Guest fiend999 Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 In article <8rb6q3lepf75v8t1ti5r5q01de2m8mqae9@4ax.com>, Starkiller <NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:18:50 -0800 (PST), genie <margene_d@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >On Jan 31, 12:47 Quote
Guest Starkiller Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:26:40 -0500, fiend999 <dontspamfiend999@newsguy.com> wrote: >In article <8rb6q3lepf75v8t1ti5r5q01de2m8mqae9@4ax.com>, Starkiller ><NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:18:50 -0800 (PST), genie <margene_d@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >> >On Jan 31, 12:47 Quote
Guest fiend999 Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 In article <uqo9q31igp51fpd6ae3qbgnbmo114c91d1@4ax.com>, Starkiller <NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:26:40 -0500, fiend999 > <dontspamfiend999@newsguy.com> wrote: > > >In article <8rb6q3lepf75v8t1ti5r5q01de2m8mqae9@4ax.com>, Starkiller > ><NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:18:50 -0800 (PST), genie <margene_d@yahoo.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >On Jan 31, 12:47 Quote
Guest Lamont Cranston Posted February 4, 2008 Posted February 4, 2008 genie wrote: > On Feb 2, 6:10 pm, fiend999 <dontspamfiend...@newsguy.com> wrote: > > In article <uqo9q31igp51fpd6ae3qbgnbmo114c9...@4ax.com>, Starkiller > > > > > > > > > > > > <NoSpam.SKS_SK...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:26:40 -0500, fiend999 > > > <dontspamfiend...@newsguy.com> wrote: > > > > > >In article <8rb6q3lepf75v8t1ti5r5q01de2m8mq...@4ax.com>, > > > >Starkiller <NoSpam.SKS_SK...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:18:50 -0800 (PST), genie > > > >> <margen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >On Jan 31, 12:47 pm, fargo116 <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> >> On Jan 30, 7:19 pm, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> > > > >> >> wrote: > > > > > >> >> > As soon as you proclaim your adversary to hate America on > > > >> >> > the basis of a > > > >> >> > different political view, you lose the argument LOSER! > > > > > >> >> > Also, if Bush is a lawless president, then you shouldn't > > > >> >> > have any problem > > > >> >> > impeaching him, but you haven't any convictions to stand > > > >> >> > up for impeachment > > > >> >> > and you've said so much. That's makes you an even a > > > >> >> > bigger LOSER! > > > > > >> >> > Thirdly, revising the subject line when you blast your > > > >> >> > opponents for doing > > > >> >> > so, makes you a hypocrite and ultimate LOSER, LOSER! > > > > > >> >> Since you never served in combat does urging others to do > > > >> >> so make you a LOSER or a HYPOCRITE? > > > > > >> >> Unless you went. Did you? > > > > > >> >> 214 times you've been asked now. > > > > > >> >> S. Olson > > > > > >> >Why are you so insistant his opinion is viable depending on > > > >> >being in the military? Clinton was too busy plucking Hillarys > > > >> >unibrow to go in the service, yet he was elected. Being a > > > >> >taxpayer should count for something and have an equal voice, > > > >> >as going to war may affect his children or grandchildren, > > > >> >even if he never served. > > > > > >> Notice that the two top Democratic candidates hae NO military > > > >> experience whatsoever. So by the arguments presented by the > > > >> left neither is qualified to hold the office yes? > > > > > >Try to remember back to the Clinton years when the right was > > > >crying "draft dodger" and claiming that Clinton's lack of > > > >military service somehow made him unfit to lead. Many on the > > > >left now expect those on the right who made such a big deal of > > > >the issue to hold their own leaders to the same standard. I am > > > >not sure which is worse - the right for being hypocritical and > > > >compulsively dishonest, or the left for foolishly expecting them > > > >to change and actually show some integrity. > > > > > Thanks for admitting that it never was an issue with the current > > > administration but instead just bullshit rhetoric. > > > > I said no such thing, I pointed out that many on the left expected > > the right to actually stick with what they claimed to believe and > > hold their own people to the same standards. An you are wrong - it > > IS an issue. The rightwing mouth breathers made it an issue for > > future candidates when they made it one of their pet issues in the > > 90's. Unfortunately, those folks lack the ability to imagine long > > term consequences for their actions and they seem to have extremely > > short memories. > > > > > Thought the left was supposed to be so much better than everyone > > > else but instead you freely admit that the past 7 years have been > > > nothing more than a little revenge thing over Clinton. > > > > What is with all your lying about what I said? Oh, it must be that > > intellectual dishonesty thing that I referred to. > > Let me try to clarify for you again - many on the left expected the > > right to hold their own leaders to the SAME STANDARDS that they > > expected of Clinton. They did not. So ithe left is at fault for > > pointing out the hypocrisy of the right? That's some screwball logic > > you've got there, messenger marksman. > > > > > Yes indeed, there were a few folks that bitched about Clinton's > > > lack of military but nothing in comparrison to the consistent 7 > > > year squealing and pissing over that one issue from the left. > > > > I guess you have a short memory or you are too young to remember > > both of the presidential elections in the 90's. It was a HUGE deal > > to many republicans. Look it up. Knowledge is power. > > > > > Just look at how many kook liberal websites are dedicated to > > > nothing but bitching about Bush and the NG. So yes, you all have > > > shown everyone how you can be bigger and better assholes than > > > anyone else on the block, > > > > Still along way to go just to keep up with you in the assholes and > > miserable failures race. > > > > -- > > ~~~- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Do tell how high that standard bar Bill Clinton put up there for the > Office of Commander in Chief, President of the United States. It was quite high. Clinton was the most internationally respected president that this country has had since John Kennedy. Bush, on the other hand, is considered to be a moron by the rest of the world and is universally despised. Bush has taken us from the high ground that this country once occupied down into the muck where the other countries that sanction torture reside. Bush has taken our Constitution and wiped his ass with it as he continues to break the law, spy on us, and do whatever else it is that Cheney tells him to do. History will judge this man very harshly as the worst president in U.S. history. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.