Guest Andrew W Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 "duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:d64qn3dku2k4tpqtc2jverfjne8og5pokt@4ax.com... > On 1 Jan 2008 22:14:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> > wrote: > >>> >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY >>> >PIXIE >>> >presented by the christian nuts. >>> It's called eye witnesses..... > >>..only by people wearing blinkers recalling the lies crammed into them as >>an >>innocent child. > > Except that the story has continued unabated and unchallenged for 2000 > years now. Now that's truth. Its called popularity. And it has been challenged many times. -- Andrew W. Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous. You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit guides, earth changes. http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it! http://www.acim.org/ Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner Quote
Guest Gabriel Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:31:56 +1100, "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:2soon318meoh31nm4cbeoamdjqsjklk01j@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:28:17 +1100, "Andrew W" >> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >> >>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:195nn31p7iqvltojc0bin3urv4pnif94jj@4ax.com... >>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:28:46 +1100, "Andrew W" >>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:4m9mn3915vegf3j2askte8c5hes2kbsjid@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W" >>>>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" >>>>>>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN >>>>>>>>>SKY >>>>>>>>>PIXIE >>>>>>>>>presented by the christian nuts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's called eye witnesses. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Can we interview one of these witnesses? >>>>>> >>>>>> You ask for a witness, yet you take a woman's word for it who >>>>>> claims to have spoken to Jesus Christ in the 60's, and now follow >>>>>> her newly designed religion. Please stop being a hypocrite. >>>>> >>>>>Is this your best rebuke? I follow one woman's religion, yeah right. >>>>>Whatever. >>>> >>>> So now you're claiming you don't follow her teachings? >>> >>>I don't follow any one source of teachings. >> >> The fact is she is one of the people you follow. You falsely try >> to now deny this, if you recall your "yeah right. Whatever." from >> above. End of argument. >> >> gabriel > > >You seem to have a fixation about this. About sometimes taking the time to expose false claims, yes. Sorry. >I don't follow people. I search for information and truth. >Anyone can be a channel for higher information. In many ways we all are at >different times. >In creation all intelligent life forms are information points. So then you'll post anyone in your sig that claims to have spoken with Jesus Christ recently? Of course not, as that numbers in the thousands of such false claims. You clearly follow her teachings as some sort of authority in your life since she claims to have spoken to Christ herself. Any witnesses? Of course not. But keep asking others for the same thing. :-/ gabriel Quote
Guest duke Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:43:16 -0000, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >news:h04qn3trous54o9ic7ih83d60n8dm3li5r@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:46:01 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" >> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" >>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY >>>>>PIXIE >>>>>presented by the christian nuts. >>>> >>>> It's called eye witnesses. >> >>>eyewitness of superstitious cave dwellers and goat fuckers from a couple >>>of >>>thousand years ago. >>>try again. >> >> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from >> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007? > >1552 before the invention of the printing press. Prior to the pring press >everything was pure heresay! But they copied on the pring [sic] press that which was available before. duke, American-American "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI Quote
Guest duke Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:37:23 +1100, "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from >> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007? >In 33AD, when Jesus allegedly left the earth (that was the last time anyone > saw him), and around 100AD, when the last eye witness died. >After that all we have is hearsay, and some copied reading material from >pious priests and scribes. So you're professing that all is lies after 100AD re Christ, and say, AD1980, when the American Civil War became questionable because all eye witnesses had died? >> Amputees are a result of man's sins. >What about babies that are born without limbs? Same. duke, American-American "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI Quote
Guest Andrew W Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3emqn356chu12i0n26v5sm3lqdviij1uq7@4ax.com... > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:31:56 +1100, "Andrew W" > <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: > >>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>news:2soon318meoh31nm4cbeoamdjqsjklk01j@4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:28:17 +1100, "Andrew W" >>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>news:195nn31p7iqvltojc0bin3urv4pnif94jj@4ax.com... >>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:28:46 +1100, "Andrew W" >>>>> <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:4m9mn3915vegf3j2askte8c5hes2kbsjid@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Can we interview one of these witnesses? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You ask for a witness, yet you take a woman's word for it who >>>>>>> claims to have spoken to Jesus Christ in the 60's, and now follow >>>>>>> her newly designed religion. Please stop being a hypocrite. >>>>>> >>>>>>Is this your best rebuke? I follow one woman's religion, yeah right. >>>>>>Whatever. >>>>> >>>>> So now you're claiming you don't follow her teachings? >>>> >>>>I don't follow any one source of teachings. >>> >>> The fact is she is one of the people you follow. You falsely try >>> to now deny this, if you recall your "yeah right. Whatever." from >>> above. End of argument. >>> >>> gabriel >> >> >>You seem to have a fixation about this. > > About sometimes taking the time to expose false claims, yes. > Sorry. Focus your efforts on exposing the known false claims of the Christian religion and you'd be making yourself useful. > >>I don't follow people. I search for information and truth. >>Anyone can be a channel for higher information. In many ways we all are at >>different times. >>In creation all intelligent life forms are information points. > > So then you'll post anyone in your sig that claims to have spoken > with Jesus Christ recently? Of course not, as that numbers in the > thousands of such false claims. Christianity often makes the same sorts of claims, but for some reason it's alright when they do it. > You clearly follow her teachings > as some sort of authority in your life since she claims to have > spoken to Christ herself. Any witnesses? Of course not. But keep > asking others for the same thing. :-/ If you look at that and other such materials you will see that its of higher spiritual quality than most of what's in the Bible, especially since the sentences are in most cases not as vague, short and open to interpretation as the Christian scriptures. Also the scriptures have had some parts removed by unknown individuals. And your Bible is written, copied and edited by men, most of whom never met Jesus. What have you got against a woman receiving spiritual information? And besides, there are also men today who are receiving this kind of spiritual information. You have just chosen to pick on one website and one woman for some reason. You have chosen an easy target and ignored the rest. > > gabriel -- Andrew W. Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous. You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit guides, earth changes. http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it! http://www.acim.org/ Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner Quote
Guest SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 > > Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from > truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007? > >>you're not going to suggest that ernest angley or benny hinn were really >>healing people are you? if so, why didn't they heal amputees? what does >>the >>christian god have against amputees? > > Amputees are a result of man's sins. why did the christian god create sin? are you going to suggest that a chid who is handicapped sinned too? your bullshit god is a SICK MOTHERFUCKER > > duke, brainwashed christian retard Quote
Guest SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 >>What about babies that are born without limbs? > > Same. babies don't sin you retarded asshole > > duke, brainwashed christian retard Quote
Guest SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 >> >>translation - christian cult members > > Christianity as a religion has fallen victim to the evil dark lord. It > can't cleanse anyone. It only contaminates everyone. The real > spiritual cleansing only happens to the individuals. christianity is and always has been a TOTAL AND COMPLETE CROCK OF CRAP > Quote
Guest SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 >>Can we interview one of these witnesses? > > Get me one from the American Civil War, and I'll get you one from the > days of Jesus. so you're admitting that there is no current eyewitness, good for you > > duke, brainwashed christian retard Quote
Guest SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 "duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:d64qn3dku2k4tpqtc2jverfjne8og5pokt@4ax.com... > On 1 Jan 2008 22:14:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> > wrote: > >>> >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY >>> >PIXIE >>> >presented by the christian nuts. >>> It's called eye witnesses..... > >>..only by people wearing blinkers recalling the lies crammed into them as >>an >>innocent child. > > Except that the story has continued unabated and unchallenged for 2000 > years now. Now that's truth. santa claus and the tooth fairy have been around for awhile too duke, and your god is no more real than they are .. > > > duke, brainwashed christian moron Quote
Guest Andrew W Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 "duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:8rpqn3539pbl8q1ln7h2n50b9u8um4dreo@4ax.com... > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:43:16 -0000, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> > wrote: > >> >>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:h04qn3trous54o9ic7ih83d60n8dm3li5r@4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:46:01 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" >>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com... >>>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" >>>>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY >>>>>>PIXIE >>>>>>presented by the christian nuts. >>>>> >>>>> It's called eye witnesses. >>> >>>>eyewitness of superstitious cave dwellers and goat fuckers from a couple >>>>of >>>>thousand years ago. >>>>try again. >>> >>> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from >>> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007? >> >>1552 before the invention of the printing press. Prior to the pring press >>everything was pure heresay! > > But they copied on the pring [sic] press that which was available > before. How do you know certain individuals didn't edit it to make it sound better, or censor certain dangerous truths so that people can't use it to empower themselves? (there is scholarly evidence for these). Like for example the verses in non canonical books where Christ says that what he has done, we can all do, and more? And where he says "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you..."? -- Andrew W. Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous. You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit guides, earth changes. http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it! http://www.acim.org/ Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner Quote
Guest Andrew W Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 "duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:7tpqn3tlijbcmmtgdv7udp4thfb6ksicu1@4ax.com... > On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:37:23 +1100, "Andrew W" > <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: > >>> Is what year did eye witness accounts become totally separate from >>> truth. 523AD, 1517, 1932, 1999, 2007? > >>In 33AD, when Jesus allegedly left the earth (that was the last time >>anyone >> saw him), and around 100AD, when the last eye witness died. >>After that all we have is hearsay, and some copied reading material from >>pious priests and scribes. > > So you're professing that all is lies after 100AD re Christ, and say, > AD1980, when the American Civil War became questionable because all > eye witnesses had died? Don't you know anything about modern methods of recording world events? > >>> Amputees are a result of man's sins. >>What about babies that are born without limbs? > > Same. So babies have committed sin? -- Andrew W. Belief and faith should not be coerced. Everyone should come to the truth naturally in their own time. That is free will and free choice. When belief and faith are coerced with threats of punishment and damnation then the messenger is from the dark side. ~ anonymous. You must unlearn what you have learned. ~ Yoda Channelled lessons about ET's, ascended masters like Jesus Christ, spirit guides, earth changes. http://www.spiritnexus.com/audio/channeling/index.htm The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it! http://www.acim.org/ Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner Quote
Guest SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 "duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:b44qn3l8gb6qg5b9ikood3r9cccbmd5h5p@4ax.com... > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +1100, "Andrew W" > <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote: > >>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:d4gln35dmfesegiiu2pmnkn7pog8n1metv@4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" >>> <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: >>> >>>>there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY >>>>PIXIE >>>>presented by the christian nuts. >>> >>> It's called eye witnesses. >> >> >>Can we interview one of these witnesses? > > Get me one from the American Civil War, and I'll get you one from the > days of Jesus. during the "supposed" time of jesus, people were fucking goats and living in caves. not so during the time of the civil war, and the civil war is in HISTORY books, not the crock of shit called christianity > > duke, brainwashed christian retard Quote
Guest Father Haskell Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 On Jan 1, 5:37 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:45:43 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" > > <kill...@killgod.com> wrote: > >there has been NO OBJECTABLE, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN SKY PIXIE > >presented by the christian nuts. > > It's called eye witnesses. Who witnessed amazing miracles yet kept mum for 80 years. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.