coal mining, which means more
water pollution. Mountaintop removal mining and the chemical cleaning
of coal also threatens Appalachian headwater streams, which are the
drinking water source for the southeastern United States -- an area
that has endured frightening water shortages this year in Florida,
Georgia and South Carolina.
The coal-to-liquid plants that coal state politicians like Gov. Joe
Manchin, III of West Virginia and Gov. Ernie Fletcher of Kentucky are
scrambling to site in their states would have one consequence that
many observers underestimate or ignore: the increase in production of
coal sludge -- one of the least known and least regulated toxic wastes
in the United States -- a direct threat to water supplies.
Ben Stout, a biologist from Wheeling Jesuit University in Wheeling,
W.Va., who testified in the landmark Bragg v. Robertson case, where 88
community members sued a coal operator for destroying their land, has
witnessed the environmental and human health devastation wreaked on
the unique mountain ecosystems and communities of Appalachia
firsthand.
"Clean Coal Technologies is a misnomer," he said. "There's nothing
clean about coal. The extraction end is not addressed; if you live in
southern West Virginia, the landscape you grew up in has been
destroyed and rearranged. The question is, why are so many people in
West Virginia so desperate to get hooked up to county water supply?"
The answer is: toxic coal sludge. Coal sludge, laden with heavy metals
found in coal and released during extraction, like arsenic, chromium,
cadmium and mercury, has been pumped underground in West Virginia for
decades, with scant regulatory oversight. The sludge has intercepted
underground water tables, from which mountain communities draw their
drinking water. Coal sludge also contains carcinogenic chemicals like
floculants, which are used to process coal.
In West Virginia, the second-largest coal-producing state in the
nation, more than 470 mountaintops have been blown apart, 800 square
miles of the most diverse temperate hardwood forest razed and replaced
with more than 4,000 valley fills and 675 toxic coal sludge ponds. By
2012, the U.S. government estimates that we will have destroyed 2,500
square miles of pristine Appalachia. Currently there are over 107
trillion gallons of coal slurry stored or permitted to be stored in
active West Virginia "impoundments."
The total mechanization of coal extraction epitomized by mountaintop
removal/valley fill coal mining has buried thousands of miles of vital
headwater streams and pumped previously mined lands full of sludge.
The coal industry says that it has "elevated" some streams -- after
they've buried them upstream -- relocating them and "repurposing" them
into chemical spillways called National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) streams.
Coal sludge, the waste by-product of the chemical cleaning of coal in
preparation for shipping to market, is initially put into surface
ponds, but eventually this chemically concentrated, pudding-like waste
leaches into the groundwater. In southern West Virginia, where the
largest seams of coal lie, whole communities have been poisoned over
years by mining waste that has contaminated their drinking water.
Coal sludge is a disaster waiting to happen, like the 2.8 billion
gallons of toxic sludge that stand behind a 325-foot, leaking, unsound
dam of slate, 400 yards from the Marsh Fork Elementary School in
Sundial, W.Va. Or, Brushy Fork, in Boone County, W.Va., one of the
largest coal sludge dumps in the world, holding back 9 billion gallons
of coal waste.
Sludge is also injected underground into the sprawling abandoned mine
works of decades past. Coal sludge is turning up in the water in Mingo
County, W.Va., where documentation of this practice stretches back for
more than 30 years. Residents of Mingo County have suffered
catastrophic illness after the toxic sludge breached the local
aquifers that feed home wells. More than 650 of these residents have
signed on to a massive class-action lawsuit against the offending coal
company, Massey Energy.
Pursuing "clean coal technology" will cause an increase in the
production of coal and toxic coal waste which contains dangerous
levels of arsenic, barium, cadmium, coper, iron, lead, manganese and
zinc. In some cases, there are no standards by which to measure
contaminants because some have never been found in drinking water
before.
While scrubbers on smoke stacks have cleaned coal fired power plant
emissions considerably, the cleaning on the combustion end causes the
processing of coal for market to be exponentially dirtier. The coal
going to market is cleaner burning today, with lower sulfur and
mercury content, but these dangerous elements are left behind in the
coal sludge and in drinking water.
The dirty truth about "clean coal"
The environmental destruction caused by mountaintop removal coal
extraction is just one of many reasons to immediately transition out
of coal. A plethora of substantial hurdles for the alternative coal
industry include technological uncertainties, billion dollar budgets,
lack of project partners willing to invest in coal, growing concern
about carbon emissions from coal fired power plants, uncertainty about
future environmental regulations, rising constructions costs and an
array of water contamination issues.
But, we've been here before. In response to the energy crisis of the
1970s, the U.S. government invested $15 billion in a failed attempt to
jump-start the coal-based synthetic fuel industry including the
infamous 1.5 billion syn-fuel plant in Beulah, N.D. In the end, the
'80s era attempt at gasification and liquefaction of coal failed
miserably because of volatile oil prices bankrupting the nascent
industry leaving taxpayers with a $330 million loss.
The newborn West Virginia Division of Energy -- formed to put a better
face on coal -- would like to institutionalize all possible
manifestations of coal production. The state agency says it would like
to surround coal extraction sites and the coal-fired power plants with
"additional advance coal opportunities" like the "production of
ammonia nitrate from coal, as well as nitrates for fertilizer."
These processes require the same copious amounts of water as CTL and
IGCC plants. WVDoE's outline for an energy future goes hand-in-hand
with what mountain people call the declaration of a "National
Sacrifice Zone" fueled by a plan to depopulate the coal-rich region of
the southern mountains. A similar strategy was publicly declared when
the federal government found uranium under Native American lands in
the Four Corners area in the 1970s. In the end, the uranium was deemed
more important than the land and the people; vast regions of Native
American lands were declared "National Sacrifice Zones," and people
were forced from their homelands.
Massey Energy's CEO, Don Blankenship, recently suggested the idea of a
far-reaching coal industrial complex upon releasing a statement
regarding the purchase of vast parcel of coal lands, increasing
Massey's reserve holding to 100 million tons in Northern Appalachia.
"This region is becoming increasingly important to the coal and energy
industry, and this transaction will enable us to take advantage of the
growth in demand for Northern Appalachian coal," he said. Massey's
newly acquired coal lands are in West Virginia, across the Ohio River
from Meigs County, Ohio, where a notorious cluster of coal-fired power
plants are concentrated.
And momentum is building in the region. At a coal-to-liquids
conference in Beckley, W.Va., in August this year, U.S. Sen. Jay
Rockefeller sent word to the crowd that, "We need the equivalent of
the Apollo and Manhattan Projects that would provide billions in
federal funding for research and development so that the best and
brightest engineers and scientific minds can tackle carbon capture
sequestration and CTL development."
It is time to stop the momentum and break our coal habit. Instead we
need an Apollo and Manhattan project to replace coal with solar, wind
and geo-thermal or our kids will be stuck cleaning up after the
dirtiest energy industry. Coal companies are notorious for leaving
their mess behind.
"The worst offenders declare bankruptcy, opting to clear their plate
of financial obligations and skip town," says Earthjustice attorney
Lisa Evans. "Residents are left with poisoned soil and water;
taxpayers are stuck with a hefty clean up bill." Only 3 percent to 5
percent of West Virginia mined lands have been reclaimed and developed
-- the Twisted Gun Golf Course in Mingo County, Mt. View High School
in McDowell County and a FBI complex in Clarksburg, W.Va., are all
built on unstable, previously mined lands -- but the lands can never
be truly reclaimed because of the extent of the destruction. Large-
scale surface mining has converted forests to grasslands, resulting in
a loss of carbon sequestration capacity of approximately 1.4 million
acres, according to Stout.
When Big Coal talks about economic benefits of CTL, they talk about
how cheap raw coal is and how we need to stick with cheap energy. But
they avoid talking about the budgets in the multi-billions, the fact
that CCS is unproven and untested commercially, and the externalities
of extracting coal: the decimation of Appalachia's ecosystems and
communities.
It is impossible to estimate the true cost of coal in a dollar figure
-- how do you calculate the destruction of animal habitats, forests,
fresh water, heritage, family history, hometowns, livelihoods, and
personal health? When you add it all up, coal costs too much!
The plunder and destruction of West Virginia began with a plan in 1760
called the Great Land Grab, when a small group of wealthy Americans
plotted to buy the coal-rich lands out from under the mountain people
who didn't know the value of what was beneath their homes. Today, coal
advocates ignore the global climate crisis, while pushing untested
coal-based technology and scaring Americans about our dependence on
foreign oil, hoping to fuel the planet with their coal, regardless of
the consequences.
No matter what, the immediate transition away from coal is necessary
and inevitable, as is a moratorium on all new coal-fired power plants.
The world is coming to understand the impacts of dirty energies like
coal and the need for sustainable, renewable, clean energy. James
Hansen, the leading climate scientist at NASA, who shared the Nobel
Prize this year with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), testified as a private citizen at the Iowa Utilities board and
said, "Coal will determine whether we continue to increase climate
change or slow human impact."
The coal industry's proposed path to a coal-based energy independent
future for the United States is like laying down a 16-lane
superhighway through the bedrooms of coal-rich regions like
Appalachia. "Clean coal technology" would require a sizable increase
in coal extraction and for the mountain communities of Central
Appalachia, already suffering under the mountaintop removal/valley
fill coal-mining campaign, "clean coal technology" is a highway to
hell. We have a choice -- let's build a new road to renewable energy
and sustainable communities.
http://www.alternet.org/story/70475/?page=entire
the necessity of shifting to renewable energies, Big Coal, in
collusion with an out-of-step administration, is pushing their dirty
fossil fuel as the solution to our nation's energy crisis.
Big Coal and its cohorts envision a "clean coal technology" future
fueled by liquifying and gasifying coal, capturing the carbon
emissions and injecting them underground. By 2030 the West Virginia
Division of Energy -- a nascent state agency formed in July, 2007 --
wants to oust oil and exalt coal by displacing the 1.3 billion gallons
of foreign oil the state currently imports every year.
The WVDoE believes "that higher energy prices are providing and will
continue to provide market opportunities" for a variety of alternative
coal technologies including "coal waste, coal fines and coal bed
methane," according to a document released in December 2007 called, "A
Blueprint for the Future."
But scientists and environmentalists say "clean coal" does not exist;
it is a misnomer and an oxymoron. The National Resources Defense
Council has said, using the term "clean coal" makes about as much
sense as saying "safe cigarettes." The extraction and cleaning of coal
inevitably decimate ecosystems and communities.
Citing abundant supplies of quality domestic coal, escalating oil
prices that are hoving around $100 per barrel, and security concerns
raised by dependence on foreign oil, the coal industry is chomping at
the bit to secure their stake in the false pursuit of domestic energy
independence through a federally assisted coal-based economy. But as
the world wakes up to the climate crisis and people learn more about
modern coal mining and the continuing exploitation of Appalachia,
which has sickened entire communities, polluted the water and air, and
condemned vast sections of an ecologically extraordinary land to
death, the coal industry faces an increasingly uphill battle against
growing public awareness and concern.
Just this year, plans for a dozen new coal plants in Texas, Florida,
Oklahoma, Minnesota, Kansas and others have been repudiated by the
growing public awareness and concern about the role of coal and other
fossil fuels in our climate crisis. Playing on stereotypes and
employing scare tactics about the unpredictability of the Middle East,
the coal industry is developing a Frankenstein-like future for U.S.
energy needs.
In Kansas, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius recently blocked plans for two coal-
fired electricity plants; afterwards, on Nov. 5, a full page ad in
Kansas newspapers explained that now, because of Sebelius' decision,
"Kansas will import more natural gas from countries like Russia,
Venezuela and Iran." The ad displayed the grinning faces of the
leaders of these countries and continued, "Without new coal-fueled
plants in our state, experts predict that electric bills will
skyrocket and Kansans will be more dependent than ever on hostile,
foreign energy sources." In fact, Kansas exports natural gas to other
states and the United States does not even import natural gas from
Russia, Venezuela or Iran, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
Why carbon capture is no safety net
Nationwide there are grandiose plans for more than 100 new coal-fired
power plants but that will all hinge on being able to sell the public
and legislators on outfitting and funding these new plants with Carbon
Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technology. This process siphons off
or "captures" carbon dioxide before it can escape into the atmosphere,
contributing to acid rain, smog and warming the planet. The
sequestered carbon would then be pumped and stored underground.
But is it really possible to bury our daily CO2 emission? Australia's
renown physicist, Karl Kruszelnicki, who is running for public office
on the Climate Change Coalition ticket, told the Sydney Morning Herald
on Nov. 1, "One cubic kilometer of CO2 to get rid of every day? It's
not possible! But they don't tell you that that's what they've got to
get rid of. They make reassuring noises that they're spending millions
looking for underground caverns. But I'm here to tell you that they're
not going to find it ... The point is that they can only store 1,000th
of 1 percent, not all their daily output."
Not only do we not have the capacity to store all the CO2 we produce,
but the technology isn't there yet. The coal industry acknowledges
that CCS is 15 years away, but continues to promulgate the myth of
"clean coal technology" and to guide generous government subsidies to
themselves and to West Virginia universities, assigning valuable
research money to dirty technology. The Massachusetts Institute of
Technology's 2007 report "The Future of Coal" stated that "there is no
standard for measurement, monitoring, and verification of CO2
distribution. Duration of post-injection monitoring is an unresolved
issue."
In other words, Big Coal is betting on a pipe dream with an entire
ecosystem at stake. Adding CCS to plans for the more than 100 proposed
coal-fired power plants on the drawing board would increase operating
budgets by 50 percent to 80 percent. And the gasifying and liquifying
of coal into syn-gas and diesel would create potential emissions twice
as carbon-rich as petroleum based gasoline or natural gas. If Big Coal
gets its way, the U.S. Air Force will cruise the skies on liquid coal
fuel -- spewing dangerously concentrated CO2 into our fragile
atmosphere, and we'll be building more polluting plants based on false
promises from an outlaw industry.
Exacerbating the water crisis
To many observers, the next natural resource wars will be waged over
water, not oil or coal. People in the United States are waking up to
the reality of a looming water crisis, but the coal industry is still
advocating for a technology that is part of the problem, not the
solution.
The U.S. Department of Energy stated in December 2006, that the demand
for water to produce coal conversion fuels "threaten our limited water
supply." Coal conversion -- gasification or liquefaction -- requires
an absurd amount of fresh water. Each new Integrated Gasification
Combined Cycle (IGCC) or Coal to Liquid (CTL) plant will require
millions of gallons of fresh water every day. And these new plants
will require even more coal.
Big Coal's proposed plans will require a large increase in coal
extraction -- at least 15 percent more, though some reports quote as
high as a 45 percent increase in coal production would be necessary to
fuel "clean coal technology." The surge in demand for coal would be
met with a surge in mountaintop removal coal mining, which means more
water pollution. Mountaintop removal mining and the chemical cleaning
of coal also threatens Appalachian headwater streams, which are the
drinking water source for the southeastern United States -- an area
that has endured frightening water shortages this year in Florida,
Georgia and South Carolina.
The coal-to-liquid plants that coal state politicians like Gov. Joe
Manchin, III of West Virginia and Gov. Ernie Fletcher of Kentucky are
scrambling to site in their states would have one consequence that
many observers underestimate or ignore: the increase in production of
coal sludge -- one of the least known and least regulated toxic wastes
in the United States -- a direct threat to water supplies.
Ben Stout, a biologist from Wheeling Jesuit University in Wheeling,
W.Va., who testified in the landmark Bragg v. Robertson case, where 88
community members sued a coal operator for destroying their land, has
witnessed the environmental and human health devastation wreaked on
the unique mountain ecosystems and communities of Appalachia
firsthand.
"Clean Coal Technologies is a misnomer," he said. "There's nothing
clean about coal. The extraction end is not addressed; if you live in
southern West Virginia, the landscape you grew up in has been
destroyed and rearranged. The question is, why are so many people in
West Virginia so desperate to get hooked up to county water supply?"
The answer is: toxic coal sludge. Coal sludge, laden with heavy metals
found in coal and released during extraction, like arsenic, chromium,
cadmium and mercury, has been pumped underground in West Virginia for
decades, with scant regulatory oversight. The sludge has intercepted
underground water tables, from which mountain communities draw their
drinking water. Coal sludge also contains carcinogenic chemicals like
floculants, which are used to process coal.
In West Virginia, the second-largest coal-producing state in the
nation, more than 470 mountaintops have been blown apart, 800 square
miles of the most diverse temperate hardwood forest razed and replaced
with more than 4,000 valley fills and 675 toxic coal sludge ponds. By
2012, the U.S. government estimates that we will have destroyed 2,500
square miles of pristine Appalachia. Currently there are over 107
trillion gallons of coal slurry stored or permitted to be stored in
active West Virginia "impoundments."
The total mechanization of coal extraction epitomized by mountaintop
removal/valley fill coal mining has buried thousands of miles of vital
headwater streams and pumped previously mined lands full of sludge.
The coal industry says that it has "elevated" some streams -- after
they've buried them upstream -- relocating them and "repurposing" them
into chemical spillways called National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) streams.
Coal sludge, the waste by-product of the chemical cleaning of coal in
preparation for shipping to market, is initially put into surface
ponds, but eventually this chemically concentrated, pudding-like waste
leaches into the groundwater. In southern West Virginia, where the
largest seams of coal lie, whole communities have been poisoned over
years by mining waste that has contaminated their drinking water.
Coal sludge is a disaster waiting to happen, like the 2.8 billion
gallons of toxic sludge that stand behind a 325-foot, leaking, unsound
dam of slate, 400 yards from the Marsh Fork Elementary School in
Sundial, W.Va. Or, Brushy Fork, in Boone County, W.Va., one of the
largest coal sludge dumps in the world, holding back 9 billion gallons
of coal waste.
Sludge is also injected underground into the sprawling abandoned mine
works of decades past. Coal sludge is turning up in the water in Mingo
County, W.Va., where documentation of this practice stretches back for
more than 30 years. Residents of Mingo County have suffered
catastrophic illness after the toxic sludge breached the local
aquifers that feed home wells. More than 650 of these residents have
signed on to a massive class-action lawsuit against the offending coal
company, Massey Energy.
Pursuing "clean coal technology" will cause an increase in the
production of coal and toxic coal waste which contains dangerous
levels of arsenic, barium, cadmium, coper, iron, lead, manganese and
zinc. In some cases, there are no standards by which to measure
contaminants because some have never been found in drinking water
before.
While scrubbers on smoke stacks have cleaned coal fired power plant
emissions considerably, the cleaning on the combustion end causes the
processing of coal for market to be exponentially dirtier. The coal
going to market is cleaner burning today, with lower sulfur and
mercury content, but these dangerous elements are left behind in the
coal sludge and in drinking water.
The dirty truth about "clean coal"
The environmental destruction caused by mountaintop removal coal
extraction is just one of many reasons to immediately transition out
of coal. A plethora of substantial hurdles for the alternative coal
industry include technological uncertainties, billion dollar budgets,
lack of project partners willing to invest in coal, growing concern
about carbon emissions from coal fired power plants, uncertainty about
future environmental regulations, rising constructions costs and an
array of water contamination issues.
But, we've been here before. In response to the energy crisis of the
1970s, the U.S. government invested $15 billion in a failed attempt to
jump-start the coal-based synthetic fuel industry including the
infamous 1.5 billion syn-fuel plant in Beulah, N.D. In the end, the
'80s era attempt at gasification and liquefaction of coal failed
miserably because of volatile oil prices bankrupting the nascent
industry leaving taxpayers with a $330 million loss.
The newborn West Virginia Division of Energy -- formed to put a better
face on coal -- would like to institutionalize all possible
manifestations of coal production. The state agency says it would like
to surround coal extraction sites and the coal-fired power plants with
"additional advance coal opportunities" like the "production of
ammonia nitrate from coal, as well as nitrates for fertilizer."
These processes require the same copious amounts of water as CTL and
IGCC plants. WVDoE's outline for an energy future goes hand-in-hand
with what mountain people call the declaration of a "National
Sacrifice Zone" fueled by a plan to depopulate the coal-rich region of
the southern mountains. A similar strategy was publicly declared when
the federal government found uranium under Native American lands in
the Four Corners area in the 1970s. In the end, the uranium was deemed
more important than the land and the people; vast regions of Native
American lands were declared "National Sacrifice Zones," and people
were forced from their homelands.
Massey Energy's CEO, Don Blankenship, recently suggested the idea of a
far-reaching coal industrial complex upon releasing a statement
regarding the purchase of vast parcel of coal lands, increasing
Massey's reserve holding to 100 million tons in Northern Appalachia.
"This region is becoming increasingly important to the coal and energy
industry, and this transaction will enable us to take advantage of the
growth in demand for Northern Appalachian coal," he said. Massey's
newly acquired coal lands are in West Virginia, across the Ohio River
from Meigs County, Ohio, where a notorious cluster of coal-fired power
plants are concentrated.
And momentum is building in the region. At a coal-to-liquids
conference in Beckley, W.Va., in August this year, U.S. Sen. Jay
Rockefeller sent word to the crowd that, "We need the equivalent of
the Apollo and Manhattan Projects that would provide billions in
federal funding for research and development so that the best and
brightest engineers and scientific minds can tackle carbon capture
sequestration and CTL development."
It is time to stop the momentum and break our coal habit. Instead we
need an Apollo and Manhattan project to replace coal with solar, wind
and geo-thermal or our kids will be stuck cleaning up after the
dirtiest energy industry. Coal companies are notorious for leaving
their mess behind.
"The worst offenders declare bankruptcy, opting to clear their plate
of financial obligations and skip town," says Earthjustice attorney
Lisa Evans. "Residents are left with poisoned soil and water;
taxpayers are stuck with a hefty clean up bill." Only 3 percent to 5
percent of West Virginia mined lands have been reclaimed and developed
-- the Twisted Gun Golf Course in Mingo County, Mt. View High School
in McDowell County and a FBI complex in Clarksburg, W.Va., are all
built on unstable, previously mined lands -- but the lands can never
be truly reclaimed because of the extent of the destruction. Large-
scale surface mining has converted forests to grasslands, resulting in
a loss of carbon sequestration capacity of approximately 1.4 million
acres, according to Stout.
When Big Coal talks about economic benefits of CTL, they talk about
how cheap raw coal is and how we need to stick with cheap energy. But
they avoid talking about the budgets in the multi-billions, the fact
that CCS is unproven and untested commercially, and the externalities
of extracting coal: the decimation of Appalachia's ecosystems and
communities.
It is impossible to estimate the true cost of coal in a dollar figure
-- how do you calculate the destruction of animal habitats, forests,
fresh water, heritage, family history, hometowns, livelihoods, and
personal health? When you add it all up, coal costs too much!
The plunder and destruction of West Virginia began with a plan in 1760
called the Great Land Grab, when a small group of wealthy Americans
plotted to buy the coal-rich lands out from under the mountain people
who didn't know the value of what was beneath their homes. Today, coal
advocates ignore the global climate crisis, while pushing untested
coal-based technology and scaring Americans about our dependence on
foreign oil, hoping to fuel the planet with their coal, regardless of
the consequences.
No matter what, the immediate transition away from coal is necessary
and inevitable, as is a moratorium on all new coal-fired power plants.
The world is coming to understand the impacts of dirty energies like
coal and the need for sustainable, renewable, clean energy. James
Hansen, the leading climate scientist at NASA, who shared the Nobel
Prize this year with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), testified as a private citizen at the Iowa Utilities board and
said, "Coal will determine whether we continue to increase climate
change or slow human impact."
The coal industry's proposed path to a coal-based energy independent
future for the United States is like laying down a 16-lane
superhighway through the bedrooms of coal-rich regions like
Appalachia. "Clean coal technology" would require a sizable increase
in coal extraction and for the mountain communities of Central
Appalachia, already suffering under the mountaintop removal/valley
fill coal-mining campaign, "clean coal technology" is a highway to
hell. We have a choice -- let's build a new road to renewable energy
and sustainable communities.
http://www.alternet.org/story/70475/?page=entire
