Guest Animal02 Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... > > "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >> "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >> >>> Hijackers Alive And Well >> >> All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are >> dead. That's how they became martyrs. >> >> In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen >> alive. There have been no new photographs taken of the dead hijackers. >> There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >> >> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still >> alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC story, > > > Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be > 'erronous', > but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 > minutes > before it actually did... Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. Poor cluless kook > > That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. > > which indicated some people with >> the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's true. >> Those people are, in fact, still alive, but none of them were the dead >> hijackers from 9/11. >> >> The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers >> names, which did not include pictures. When the FBI released photographs >> of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were not the same >> men. One of the key indicators was that these men were alive, whereas the >> dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious difference. Only someone >> with an extremely low IQ would not be able to tell the difference between >> a living person, and a dead person with the same name. >> >> Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim >> Smith's are, miraculously to some, still alive. Additionally, there is a >> Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living human - it's a >> lake. Obviously, to some of the 9/11 chowderheads, every Jim Smith is a >> lake. > > John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted? > > Yeah, only if you were braindead. > Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... > > "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >> >> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>> "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>> >>>> Hijackers Alive And Well >>> >>> All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>> >>> In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs taken >>> of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>> >>> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >>> story, >> >> >> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >> before it actually did... > > Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. Care to explain? > Poor cluless kook Haha, look who's talking!!! > >> >> That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. >> >> which indicated some people with >>> the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's true. Those people are, in fact, still alive, >>> but none of them were the dead hijackers from 9/11. >>> >>> The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers names, which did not include pictures. When >>> the FBI released photographs of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were not the same men. One of the >>> key indicators was that these men were alive, whereas the dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious difference. >>> Only someone with an extremely low IQ would not be able to tell the difference between a living person, and a dead >>> person with the same name. >>> >>> Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim Smith's are, miraculously to some, still >>> alive. Additionally, there is a Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living human - it's a lake. >>> Obviously, to some of the 9/11 chowderheads, every Jim Smith is a lake. >> >> John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted? >> >> Yeah, only if you were braindead. >> > > Quote
Guest Vandar Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 johnoneill wrote: > "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... > >>"johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >> >>>"John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>> >>>>"911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well >>>> >>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>>> >>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs taken >>>>of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>>> >>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >>>>story, >>> >>> >>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>before it actually did... >> >>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. > > > Care to explain? They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous. Follow the logic, Einstein? Quote
Guest BDK Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 In article <fnjfn1$1up$1@aioe.org>, johnoneill@dmail.com says... > > "spammer" <serebel1@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:542cdc6d-6082-4761-979a-aba8fa79ef8e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 27, 7:38 pm, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote: > > > > > You enjoy being wrong, don't you? Keep reading, if your ADD can hold out > > that long. > > > >> > > Why do Americans assume that Arabs are idiots? Here's the relevant quote > > that you missed: > > > > "Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told > > the Arabic Press after meeting with President George W. Bush on Sept. > > 20th, "It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list > > had nothing to do with what happened."" > > > > Got it? The Saudis flat out told George W. Bush that he had the wrong guys. > > > > These Arab men saw their photos on television and went to the local > > authorities to clear their names. > > > > > When the posters were released I didn't hear any more talk about the > > > hijackers being alive. > > > > "Didn't hear any more talk" = media censorship in the US. Didn't you get > > the memo? > > > > > > The Saudis will make up anything. If you choose to believe them, > you're the biggest idiot on the net. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Well, having in mind that Saudis are no different thatn your precious > NSA, FBI or CIA... are you saying that those agencies also should > not be trusted? > > > There you have it folks, the biggest idiot on the net. Take a bow, Aunt Flo/Demented. BDK Quote
Guest BDK Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 In article <fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org>, johnoneill@dmail.com says... > > "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... > > "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message > > > >> Hijackers Alive And Well > > > > All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. > > > > In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs taken > > of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. > > > > The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC > > story, > > > Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', > but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes > before it actually did... > > That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. > > which indicated some people with > > the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's true. Those people are, in fact, still alive, but > > none of them were the dead hijackers from 9/11. > > > > The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers names, which did not include pictures. When the > > FBI released photographs of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were not the same men. One of the key > > indicators was that these men were alive, whereas the dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious difference. Only > > someone with an extremely low IQ would not be able to tell the difference between a living person, and a dead person > > with the same name. > > > > Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim Smith's are, miraculously to some, still alive. > > Additionally, there is a Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living human - it's a lake. Obviously, to > > some of the 9/11 chowderheads, every Jim Smith is a lake. > > John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted? > > Yeah, only if you were braindead. > > > Even for you, that's a jump. Poor Aunt Flo. BDK Quote
Guest Animal02 Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjhml$7gk$1@aioe.org... > > "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message > news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... >> >> "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message >> news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >>> >>> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message >>> news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>>> "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>>> >>>>> Hijackers Alive And Well >>>> >>>> All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" >>>> are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>>> >>>> In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen >>>> alive. There have been no new photographs taken of the dead hijackers. >>>> There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>>> >>>> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still >>>> alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC story, >>> >>> >>> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be >>> 'erronous', >>> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 >>> minutes >>> before it actually did... >> >> Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. > > Care to explain? Only a cluless moron like yourself needs to have "they made an erroneous report" explained. > >> Poor cluless kook > > Haha, look who's talking!!! You the kook. > >> >>> >>> That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. >>> >>> which indicated some people with >>>> the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's >>>> true. Those people are, in fact, still alive, but none of them were the >>>> dead hijackers from 9/11. >>>> >>>> The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers >>>> names, which did not include pictures. When the FBI released >>>> photographs of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were >>>> not the same men. One of the key indicators was that these men were >>>> alive, whereas the dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious >>>> difference. Only someone with an extremely low IQ would not be able to >>>> tell the difference between a living person, and a dead person with the >>>> same name. >>>> >>>> Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim >>>> Smith's are, miraculously to some, still alive. Additionally, there is >>>> a Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living human - >>>> it's a lake. Obviously, to some of the 9/11 chowderheads, every Jim >>>> Smith is a lake. >>> >>> John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted? >>> >>> Yeah, only if you were braindead. >>> >> >> > > Quote
Guest What Me Worry? Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "BDK" <BDK@magicsteel.com> wrote in message news:MPG.22071a617bf160ce98c1eb@news.buckeye-express.com... > In article <fnjfn1$1up$1@aioe.org>, johnoneill@dmail.com says... >> >> "spammer" <serebel1@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:542cdc6d-6082-4761-979a-aba8fa79ef8e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com... >> On Jan 27, 7:38 pm, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote: >> > > >> > You enjoy being wrong, don't you? Keep reading, if your ADD can hold >> > out >> > that long. >> > >> >> >> > Why do Americans assume that Arabs are idiots? Here's the relevant >> > quote >> > that you missed: >> > >> > "Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told >> > the Arabic Press after meeting with President George W. Bush on Sept. >> > 20th, "It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list >> > had nothing to do with what happened."" >> > >> > Got it? The Saudis flat out told George W. Bush that he had the wrong >> > guys. >> > >> > These Arab men saw their photos on television and went to the local >> > authorities to clear their names. >> > >> > > When the posters were released I didn't hear any more talk about the >> > > hijackers being alive. >> > >> > "Didn't hear any more talk" = media censorship in the US. Didn't you >> > get >> > the memo? >> >> >> >> >> BDK Liar>> The Saudis will make up anything. If you choose to believe them, BDK Liar>> you're the biggest idiot on the net. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Well, having in mind that Saudis are no different thatn your precious >> NSA, FBI or CIA... are you saying that those agencies also should >> not be trusted? BDK Liar> There you have it folks, the biggest idiot on the net. Take a bow, Aunt BDK Liar> Flo/Demented. The liar BDK apparently thinks that he's made a point. He doesn't realize he's a complete fool. Quote
Guest John P. Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message >> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the >> dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, >> erroneous BBC story, > Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be > 'erronous', Interesting how it is found to be erroneous by every sane person with at least a two digit IQ. Are you saying you are far to undedicated and too severely mentally retarded to realize this BBC story was erroneous? > but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 > minutes > before it actually did... > That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. What would be the cause of you believing something so moronic, do you also have attention deficit disorder? You seem to have forgotten our discussions of the erroneous BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7. Were you born severely mentally retarded, or did you suffer a massive brain injury at some later point in life? Quote
Guest John P. Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "What Me THINK?" <__@____.___> wrote in a message > The liar BDK apparently thinks that he's made a point. He doesn't > realize he's a complete fool. Yup... and you're going to show us all what a fool he is by posting recent pictures of the hijackers, proving they are still alive. Once you do that, BDK will be exposed to the world as a complete fool! So.... OK... go ahead... post them. <wind rustles as a tumbleweed goes by> Quote
Guest BDK Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 In article <YpqdnasWWpfG4wDanZ2dnUVZ_rSrnZ2d@comcast.net>, __@____.___ says... > > "BDK" <BDK@magicsteel.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.22071a617bf160ce98c1eb@news.buckeye-express.com... > > In article <fnjfn1$1up$1@aioe.org>, johnoneill@dmail.com says... > >> > >> "spammer" <serebel1@yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> news:542cdc6d-6082-4761-979a-aba8fa79ef8e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com... > >> On Jan 27, 7:38 pm, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote: > >> > > > >> > You enjoy being wrong, don't you? Keep reading, if your ADD can hold > >> > out > >> > that long. > >> > > >> >> > >> > Why do Americans assume that Arabs are idiots? Here's the relevant > >> > quote > >> > that you missed: > >> > > >> > "Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told > >> > the Arabic Press after meeting with President George W. Bush on Sept. > >> > 20th, "It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list > >> > had nothing to do with what happened."" > >> > > >> > Got it? The Saudis flat out told George W. Bush that he had the wrong > >> > guys. > >> > > >> > These Arab men saw their photos on television and went to the local > >> > authorities to clear their names. > >> > > >> > > When the posters were released I didn't hear any more talk about the > >> > > hijackers being alive. > >> > > >> > "Didn't hear any more talk" = media censorship in the US. Didn't you > >> > get > >> > the memo? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > BDK Liar>> The Saudis will make up anything. If you choose to believe them, > BDK Liar>> you're the biggest idiot on the net. Um, What Me Get Something Right, I didn't post anything above. If you're going to bark "Liar Liar" like a neurotic dog, at least bark it at the right poster, OK? Not that it matters much. > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Well, having in mind that Saudis are no different thatn your precious > >> NSA, FBI or CIA... are you saying that those agencies also should > >> not be trusted? > > There you have it folks, the biggest idiot on the net. Take a bow, Aunt Flo/Demented. I actually said this. > The liar BDK apparently thinks that he's made a point. He doesn't realize > he's a complete fool. You make a fool of yourself when you edit posts to fit your agenda. Try again, kooktard. Hey, if you can find the dead hijackers alive, you'll be famous you know. How come one of you brilliant investigators hasn't done that yet. As soon as one of them was put on live TV, the whole "plot" would unravel. Even someone as dim as you must wonder why that hasn't happened, right? BWHAHAHAHA! Well, maybe you haven't thought it through that. Or at all. Sane people have. BDK Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:q6cnj.2990$7d1.2684@news01.roc.ny... > johnoneill wrote: >> "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... >> >>>"johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >>> >>>>"John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>>> >>>>>"911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well >>>>> >>>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>>>> >>>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs >>>>>taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>>>> >>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >>>>>story, >>>> >>>> >>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>>before it actually did... >>> >>>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. >> >> >> Care to explain? > > They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed > was obviously erroneous. > > Follow the logic, Einstein? Yeah, Oppenheimer. I follow your logic. Too fucking bad your 'logic' stops there. And it is funny to see you 'making a point' and falling into my little trap, Vandar. Ok. They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous. Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer? Care to explain, brainiac? Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:g5udnSX7rqfoygDanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... > > "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjhml$7gk$1@aioe.org... >> >> "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... >>> >>> "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >>>> >>>> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>>>> "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>>>> >>>>>> Hijackers Alive And Well >>>>> >>>>> All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>>>> >>>>> In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs >>>>> taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>>>> >>>>> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >>>>> story, >>>> >>>> >>>> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >>>> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>> before it actually did... >>> >>> Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. >> >> Care to explain? > > Only a cluless moron like yourself needs to have "they made an erroneous report" explained. No, I understand what you said the first time, AnimalLiar. Now, I'd like you to figure out who told BBC reporter that WTC7 has collapsed? Do you have such information? >>> Poor cluless kook >> >> Haha, look who's talking!!! > > You the kook. It lloks like you're more of a kook than I have ever was, or ever will be. > >> >>> >>>> >>>> That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. >>>> >>>> which indicated some people with >>>>> the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's true. Those people are, in fact, still alive, >>>>> but none of them were the dead hijackers from 9/11. >>>>> >>>>> The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers names, which did not include pictures. When >>>>> the FBI released photographs of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were not the same men. One of >>>>> the key indicators was that these men were alive, whereas the dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious >>>>> difference. Only someone with an extremely low IQ would not be able to tell the difference between a living >>>>> person, and a dead person with the same name. >>>>> >>>>> Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim Smith's are, miraculously to some, still >>>>> alive. Additionally, there is a Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living human - it's a lake. >>>>> Obviously, to some of the 9/11 chowderheads, every Jim Smith is a lake. >>>> >>>> John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted? >>>> >>>> Yeah, only if you were braindead. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xIudnZlKH78aHgDanZ2dnUVZ_tyknZ2d@comcast.com... > "Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message > >>> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the >>> dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, >>> erroneous BBC story, > >> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', > > Interesting how it is found to be erroneous by every sane person with at least a two digit IQ. > > Are you saying you are far to undedicated and too severely mentally retarded to realize this BBC story was erroneous? Hold your horses, Johnnyboy. Yes, the report was erronous. I know that. But, I just enjoy seeing you jumping to conclusions and ranting like a little bitch about my 'low' IQ. Haha, poor Johnnyboy, fell right into my trap. Ok, Pindelski. Now that we've established that the BBC report was erronous, and that you're a fucking retard... tell me, where did BBC get such information? Oh, yes... CNN too, Pindelski. Do you know? If you don't, wouldn't you like to know? >> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >> before it actually did... >> That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. > > What would be the cause of you believing something so moronic, do you also have attention deficit disorder? You seem > to have forgotten our discussions of the erroneous BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7. Oh, please, Pindelski... refresh my memory. Tell how is it possible for BBC and CNN to report the collapse of WTC7 BEFORE it actually happened? Huh? > Were you born severely mentally retarded, No, I am not your mother's child, Pindelski. or did you suffer a massive brain > injury at some later point in life? Nope, I never had a friend like you, Pindelski. Sorry. Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "BDK" <BDK@magicsteel.com> wrote in message news:MPG.22071a9d572088f98c1ec@news.buckeye-express.com... > In article <fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org>, johnoneill@dmail.com says... >> >> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >> > "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >> > >> >> Hijackers Alive And Well >> > >> > All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >> > >> > In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs >> > taken >> > of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >> > >> > The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >> > story, >> >> >> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >> before it actually did... >> >> That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. >> >> which indicated some people with >> > the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's true. Those people are, in fact, still alive, >> > but >> > none of them were the dead hijackers from 9/11. >> > >> > The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers names, which did not include pictures. When >> > the >> > FBI released photographs of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were not the same men. One of the key >> > indicators was that these men were alive, whereas the dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious difference. >> > Only >> > someone with an extremely low IQ would not be able to tell the difference between a living person, and a dead >> > person >> > with the same name. >> > >> > Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim Smith's are, miraculously to some, still >> > alive. >> > Additionally, there is a Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living human - it's a lake. Obviously, >> > to >> > some of the 9/11 chowderheads, every Jim Smith is a lake. >> >> John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted? >> >> Yeah, only if you were braindead. >> >> >> > > Even for you, that's a jump. Sure, BDK, sure. Keep comforting yourself... Quote
Guest Vandar Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 johnoneill wrote: > "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:q6cnj.2990$7d1.2684@news01.roc.ny... > >>johnoneill wrote: >> >>>"Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... >>> >>> >>>>"johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >>>> >>>> >>>>>"John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>"911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well >>>>>> >>>>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>>>>> >>>>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs >>>>>>taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>>>>> >>>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >>>>>>story, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >>>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>>>before it actually did... >>>> >>>>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. >>> >>> >>>Care to explain? >> >>They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed >>was obviously erroneous. >> >>Follow the logic, Einstein? > > > Yeah, Oppenheimer. I follow your logic. Too fucking bad your 'logic' stops > there. And it is funny to see you 'making a point' and falling into my little trap, > Vandar. > > Ok. > > They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the > background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous. > > Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer? The NWO, of course. Quote
Guest Vandar Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 johnoneill wrote: > "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xIudnZlKH78aHgDanZ2dnUVZ_tyknZ2d@comcast.com... > >>"Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message >> >> >>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the >>>>dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, >>>>erroneous BBC story, >> >>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >> >>Interesting how it is found to be erroneous by every sane person with at least a two digit IQ. >> >>Are you saying you are far to undedicated and too severely mentally retarded to realize this BBC story was erroneous? > > > Hold your horses, Johnnyboy. > > Yes, the report was erronous. I know that. But, I just enjoy seeing you > jumping to conclusions and ranting like a little bitch about my 'low' IQ. > > Haha, poor Johnnyboy, fell right into my trap. > > Ok, Pindelski. > > Now that we've established that the BBC report was erronous, and that > you're a fucking retard... tell me, where did BBC get such information? > > Oh, yes... CNN too, Pindelski. > > Do you know? If you don't, wouldn't you like to know? > > >>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>before it actually did... >>>That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. >> >>What would be the cause of you believing something so moronic, do you also have attention deficit disorder? You seem >>to have forgotten our discussions of the erroneous BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7. > > > Oh, please, Pindelski... refresh my memory. > > Tell how is it possible for BBC and CNN to report the collapse of WTC7 > BEFORE it actually happened? > > Huh? How is it possible for nearly every news agency in the country to report the death of the Pope a full day before he died? JOHN PAUL II WAS AN INSIDE JOB! Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:IKlnj.3001$7d1.1670@news01.roc.ny... > johnoneill wrote: >> "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:q6cnj.2990$7d1.2684@news01.roc.ny... >> >>>johnoneill wrote: >>> >>>>"Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... >>>> >>>> >>>>>"johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>"John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>"911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well >>>>>>> >>>>>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs >>>>>>>taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC >>>>>>>story, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >>>>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>>>>before it actually did... >>>>> >>>>>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too. >>>> >>>> >>>>Care to explain? >>> >>>They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed >>>was obviously erroneous. >>> >>>Follow the logic, Einstein? >> >> >> Yeah, Oppenheimer. I follow your logic. Too fucking bad your 'logic' stops >> there. And it is funny to see you 'making a point' and falling into my little trap, >> Vandar. >> >> Ok. >> >> They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the >> background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous. >> >> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer? > > The NWO, of course. No, of course it wasn't 'NWO'. Don't jerk around, Vandar. I asked you a serious question. Are you telling me that you'll once again act as an evasive asshole when pushed into a corner? Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:RMlnj.3002$7d1.2868@news01.roc.ny... > johnoneill wrote: > >> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xIudnZlKH78aHgDanZ2dnUVZ_tyknZ2d@comcast.com... >> >>>"Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message >>> >>> >>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the >>>>>dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, >>>>>erroneous BBC story, >>> >>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous', >>> >>>Interesting how it is found to be erroneous by every sane person with at least a two digit IQ. >>> >>>Are you saying you are far to undedicated and too severely mentally retarded to realize this BBC story was erroneous? >> >> >> Hold your horses, Johnnyboy. >> >> Yes, the report was erronous. I know that. But, I just enjoy seeing you >> jumping to conclusions and ranting like a little bitch about my 'low' IQ. >> >> Haha, poor Johnnyboy, fell right into my trap. >> >> Ok, Pindelski. >> >> Now that we've established that the BBC report was erronous, and that >> you're a fucking retard... tell me, where did BBC get such information? >> >> Oh, yes... CNN too, Pindelski. >> >> Do you know? If you don't, wouldn't you like to know? >> >> >>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes >>>>before it actually did... >>>>That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski. >>> >>>What would be the cause of you believing something so moronic, do you also have attention deficit disorder? You seem >>>to have forgotten our discussions of the erroneous BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7. >> >> >> Oh, please, Pindelski... refresh my memory. >> >> Tell how is it possible for BBC and CNN to report the collapse of WTC7 >> BEFORE it actually happened? >> >> Huh? > > How is it possible for nearly every news agency in the country to report the death of the Pope a full day before he > died? Don't be an evasive asshole, Vandar. Answer the damn question. Oh, you don't know the answer? > JOHN PAUL II WAS AN INSIDE JOB! So, this is the way you deal with the bullshit you spew? Priceless! It is priceless to see Vandar swimming in a pool of his own shite! Quote
Guest John P. Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message > They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the > background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous. > Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer? Why do you think every time a reporter says something stupid, someone told him or her to say it? You've obviously never watched a live newscast in your life. At a time when no one yet knows what's going on, it's extremely common there are erroneous reports. If you'd do some research, you find there were many erroneous reports in the 9/11 newscasts on 9/11. Quote
Guest johnoneill Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:PpSdnYXfOr-kZwDanZ2dnUVZ_rGhnZ2d@comcast.com... > "Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message > >> They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the >> background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous. > >> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer? > > Why do you think every time a reporter says something stupid, someone told him or her to say it? So, you're saying that those two reporters, from CNN and BBC, made it up? Is that what you're saying, Pindelski? Interesting how far will you go, and what kind of excuses you will find for those two reporters, and funny enough how you find nothing interesting or strange in the fact that Dick Cheney and GWB appeared together in front of the 9/11 Commission, without being under oath and without any transcript being made of their testimonies. Indicative? Of course. So, John Pindelski is selectively picking up thing he will 'defend' and present as 'the truth'? Of course. So, John Pindelski is a liar? Of course. > You've obviously never watched a live newscast in your life. At a time when no one yet knows what's going on, it's > extremely common there are erroneous reports. Hahahaha, how little Johnnyboy is trying to find an excuse for CNN and BBC reporters! Hahahaha! Unbeliveable! > If you'd do some research, you find there were many erroneous reports in the 9/11 newscasts on 9/11. Even if a reporter is standing right in front of the building that did not collapse, although they are reporting that it has just collapsed? Hahaha, Pindelski, Pindelski... are you aware of the fact how obvious you are? When you lie? Ommit? Distort? If you are, well... I can respect that. Well, are you Pindelski? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.