Jump to content

Why The Bush Machinery Is So Terrified of Huckabee and Ron Paul.


Guest tomaxo@aol.com

Recommended Posts

Guest tomaxo@aol.com

The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

 

To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

 

The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

 

The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

spending under the Bush presidency.

 

What they want is another fraud like Bush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lorad474@cs.com

On Dec 15, 12:05 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>

> To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>

> The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

> christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>

> The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

> slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> spending under the Bush presidency.

>

> What they want is another fraud like Bush.

 

Nothing like outsiders to threaten the nicely established neocon/nwo/

globalist daisey chain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest theloneranger100@aol.com

On Dec 15, 12:05�pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>

> To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>

> The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: �He will bring actual

> christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>

> The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: �He will end the

> slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> spending under the Bush presidency.

>

> What they want is another fraud like Bush.

 

The "Bush Machinery" is about to go into RETIREMENT,

DumbAss...........President Bush ISN'T running for Any Office,

Dork.............You Leftist Pukes are Sure S-T-U-P-I-

D..........Donchaknow..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names

On Dec 15, 4:04 pm, "theloneranger...@aol.com"

<theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:

> On Dec 15, 12:05�pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>

> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>

> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: �He will bring actual

> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>

> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: �He will end the

> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > spending under the Bush presidency.

>

> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>

> The "Bush Machinery" is about to go into RETIREMENT,

> DumbAss...........President Bush ISN'T running for Any Office,

> Dork.............You Leftist Pukes are Sure S-T-U-P-I-

> D..........Donchaknow..............- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

 

 

 

Bush is only the front man for a deeply-entrenched gang of traitors --

when Bush leaves, they'll still be there.

 

Donchaknow.

 

Nyuk, nyuk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tomaxo@aol.com

theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:

> On Dec 15, 12:05�pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

> >

> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

> >

> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: �He will bring actual

> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

> >

> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: �He will end the

> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > spending under the Bush presidency.

> >

> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>

 

...

> The "Bush Machinery" is about to go into RETIREMENT,

> DumbAss...........President Bush ISN'T running for Any Office,

> Dork.............You Leftist Pukes are Sure S-T-U-P-I-

> D..........Donchaknow..............

 

Good to catch you in one of your more "intellectual" states of mind

Lone-shill.

 

But as even you must understand, Gilligan Bush hasn't been "running"

anything since he's been President and most of his handlers were hand-

me-downs from his Dad's presidency (some even cut their teeth in the

Nixon White House). The same group of handlers (and their under-

studies) is presently waiting in the wings for the next make-believe

leader to arrive who will do their bidding. That is why they find

people who actually are what they claim to be (Paul and Huckabee) to

be such a danger to their plans for slush fund perpetuation.

 

They put the easily fooled voting block that makes the neo con/

religious kook alliance possible at risk, by giving the voters

something genuine to compare the fraud the slushfundicans hoist before

them to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest the_blogologist

I so fucking wish democrats could put someone up there who was worth a

damn. And balancing the budget and welfare reform were part of

Republicans contract with america. Clinton doesn't diserve the credit

when most of his vetos were because they weren't spending enough. And

the Clintons took arkansas from 48th to 49th in the country in health

and health care.

 

<tomaxo@aol.com> wrote:

> The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>

> To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>

> The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

> christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>

> The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

> slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> spending under the Bush presidency.

>

> What they want is another fraud like Bush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:22:22 -0800, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:

> On Dec 15, 4:04 pm, "theloneranger...@aol.com"

> <theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:

>> On Dec 15, 12:05�pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

>> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

>> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

>> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

>> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>>

>> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

>> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

>> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

>> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>>

>> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: �He will bring actual

>> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

>> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

>> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>>

>> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: �He will end the

>> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

>> > spending under the Bush presidency.

>>

>> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>>

>> The "Bush Machinery" is about to go into RETIREMENT,

>> DumbAss...........President Bush ISN'T running for Any Office,

>> Dork.............You Leftist Pukes are Sure S-T-U-P-I-

>> D..........Donchaknow..............- Hide quoted text -

>>

>> - Show quoted text -

>

>

>

> Bush is only the front man for a deeply-entrenched gang of traitors --

> when Bush leaves, they'll still be there.

>

> Donchaknow.

>

> Nyuk, nyuk.

-------

Much like the Clinton moles in the CIA, State Dept., and the Justice Dept.

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tomaxo@aol.com

the_blogologist wrote:

> I so fucking wish democrats could put someone up there who was worth a

> damn.

 

My biggest dissappointment of 2007 was when Evan Bayh announced he

would not run for President. While not quite a Reagan or JFK on the

charisma level, he's a proven centrist who was highly successful as

both a Governor and a Senator from Indiana. Retaining very high

ratings, as a Democrat, in a solidly Red state gives testimony to the

potential uniting effect he could have had on this highly divided

country.

 

I've got a pretty stron bet he's going to be Hillary's choice for VP,

though it will, unfortunately have a ring of the Lloyd Benston VP slot

under Dukakas (i.e. America would prefer the more centrist candidate

on top of the ticket).

 

While Giuliani has the potential of leading from the center, his

entire candidacy seems compromised to me, as he's turned his entire

speal into a "I'm the mayor of 9/11" show, and seems, increasingly to

be appealing to the slush-funders in his careful balancing act

performance. Ethics are also a huge problem for him.

 

If the Republicans have the sense to put MCcain on the top of their

ticket this year, I will vote Republican again, even though I disagree

with him on Iraq.

 

That said, ownership for the fact Hillary is both the near-certain

Democratic nominee and the near-certain next President belongs

overwhelmingly to the Bush administration and those who blindly

followed it.

 

2008 will primarily be a reactionary vote by a pissed off American

center, like those of 1980, 1968, and 1932

 

>And balancing the budget and welfare reform were part of

> Republicans contract with america.

 

And yet, when those same Republicans in Congress had a Republican

President they failed to roll back a single entitlement program and

ran up the highest rate of discretionary spending since FDR (falling

behind only LBJ for that period, when entitlement spending was

included).

>Clinton doesn't diserve the credit

> when most of his vetos were because they weren't spending enough. And

> the Clintons took arkansas from 48th to 49th in the country in health

> and health care.

 

Regardless of whether Clinton's hand was forced, the result was a tilt

towards the political center during his administration, which is why

that part of his administration (the 1995-2000 period) had so many

successes.

 

America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

and conservative values, not despite it.

>

> <tomaxo@aol.com> wrote:

>

> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

> >

> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

> >

> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

> >

> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > spending under the Bush presidency.

> >

> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mr.Smartypants

On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> and conservative values, not despite it.

>

 

 

 

Successful!!!???

 

 

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

 

Amerikkka is a total failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tomaxo@aol.com

Mr.Smartypants wrote:

> On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> > and conservative values, not despite it.

> >

>

>

>

> Successful!!!???

>

>

> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

Yeah, I guess those little things like being the birthplace of the

light bulb, air travel, seperation of church and state, jazz, moon

landings, mars exploration, elected government with checks and

balances, and the largest economy on earth are highly over-rated.

>

>

> Amerikkka is a total failure.

 

and they don't call you "Mr. Smartypants" for nothin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tomaxo@aol.com

lorad...@cs.com wrote:

> On Dec 15, 12:05 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

> >

> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

> >

> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

> >

> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > spending under the Bush presidency.

> >

> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>

> Nothing like outsiders to threaten the nicely established neocon/nwo/

> globalist daisey chain.

 

While I understand, and agree with, what you are saying, I'm not so

sure it's the political "outsiders" who are the "outsiders". Is it

simple irony that so many of the leading power-brokers of American

politics are of foreign origin (Ruport Murdoch, George Soros, Sun

Myung Moon, etc, etc.), and that so many of the leading lobbies and

influences involve external interests (AIPAC, Saudi Oil, Chinese

financing, etc.). Am I the only person in America who finds it near-

treasonous that after our shoveling multi-billion dollar, no bid

contracts to Halliburton, which they repaid by scamming us out of

millions more, that the company was allowed to do an inversion by

which it became a U.A.E. company without penalty?

 

These things, and the treason of our intentionally letting our guard

down at our southern border are pretty good indicaters that America

has largely relenquished control of its own destiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lorad474@cs.com

On Dec 15, 9:15 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> lorad...@cs.com wrote:

> > On Dec 15, 12:05 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>

> > > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>

> > > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

> > > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>

> > > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

> > > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > > spending under the Bush presidency.

>

> > > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>

> > Nothing like outsiders to threaten the nicely established neocon/nwo/

> > globalist daisey chain.

>

> While I understand, and agree with, what you are saying, I'm not so

> sure it's the political "outsiders" who are the "outsiders". Is it

> simple irony that so many of the leading power-brokers of American

> politics are of foreign origin (Ruport Murdoch, George Soros, Sun

> Myung Moon, etc, etc.), and that so many of the leading lobbies and

> influences involve external interests (AIPAC, Saudi Oil, Chinese

> financing, etc.).

 

We seem to generally agree on the usefulness of centrism.

 

And I also agree with you on the negative effects of foreign

influences acting upon our body politic.. to which I will add;

European financial consortiums buying up US tollroads, UAE 'sovereign

funds' buying up US banks, red chinese buying up IBM's pc line, and to

underscore the Israeli influence.. the many 'dual citizenship'

Israelis that staff senior positions in the US government.

> Am I the only person in America who finds it near-

> treasonous that after our shoveling multi-billion dollar, no bid

> contracts to Halliburton, which they repaid by scamming us out of

> millions more, that the company was allowed to do an inversion by

> which it became a U.A.E. company without penalty?

 

No, you're not.

I already posted comments here regarding the scurrillous conduct of

halliburton skulking off to Dubai.. to seemingly avoid US taxes and US

investigations regarding its conduct - after having received BILLIONS

in tax payer money no-bid Iraq contracts.

 

...The problem is that most of the people here in usenet are party

extremists.. tie-dyed republicons or democons.. who prefer to latch

onto mud that they use against each other (many are no doubt foreign

operatives also)

 

I don't think that many of them (the americans) realize that both

their sides are being played against each other - in order to achive

the synthesized the anti-american goals that the globalists/nwos

desire. (Helegian dialectic stuff)

> These things, and the treason of our intentionally letting our guard

> down at our southern border are pretty good indicaters that America

> has largely relenquished control of its own destiny.

 

No.. and I am emphatic.

Americans have not reliquished control of the borders.. The

immigration issue is a very large one with US voters in Iowa, for

example, strongly against illegal immigration..

Rather it is the con leadership (in both parties) who have been

relinquishing their sworn duties and violating their oaths of office.

 

And so we get back to the point... which candidate would be effective

in disrupting the current con-game that has been passing itself off as

a responsible government. In my book Ron Paul would be that man.

 

PS: Huckabee would be also.. but I just can't agree with him that the

world was formed ca 10,000 BC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest the_blogologist

Mr.Smartypants <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> > and conservative values, not despite it.

> >

>

>

>

> Successful!!!???

>

>

> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>

>

> Amerikkka is a total failure.

 

Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest lorad474@cs.com

On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

> Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> > > and conservative values, not despite it.

>

> > Successful!!!???

>

> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>

> > Amerikkka is a total failure.

>

> Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

> states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

> million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

> heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

 

Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

waste of time.

Get smart or get lost.

 

Message-ID: <0e57a604-5f00-4adf-

aaa8-3c2e10e5f958@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest kyldltn@yahoo.com

On Dec 15, 4:04 pm, "theloneranger...@aol.com"

<theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:

> On Dec 15, 12:05�pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>

> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>

> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: �He will bring actual

> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>

> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: �He will end the

> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > spending under the Bush presidency.

>

> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>

> The "Bush Machinery" is about to go into RETIREMENT,

> DumbAss...........President Bush ISN'T running for Any Office,

> Dork.............You Leftist Pukes are Sure S-T-U-P-I-

> D..........Donchaknow..............

 

 

Sorry dumbfuck, but ALL rightards will be tarnished with the toxic

shit that was the Bush presidency for decades to come! Bush may not be

running, but he might as well be running right next to any rightard

who foolishly thinks he's going to get into the White House! Deal with

it, you ignorant asswipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:16:35 -0800, kyldlt wrote:

> On Dec 15, 4:04 pm, "theloneranger...@aol.com"

> <theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:

>> On Dec 15, 12:05�pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

>> > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

>> > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

>> > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

>> > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

>>

>> > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

>> > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

>> > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

>> > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

>>

>> > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: �He will bring actual

>> > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

>> > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

>> > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

>>

>> > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: �He will end the

>> > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

>> > spending under the Bush presidency.

>>

>> > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

>>

>> The "Bush Machinery" is about to go into RETIREMENT,

>> DumbAss...........President Bush ISN'T running for Any Office,

>> Dork.............You Leftist Pukes are Sure S-T-U-P-I-

>> D..........Donchaknow..............

>

>

> Sorry dumbfuck, but ALL rightards will be tarnished with the toxic

> shit that was the Bush presidency for decades to come! Bush may not be

> running, but he might as well be running right next to any rightard

> who foolishly thinks he's going to get into the White House! Deal with

> it, you ignorant asswipe.

-------

You remind me of Chevy Chase on the old SNL, "Jane, you poor, misguided,

ignorant, slut."

 

Using your characterization of those associated with the current President, you

won't mind if I refer to ALL leftards as lying philanderers.

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lt Gen Al E. Gator

<lorad474@cs.com> wrote in message

news:7680e967-107b-4938-a199-d66494fa4681@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

> On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

>> Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>> > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

>> > > and conservative values, not despite it.

>>

>> > Successful!!!???

>>

>> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>>

>> > Amerikkka is a total failure.

>>

>> Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

>> states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

>> million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

>> heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

>

> Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

> waste of time.

> Get smart or get lost.

>

they're desperate, clutching at straws as their philosophy collapses under

the weight

of the sheer stupidity it took to formulate it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lt Gen Al E. Gator

"Genaro" <genaro@bat.hit> wrote in message

news:pan.2007.12.16.15.07.10.855422@bat.hit...

> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:16:35 -0800, kyldlt wrote:

>

>> On Dec 15, 4:04 pm, "theloneranger...@aol.com"

>> <theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:

>>> On Dec 15, 12:05?pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> You remind me of Chevy Chase on the old SNL, "Jane, you poor, misguided,

> ignorant, slut."

>

> Using your characterization of those associated with the current

> President, you

> won't mind if I refer to ALL leftards as lying philanderers.

 

chevy chase has a 90% approval rating among Americans, the other 10% are

republican,

feeble and simple minded hillbilly losers,failures, and fuckups

 

you can call us whatever you want, but don't call for help, and don't come

for dinner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tomaxo@aol.com

lorad...@cs.com wrote:

> On Dec 15, 9:15 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > lorad...@cs.com wrote:

> > > On Dec 15, 12:05 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > The Slush-Fund machinery that has, for the last seven years relied so

> > > > heavily on the block of voters that could be baught off by pretenses

> > > > of religious piety and conservative rhetoric are now on the attack, in

> > > > a desperate attempt to undermine the surprising success of the two

> > > > candidates who actual hold Religious and Conservative values.

> >

> > > > To serve their purpose of routing record amounts of slush-fund capital

> > > > into the same hands that are enjoying the record tax cuts the

> > > > Slushfundicans absolutely cannot allow actual religious or

> > > > conservative values to enter the Republican party at a national level.

> >

> > > > The reason they must destroy Huckabee is simple: He will bring actual

> > > > christian values into the White House, which would result in an ending

> > > > of the "America for sale" ethics violations that have become one of

> > > > the two symbols of the Bush presidency.

> >

> > > > The reason they must destroy Ron Paul is simple: He will end the

> > > > slush funds that have been funded by over $3 trillion in deficit

> > > > spending under the Bush presidency.

> >

> > > > What they want is another fraud like Bush.

> >

> > > Nothing like outsiders to threaten the nicely established neocon/nwo/

> > > globalist daisey chain.

> >

> > While I understand, and agree with, what you are saying, I'm not so

> > sure it's the political "outsiders" who are the "outsiders". Is it

> > simple irony that so many of the leading power-brokers of American

> > politics are of foreign origin (Ruport Murdoch, George Soros, Sun

> > Myung Moon, etc, etc.), and that so many of the leading lobbies and

> > influences involve external interests (AIPAC, Saudi Oil, Chinese

> > financing, etc.).

>

> We seem to generally agree on the usefulness of centrism.

>

> And I also agree with you on the negative effects of foreign

> influences acting upon our body politic.. to which I will add;

> European financial consortiums buying up US tollroads, UAE 'sovereign

> funds' buying up US banks, red chinese buying up IBM's pc line, and to

> underscore the Israeli influence.. the many 'dual citizenship'

> Israelis that staff senior positions in the US government.

>

> > Am I the only person in America who finds it near-

> > treasonous that after our shoveling multi-billion dollar, no bid

> > contracts to Halliburton, which they repaid by scamming us out of

> > millions more, that the company was allowed to do an inversion by

> > which it became a U.A.E. company without penalty?

>

> No, you're not.

> I already posted comments here regarding the scurrillous conduct of

> halliburton skulking off to Dubai.. to seemingly avoid US taxes and US

> investigations regarding its conduct - after having received BILLIONS

> in tax payer money no-bid Iraq contracts.

>

> ..The problem is that most of the people here in usenet are party

> extremists.. tie-dyed republicons or democons.. who prefer to latch

> onto mud that they use against each other (many are no doubt foreign

> operatives also)

>

> I don't think that many of them (the americans) realize that both

> their sides are being played against each other - in order to achive

> the synthesized the anti-american goals that the globalists/nwos

> desire. (Helegian dialectic stuff)

>

> > These things, and the treason of our intentionally letting our guard

> > down at our southern border are pretty good indicaters that America

> > has largely relenquished control of its own destiny.

>

> No.. and I am emphatic.

> Americans have not reliquished control of the borders.. The

> immigration issue is a very large one with US voters in Iowa, for

> example, strongly against illegal immigration..

> Rather it is the con leadership (in both parties) who have been

> relinquishing their sworn duties and violating their oaths of office.

>

> And so we get back to the point... which candidate would be effective

> in disrupting the current con-game that has been passing itself off as

> a responsible government. In my book Ron Paul would be that man.

 

The primary attack that will be (is already being) used on Paul is

that he can't get elected, if nominated. But, as the fact of the

matter is that NO Republican will be likely to overcome the

reactionary ant-Bush vote next year, running a Goldwater-esque nominee

who loses, but helps the party recapture its soul, may make the

election something positive for the party and for America.

 

If you remember the "new" Beetle commercial volkwagen ran in the early

90's (under the phrase "if you sold your soul in the 80's, here's a

chance to buy some of it back"), I think a play on that concept would

be a perfect type of commercial for Ron Paul to be running right now.

 

Americans (particularly Americans like myself) don't get overly hung

up on "who's winning" the phony "Conservative vs Liberal" battle. We

would simply like to see a genuine item of either of them for a

change. The appeal of Paul is he is genuine in his conservatism.

>

> PS: Huckabee would be also.. but I just can't agree with him that the

> world was formed ca 10,000 BC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:41:38 +0000, Lt Gen Al E. Gator wrote:

>

> "Genaro" <genaro@bat.hit> wrote in message

> news:pan.2007.12.16.15.07.10.855422@bat.hit...

>> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:16:35 -0800, kyldlt wrote:

>>

>>> On Dec 15, 4:04 pm, "theloneranger...@aol.com"

>>> <theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:

>>>> On Dec 15, 12:05?pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>> You remind me of Chevy Chase on the old SNL, "Jane, you poor, misguided,

>> ignorant, slut."

>>

>> Using your characterization of those associated with the current

>> President, you

>> won't mind if I refer to ALL leftards as lying philanderers.

>

> chevy chase has a 90% approval rating among Americans, the other 10% are

> republican,

> feeble and simple minded hillbilly losers,failures, and fuckups

>

> you can call us whatever you want, but don't call for help, and don't come

> for dinner

-------

You missed the entire point.

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:39:36 +0000, Lt Gen Al E. Gator wrote:

>

> <lorad474@cs.com> wrote in message

> news:7680e967-107b-4938-a199-d66494fa4681@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

>> On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

>>> Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>>> > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

>>> > > and conservative values, not despite it.

>>>

>>> > Successful!!!???

>>>

>>> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>>>

>>> > Amerikkka is a total failure.

>>>

>>> Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

>>> states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

>>> million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

>>> heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

>>

>> Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

>> waste of time.

>> Get smart or get lost.

>>

> they're desperate, clutching at straws as their philosophy collapses under

> the weight

> of the sheer stupidity it took to formulate it

-------

Dismissing history handicaps your understanding of current events.

Selective memory delegitimizes it. Ever heard of Robert Byrd, the current

democrat senator from West Virginia and former klansman who still uses the

word ******?

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ChasNemo

On Dec 16, 12:26�pm, "Genaro" <gen...@bat.hit> wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:39:36 +0000, Lt Gen Al E. Gator wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message

> >news:7680e967-107b-4938-a199-d66494fa4681@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

> >> On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

> >>> Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >>> > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> >>> > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> >>> > > and conservative values, not despite it.

>

> >>> > Successful!!!???

>

> >>> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>

> >>> > Amerikkka is a total failure.

>

> >>> Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

> >>> states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

> >>> million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

> >>> heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

>

> >> Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

> >> waste of time.

> >> Get smart or get lost.

>

> > they're desperate, clutching at straws as their philosophy collapses under

> > the weight

> > of the sheer stupidity it took to formulate it

>

> -------

> Dismissing history handicaps your understanding of current events.

> Selective memory delegitimizes it. Ever heard of Robert Byrd, the current

> democrat senator from West Virginia and former klansman who still uses the

> word ******?

> -------- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

 

How is Byrd relevant to modern events, moron? <snicker>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:38:58 -0800, ChasNemo wrote:

> On Dec 16, 12:26�pm, "Genaro" <gen...@bat.hit> wrote:

>> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:39:36 +0000, Lt Gen Al E. Gator wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> > <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message

>> >news:7680e967-107b-4938-a199-d66494fa4681@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

>> >> On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

>> >>> Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> >>> > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

>> >>> > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

>> >>> > > and conservative values, not despite it.

>>

>> >>> > Successful!!!???

>>

>> >>> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>>

>> >>> > Amerikkka is a total failure.

>>

>> >>> Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

>> >>> states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

>> >>> million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

>> >>> heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

>>

>> >> Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

>> >> waste of time.

>> >> Get smart or get lost.

>>

>> > they're desperate, clutching at straws as their philosophy collapses under

>> > the weight

>> > of the sheer stupidity it took to formulate it

>>

>> -------

>> Dismissing history handicaps your understanding of current events.

>> Selective memory delegitimizes it. Ever heard of Robert Byrd, the current

>> democrat senator from West Virginia and former klansman who still uses the

>> word ******?

>> -------- Hide quoted text -

>>

>> - Show quoted text -

>

> How is Byrd relevant to modern events, moron? <snicker>

-------

Byrd's voting record as a current senator makes him relevant to

modern/current events. Take a look if you wish.

 

http://www.issues2000.org/Senate/Robert_Byrd.htm

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest the_blogologist

<lorad474@cs.com> wrote:

> On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

> > Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> > > > and conservative values, not despite it.

> >

> > > Successful!!!???

> >

> > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

> >

> > > Amerikkka is a total failure.

> >

> > Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

> > states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

> > million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

> > heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

>

> Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

> waste of time.

> Get smart or get lost.

 

So Mr. Smartypants's reference to the KKK is irreverent then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ChasNemo

On Dec 16, 2:14 pm, "Genaro" <gen...@bat.hit> wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:38:58 -0800, ChasNemo wrote:

> > On Dec 16, 12:26�pm, "Genaro" <gen...@bat.hit> wrote:

> >> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:39:36 +0000, Lt Gen Al E. Gator wrote:

>

> >> > <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message

> >> >news:7680e967-107b-4938-a199-d66494fa4681@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com....

> >> >> On Dec 15, 11:33 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:

> >> >>> Mr.Smartypants <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >> >>> > On Dec 15, 7:29 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:

> >> >>> > > America is successful BECAUSE the awkward coexistence of its liberal

> >> >>> > > and conservative values, not despite it.

>

> >> >>> > Successful!!!???

>

> >> >>> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>

> >> >>> > Amerikkka is a total failure.

>

> >> >>> Note: the KKK was created by ex-confederate soldiers and the confederate

> >> >>> states of course, all voted democrat. When the KKK peaked at about 6

> >> >>> million members the Klan existed almost entirely in states that voted

> >> >>> heavily democrat. So lets all give Democrats credit for our KKKism.

>

> >> >> Ancient history that doesn't have anything to do with anything is a

> >> >> waste of time.

> >> >> Get smart or get lost.

>

> >> > they're desperate, clutching at straws as their philosophy collapses under

> >> > the weight

> >> > of the sheer stupidity it took to formulate it

>

> >> -------

> >> Dismissing history handicaps your understanding of current events.

> >> Selective memory delegitimizes it. Ever heard of Robert Byrd, the current

> >> democrat senator from West Virginia and former klansman who still uses the

> >> word ******?

> >> -------- Hide quoted text -

>

> >> - Show quoted text -

>

> > How is Byrd relevant to modern events, moron?  <snicker>

>

> -------

> Byrd's voting record as a current senator makes him relevant to

> modern/current events. Take a look if you wish.

>

> http://www.issues2000.org/Senate/Robert_Byrd.htm

> -------- Hide quoted text -

>

> - Show quoted text -

 

One one Senator's voting record is relevant to modern/current events

exactly how? You haven't answered the question yet.

 

Your insistence on blathering about ancient minor history makes you an

irrelevant fool. Gospel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...