YAY!!Lets Kill Animals!!YAY

Status
Not open for further replies.

azemkamikaze03

New member
Do you agree with animal expirimentation? Yes or No. Why.

Me no...um not much diseases can be cured by it. The animal body system is way diff. from ours.(i mean cows have 4 stomachs and u wanna test them?) there a fine line between animal expiriments and being a vegitarian. I love to eat meat, but animal expirimentation is just cruel. Clothing..is still difrent..yeah they get skinned but they live dont they..in animal expirimentation they end up dying...heres a vid..DONT WATCH IF SQUIMISH

Throat

 

misery

New member
yea i dont agree with animal experiments either, at least if its causing the animal harm

but if its like experiments for like dog food taste or something i think thats something thats better left for dogs to test.. lol

edit: just noticed my sig talks about dog food.. ironic, now i almost feel obsessed with dog food

 

twilightcrimson7

New member
If it's for signifigant medical or scientifical reserach that could affect the quality and safety of our future lives, I say, go for it. But if its for something trivial or stupid, I say leave them alone.
 

azemkamikaze03

New member
Most people believe that experiments on animals are necessary, but they are not. The medical research establishment, pharmaceutical companies, other industries and a sizeable public relations machine keep this belief alive. Why? Because lab animal study safeguards industry against legal responsibility and is hugely profitable, from a financial point of view only.

Animal experimentation continually falls short of providing the rigorous criteria that define real science - accuracy, predictability and applicability. Applying animal data to humans meets none of these requirements consistently. Why submit another species to pseudo-scientific exploration of human disease when human-based methods are available?

By contrast, there exist many rewarding human-based methodologies, some time-honored and some new, that provide accurate, usable information about our diseases and their cures. These methodologies do not require the guesswork that accompanies extrapolations from animal-data to humans. They do not "replace" animal experimentation per se. Animal experimentation does not reliably lead to cures for human disease so it needs to be "replaced" with something that does. The methodologies listed below are required to overcome animal experimentation’s enormous inadequacy and dangers.

The following truly scientific methods are accurate, predictive and applicable. It is human health that is at risk and human wellness that is our objective. And none of these methods, though human-based, imposes risks on humans.

Scientific innovation would get a big boost if animal experimentation ceased. These more rewarding techniques would gather strength under augmented effort and increased funding. It is entirely likely that we would then find cures for today’s most challenging illnesses.

It is not precise to call these human-based techniques “alternatives to animal experimentation.” Mistakenly, that term implies that past medical achievements necessarily relied on lab animals. A true reading of medicine’s history reveals our past and present reliance on non-animal methods.

 

VinnyTheory

New member
No, i hate it

i wish it would stop..its so cruel to do that to animals..when they havent done sod all to us

 

ImTheOneThatFalls

New member
i am a peta freak so i dont wear skins or furs and animal expiramentation is bad i also love to eat meat..but just sutff like skins and furs and expiramentation are wrong

im also against many companies such as pantene props to peta at times

 

azemkamikaze03

New member
Dude it ok cuz theres a fine line between AE and eating...PETA wants u not to eat meat but that a diffrent story

EDIT-I dont support PETA though.

 

Minzara

New member
I dont really care..... but then again i dont really care about much... i lost my passion long ago...
 

LPGotLinkinPark

New member
Animal experimenting is ok to some limits. I don't think they should do anything to harm them, but if it's just little things, then what's the harm. But if they were going to test something lethal, I wouldn't want that. Why do they use animals anyway? Why don't those scientists test it on themselves!!! hahaha
 

misery

New member
GotLinkinPark?']Animal experimenting is ok to some limits. I don't think they should do anything to harm them' date=' but if it's just little things, then what's the harm. But if they were going to test something lethal, I wouldn't want that. Why do they use animals anyway? Why don't those scientists test it on themselves!!! hahaha[/quote']lol

yea, i agree, if its not harming the animal then theres nothing to worry about, but if it is, then theres a problem

ps. i like ur new sig :D its awesome
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom